CE8xx

Respecting Intellectual Property in the Digital Era: Insights
from the Eighth Commandment of Computer Ethics
Anonymous1,2
1
Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT),
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam anonymous@hcmut.edu.vn
Digital transformation has introduced new risks and responsibilities for intellectual property.
Computers have revolutionized the way we share and build on knowledge, but this power requires
respecting intellectual property [ ]. As dependence on digital systems grows, cyber attacks like
malware and phishing increasingly threaten sensitive information across individuals, businesses,
and governments [ ]. Addressing these risks is vital to ensure digital technologies foster ethical
progress, not exploitation [ ].
The eighth commandment of the Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics, “Thou shalt not
appropriate other people’s intellectual output”, directly aligns with the challenges discussed here.
Respecting intellectual property is not just a legal duty but a moral imperative in the digital age.
Intellectual property theft is a pressing issue. The 2014 Sony Pictures hack caused significant
financial losses and leaked sensitive data, severely impacting the entertainment industry [ ]. Sim-
ilarly, the 2009 Google trade secret theft revealed risks of internal exploitation, where proprietary
algorithms were stolen and offered to competitors. These cases highlight the severe consequences
of intellectual property theft in the tech industry [ ].
In conclusion, intellectual property theft undermines innovation and trust. The examples of
Sony Pictures and Google illustrate how such actions not only cause financial damage but also
erode the integrity of industries. Upholding ethical standards and respecting intellectual property
ensures that digital technologies foster creativity and societal progress rather than exploitation.
References
.TO DO. Based on the titles and abstracts of the references provided below, carefully read and
analyze their content to determine the most suitable references. Use the corresponding numbers to
fill in the [ ] in the essay above, ensuring that each citation is relevant and aligns accurately with
the context of the essay.
[1] M. Dunn Cavelty, “Breaking the cyber-security dilemma: Aligning security needs and re-
moving vulnerabilities”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1083–1099, 2013.
,→ Current cyber-security approaches are failing, with increasing vulnerabilities rather than
stronger protections. Overemphasis on national security overlooks individual needs, weakening
global systems. The 2014 Sony Pictures hack exemplifies the consequences, causing significant fi-
nancial losses and leaking sensitive data. A balanced cyber-security policy must address these vul-
nerabilities while protecting privacy and data, ensuring ethical handling of information to prevent
similar incidents.
[2] W. Sun, O. Nasraoui, and P. Shafto, “Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine
learning algorithm interaction”, PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 8, p. e0235502, 2020.
,→ Recently, algorithms have been receiving data from the general population in the form of
labeling, annotations, etc. The result is that algorithms are subject to bias that is born from in-
gesting unchecked information, such as biased samples and biased labels. Furthermore, people and
algorithms are increasingly engaged in interactive processes wherein neither the human nor the
algorithms receive unbiased data. Algorithms can also make biased predictions, leading to what is
2 ID: CE801
now known as algorithmic bias. On the other hand, human’s reaction to the output of machine
learning methods with algorithmic bias worsen the situations by making decision based on biased
information, which will probably be consumed by algorithms later. Some recent research has focused
on the ethical and moral implication of machine learning algorithmic bias on society. However,
most researchs so far treated algorithmic bias as a static factor, which fails to capture the dynamic
and iterative properties of bias. We argue that algorithmic bias interacts with humans in an it-
erative manner. Based on statistical analyses of the results of several controlled experiments, we
found that the three different iterated bias modes, as well as initial training data class imbalance
and human action, do affect the models learned by machine learning algorithms. We also found that
iterated filter bias, which is prominent in personalized user interfaces, can lead to more inequality
in estimated relevance and to a limited human ability to discover relevant data.
[3] J. Dietrich, F. Leder, and T. Werner, “Botnets: Detection, measurement, disinfection, and
defence”, in Proceedings of the Conference on Communication and Internet Security (CCIS), Berlin,
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
,→ The growing data volume from Space demands advanced tools and methodologies for effective
management. Automated systems utilizing artificial intelligence and botnets are critical for anomaly
detection and operational integrity. The risks of internal exploitation, as highlighted by the 2009
Google trade secret theft, underscore the importance of safeguarding proprietary technologies. By
integrating DevSecOps and cloud-based solutions, these systems ensure secure and efficient data
handling for scientific, commercial, and exploratory missions.
[4] T. Q. Pham and M. N. Dang, “Impact factors of personal digital piracy behavior in Viet-
nam”, Science and Technology Development Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2017.
,→ This study from VNUHCM - HCMUT examines factors influencing personal digital piracy in
Vietnam and mitigation strategies. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Unified
Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the study explores psychological, moral,
and technological dimensions of piracy. Key findings include the role of perceived behavioral control
and risk perception. The paper also references instances where enforcement actions were necessary
to address large-scale piracy issues in the country.
[5] L. A. Gordon and M. P. Loeb, “The Economics of Information Security Investment”, ACM
Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 438–457, 2002.
,→ As digital dependence grows, cyber threats like malware and phishing pose serious risks to
sensitive information. This article proposes an economic model to optimize security investments by
assessing information vulnerabilities and potential losses. It suggests prioritizing midrange vulnera-
bilities for cost-effective protection and allocating a fraction of expected losses to maximize resource
efficiency in mitigating these risks.
[6] R. A. Spinello, Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace, 6th ed. Burlington, MA,
USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2017.
,→ Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace provides a comprehensive and up-to-date ex-
ploration of the internet’s impact on society, addressing ethical challenges such as information
privacy, cybersecurity, and digital misconduct. By analyzing case studies of data breaches, “fake
news", and online fraud, the book emphasizes the moral responsibilities of internet users and pol-
icymakers. The author proposes that the intersection of technology, law, and public policy offers
pathways to mitigate harm and create a safer cyberspace, fostering ethical practices in the digital
age.
[7] M. Akbanov, V. G. Vassilakis, and M. D. Logothetis, “WannaCry ransomware: Analysis of
infection, persistence, recovery prevention and propagation mechanisms”, Journal of Telecommu-
nications and Information Technology, no. 1, pp. 113–124, 2019.
,→ In recent years, we have been experiencing fast proliferation of different types of ransomware
targeting home users, companies and even critical telecommunications infrastructure elements.
The Eighth Commandment of Computer Ethics – ID: CE801 3
Modern day ransomware relies on sophisticated infection, persistence and recovery prevention mech-
anisms. Some recent examples that received significant attention include WannaCry, Petya and
BadRabbit. To design and develop appropriate defense mechanisms, it is important to understand
the characteristics and the behavior of different types of ransomware.
[8] S. J. Harrington, “The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on
computer abuse judgments and intentions”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 257–278, 1996.
,→ This research examines the impact of ethical codes on the judgments and intentions of
information systems (IS) employees regarding computer abuse, including deceptive practices like
phishing and other harmful behaviors. The study highlights how ethical codes can clarify individual
responsibilities and reduce rationalizations for unethical actions. It also explores the psychological
trait of responsibility denial, showing its significant role in influencing decisions related to computer
misuse.
[9] R. Barquin, “The ten commandments for computer ethics”, Computer Ethics Institute, vol.
27, 2006.
,→ This paper begins with an overview of what has occurred in the Computer Ethics Conferences
previous to 1992 and reaches the conclusion “that the time is ripe to enter into a normative phase
as we attempt to pursue a ‘ten commandments’ for computer ethics". Ramon Barquin discusses
the role the Computer Ethics Institute has played and then, leads into the need for a set of stan-
dards to guide and instruct people in the ethical use of computers. Barquin calls for the use of the
‘Ten Commandments for Computer Ethics.’ This is where the ‘Ten Commandments for Computer
Ethics’ was first presented and has since been used by hundreds of schools and corporations. The
ninth commandment of the Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics had clearly stated that: "Thou
shalt think about the social consequences of the program you are writing or the system you are de-
signing". This commandment emphasizes the responsibility of developers and designers to consider
the broader impact of their creations.
[10] R. von Solms and J. van Niekerk, “From Information Security to Cyber Security”, Com-
puters & Security, vol. 38, pp. 97–102, 2013.
,→ Cyber security and information security are closely related but distinct concepts. Cyber se-
curity extends beyond protecting information resources to safeguarding other assets, including indi-
viduals who may be targets or unwitting participants in cyber attacks. This broader scope introduces
ethical responsibilities, emphasizing the societal duty to protect vulnerable groups, such as children.
Addressing these risks is crucial to ensure digital technologies promote ethical progress rather than
exploitation.
[11] S. Nguyen, “Copyright and intellectual property protection in Vietnam”, Asian Journal
of Law and Society, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 200–215, 2019.
,→ This article analyzes intellectual property protection measures in Vietnam, with a focus
on legal frameworks and enforcement challenges. It highlights significant cases that illustrate the
financial and reputational risks of copyright infringement. The paper discusses how these cases
have shaped public awareness and policy adjustments in the evolving digital landscape.
[12] L. Lessig, Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity, Penguin Books, 2004.
,→ Lawrence Lessig, a leading thinker on intellectual property (The New Yorker), warns that
in the digital era, where technology revolutionizes knowledge sharing, control over creativity is
increasingly concentrated in the hands of Big Media. This dominance undermines free markets,
free speech, and the tradition of free culture that fosters innovation. Lessig argues for safeguarding
intellectual property and preserving an open digital ecosystem to protect our freedom to create,
build, and imagine.
[13] R. C. Barquin, In Pursuit of a ’Ten Commandments’ for Computer Ethics, Computer
Ethics Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
4 ID: CE801
as we attempt to pursue a ‘ten commandments’ for computer ethics". Ramon Barquin discusses the
role the Computer Ethics Institute has played and then leads into the need for a set of standards
to guide and instruct people in the ethical use of computers. Among these commandments is the
principle of respecting intellectual property, which emphasizes avoiding unauthorized use or copying
of proprietary software. This is where the ‘Ten Commandments for Computer Ethics’ was first
presented and has since been used by hundreds of schools and corporations.
[14] J. M. Stewart, M. Chapple, and D. Gibson, Certified Information Systems Security Pro-
fessional (CISSP) Official Study Guide, 8th ed., Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2018.
,→ This study guide for the CISSP certification covers key concepts in cybersecurity, including
threats like ransomware and their impact on organizations. It delves into security assessment, risk
management, and network protection strategies to prevent data loss and mitigate cyber threats.
The authors integrate real-world scenarios to illustrate the consequences of cyberattacks and the
importance of implementing robust cybersecurity measures.
[15] R. C. Barquin, “In Pursuit of a ’Ten Commandments’ for Computer Ethics”, Computer
principle of avoiding harm to others through the misuse of technology. This is where the ‘Ten
Commandments for Computer Ethics’ was first presented and has since been used by hundreds of
schools and corporations.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
[1] P. Zhang and D. S. Lee, “Digital Rights Management (DRM) and software piracy: Strate-
gies and challenges”, Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol. 36, pp. 101–115, 2018.
,→ Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems provide a secure framework to control user
access and actions, crucial in today’s networked environment. They allow file owners to main-
tain control even after distribution, aiding in piracy prevention and protecting sensitive enterprise
documents. DRM operates at various levels, including application (e.g., Apple iTunes), operating
systems (e.g., Microsoft RMS), and hardware (e.g., DVD CSS). However, current DRM systems
often lack interoperability, fail to meet all customer requirements, or aren’t fully secure. This paper
reviews the current DRM landscape, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses, analyzing legal and
technical requirements, and assessing three specific DRM systems against these criteria.
2 ID: CE802
27, 2006.
[4] H. T. Tavani, Ethics and Technology: Controversies, Questions, and Strategies for Ethical
Computing, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2013.
,→ This book introduces readers to a broad range of ethical and social issues within the field of
cyberethics, including those that directly impact professionals in computer and information tech-
nology (IT). Among the topics explored are moral responsibilities, the prevention of harm through
responsible computing, and the broader societal implications of unethical behavior in the digital
realm. It offers strategies to address these challenges, promoting a deeper understanding of ethical
computing practices.
[5] H. Le and T. Vu, “Cybersecurity law and intellectual property rights in Vietnam: Progress
and challenges”, Vietnam Law Review, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 45–65, 2020.
,→ This study examines Vietnam’s legislative efforts in the digital economy, particularly in
copyright and intellectual property rights protection. It highlights the interplay between national and
international regulations, focusing on measures to address unauthorized distribution and safeguard
creators’ rights. The article emphasizes the importance of adapting legal frameworks to the demands
of the digital era.
[6] P. W. Singer and A. Friedman, Cybersecurity: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2014.
,→ Dependence on computers has profoundly impacted human society, especially in warfare,
where the U.S. military is highly reliant on advanced systems. The rise of cyberwarfare is exemplified
by incidents like Stuxnet and Chinese cyberattacks aimed at stealing U.S. government data. In this
book, Peter W. Singer and Allan Friedman examine the evolution of military cybernetics, the
challenges of defending cyberspace, and recent security developments. The book explores modern
conflict dynamics and offers strategies for individuals and governments to protect themselves.
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
[9] E. K. Clemons, R. V. Waran, S. Hermes, M. Schreieck, and H. Krcmar, “Computing and
Social Welfare: Minimizing societal harm from digital transformation while preserving the benefits
of innovation in online businesses”, Electronic Markets, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 417–436, 2022.
,→ Social Welfare Computing is an emerging discipline that seeks to direct technology to cause
minimum societal disruption, and in particular seeks to minimize the harm caused directly by
technology itself. Often the companies that create significant value for their users obtain new sources
of wealth and power, which inevitably lead to new forms of abuse of power and new forms of
societal disruption. Societal disruption in turn requires social adaptation, including new regulations
to influence the behavior of firms and to define and to protect the rights of individuals in the
changed society. Social Welfare Computing seeks to guide social adaptation, combining insights
from disciplines as varied as anthropology, business strategy, economics, strategic planning, and
law.
[11] M. Dunn Cavelty, “Breaking the cyber-security dilemma: Aligning security needs and
removing vulnerabilities”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1083–1099, 2013.
similar incidents.
exploitation.
4 ID: CE802
build, and imagine.
[15] N. P. Nguyen, H. M. Nguyen, H.-L. La, T. T. T. Thi, N. H. Duong, T. S. Le, D. L. N.
Le, and N. Thoai, “AI-based traffic counting: A Case Study in Vietnam”, in Proceedings of the
2022 International Conference on Advanced Computational and Analytical Methods (ACOMPA),
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Oct. 2022, pp. 34–39.
,→ Ho Chi Minh City, particularly Vietnamese cities in general, is so busy and crowded since
tremendous numbers of motorbikes move on roads. Ho Chi Minh City leaders have encountered
several challenges in fully understanding and effectively dealing with problems of urban traffic for
the past few decades. If successful, it will make a positive impact on urban aesthetics and helps
reduce traffic accidents. Software-based solutions are proper and dramatically necessary, currently.
The paper mainly concentrates on traffic counting problems during the outbreak of the Covid-19
pandemic from June 2021.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
similar incidents.
2 ID: CE803
build, and imagine.
law.
exploitation.
[8] J. Demmers, W. M. Van Dolen, and J. W. J. Weltevreden, “Handling consumer messages
on social networking sites: customer service or privacy infringement?”, International Journal of
Electronic Commerce, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 8–35, 2018.
,→ Firms increasingly use social network sites to reach out to customers and proactively in-
tervene with observed consumer messages. Despite intentions to enhance customer satisfaction by
extending customer service, sometimes these interventions are received negatively by consumers.
We draw on privacy regulation theory to theorize how proactive customer service interventions
with consumer messages on social network sites may evoke feelings of privacy infringement. To
practitioners, our findings demonstrate that feelings of privacy are an element to consider when
handling consumer messages on social media, but also that privacy concerns may be overcome if
an intervention is perceived as useful enough.
[9] J. J. Jang-Jaccard and S. Nepal, “A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity”, Journal
of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 973–993, 2014.
,→ The rise of Internet connectivity has triggered a surge in cyberattacks, with malware ex-
ploiting vulnerabilities or leveraging emerging technologies. Beyond traditional methods, new at-
tack patterns are emerging in areas like social media, cloud computing, smartphones, and critical
infrastructure. These attacks exploit unique traits such as data centralization in the cloud, the per-
vasive use of mobile devices, and the interconnectivity of critical systems, presenting unprecedented
challenges.
[10] R. Barquin, “The ten commandments for computer ethics”, Computer Ethics Institute,
vol. 27, 2006.
[11] J. Dietrich, F. Leder, and T. Werner, “Botnets: Detection, measurement, disinfection,
and defence”, in Proceedings of the Conference on Communication and Internet Security (CCIS),
Berlin, Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
4 ID: CE803
of the digital era.
[14] I. H. Sarker, M. H. Furhad, and R. Nowrozy, “AI-driven cybersecurity: An overview,
security intelligence modeling and research directions”, SN Computer Science, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 173,
2021.
,→ Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the key technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
(or Industry 4.0), which can be used for the protection of Internet-connected systems from cyber
threats, attacks, damage, or unauthorized access. To intelligently solve today’s various cybersecurity
issues, popular AI techniques involving machine learning and deep learning methods, the concept
of natural language processing, knowledge representation and reasoning, as well as the concept of
knowledge or rule-based expert systems modeling can be used.
[15] T. Q. Pham and M. N. Dang, “Impact factors of personal digital piracy behavior in
Vietnam”, Science and Technology Development Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2017.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
similar incidents.
2 ID: CE804

law.
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
age.
of the digital era.
27, 2006.
4 ID: CE804
build, and imagine.
exploitation.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
2 ID: CE805
law.
challenges.
exploitation.
[8] J. Isaak and M. J. Hanna, “User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy
protection”, Computer, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 56–59, 2018.
,→ With the revelation that Facebook handed over personally identifiable information of more
than 87 million users to Cambridge Analytica, it is now imperative that comprehensive privacy
policy laws be developed. Technologists, researchers, and innovators should meaningfully contribute
to the development of these policies.
build, and imagine.
similar incidents.
4 ID: CE805
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
similar incidents.
27, 2006.
2 ID: CE806
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
build, and imagine.
[9] S. Nguyen, “Copyright and intellectual property protection in Vietnam”, Asian Journal of
Law and Society, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 200–215, 2019.
of the digital era.
misuse.
4 ID: CE806
age.
exploitation.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
of the digital era.
2 ID: CE807
27, 2006.

challenges.


law.

similar incidents.
exploitation.
4 ID: CE807
build, and imagine.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
similar incidents.
build, and imagine.
2 ID: CE808
age.
exploitation.
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
4 ID: CE808
2021.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
2 ID: CE809

challenges.
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
27, 2006.
exploitation.
age.
4 ID: CE809
similar incidents.
build, and imagine.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
of the digital era.
similar incidents.
2 ID: CE810

misuse.
law.
exploitation.
build, and imagine.
age.
4 ID: CE810
2021.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
T
. O DO. Based on the titles and abstracts of the references provided below, carefully read and
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
2 ID: CE811
misuse.
similar incidents.
exploitation.
build, and imagine.
4 ID: CE811
[14] M. Akbanov, V. G. Vassilakis, and M. D. Logothetis, “WannaCry ransomware: Analysis

of infection, persistence, recovery prevention and propagation mechanisms”, Journal of Telecom-
munications and Information Technology, no. 1, pp. 113–124, 2019.
2021.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
2 ID: CE812
build, and imagine.
law.
exploitation.
misuse.
27, 2006.

challenges.

similar incidents.

4 ID: CE812
of the digital era.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
2 ID: CE813
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
misuse.
build, and imagine.
challenges.
similar incidents.
4 ID: CE813
exploitation.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
[1] I. H. Sarker, M. H. Furhad, and R. Nowrozy, “AI-driven cybersecurity: An overview, se-
curity intelligence modeling and research directions”, SN Computer Science, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 173,
2021.
2 ID: CE814
exploitation.
misuse.
challenges.
similar incidents.
vol. 27, 2006.
4 ID: CE814
build, and imagine.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
2 ID: CE815
similar incidents.
exploitation.
of the digital era.
build, and imagine.
age.
[12] J. Isaak and M. J. Hanna, “User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and
privacy protection”, Computer, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 56–59, 2018.
4 ID: CE815
challenges.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
T
2 ID: CE816
27, 2006.
exploitation.
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
build, and imagine.
age.
2021.
4 ID: CE816
similar incidents.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
2 ID: CE817
similar incidents.
challenges.
build, and imagine.
exploitation.
of the digital era.
vol. 27, 2006.
4 ID: CE817
misuse.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
2 ID: CE818
exploitation.
27, 2006.
law.
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
build, and imagine.
4 ID: CE818
age.
similar incidents.
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
build, and imagine.
2 ID: CE819
law.
similar incidents.
misuse.
2021.
exploitation.
4 ID: CE819
Anonymous1,2
1
2
References
T
Germany, 2012, pp. 1–17.
2 ID: CE820
[3] I. H. Sarker, M. H. Furhad, and R. Nowrozy, “AI-driven cybersecurity: An overview, se-

curity intelligence modeling and research directions”, SN Computer Science, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 173,
2021.
misuse.
build, and imagine.
27, 2006.
exploitation.
4 ID: CE820
similar incidents.

CE8xx

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CE8xx

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CE8xx

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Respecting Intellectual Property in the Digital Era: Insights

from the Eighth Commandment of Computer Ethics

[3] E. K. Clemons, R. V. Waran, S. Hermes, M. Schreieck, and H. Krcmar, “Computing and

[6] J. J. Jang-Jaccard and S. Nepal, “A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity”, Journal

[7] R. C. Barquin, In Pursuit of a ’Ten Commandments’ for Computer Ethics, Computer

[8] E. K. Clemons, R. V. Waran, S. Hermes, M. Schreieck, and H. Krcmar, “Computing and

[10] J. Dietrich, F. Leder, and T. Werner, “Botnets: Detection, measurement, disinfection,

[3] J. J. Jang-Jaccard and S. Nepal, “A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity”, Journal

[3] M. Akbanov, V. G. Vassilakis, and M. D. Logothetis, “WannaCry ransomware: Analysis of

[14] M. Akbanov, V. G. Vassilakis, and M. D. Logothetis, “WannaCry ransomware: Analysis

[10] J. J. Jang-Jaccard and S. Nepal, “A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity”, Journal

[11] J. Dietrich, F. Leder, and T. Werner, “Botnets: Detection, measurement, disinfection,

[13] M. Akbanov, V. G. Vassilakis, and M. D. Logothetis, “WannaCry ransomware: Analysis

[3] I. H. Sarker, M. H. Furhad, and R. Nowrozy, “AI-driven cybersecurity: An overview, se-

You might also like