Tubular!!_ Works for Tuba(s)
Tubular!!_ Works for Tuba(s)
Tubular!!_ Works for Tuba(s)
ScholarWorks@BGSU
7-2021
Part of the Music Performance Commons, Music Practice Commons, and the Other Music Commons
How does access to this work benefit you? Let us know!
Repository Citation
Bush, Christian, "Tubular!!: Works for Tuba(s)" (2021). Honors Projects. 619.
https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/619
This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has
been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU.
Tubular!!: Works for Tuba(s)
Christian Bush
Honors Project
July 2021
Introduction
Tubular!! is an album that was produced during the Spring and Summer of 2021. It was
made possible through the support of many friends, colleagues, and mentors, and will serve as a
cornerstone upon which to build my career as a performer and a recording engineer. The album
This project was conducted with two main questions in mind: Why commission and
record new music featuring the tuba? What recording techniques can I use to produce lifelike and
When deciding which composer I wanted to commission for this project, I looked at the
repertoire for the solo tuba and tuba ensembles, and noticed a couple of things. For one, there are
few pieces for tuba written by non-white, non-male composers, and second, there are few tuba
trios in existence (Morris 2007; Institute 2021). These factors served as inspiration for me to
suburbs of Atlanta. She has been commissioned by the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra,
Carnegie Hall with Ensemble Connect, the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, the
Louisville Orchestra, the New Haven Symphony Orchestra, Nashville in Harmony with
Intersection, Time for Three with the Sun Valley Summer Symphony, Play On Philly!,
2
the Music in May Festival, Music in the Vineyards, the Lake Champlain Chamber Music
The remainder of the pieces on the album were chosen to promote the tuba as a solo instrument,
and the tuba trio as an ensemble. When selecting other pieces for the album, I looked for works
that I felt demonstrated the technical and lyrical capabilities of the tuba, while spotlighting the
The other domain of this project was the recording. I conducted research on miking the
tuba specifically and stereo miking, which is “a technique intended to create a spatial sound
impression by the use of two or more channels” (DPA 2020). Several sources served as jumping
off points. The dissertation, “Recording the Classical Tuba,” (Dine 2019) offered
recommendations that come from a recording engineer who is also a tuba player. Although the
dissertation does not have as exhaustive a list of microphone recommendations as other texts I
read, or any recommendations for preferred stereo miking techniques, the general perspective of
a tuba player was valuable in my decision-making. Other sources included Modern Recording
Techniques (Huber 2018), which is more geared towards studio/pop music, Classical Recording:
A Practical Guide in the Decca Tradition (Haigh 2020) and Recording Orchestra and Other
Classical Music Ensembles (King 2017). These latter texts were both valuable for their
Additional sources for this project included commercially produced albums, and the sheet
music for the pieces I will be recording. All of these sources helped me to refine the sound of the
album during the mixing phase in order to effectively demonstrate the tuba’s abilities.
3
Hundreds of hours went into this project before the recording ever began. Along with
research and planning in the Fall of 2020, I was practicing repertoire, rehearsing with my
collaborators, and communicating with composers. I was also experimenting with microphone
layouts. After reading through different texts that ranged from string quartet and orchestral
“big AB, small AB” (King 2017). This blends the direct sound from a smaller, close-spaced pair
with the more diffuse hall-sound from a wider-spaced pair farther back in the hall. After deciding
on the “big AB, small AB” pattern, I began to experiment with spacing. The distance between
the pairs, the distance between each microphone in each of the pairs, and the distance from the
pairs to the tuba all affected the sound in drastic ways. The spacing I ended up deciding on was
the small AB pair being eight feet off the ground and twelve inches apart, just behind the tuba.
The big AB pair was fifteen feet in front of the small AB pair, sixty-five inches off the ground,
and eight feet apart. Through experimentation I found this setup to be the most accurate and
acoustically pleasing representation of the tuba’s sound. A diagram of the setup can be seen
below in figure 1.
Next, I began recording. The general process for most of the pieces was to schedule a
recording session, drive to the recording location, set up, record for a few hours, tear down, and
drive back. After those recording sessions, I would splice together different segments of audio to
make one cohesive “run” of the piece and then send it to one of my advisors, Professor David
Saltzman. Professor Saltzman would then listen and give feedback and recommendations about
what to change. From there I would go back and repeat the process until we were both satisfied.
This part of the project took an immense amount of time, effort, and planning. Managing four
people’s schedules (my trio and my assistant recording engineer) and a hall schedule in the
After I had a completed run of each piece, I sent the recordings to my other advisor,
Professor Michael Laurello. Professor Laurello then gave me advice and recommendations on
how to mix the pieces to make the tracks sound more cohesive, and fix some balance issues.
After some back and forth, Professor Laurello mastered the album for me. While all this work
was going on, I was also designing the website (pictured in the appendix).
Before the literature review, I asked a couple questions. First, why commission and
record new music featuring the tuba? I will outline four main reasons. The first is a lack of
repertoire. Although there has been more writing for the tuba in the past century, other
instruments in the orchestra, like the violin, have been around longer and have historically been
taken more seriously as soloistic instruments. Second, in addition to a general need for more
repertoire, I specifically see a need for more trios in the tuba repertoire. When I formed my trio,
5
the Johnson Three, in the summer of 2020, we quickly noticed that there was not much repertoire
A third important reason I see to commission and record new tuba works is a lack of
diversity. Most Western Art Music, historically and presently, has been written by cisgender
white men. Tuba music is certainly no exception. We live in a diverse world, and I believe that
the compositions musicians play should be more inclusive of underrepresented composers. The
final reason I see to commission and record new music for the tuba is a lack of quality
recordings. There are plenty of recordings of tuba out there that do not adequately portray the
tuba’s capabilities because the recordings are not well recorded and often lack clarity of sound.
The next question I asked was: “What recording techniques can I use to produce lifelike
and sonically pleasing tuba recordings of myself?” The microphone setup I decided record with
was the “big AB, small AB” (King 2017) setup. The diagram can be found on page three, figure
1. This setup was arrived at through a combination of research on recording techniques and
experimenting with microphone spacing. I believe the sound that I accomplish with the
microphone setup in this album represents me well as a tuba player and a recording artist.
First, I want to discuss some of the limitations that shaped this project. The first
limitation was access to equipment and recording spaces. When I first envisioned this project, I
imagined being able to test many different microphone types and configurations in multiple halls
to realize my ideal tuba recording sound. Unfortunately, because of the Covid-19 pandemic, it
became apparent that I would not be able to easily gain access to the halls on campus or access
the microphones in the College of Musical Arts. Because of this, I had to produce a sound that I
was happy with using only four microphones. This forced me to focus on listening to stereo pairs
6
without relying too much on spot microphones. I think this limitation ultimately helped me to get
The other limitation was time. Even with the extension I received on this project, a little
over six months is a quick turnaround time for a project of this scale for a full-time student. This
limitation also caused me to get creative and figure out ways to edit that saved me time. I became
more skilled at editing audio because I often did not have enough time to go back to the hall with
As with most other things during the Covid-19 pandemic, this project did not go as I
originally planned. The project was originally slated to be completed in May of 2021, but due to
the size of the project and the amount of work involved, I needed to extend the project into
Summer 2021 for completion in July. Covid was a contributor to the timeline problems, but other
problems included the scope of the project and my own sense of my availability. The project
ended up being even more time consuming than I had planned for and this caused me to fall
The next difference has to do with my research questions. When I first submitted the
proposal, my original second question was “What are the most accurate and acoustically pleasing
techniques for recording tuba?” This question changed to “What recording techniques can I use
to produce lifelike and sonically pleasing tuba recordings of myself?” After setting out to test
configurations I realized that my original question was too difficult to answer because of it
would require objective measurements to be answered, which would have gone beyond the scope
of the project. I was also not able to test as many microphones in as many configurations as I had
set out to in the proposal so I did not feel I could answer what was “most accurate and
could be tested and you still wouldn’t truly be able to answer the question of which technique
was best because the answer is ultimately subjective. Recording is just as much art as it is
science and one person’s ideal sound might be totally different from another’s. I figured I could
not answer which techniques were best, but I could, through research and experimentation, figure
out which techniques using my limited equipment would make a sound that I thought best
represented me.
The final difference from my proposal is the mastering of the album. In the proposal, I set
out with the intention to work with Professor Laurello in order to learn how to master, and
master the album with him. Because of the adjustments to the timeline, and the amount of work I
already had to do for the rest of the project, I was not able to master the album myself.
The main output of this project was the album and liner notes that are found on my
website linked at the top of this paper. The album will serve as a useful tool for me to market
myself as both a tuba player and a recording engineer. Although further study can be conducted
into recording techniques for the tuba, I did find ways to record myself that I feel represent me
well, and I will be able to use these recording techniques I have developed during this project to
better record myself and other tuba players. The last important output of this project is the
addition of a new piece from a member of an underrepresented group in the field. Happy Harp
will hopefully carve out a place in the tuba repertoire and be performed for years to come.
8
References
Cooper, Dan. “Higher Sample Rates For Recording And Mixing - When And Why You Should
Use Them And When You Shouldn't.” Production Expert, 5 Mar. 2020, www.pro-tools-
expert.com/production-expert-1/2020/3/4/when-and-why-you-should-use-higher-sample-
rates-for-recording-and-mixing-and-when-you-shouldnt.
Dine, Larry, "Recording the Classical Tuba" (2019). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and
Problem Reports. 7379. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7379.
Grant, James. Three Furies for Solo Tuba. 1993. Delaware: Grantwood Music Press, 1993. Print.
Haigh, Caroline, et al. Classical Recording: A Practical Guide in the Decca Tradition.
Routledge, 2020.
32
Huber, David Miles, and Robert E. Runstein. Modern Recording Techniques. Routledge, 2018.
Hynds, Aaron. "The Composer's Guide to the Tuba: Creating a New Resource on the
Capabilities of the Tuba Family." Electronic Thesis or Dissertation. Bowling Green State
University, 2019. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. 08 Dec 2020.
King, Richard Lemprière. Recording Orchestra and Other Classical Music Ensembles.
Routledge, 2017.
Morris, R. Winston, and Daniel Perantoni. Guide to the Tuba Repertoire: The New Tuba Source
Book. 2nd ed., Indiana University Press, 2007.
Nelhybel, Vaclav. Ludus. N.D. Connecticut: Cimarron Music Press, 2006. Print.
Owsinski, Bobby. The Mastering Engineer's Handbook. 4th ed., Bobby Owsinski Media Group,
2017.
Ron, Nimrod Haim. “The Modern Tuba: The Evolution of the Instrument, Key Compositions
and Extended Techniques.” Iceland University of the Arts, Skemman, 2016, pp. 1–34.
Self, Jim. Duh Suite. 1998. Los Angeles: Basset Hound Music, 1998. Print.