PHOTOS of Saturday November 31st and Sunday December 1st, 2024
PHOTOS of Saturday November 31st and Sunday December 1st, 2024
PHOTOS of Saturday November 31st and Sunday December 1st, 2024
Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
Tactics include online and personal slander, libel, defamation, blacklisting, “mobbing”
(intense, organized harassment in public), “black bag jobs” (residential break ins),
abusive phone calls, computer hacking, framing, threats, blackmail, vandalism, “street
theater”(staged physical and verbal interactions with the minions of the people who
orchestrate thestalking), harassment by noises, and other forms of bullying.
Since counterintelligence stalking goes far beyond surveillance – into the realm of
psychological terrorism, as it is essentially a form of extrajudicial punishment. As such,
the harassment is illegal – even when done by the government. It clearly violates the US
Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unwarranted searches, and the Sixth
Amendment which guarantees the right to a trial. Such operations also violate similar
fundamental rights defined by state constitutions. Stalking is also specifically prohibited
by the criminal codes of every state in America.”
August 22, 2016 Written by Rahul D. Manchanda, Esq.
The Church Committee was the United States Senate Select Committee to Study
Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate
committee chaired by Senator Frank Church (D ID) in 1975. A precursor to the U.S.
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the committee investigated intelligence
gathering for illegality by the aforementioned agencies after certain activities had been
revealed by theWatergate affair.
Some famous examples which have since emerged include: (1) the FBI sending letters
to Martin Luther King Jr encouraging him to kill himself or else they would tell the world
about his sexual proclivities; (2) the planned or successful assassinations of foreign
leaders such as Fidel Castro,Patrice Lumumba, and countless other South American,
Middle Eastern or Asian leaders; (3) the wholesale undermining of entire foreign
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.771of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
economies if they democratically elected someone at odds with the elite power
structure deep state of the United States such as what occurred against Salvatore
Allende of Guatemala; (4) the possible assassination of John F Kennedy; (5) revelations
of Christopher Pyle in January 1970 of the U.S. Army's spying on the civilian population;
(6) the December 22, 1974 New York Times article by Seymour Hersh detailing
operations engaged in by the CIA over the years that had been dubbed the "family
jewels,” involving covert action programs involving assassination attempts against
foreign leaders and covert attempts to subvert foreign governments were reported for
the first time; (7) efforts by intelligence agencies to collect information on the political
activities of US citizens; and (8) countless other examples, both overseas and
domestically.
The end result of the Church Committee Hearings was the outright banning on CIA
assassinations as well as the FBI/DOJ COINTELPRO gang-stalking programs. In 1975
and 1976, the Church Committee published fourteen reports on various U.S. intelligence
agencies' formation, operations, and the alleged abuses of law and of power that they
had committed, with recommendations for reform, some of which were later put in
place. Among the other matters investigated were attempts to assassinate other foreign
leaders such as Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic, the Diem brothers of Vietnam,
Gen. René Schneider of Chile, and Director of CIA Allen Dulles's plan (approved by
President Dwight Eisenhower) to use the Sicilian Mafia to kill Fidel Castro of Cuba.
Under recommendations and pressure by this committee, President Gerald Ford issued
Executive Order 11905 (ultimately replaced in 1981 by President Reagan's Executive
Order 12333) to ban U.S. sanctioned assassinations of foreign leaders.
Together, the Church Committee's reports have been said to constitute the most
extensive review of intelligence activities ever made available to the public. Much of the
contents were classified, but over 50,000 pages were declassified under the President
John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992.
The Church Committee learned that beginning in the 1950s, the CIA and FBI
intercepted, opened, and photographed more than 215,000 pieces of mail by the time
the program was shut down. The Church report found that the CIA was zealous about
keeping the US Postal Service from learning that mail was being opened by government
agents. CIA agents moved mail to a private room to open the mail or in some cases
opened envelopes at night after stuffing them in briefcases or coat pockets to deceive
postal officials.
On May 9, 1975, the Church Committee called CIA director William Colby. That same day
Ford's top advisers (Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Philip W. Buchen, and John
Marsh) drafted a recommendation that Colby be authorized to brief only rather than
testify, and that he would be told to discuss only the general subject, with details of
specific covert actions to be avoided except for realistic hypotheticals. But the Church
Committee had full authority to call a hearing and require Colby's testimony. Ford and
his top advisers met with Colby to prepare him for the hearing.
The Ford administration, particularly Rumsfeld, was “concerned” about the effort by
members of the Church Committee in the Senate and the Pike Committee in the House
to curtail the power of U.S. intelligence agencies. It seemed that Rumsfeld et al was
comfortable giving the power to arbitrarily destroy anyone as “enemies of the state” by
anyone working in the IC and MIC.COINTELPRO (COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a
series of covert and illegal projects conducted by the FBI aimed at surveilling
infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic “political dissidents.”
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.882of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the
FBI deemed subversive, including anti Vietnam War organizers, activists of the Civil
Rights Movement or Black Power movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black
Panther Party), feminist organizations, anti colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican
independence groups like the YoungLords), and a variety of organizations that were
part of the broader New Left.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives on COINTELPRO, ordering FBI agents to
"expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or otherwise eliminate" the activities of
these movements and especially their leaders. Under Hoover, the agent in charge of
COINTELPRO was William C. Sullivan.
Tactics included anonymous phone calls, IRS audits, and the creation of documents that
would divide their targets internally. After the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and
Freedom, Hoover singled out King as a major target for COINTELPRO. Under pressure
from Hoover to focus on King, Sullivan wrote: “In the light of King's powerful demagogic
speech, we must mark him now, if we have not done so before, as the most dangerous
Negro of the future in this nation from the standpoint of communism, the Negro, and
national security.”
The Final Report of the Select Frank Church Committee blasted the behavior of the
intelligence community in its domestic operations (including COINTELPRO) in no
uncertain terms: “The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence
community at times violated specific statutory prohibitions and infringed the
constitutional rights of American citizens. The legal questions involved in intelligence
programs were often not considered.
On other occasions, they were intentionally disregarded in the belief that because the
programs served the "national security" the law did not apply. While intelligence
officers on occasion failed to disclose to their superiors programs which were illegal or
of questionable legality, the Committee finds that the most serious breaches of duty
were those of senior officials, who were responsible for controlling intelligence
activities and generally failed to assure compliance with the law. Many of the techniques
used would be intolerable in a democratic society even if all of the targets had been
involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that - the Bureau
conducted a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise
of First Amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the
growth of dangerous groups and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the
national security and deter violence.”
According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used four main
methods during COINTELPRO: (1) Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy
on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very
presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and
police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents; (2) Psychological
warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to undermine progressive
movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and other
publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence,
sentanonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread
misinformation about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run by
government agents, and manipulated or strong armed parents, employers, landlords,
school officials and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad jacketing to
create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with lethal consequences; (3)
Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.993of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured
testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful
imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government
regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand
jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters; (4)
Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten dissidents; to
conduct illegal break ins in order to search dissident homes; and to commit vandalism,
assaults, beatings and assassinations. The object was to frighten or eliminate dissidents
and disrupt their movements. The FBI specifically developed tactics intended to
heighten tension and hostility between variousfactions in their targeted groups and
individuals, and this resulted in numerous deaths, among which were San Diego Black
Panther Party members John Huggins, Bunchy Carter and Sylvester Bell.
While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, critics allege that continuing
FBI actions indicate that post COINTELPRO reforms did not succeed in ending
COINTELPRO tactics. ENTER THE “COPS” FEDERAL AND STATE SANCTIONED GANG-
STALKING PROGRAM “Community Oriented Policing,” (“COPS”) is a strategy of policing
that focuses on police “building ties and working closely with members of the
communities,” and originated in 1994 when then Senator Joseph Biden wrote and then
President Bill Clinton enacted the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act
(“VCCLEA”) establishing the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (“COPS”)
within the US Department of Justice.
In other words, federal and state sanctioned and approved GANG-STALKING. Gang
Stalking has been described as fascism, using East Germany style “Stasi Tactics,” a
systemic form of control, which seeks to control every aspect of a “Targeted
Individual’s” life. Gang Stalking has many similarities to workplace mobbing, but takes
place outside in the community, where the target is followed around and placed under
surveillance by groups of organized civilian spies/snitches 24/7, 365 days a year.
Targeted Individuals are harassed in this way for months or years before they realize
that they are being targeted by an organized program of gang-stalking harassment. This
is very similar to what happened to many innocent individuals in the former East
Germany or activists and dissidents in the former Soviet Union. Many innocent people in
the former East Germany would be targeted for these harassment programs, and then
their friends, family, and the community at large would be used to monitor, prosecute,
and harass them. In the former USSR it was used by the state to target activists,
political dissidents, or anyone that the Secret Police thought was an “enemy of the
state,” or as “mentally unfit,” and many were institutionalized or murdered using this
form of systematic control.In Bill Clinton’s COPS Gang-Stalking Program, civilian spies
are recruited from every segment of society, and everyone in the “targets” life is made a
part of this ongoing, continuous, and systematic form of control and harassment, with
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.10
10
4 of
of
of137
28
77 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
such actions that are specifically designed to control the target and to “keep them in
line,” like a Pavlovian Dog.
For the state, it is a way to keep their targets in line, control them, or ultimately destroy
them. This modern day systematic form of control is funded at the highest levels of
government, just like it has in other societies where these similar types of harassment
programs have been implemented.
Targets can be chosen for many reasons: (1) political views; (2) whistle blowing; (3)
political dissidence; (4) asserting rights at work; (5) making the wrong enemy; (6) too
outspoken; (7)investigating something that the state does not want investigated; (8)
signing a petition; (9) writing a letter; (10) being “suspicious” by a civilian spy/snitch;
or (11) being a religious/ethnic/racial minority.
The goal of the COPS state sanctioned organized gang-stalking program is to isolate the
target from all forms of support, so that the target can be set up in the future for arrest,
institutionalized, or forced suicide. Other goals of this harassment are to destroy the
targets reputation and credibility, and to make the target look “crazy” or unstable. The
process often involves sensitizing the target to every day stimuli’s as a form of control,
which is used to control targets when they “get out of line.” Targets of this harassment
become vulnerable and destitute, and often become homeless, jobless, have a
breakdown, are driven to suicide, similar to targets of the banned COINTELPRO. The
government eliminates perceived “enemies of the state” in this manner.
When a target moves or changes jobs, the harassment continues. Every time the target
moves, the same defamation, lies, libel, and slander will be spread, and the systematic
harassment will continue. Online defamation, libel, and slander on the internet has
made this continuation of COPS gang-stalking a great deal easier. People from all
segments of society can be recruited to be the “eyes and ears” of the state, such as
laborers, drug dealers, drug users, street people, prostitutes, punks, church groups,
youth groups, your best friend, your lawyer, local policeman, doctor, emergency
services, a neighbor, family, social workers, politicians, judges, dentists, vet,
supermarket cashier, postman, religious leader, care worker, landlord, anyone.
Most of these recruited civilian spies/snitches do not understand or even care that the
end consequence of this harassment protocol is to eventually destroy the targeted
person, and function as “useful idiots” of the state sanctioned COPS gang-stalking
program. It has been reported that people participate in this COPS gang stalking
because it: (1) gives them a sense of power; (2) is a way to make friends; (3) is
something social and fun; (4) breaks down race/gender/age/social barriers; (5) is
forced or blackmailed upon them by the State or police to take part; (6) is told to them
that they are part of “homeland or national security” to help keep an eye on
“dangerous” or “emotionally disturbed” individuals where they are “heroic spies for the
state;” (7) is used on local thugs or informants who are already being used for other
activities where their energies are diverted into these COPS gangstalking community
spy programs; (8) is either a choice of spying for the State or police, or else go to jail;
(9) involves outright lies and slander about the target to get them to go along with
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.11
11
5 of
of
of137
28
77 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
ruining the targets life; (10) includes average citizens recruited by the state the same
way citizens were recruited in the formerEast Germany and other countries.
Some techniques used against targets in this organized COPS Gang-stalking program
include: (1) classic conditioning where a target is sensitized to everyday stimuli over a
period of months and years to harass them in public to let them know they are
constantly being harassed and monitored; (2) 24/7 Surveillance following the target
everywhere they go, learning about the target and where they shop, work, play, who
their friends and family are, getting close to the target, moving into the community or
apartment where they live, across the street, monitoring the targets phone, house, and
computer activity; (3) isolating the target via defamation, libel, and slander campaigns,
(eg, people in the target’s community are told that the target is a thief, into drugs, a
prostitute, pedophile, crazy, in trouble for something, needs to be watched, false files
will even be produced on the target, shown to neighbors, family, store keepers); (4)
constant or intermittent noise and mimicking campaigns disrupting the targets life and
sleep with loud power tools, construction, stereos, doors slamming, etc; (5) talking in
public about private things in the target’s life; (6) mimicking actions of the target and
basically letting the target know that they are in the target’s life; (7) daily
interferences, not too overt to the untrained eye, but psychologically degrading and
damaging to the target over time; (8) everyday life breaks and street theater such as
flat tires, sleep deprivation, drugging food, putting dirt on targets property; (9) mass
strangerstime and place to perform a specific action; (10) blocking targets path, getting
ahead of them in line, cutting or boxing them in on the road, saying or doing things to
elicit a response from the target; (11) “baiting” tactics where a surveillance operation
can selectively capture evidence of a targete person responding to harassment, and
then that evidence could then be used to justify the initiation of more formal scrutiny by
a government agency.
Such operations have nothing to do with the target’s criminality - they are led and
perpetrated by federal agents and intelligence/security contractors, often with the
support of state and local law enforcement personnel. Unofficial operations of this type
are often private investigators and vigilantes – including many former agents and police
officers, sometimes on behalf of corporate clients and others with connections to the
public and private elements of America’s security industry.
Agents of communist East Germany’s Stasi (state police) referred to this process as
Zersetzung (German for “decomposition” or “corrosion” – a reference to the severe
psychological, social, and financial effects upon the victim). Victims have described the
process as “no touch torture” – a phrase which also captures the nature of the crime:
cowardly, unethical (and often illegal), but difficult to prove legally, because it
generates minimal forensic evidence.
Tactics include online and personal slander, libel, defamation, blacklisting, “mobbing”
(intense, organized harassment in public), “black bag jobs” (residential break ins),
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.12
12
6 of
of
of137
28
77 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
abusive phone calls, computer hacking, framing, threats, blackmail, vandalism, “street
theater” (staged physical and verbal interactions with the minions of the people who
orchestrate the stalking), harassment by noises, and other forms of bullying.
Since counterintelligence stalking goes far beyond surveillance – into the realm of
psychological terrorism, as it is essentially a form of extrajudicial punishment. As such,
the harassment is illegal – even when done by the government. It clearly violates the US
Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unwarranted searches, and the Sixth
Amendment which guarantees the right to a trial. Such operations also violate similar
fundamental rights defined by state constitutions. Stalking is also specifically prohibited
by the criminal codes of every state in America.
As was stated above, organized stalking methods were used extensively by communist
East Germany’s Stasi (state police) as a means of maintaining political control over its
citizens. Although this is supposedly illegal in the US, the same covert tactics are quietly
used by America’s local and federal law enforcement, and intelligence agencies, to
suppress political and domestic dissent, silence whistle blowers, and get revenge
against persons who have angered someone with connections to the public and private
agencies involved.
Although Edward Snowden’s revelations about the National Security Agency (“NSA”) in
2013 and 2014 generated a great deal of public discussion about mass surveillance, US
domestic counterintelligence activities such as the COPS Program receive relatively little
attention.
The FBI’s COINTELPRO operation is still happening, involving even more advanced
surveillance technology - and this program is none other than Joseph Biden and Bill
Clinton’s COPS Program.
In addition to being morally reprehensible, the COPS gang stalking program, just like
the original version of the FBI’s COINTELPRO operations, is very, very illegal. It violates
criminal laws in all fifty states against stalking, as well as grossly violates the US
Constitution’s prohibitions against warrantless searches and extra judicial punishment.
While the vast majority of Americans are never personally targeted by the Joseph
Biden/Bill Clinton COPS gangstalking program, they should still be concerned about the
existence of such operations. Even if such activities were constitutionally legitimate
(which they are not), they still have an enormous potential for abuse as a personal or
political weapon by enemies currently employed or friendly with these governmental
institutions.
Ending this cowardly and illegal practice by law enforcement agencies, intelligence
agencies, and their parasitic corporate and individual recruits will first require exposing
what is happening to the public.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.13
13
7 of
of
of137
28
77 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.14
14
8 of
of
of137
28
77 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
Family History (Brother Sammy and Dad, Brother Tommy?)– Refusal to Accept the
Truth regarding Family History involving MK-ULTRA, the CIA, and Lancaster City
Police.
BRAIN-HACKING thru the use of State-of-the-Art BCI, or Brain-To-Computer
Interface, now CONVENIENTLY CALLED HAVANA SYNDROME Delivering
HARASSMENT via Synthetic Telepathy on a 24/7 basis.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.15
15
9 of
of
of137
28
77 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
The Case (08-08942 CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police) Was WITHDRAWN WITHOUT
PREJUDICE and GRANTED by the Honorable Judge Mary McLaughlin. The Following is the
Introduction Filed in that case.
The PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE), alleges that the City of Lancaster
and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police and others colluded to deliberately ignore
CATERBONE’S complaints, an abuse of process, in an effort to interrupt and sabotage
current and ongoing litigation and civil complaints against several major businesses and
government agencies with headquarters in the City of Lancaster and the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania. Those would include the Lancaster General Hospital; High Industries
(Penn Square Partners and the Lancaster County Convention Center); Fulton Bank and
Fulton Financial Corporation; Wachovia Bank branches; Lancaster Newspapers; the
County of Lancaster; the Lancaster County Prison; the Hotel Brunswick; James Street
Investment District; Aurora Films; Haverstick Films; and the Lancaster City Bureau of
Police.
CATERBONE also alleges that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police were used to retaliate
and sabotage other litigation and civil complaints against other police departments,
namely the Southern Regional Police Department, Manheim Township Police
Department, East Lampeter Police Department, Millersville Boro Police, Avalon Police
Department and the Stone Harbor Police Department.
CATERBONE alleges that by ignoring his complaints the Lancaster City Police
Department gave the green light for others to continue a long and successful period of
harassment, thievery, property damage, computer and electronic hacking, deletion and
manipulation of court related documents, records and evidence, mail fraud, and the like.
These activities are so intense that they have taken on the characteristics of hate
crimes.
CATERBONE alleges that the gross abuse and negligence defamed his name and that of
his company, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, which discredited his reputation in an effort to
diminish credibility in the courts and to disrupt and thwart any possible business
relations and operations of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP resulting in direct and immediate
financial losses and loss of income.
Chief Keith Sadler and the Lancaster City Police Bureau rejected and refused to resolve
these disputes through mediation when CATERBONE opened a case with the Lancaster
Center for Mediation in May of 2008 and Keith Sadler communicated on May 8, 2008 that
he would not cooperate and mediate with CATERBONE.
On several occasions in 2007 several police officers of the Lancaster City Bureau of
Police instructed CATERBONE, in person upon responding to complaints, not to call 911
or the Lancaster City Police Department and that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police
would not respond or take complaints.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.16
16
10of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
The Lancaster City Bureau of Police only took one (1) incident of gas siphoned and
stolen from CATERBONE’s 1991 Dodge pickup truck, and refused to take the over 50
(from December 20, 2007 to present), or so other incidents as a complaint, regardless
of the efforts to have Lancaster City Mayor Rick Grey and the Lancaster City Solicitor to
look into the allegations and complaints. CATERBONE had meticulously documented the
incidents in a journal and a log of gas receipts, photographs, and odometer miles for all
of the incidents.
The Lancaster City Bureau of Police had responded to approximately 10 or so 911 calls
in the last eighteen (18) months to 1250 Fremont Street, residence of CATERBONE, for
complaints of property damage; stolen property, legal and business files and evidence
for litigation; computer and electronic hacking with deleted electronic files; harassment;
terrorist threats, stalking, stolen mail, etc.,.
CATERBONE had complained of abuse of process to state and federal law enforcement of
the situation, including U.S. Senator Arlen Specter’s office. CATERBONE had also visited
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in both Harrisburg and Philadelphia for help
and intervention.
CATERBONE also had personal meeting with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in Lancaster
City Hall on at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and for help to
mediate the problems and resolve the conflicts and the pain and suffering, as well as
loss and destruction of property and that CATERBONE was undergoing.
In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public with
their Downtown Lancaster investments and business plans that were culminated over
the past 9 years. The Advanced Media Group also formerly and publicly introduced their
Downtown Lancaster Action Plan via handouts, websites, and blogs; and began
meetings and negotiations with major stakeholders, City of Lancaster Public Officials,
Developers, and investors.
In 1997 CATERBONE had solicited Attorney Christina Rainville of Philadelphia and pro
bono attorney for Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case. The murder
trials and appeals of the Lambert case demonized Ms. Christina Rainville and U.S.
District Court Judge Stewart Dalzell. After CATERBONE submitted documents and audio
recordings, Ms. Christina Rainville had communicated with CATERBONE that she was not
able to take his case due to the fact that her Philadelphia law firm had banned her from
taking on any more Lancaster County residents, despite the fact that many more sought
her legal counsel. On December 31, 1997, CATERBONE had also personally delivered a
CD-ROM to the chambers of U.S. District Court Judge Stewart Dalzell in an effort to bring
attention to his case. In May of 1998 CATERBONE submitted an AFFADAVIT to the law
firm of Schneider and Harrison outlining the prosecutorial misconduct or Finding of
Facts of the 1987 cover-up for Ms. Christina Rainville. CATERBONE alleges that these
facts were part of the attitude and the motives for the law enforcement-at-large of
Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to ignore the rule of law and
procedure in order to bring these false arrests and malicious prosecutions. The
Lancaster County community-at-large had the same attitude toward CATERBONE..
The Lambert case received national notoriety when U.S. District Judge Stuart Dalzell
freed Lambert on a Habeus Corpus appeal hearing citing she was “actually innocent”
beyond a reasonable doubt. Judge Dalzell was quoted in chambers as saying, "I can tell
you, Mr. Madenspacher, that I've thought about nothing else but this case for over three
weeks, and in my experience, sir, and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral
argument, I want you and I want the Schnader firm to look for any case in any
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.17
17
11of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
jurisdiction in the English-speaking world where there has been as much prosecutorial
misconduct, because I haven't found it.” The case was covered by a 3 part series in the
Los Angeles Times by writer Barry Seigel on November 10, 1997 and a television
episode on the A&E Network American Justice Series. The Lancaster community
gathered over 10,000 signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District Judge Stewart
Dalzell for his rulings. In the end, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania took control of
the case and appealed the ruling that freed Lambert sending her back to prison.
The case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, after being denied any
review. The case accentuated the rights of Federal Law vs. State Law and the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania solicited a team of attorney generals from across the
nation to help their cause. CATERBONE attended a hearing before Judge Larry Stengel in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas and to this day, due to his knowledge and
experience with the Lancaster County Judicial System and Law Enforcement believes
the case should have never been conducted without a jury trial, and that the over
zealous prosecution proves that prosecutorial misconduct was never thoroughly
investigated or prosecuted in the Lambert case. CATERBONE will not let that happen in
his cases.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania,
with over 5,000 employees.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.18
18
12of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the
United States as of 1992.
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA,
and currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research
organizations (SAIC).
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle
Eastern Countries under U.S. Sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the
U.S. Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of
Great Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of
it's subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA
Robert Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to
Saadam Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian
Gulf War I, with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in
Iraq by Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of
Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International
Signal & Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services.
Joseph Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and
would not believe him.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.19
19
13of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.20
20
14of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.
Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort any
monies and/or possessions of value.
Change the history of events and the truth.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,
or case no. 05-cv-2288. This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff
Stan J. Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.21
21
15of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
Court of Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the
security of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process.
On May 16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the
case under seal. One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern
Pennsylvania in Reading, Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone
filed a petition for protection under the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-
23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized
Stalking with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental
telepathy or total Mind Control.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy
devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the
targeted victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with
the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County
Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after the handlers remotely trained
Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other
victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is connected 24/7 with a person who
declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri. Stan J.
Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person without success.
Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents
for more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control
program labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes
something like the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family because of
nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning business. He traveled the
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.22
22
16of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and Space Aliens. He ended up living in
government subsidized housing broke and with a severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his father,
Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as his
brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and finally committed
suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and had a
nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services industry. When
he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue everyone in court and is
deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is against him. He always spends all of his
money during his fits of mania and has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program
that began during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone, Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms. His brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD
experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is most likely part of a program sponsored
by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA or the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions with both his father
and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that were
preserved in thier estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high
school documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA
or one of it's subprograms.
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE FACTS AND THE REAL RECORD OF THE
FAMILY HISTORY:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and graduated
with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the
band as well as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy,
he went on to build a successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with
inventing a filtration system for the solvents. He also developed a very good investment
in real estate along the Manheim Pike, owning several properties. By his own writings
and from his personal accounts to me, he was definitely a remote viewer for some U.S.
Agency with telepathic abilities. His viewing is documented to have begun back in the
early 1970's. He also suffered from organized stalking, and was considered an enemy
and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a world traveler, this is
documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a covert carrier
for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another
subprogram of MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record
with the Lancaster City Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas. In 1973 Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging 2 checks from the
Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking account. The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at
the Manor Shopping Center was never entered into evidence, it was for a total of
$70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster Attorney James Coho for $200.00
with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his only criminal record.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.23
23
17of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President Judge
William Johnstone. However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of
the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks
from his own corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own
company, Financial Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones
and Kate O'Brien to learn more on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough
writings and documentation to know that his life fits the model for targeted individuals,
complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised from family and friends, and of
course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of his record online.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970. In
1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother,
Samuel A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A
notarized letter of October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney
General on the subject matter, with a return letter from the California Attorney General
on January 14, 1992. By his own admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone
disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD" trips while in the Air Force. Since his
death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others questioned the classification
of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately responsible for his
death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara Public
Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan
than suicide. Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while
attending Lancaster Catholic High School. After playing varsity football as a sophomore,
he had an unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November. While in the
woods in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm. It
left him in the Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts
and isolation. The hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs
for life. The Schizophrenia diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized
stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease
and Manic Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for
his suicide in 1996. Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real
estate settlement closing and lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of
1995. The funds were never recovered and Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful
death claim in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288. FULTON BANK triggered a
severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this day has refused to
acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an exceptional
athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P.
McCaskey and Franklin and Marshall College. Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful
lawn and landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United
Financial Services and selling residential mortgages. John DePatto was the former head
of Parent Bank, owned by James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also
foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was
owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars of equity was extorted in the process,
despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster
Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High School.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.24
24
18of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August 10(?),
1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?),
2005 by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for
the 302 Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General
Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on
summary appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J.
Caterbone appearing as pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil
complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.25
25
19of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and several video broadcasts of the ISC News
broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an exhibit to some of the law suits filed
by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has
over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local courts. There are also
Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare and
Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster
County Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records;
Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for
Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service records;
Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender
records; and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster
County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax
Assessment records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate
Deeds and Mortgages; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal
records; and of course papers and documents persevered from his estate.
__________________________________
Advanced Media Group and Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
President, Owner, and Founder.
In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor
International Signal and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and
CIA that was convicted in 1992 for an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle
Eastern countries with a broad array of weapons, most notably cluster bombs. It was
the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that time. I have been a victim of organized
stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. I
had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned
into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic
devices; vandilism and thefts of personal property, extortions, intellectual property
violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due process; thefts and modifications of
court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and
weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of
the federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et.
al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after the handlers remotely trained/sychronized
Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other
victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with the same person who
declares telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I have
been telepathic with at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to
validate and confirm their identities without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies
refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's
Office refuse to comment and act on the numerous formal complaints that are filed in
their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on the routine victimization's of a
targeted individual including but not limited to stalking, harassment, threats, vandalism,
thefts, extortion, burglaries, false imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants or
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.26
26
20of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the body, and most often the cause of
obstruction of justice is the computer hacking.
I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the
1940's while my father was in the U.S. Navy after he graduated with honors from Air
Gunners School in Florida, including an affidavit motorized and authenticated by my
father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air force and was victim to LSD
experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.
In 2016 I was the AMICUS for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane in the
Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016 in the COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA v. Kane which included perjury charges during the alleged leaking of
grand jury information. Kathleen Kane took on the “Good Old Boy” network regarding
judicial reform in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in an effort to rid the state of the
long standing public corruption ring that was evident from local law enforcement to
Supreme Court Justices, and everyone in between.
In 2015 I filed an AMICUS CURIE on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted
in 1992 of the murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am
in litigation in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa
Michelle Lambert published her book titled “Corruption in Lancaster County – My Story”,
which is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. I am in frequent contact with her
co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed
as "FULT" on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group,
Ltd., a full service financial firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in
developing the strategic vision for his company and the experience gained in directing
the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial. I have been
in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to
various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and the
subprime failures. I believe that Fulton Financial needs management to become more
aggressive in it's strategic planning and the performance it expects from it's
management team in order to increase shareholder value. Expanding the footprint of
the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is consistent with
the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking
institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton
Financial will see in it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current
litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.27
27
21of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
United States Third District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The
Pennsylvania Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of
Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of
intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating
to several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital
Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and it’s affiliated
businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act
regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar
Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation
dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by
ISC executives for professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part
of RICO Civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common
Pleas of Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their
attempts to withhold the Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown
Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot. We also proposed an alternative plan to move
the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and Lancaster Square to all of the major
stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under construction with
a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after
submission of an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R.
Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working
with such organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton
Global Initiative, Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of
Commerce, Tom’s Project Hope, People to People International, GlobalWarming.org,
Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric Center, and numerous
others.
In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries
with an emphasis on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and
royalties in the fight against electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in
developing new business models to address the convergence of physical and electronic
mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those creating, promoting, and
delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.28
28
22of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Tom’s Project Hope, a non-profit
organization promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide
prevention. We had provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County,
Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric
Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities. The video
"Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit organizations, faith
based initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the prevention of
suicide and to bring awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was
controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and
Bar to computerized their accounting and records management from top to bottom. I
had also provided consulting for the computerization of accounting and payroll for
Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was retained to evaluate and develop
an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of the Jay Group, formally of
Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West
Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe
technologies hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits
of migrating to a PC based real time networking system throughout the entire
organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some 500 employees with revenues in
excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible
for saving the company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid
contracts, the company was facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding
insurance company. We were responsible for implementing computerized accounting,
accounting and contract policies and procedures, human resource policies and
procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and negotiate
for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic,
since it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of
Lancaster County demanded a complete accounting of the operations in order to stave
off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We essentially revamped the entire
operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its
previous years, and record revenues.
In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador
Program, which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program
was founded to “To give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to
work together and effectively communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador
program administers face-to-face scientific, technical, and professional exchanges
throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State Department
established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program. We were
scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and
publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the government’s
technology think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-
authored the article “Escaping the Unix Tar Pit” with a scientist from NIST that was
published in the magazine “DISC”, then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM
industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you call an 800
number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving
telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S.
domestic companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.29
29
23of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive
producer of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be
delivered in a digital format; the first of it’s kind. We had originated the marketing for
the technology, and created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie System
(PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY
technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development
and commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the
recording industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and
Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the
project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading
engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible
for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce
Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve
Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original
Sound Track for the original “Star Wars” motion picture. It was released for distribution
and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace
technologies. * We had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to
partner with us in delivering the Digital Movie and it’s related technologies to the
marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization of technologies, which
Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the release
of the Digital Movie.
I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark
logo for the technology, similar to the DOLBY sound system’s trademark. The acronym’s
stand for the Power Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for
delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a compact disc.
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was
funded by a major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance
projects from $3 to $100 million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we
had quickly received solicitations from developers across the country. We were also
very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both debt and
equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private
placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by
Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of their postproduction
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.30
30
24of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured refinancing
packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the
current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and
discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt
portfolio. We were quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to
California. We also had a number of other prominent local developers seeking our
competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a
partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly told that
our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial
services organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location.
We had developed a stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity
for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers,
accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate
planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had
24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under
management, and our advisers were generating almost $4 million of commissions,
which did not include the fees from the other professionals. We had acquired our own
Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4 million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for
the Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams
scouting departments. (See Washington Post ¾ page article of March 24, 1985) Current
camps were dependent on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for
recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a
copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for teams in all
three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa
Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of
the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the
Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent
for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the
NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for
agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and
associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually,
that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the
country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about
60 participants, with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp
at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional production company filming the entire camp,
while I did the editing and produced the video. The well respected and widely acclaimed
professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys, had given me support for
my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked forward to
reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the
International Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by
increasing membership 3to 4 times. We had personally retained the nationally
acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of
Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals attended the
dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong
discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in
order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals
including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners,
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.31
31
25of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial planning
was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National
Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi
Group (the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to
help advise on the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and
the investment industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of
American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified Services). We were at that time a national
leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new
concept in the investment community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely
held by most investment advisers.
In 1998 Advanced Media Group had developed a comprehensive plan for the
revitalization of the Excelsior Place Historic Property (Sprecher Brewery) located 1
block from the proposed Downtown Lancaster Convention Center. We had planned a
unique entertainment complex comprised of a Pub, an upscale restaurant in the lower
catacomb, and a nightclub in the first floor. We had also developed and designed a
state-of-the-art video conferencing facility to compliment the Convention Center. We
have joined in the talks and discussions with principals, stakeholders, and taxing
authorities concerning the present proposals and the future of the revitalization of
Downtown Lancaster and the Convention Center.
Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn (Lancaster County
Hoteliers) for their attempts to withhold the Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports
the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center. The City of Lancaster supported the civil
action. We also proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel
Brunswick and Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders.
In 2007 Advanced Media Group signed a Non Disclosure Agreement with a local real
estate firm to continue the advancement of the Excelsior Place Business Plan.
Advanced Media Group has an exclusive agreement for a UPS Shipping/Copy Store or a
FedEx/Kinkos in Downtown Lancaster. There is no such service currently serving the
needs of downtown businesses and it is a vital component for the Lancaster County
Convention Center. In 1998 Advanced Media Group had contacted Mail Box Etc., and
began initial franchise due diligence. However when the Lancaster County Convention
Center was stalled, Advanced Media Group also put the project on the back burner. In
2005 Advanced Media Group negotiated for the exclusive right of first refusal to move
the UPS Store at Stone Mill Plaza to downtown Lancaster.The UPS/MBE Franchise is
ranked number 4 among all franchises and number one in the shipping-postal store
categories by Forbes.
Advanced Media Group would also add services such as scanning, imaging, and records
management services that would attract an additional market to the concept. The
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.32
32
26of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
UPS/MBE Franchise is ranked number 4 among all franchises and number one in the
shipping-postal store categories by Forbes. Advanced Media Group is currently studying
several site locations, including storefronts at the Brunswick Hotel, and a possible East
King Street site. Advanced Media Group would like to cater to the many legal firms that
conduct business in the Lancaster County Courthouse.In 1990 Advanced Media Group
developed and copyrighted the AMG Legal Systems Prototype which was a digital search
and retrieval application designed to help legal firms deal with the complexities of
organizing and filing court cases.
Advanced Media Group has specialized in records management and has a vast
knowledge base and experience in optical publishing and records management. This
service would allow firms to convert and store records off-site in a secure location with
state-of-the-art retrieval services. Typical Desktop Publishing services and binding
services would also be offered.
Advanced Media Group has been attempting to help facilitate the attraction of a big box
retailer for Downtown Lancaster. In 2006 Advanced Media Group had discussions with
the owner of Bulova Technologies regarding the development of that building to a retail
store. The Advanced Media Group has contacted the Corporate development teams of
the Hard Rock Café and Best Buy Electronics Stores.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group had talks with former Mayor Charlie Smithgall in
attempts to lure a Cabelas or a Pro Shops to the site.
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.33
33
27of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, Appellant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
The PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT the the Petitioner has been subject to has violated
his constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the
Petitioner from completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. §1983
Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: “The underlying purpose of
the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional
violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional
violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring
violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state
infringement and protection from state and local government from federal
interference”, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 241, 242; U.S.C.A. – Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5,
Case
14 Items
23-CV-8504
For COURT
MUHAMMAD
Relief and A.
Cops
AZIZ
Gang-Stalking
AMICUS BRIEF Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.34
34
28of
of
of137
77
28 Pages
Pages
Pages WEDNESDAY
TUESDAYNovember
November22nd,
21st, 2023