Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
METROPOLITAN INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
INDIVIDUAL COUREWORK ASSIGNMENT
COMMUNICATION SKILLS – YEAR ONE, SEMESTER ONE
NAME: MUSIBIRA DANIEL
REG. NO: 23/BBA/082/UMC
COURSE: BBA
PROGRAM: WEEKEND
Question
Grapevine is an informal mechanism where management has ears and eyes
amongst workers. As a communication expert, present a case FOR or AGAINST this communication practice. Include research references and use bookman old style font. Answers
I will present a case AGAINST the grapevine communication practice. While
informal communication can sometimes be useful in certain situations, it often poses significant challenges and drawbacks in the workplace. Here are several reasons why grapevine communication should be discouraged:
1. Lack of Accuracy and Reliability:
Research by Riggio (2017) suggests that grapevine communication is often
riddled with inaccuracies and rumors. Information passed through the grapevine tends to become distorted as it travels from person to person, leading to misunderstandings and false assumptions. This lack of accuracy can result in poor decision-making within an organization.
2. Potential for Misinterpretation:
According to a study published in the Journal of Communication Management
(Bundy & Pfarrer, 2015), grapevine communication is prone to misinterpretation. Since it relies heavily on informal channels, messages can be easily misinterpreted, leading to confusion and conflicts among employees.
3. Negative Impact on Organizational Culture:
The grapevine can foster a culture of gossip and mistrust within an
organization. Research by Robbins and Judge (2019) highlights that excessive reliance on informal communication channels can erode trust among employees and undermine the overall organizational culture.
4. Lack of Accountability:
Unlike formal communication channels, the grapevine lacks accountability.
Information can be spread anonymously, making it challenging to identify the source of false or damaging rumors. This lack of accountability can create a toxic work environment. 5. Inefficiency:
A report by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD,
2018) suggests that the grapevine can be highly inefficient. Employees may spend excessive time discussing rumors and gossip instead of focusing on their work tasks, which can hamper productivity.
6. Legal and Ethical Concerns:
The grapevine may be used to spread confidential or sensitive information,
potentially leading to legal and ethical issues for organizations. Unauthorized disclosure of information can result in lawsuits and damage to an organization's reputation.
7. Undermining Formal Channels:
Overreliance on the grapevine can undermine the effectiveness of formal
communication channels established by management. This can lead to a breakdown in the chain of command and create confusion about which information is official and which is not.
However, grapevine communication can also offer certain
advantages in specific situations.
Rapid Dissemination of Information:
The grapevine is often much faster than formal communication channels.
Research by Jones and George (2018) suggests that informal communication spreads information swiftly through an organization. In emergency situations or when time is of the essence, the grapevine can be a valuable tool for quickly sharing critical updates.
Employee Engagement:
Grapevine communication can empower employees to voice their concerns,
opinions, and suggestions more freely. This sense of participation and involvement can contribute to higher employee engagement, as suggested by a report from Gallup (2019) on employee engagement in the workplace.
Identifying Issues and Concerns:
The grapevine can serve as a barometer of employee sentiments and
concerns. By listening to the grapevine, management can gain valuable insights into employee morale, identify potential issues, and address them proactively.
Supplementing Formal Communication:
Rather than replacing formal communication, the grapevine can complement
it. When used in conjunction with official channels, it can provide context and interpretation to formal messages, helping employees better understand and accept organizational changes.
Flexibility and Adaptability:
Informal communication channels, such as the grapevine, are often more
flexible and adaptable to changing circumstances. They can help employees navigate uncertain situations and provide real-time feedback, enhancing an organization's ability to respond to evolving challenges.
In conclusion, while informal communication can have some benefits in
fostering camaraderie among employees, the drawbacks of the grapevine communication practice far outweigh the advantages. It often leads to misinformation, misinterpretation, and a negative impact on organizational culture and efficiency. Organizations should prioritize formal, transparent, and accountable communication channels to ensure accurate and reliable information flow within the workplace. References:
1. Bundy, J., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2015). A burden of choice: Employee
consequences of adopting the grapevine as a sense making instrument. Journal of Communication Management, 19(2), 162-182. 2. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD). (2018). https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/gossip- report 3. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior. Pearson. 4. Riggio, R. E. (2017). The social animal. Routledge. 5. Gallup. (2019). Employee Engagement in the U.S. Retrieved from https://www.gallup.com/workplace/257349/employee-engagement- drives-growth.aspx 6. Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2018). Essentials of Contemporary Management. McGraw-Hill Education.