Geochemical_processes_salinity_sources_and_utility
Geochemical_processes_salinity_sources_and_utility
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12533-1
RESEARCH
Received: 17 November 2023 / Accepted: 5 March 2024 / Published online: 14 March 2024
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
Abstract Identifying factors contributing to water isotope analysis revealed that the water originated
salinity is paramount in efficiently managing limited from meteoric sources and underwent significant
water resources in arid environments. The primary evaporation during or before infiltration. The utility
objective of this study is to enhance understanding assessment of water samples indicates that most sam-
regarding the hydrochemistry, source, and mecha- ples are not appropriate for consumption and are sig-
nism of water salinity, as well as to assess the suit- nificantly below the established standards for potable
ability of water for various uses in southern Iraq. water. In contrast, a significant portion of the ground-
The groundwater samples were collected from water water samples were found to meet the criteria for
wells and springs and analyzed for major cations and irrigation suitability by adopting Wilcox and the US
anions along with stable isotopes (δ18O and δ2H) to Salinity Laboratory criteria. The groundwater could
accomplish the objective. The analysis of major ion be considered for irrigation with proper salinity con-
chemistry, hydrochemical techniques, principal com- trol management. Overall, this study has significantly
ponent analysis (PCA), and isotope signatures were improved the understanding of the hydrogeochemical
adopted to determine the primary factors contribut- regimes and acts as a first step toward the sustainable
ing to water mineralization. The study inferred that utilization of water resources.
evaporation and geological processes encompassing
water–rock interactions, such as dissolution precipita-
tion and ion exchange, were key processes. The stable
Vol.: (0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
365 Page 2 of 18 Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365
Vol:. (1234567890)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365 Page 3 of 18 365
the west, arid desert terrain in the east and the Ara- Mesopotamian region, especially in the Euphra-
bian Gulf in the south. The floodplain primarily com- tes sub-region, which led to a paralleled series of
prises sediments from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers northwest–southeast normal faults, where they are
through their flow and flooding events. Throughout traversed by numerous geological formations to the
the study area, topography is variable, gently slop- west of the Euphrates River (Fouad, 2015). In terms
ing towards the southeast (Fig. 1). The region expe- of stratigraphy, the stratigraphic sequence starts with
riences an arid to semi-arid environment, character- the Umm al-Ruduma formation, which was deposited
ized by average rainfall ranging from 3.84–18.04 mm/ during a huge transgression during the late Paleocene
month between May and November and 14.11–22.56 to early Eocene (Jassim & Goff, 2006). The forma-
mm/month from December to February (IMO, tion consists mainly of a dense succession of carbon-
2020). The temperature is high in the summer, which ate and limestone rocks. It is overlaid conformably by
upscales from April with an average of 24.74°C and the alternating anhydrite marl, shale, and limestone of
reaches its highest value in July, recording an average the lower Eocene Rus Formation (Fig. 2). The rocks
of 36.62°C. are overlaid unconformably by upper-middle Eocene
nummulitic limestones formation referred to as the Jil
Geology and hydrogeology (Sissakian & Mohammed, 2007). The Jil formation is
followed by the deposition of the Dammam formation
Geologically, Iraq is an essential part of the huge of the early Eocene, which is mainly of dolomite and
tectonic-strategic sequence of the Arabian Penin- limestone rocks alternating with marly limestones and
sula (Martin, 2001). According to this sequence, Iraq portrayed by the occurrence of fissures, karst chan-
was divided into a stable shelf consisting of three nels, and fractures. On top of the Dammam forma-
main components, including the Mesopotamian Sal- tion, the Euphrates formation of the early Miocene is
man region, the Rutba-Al Jazeera sub-region, and an deposited. This deposition comprises basal conglom-
unstable shelf separated by the Abu Jir fault (Jassim erates and limestone (Jassim & Goff, 2006).
& Goff, 2006; Fouad, 2015). The region considered The shallow groundwater in this region is
for the study is positioned in the weakest unit of the restricted to the unconsolidated, sandy aquifer group
Vol.: (0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
365 Page 4 of 18 Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365
Vol:. (1234567890)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365 Page 5 of 18 365
Vol.: (0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
365 Page 6 of 18 Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365
area feature low salinity water, while hypersaline 0.75) with N a+, K+, SO42−, and CO32− was depicted
waters dominate inland regions. The water type of ; the correlation was moderately positive (r = 0.5)
this hypersaline water was similar to that of Kuwait, with Mg2+ and C l−; and a weak positive correla-
located in the south of the study area (Bhandary et al., tion (r = 0.45) with HCO3−. In addition, there was
2018). Hydrochemical facies have a very consistent a highly positive correlation (r > 0.9) of K + with
2+ 2− 2+ 2−
spatial distribution with TDS changes. Ca , SO4 and C a , CO3 with C a , Na and K+,
2+ +
2− 2− −
Durov diagram (Durov, 1948) has been used to CO3 with S O4 , HCO3 and N a+, and C
l− with
− 2−
indicate the mixing between the surface water and HCO3 and CO3 was observed. A moderate posi-
ground-water (Figure 7). The majority of ground- tive correlation (r > 0.5) was found between C a2+ and
water samples are plotted in 2, 4 and 5 fields, indi- 2−
Cl , Mg , Na , and CO3 , Na and Cl , and Cl− and
− 2+ + + −
cating direct recharge of surface water, otherwise CO32−. Finally, a weak positive correlation was found
mixed water or simple dissolution with reverse cation between Cl− and K+, SO42− and Cl−, CO32− and pH,
exchange process. and HCO3− and Ca2+. Based on the calculated cor-
relation matrices, it can be observed that association
Sources of salinity between ions Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl− ions indicate the
possibility of evaporation process, and that of pH, K +,
2+
The accumulation of dissolved solids in groundwa- Ca reflects ion exchange process. Further carbon-
ters is often attributed to various factors, which can ate weathering process is inferred due to the correla-
be determined by analyzing the relative abundance, tion pattern between pH Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3−, CO32−,
ratios, and interactions of different ions, as outlined in and the relationship of different ions (TDS, Ca2+,
Table 2. Investigating the relationship between twelve Mg2+, Na+, K+, HCO3−, CO32−, SO42−, Cl−) indicate
chemical variables—pH, TDS, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, salts originating from the evaporites might have also
HCO3−, CO32−, SO42−, Cl−, B, and NO3− revealed played a substantial role in influencing the hydro-
intriguing observations. Among the parameters chemistry of groundwater (Tarawneh et al., 2019;
measured by TDS, a strong positive correlation (r = Boosalik et al., 2022).
Vol:. (1234567890)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365 Page 7 of 18 365
Table 2 Correlation matrix for the analytical values of geochemical variables in the water samples of the study area
pH TDS Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ Cl- SO42− CO32− HCO3− NO3− Br
pH 1.00
TDS 0.21 1.00
Ca2+ 0.20 1.00 1.00
Mg2+ −0.14 0.64 0.66 1.00
Na+ 0.38 0.82 0.83 0.53 1.00
K+ 0.07 0.94 0.94 0.71 0.81 1.00
Cl- 0.10 0.51 0.51 0.26 0.52 0.47 1.00
SO42− 0.06 0.94 0.94 0.75 0.81 0.99 0.47 1.00
CO32− 0.41 0.76 0.76 0.52 0.95 0.75 0.51 0.74 1.00
HCO3− 0.38 0.45 0.45 0.05 0.69 0.38 0.81 0.37 0.67 1.00
NO3− 0.17 0.18 0.21 0.17 0.37 0.14 0.07 0.15 0.34 0.30 1.00
B 0.12 −0.28 −0.27 −0.14 −0.17 −0.21 −0.21 −0.24 −0.12 −0.11 −0.13 1.00
1000 1000
Rock Rock
TDS
TDS
Dominance Dominance
100 100
10 10
Surface Water Surface Water
Groundwater Groundwater
1
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Cl-/(Cl+HCO3) Na+k/(Na+Ca+K)
Vol.: (0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
365 Page 8 of 18 Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365
Ca+Mg
0.60
the water samples from the
Na/Cl
200
study area 0.40
100
0.20
0
0.00 0 100 200 300 400 500
0 50000 100000 150000 HCO3+SO4
EC
500 120
100 (d)
400 (c)
80
300
60
Ca
SO4
200 40
100 20
0
0
0 10 20 30 40
0 100 200 300 400 500
Ca HCO3
200
(e)
150
100
Ca
50
0
0 100 200 300 400
Mg
6 150 (h)
(g)
Ca+Mg-HCO3-SO4
100
4 50
HCO3
0
2 -200 -100 0 100
-50
-100
0
-150
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Total Cations Na-Cl
dissolution with cation exchange as a possible be attributed to the gypsum and/or anhydrite dis-
source of water mineralization (Fig. 6). The Ca2++ solution, while increased levels of H CO3− can be
Mg2+ against HCO3−+ SO42− plot (Fig. 5b) sug- ascribed to the weathering process of carbonates
gests the dissolution of both carbonate and sulfate (Prasanna et al., 2010). Most of the water sam-
along with ion exchange may affect groundwa- ples in the C O42− variation diagram were
a2+ and S
ter mineralization (Liu et al., 2020). Furthermore, observed to fall above the line 1:1 (Fig. 5c), reflect-
a significant proportion of the water samples are ing the depletion of C a2+ or increase of S O42−.
proximal to the 1:1 equiline, indicating the deficit Such mechanism can be mainly due to calcite pre-
of (HCO3−+SO42−) ions for counterbalancing the cipitation triggered by gypsum dissolution, which
presence of alkali ions ( Na++K+) (Xu et al., 2023). is likely responsible for the enrichment—and
Consequently, elevated concentrations of SO42− can referred to as the common ion effect, Ca2+ being the
Vol:. (1234567890)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365 Page 9 of 18 365
common ion for carbonate and sulfates (Chidam- evaporate deposits within the sedimentary layers of
baram et al., 2020). the aquifer (Liu et al., 2016). Moreover, it reflects a
Consumption of carbonic acid is often found slight surplus of Na+ and Cl− in a few samples in both
alongside calcite precipitation in water. The increased spring and well waters, primarily attributed to weath-
pCO2 increases the availability of H2CO3 for reaction ering and/or ion exchange reactions. If the sum of cat-
(Samayamanthula et al., 2022). Thus, it subsequently ions and HCO3− concentration are almost equal, then
increases the availability of ions in the groundwater, it could indicate a possibility of silicate weathering
resulting in the saturation and precipitation of car- based on the lithology (Kim, 2003). The current study
bonate minerals (Chidambaram et al., 2011). The shows that silicates are also involved in the minerali-
relationship of C a2+ versus HCO3− reflects a remark- zation processes (Fig. 5g). The main cause of excess
able deficiency of H CO3- and enrichment of C a2+ Na+ is probably due to cation exchange facilitated by
in groundwater samples (Fig. 5d). Additionally, an clay minerals. Thus, it could be inferred that the cati-
excess of C a2+ relative to M
g2+ could be explained ons adsorbed on the clay are swapped for other ions
by calcite dissolution during infiltration (Liu et al., during ion exchange. (Meybeck, 1987). The chloro-
2020). The sample points cluster around and below alkaline indices could be used to study the exchange
the 1:1 line, resulting from calcite dissolution equation for Na+ and C a2+, which frequently occurs
(Fig. 5e). in many natural groundwater systems (Schoeller,
The scatter plot depicting the relationship between 1967; Chidambaram et al., 2021). CA1 and CA2,
Na+ and C l− reveals that the majority of the samples which are expressed using the following Eqs. 2 and 3:
are dispersed along the 1:1 line (Fig. 5f). The data )]
presented potentially suggests the potential role of CA1 = Cl− − Na+ + K+ ∕Cl− (2)
(
Vol.: (0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
365 Page 10 of 18 Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365
Table 3 Factors loadings and explained variance ion exchange processes. The correlation associated
Parameter Component with Ca–Mg–SO4–HCO3 and Na–Cl adequately
supports the process of the N a+–Ca2+ exchanges on
1 2 3
the water chemistry (Fig. 5h). As a result, the sur-
pH −0.02 0.82 −0.12 plus Na+ is postulated mainly due to ion exchange
TDS 0.89 0.23 0.28 or feldspar weathering caused by an increase in
Ca2+ 0.90 0.24 0.27 groundwater residence in contact with aquifer mate-
Mg2+ 0.86 −0.12 −0.03 rials (Maskooni et al., 2021), apart from the pro-
Na+ 0.72 0.57 0.28 cess of evaporation. To summarize, the chemical
K+ 0.94 0.14 0.21 approach revealed that the main causes of salinity in
Cl− 0.27 0.30 0.78 the study area were evaporation, ion exchange, dis-
SO42− 0.95 0.12 0.21 solution of evaporite-bearing rocks, and carbonate
CO32− 0.67 0.60 0.24 weathering caused by the common-ion effect.
HCO3− 0.15 0.68 0.66 Principal component analysis (PCA) was stud-
NO3− 0.14 0.43 0.05 ied for the analytical dataset, showing that there are
B −0.17 0.31 −0.65 only three major factors explaining 78.98% of the
Eigen values 5.24 2.37 1.86 total variation in the data set (Table 3 and Fig. 7).
Variance % 43.70 19.74 15.54 The first factor accounts for 43.70% of the vari-
Cumulative % 43.70 63.44 78.98 ance in water samples, showing very high-positive
loadings for SO42−, K+, Ca2+, TDS, Na+, Mg2+,
and CO32−. The process indicates the dissolution of
carbonates and sulfates. Further, the negative repre-
sentation of pH and positive loadings of K + indicate
the reverse exchange process (Thilagavathi et al.,
2014).
The second factor accounted for 19.74% of the
overall variance, with the highest positive load-
ing for pH, HCO3−, CO32−, and Na+, reflecting the
sodic silica mineral weathering (probably plagio-
clase feldspars) or redissolution of precipitated car-
bonates of sodium (Nepolian et al., 2022), which
has resulted during the process of evaporation.
The third factor explains 15.54% of the total vari-
ance, showing high-positive loadings for C l− and
−
HCO3 , indicating the leaching of evaporite salts;
the association of leading indicates the enrichment
of Cl− during the process of weathering and further
Fig. 7 Three-dimensional PCA analysis for water samples
from the study area
leaching of the salts subsequently during the wet
season thus infiltrating to the water table (Thilaga-
vathi et al., 2017). As NO3− is associated with the
)] Na+, HCO3−, and pH, in PCA 2, the possibility of
CA1 = Cl− − Na+ + K+ ∕SO2− + HCO−3 (3)
(
4 the nitrate ion in the alkaline environment would
be mainly facilitated by the agricultural or related
Positive values for these indices signify an
anthropogenic activities (Xu et al. 2023). The
exchange process in groundwater, wherein Na+ and
results of the PCA analysis validate the predomi-
K+ are replaced by Ca2+ and Mg2+, which origi-
nant influence of dissolution, weathering, and evap-
nate from the weathering of rocks (Liu et al., 2020).
oration, which are the three major processes identi-
These two indices have positive and negative val-
fied as major mechanisms for salinity enhancement
ues, indicating the significance of reverse and direct
in the groundwater.
Vol:. (1234567890)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365 Page 11 of 18 365
Evaporation
Chloride (mg/L)
30.00
70000
TDS (mg/L)
20.00
d-excess
60000
10.00 50000
0.00 40000
-10.00 Evaporation 30000
-20.00 20000 Dissolution
10000
-30.00
-10 -5 0 5 0
-40 -20 0 20 40 60
18O (‰)
d-excess (‰)
Vol.: (0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
365 Page 12 of 18 Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365
Vol:. (1234567890)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365 Page 13 of 18 365
Table 4 Classification of water samples based on TDS concentrations and categorizing their utility based on the ionic concentra-
tions of the analyzed parameters. All ion values are in mg/L, except for EC (μS/cm) and pH
Springs Wells
were not suitable for irrigation. However, 30% and Wilcox (1955) categorized groundwater for irriga-
38.6% were suitable for irrigation, and the remain- tion into categories based on its Na content. In this
ing samples were categorized as brackish or brack- classification, the term “Na content” refers to the
ish-salt water. percentage of soluble sodium (%Na) in groundwater
Vol.: (0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
365 Page 14 of 18 Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365
(Wilcox, 1955). About 53% of the spring water is including C3S1, C4S1, C5S1, C4S2, C5S2, C5S3,
categorized to represent excellent and good class for and C5S4, where S1 and S2 represent low and
irrigation, whereas 23.23% of the samples are found medium SAR hazard levels, respectively, and C2, C3,
good to permissible, 3.75% are categorized as doubt- and C4 represent medium, high, and very high SAR
ful to unsuitable, and 1.25% are classified as permis- hazard levels, respectively. Percentages of 78.95%
sible to doubtful (Fig. 9a). Water with a high salt and 68.42% of the well and spring samples fell in the
content reduces soil permeability and, consequently, C4-S1 field (Fig. 9b), which denotes high salinity and
crop yield ( Rao 2005). For water wells, 64.91% are low sodium. The water can be considered for irriga-
classified as excellent for irrigation, 15.79% as good tion in most soil types with open drainage. For soils
to permissible, 3.51% as doubtful to unsuitable, and with poor drainage, nevertheless, particular salinity
15.79% as unsuitable for irrigation. High concentra- management strategies may be necessary (Chidam-
tions of Na+ in irrigation water, relative to other con- baram et al., 2022). About 1.75%, 3.51%, 3.51%, and
stituents such as Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+, could lead 10.52% of the water wells and spring samples fall in
to flocculation and reduced soil permeability (Singh the C4S2, C5S2, C5S3, and C5S4 categories, respec-
et al., 2007). Saline soils are produced when sodium tively, suggesting high salinity and relatively increas-
interacts with chloride, while alkali soils are pro- ing order of alkali water. In contrast, high salinity
duced when excess sodium combines with carbonate water (C4 and C5) can irrigate salt-tolerant and semi-
(Fipps, 2003). tolerant crops under favorable drainage conditions.
In addition, an important plot to study the irriga-
tion suitability of water is the US salinity diagram,
which is used to evaluate the alkali/sodium risk Conclusions
to crops (USSL, 1954). EC is considered a salin-
ity hazard in this plot, and the sodium adsorption This study used geochemical investigations, multi-
ratio (SAR) is an alkalinity hazard. The plot shows variate statistical analysis, and isotopic approaches to
the scattering of water samples in seven classes, understand sources of groundwater salinization and
Fig. 9 Wilcox diagram (a) and USSL diagram (b) for the assessment of the water for irrigation
Vol:. (1234567890)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365 Page 15 of 18 365
the mechanisms governing groundwater quality. The —review and editing. Alaa Ahmed: conceptualization, meth-
results presented here demonstrated the spatial vari- odology, data curation, writing—review and editing. Chidam-
baram Sabarathinam: methodology, writing—original draft,
ation of salinity from the peripheral region towards writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the
the center. Multivariate statistics, including Pearson’s article and approved the submitted version.
correlation and PCA, were employed to identify the
sources of mineralization and the factors and sources Data availability Data cannot be shared openly but are avail-
responsible for variation amongst chemical variables able on request from authors.
and reduced the original data matrix into three com- Declarations
ponents that explain 78.98% of the total variance. The
dissolution of carbonates and sulfates, ion exchange Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.
process, weathering of minerals, and evaporation
were inferred to be the major processes governing the
geochemistry of the region. Therefore, the observed
salinization can be attributed to the disproportionate References
interplay of evaporation and water–rock interaction
Abu-Alnaeem, M. F., Yusoff, T., Alias, N. Y., & Raksmey, M.
processes. The study also infers that the common- (2018). Assessment of groundwater salinity and quality
ion effect induces calcite precipitation gypsum dis- in Gaza coastal aquifer, Gaza Strip, Palestine: An inte-
solution. In addition, isotopic tracers (δ18O and δ2H) grated statistical, geostatistical and hydrogeochemical
show meteoric signatures for waters with the influ- approaches study. Science of the Total Environment, 615,
972–989.
ence of evaporation when compared to the LMWL Ahmed, A., & Clark, I. (2016). Groundwater flow and geo-
and GML. The suitability of water for drinking was chemical evolution in the Central Flinders Ranges,
evaluated using the TDS classification, while irriga- South Australia. Science of the Total Environment, 572,
tion purposes were evaluated using Wilcox’s and US 837–851.
Al-Naseri, S. K., Falih, A. H., & Saravana Kumar, U. (2022).
Salinity Laboratory–based classifications. Though the Moisture sources and spatio-temporal variation of iso-
water was found to be suitable for irrigation based topic signatures in Iraqi precipitation. Environmen-
on the estimated SARs, this water can pose nega- tal Earth Sciences, 81(18). https://doi.org/10.1007/
tive effects and further cause irreversible damage in s12665-022-10559-7
Aliewi, A., Bhandary, H., Chidambaram, S., & Al-Qallaf, H.
irrigated soils due to high salinity. The geochemi- (2022). A new modified chloride mass balance approach
cal nature of the subsurface water in the semiarid based on aquifer hydraulic properties and other sources
region thus can be further explored with the increased of chloride to assess rainfall recharge in brackish aquifers.
sampling intensity, adopting temperature-governed Hydrological Processes, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/
hyp.14513
thermodynamics using modeling approaches and American Public Health Association (APHA). (2012). Stand-
microbiological parameters to validate the results of ard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewa-
the current study further. Increasing the geochemi- ter (27th ed.).
cal database in the arid regions can help manage and Arumugam, K., & Elangovan, K. (2009). Hydrochemical char-
acteristics and groundwater quality assessment in Tirupur
decide the future course of action to achieve the UN- region, Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu India. Environ-
SDG6 in the studied regions. mental Earth Sciences, 58(7), 1509–1520.
Barlow, P. M., & Reichard, E. G. (2010). Saltwater intru-
Authors’ contributions Ali Al Maliki: conceptualization, sion in coastal regions of North America. Hydrogeol-
methodology, formal analysis and investigation, software, data ogy Journal, 18(1), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/
curation, validation, writing—original draft, writing—review s10040-009-0514-3
and editing. U. Saravana Kumar: conceptualization, methodol- Belkhiri, L., Mouni, L., & Boudoukha, A. (2012). Geochemi-
ogy, supervision, validation, writing—review and editing. Ali cal evolution of groundwater in an alluvial aquifer: Case
Hasan Falih: formal analysis and investigation, data acquisi- of El Eulma aquifer, East Algeria. Journal of African
tion, validation, writing—original draft, writing—review and Earth Sciences, 66–67, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
editing. Maitham Sultan: conceptualization, methodology, jafrearsci.2012.03.001
data curation, writing—review and editing. Amer Al-Naemi: Bennetts, D., Webb, J. A., Stone, D. J., & Hill, D. M. (2006).
formal analysis and investigation, data curation, supervision, Understanding the salinisation process for groundwater in
writing—review and editing. Dalal Alshamsi: formal analysis an area of south-eastern Australia, using hydrochemical
and investigation, data curation, validation, writing—review and isotopic evidence. Journal of Hydrology, 323(1–4),
and editing. Hasan Arman: data curation, validation, writing 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.08.023
Vol.: (0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
365 Page 16 of 18 Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365
Bhandary, H., Chidambaram, S., & Al-Khalid, A. (2018). Fipps, G. (2003). Irrigation water quality standards and salinity
Occurrence of hypersaline groundwater along the coastal management strategies Texas a&M AgriLife Extension.
aquifers of Kuwait. Desalination, 436, 15–27. https://doi. http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/11/10685.pdf
org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.02.004 Fouad, S. F. (2015). Tectonic map of Iraq, scale 1: 1000 000,
Boosalik, Z., Jafari, H., Clark, I. D., & Bagheri, R. (2022). 3rd EDITION, 2012. Iraqi Bulletin of Geology and Min-
Chemo-isotopic tracing of the groundwater salinity in arid ing, 11(1), 1–7 http://ibgm-iq.org/ibgm/index.php/ibgm/
regions: An example of Shahrood aquifer (Iran). Journal article/view/262
of Geochemical Exploration, 239, 107029. https://doi.org/ Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater. Pren-
10.1016/j.gexplo.2022.107029 tice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, Vol. 7632, 604.
Carol, E. S., Kruse, E. E., & Mas-Pla, J. (2009). Hydrochemi- Fu, C., Li, X., Ma, J., Liu, L., Gao, M., & Bai, Z. (2018).
cal and isotopical evidence of ground water salinization A hydrochemistry and multi-isotopic study of ground-
processes on the coastal plain of Samborombón Bay water origin and hydrochemical evolution in the middle
Argentina. Journal of Hydrology, 365(3–4), 335–345. reaches of the Kuye River basin. Applied Geochemistry,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.041 98, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.
Chen, Y., Vigouroux, G., Bring, A., Cvetković, V., & Destouni, 08.030
G. (2019). Dominant hydro-climatic drivers of water tem- Gat, J., & Carmi, I. (1970). Evolution of the isotopic composi-
perature, salinity, and flow variability for the large-scale tion of atmospheric waters in the Mediterranean Sea area.
system of the Baltic Coastal Wetlands. Water, 11(3), 552. Journal of Geophysical Research, 75(15), 3039–3048.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030552 https://doi.org/10.1029/jc075i015p03039
Chidambaram, S., Bhandary, H., & Al-Khalid, A. (2020). Trac- Giambastiani, B., Colombani, N., Mastrocicco, M., & Fideli-
ing the evolution of acidic hypersaline coastal groundwa- bus, M. D. (2013). Characterization of the lowland coastal
ter in Kuwait. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13(21). aquifer of Comacchio (Ferrara, Italy): Hydrology, hydro-
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06116-w chemistry and evolution of the system. Journal of Hydrol-
Chidambaram, S., Bhandary, H., & Hadi, K. (2021). CHIDAM ogy, 501, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.
-A software for chemical interpretation of the dissolved 07.037
ions in aqueous media. Groundwater for Sustainable Gibbs, R. J. (1970). Mechanisms controlling world water
Development, 13, 100496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd. chemistry. Science, 170(3962), 1088–1090. https://doi.
2020.100496 org/10.1126/science.170.3962.1088
Chidambaram, S., Prasanna, M. V., Karmegam, U., Singaraja, Guggenmos, M., Daughney, C. J., Jackson, B., & Morgenstern,
C., Pethaperumal, S., Manivannan, R., Anandhan, P., & U. (2011). Regional-scale identification of groundwa-
Tirumalesh, K. (2011). Significance of pCO2 values in ter-surface water interaction using hydrochemistry and
determining carbonate chemistry in groundwater of Pondi- multivariate statistical methods, Wairarapa Valley, New
cherry region India. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5(2), 197– Zealand. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(11),
206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-011-0170-5 3383–3398. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3383-2011
Chidambaram, S., Prasanna, M. V., Senapathi, V., Nepolian, Güler, C., Kurt, M. A., Alpaslan, M., & Akbulut, C. (2012).
M., Pradeep, K., Panda, B., Thivya, C., & Thilagavathi, Assessment of the impact of anthropogenic activities
R. (2022). Groundwater quality assessment for irrigation on the groundwater hydrology and chemistry in Tarsus
by adopting new suitability plot and spatial analysis based coastal plain (Mersin, SE Turkey) using fuzzy cluster-
on fuzzy logic technique. Environmental Research, 204, ing, multivariate statistics and GIS techniques. Journal of
111729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111729 Hydrology, 414–415, 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Clark, I. D., & Fritz, P. (2013). Environmental isotopes in jhydrol.2011.11.021
hydrogeology. CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10. Han, D., & Currell, M. (2018). Delineating multiple saliniza-
1201/9781482242911 tion processes in a coastal plain aquifer, northern China:
Dansgaard, W. (1964). Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus Hydrochemical and isotopic evidence. Hydrology and
B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 16(4), 436–468. Earth System Sciences, 22(6), 3473–3491. https://doi.org/
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1964.tb00181.x 10.5194/hess-22-3473-2018
Davis, S., & DeWiest, R. (1966). M (p. 463). Hydrogeology. Iraqi Meteorological Organization (IMO). (2020). Climatically
Del Pilar Álvarez, M., Carol, E. S., & Dapeña, C. (2015). The Data for Haditha meteorological station for the period
role of evapotranspiration in the groundwater hydrochem- (1988 - 2019), Baghdad, Iraq, Iraqi Meteorological
istry of an arid coastal wetland (Península Valdés, Argen- Organization (IMO).
tina). Science of the Total Environment, 506–507, 299– Jackson, R. E., Gorody, A. W., Mayer, B., Roy, J. W., Ryan, M.
307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.028 C., & Van Stempvoort, D. R. (2013). Groundwater protec-
Drever, J. I. (1988). The Geochemistry of Natural Waters. 2nd tion and unconventional gas extraction: The critical need
Edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p. 437. https:// for field-based hydrogeological research. Groundwater,
openlibrary.org/books/OL2388438M/The_geochemistry_ 51(4), 488–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12074
of_natural_waters Jassim, S. Z., & Goff, J. C. (2006). “Geology of Iraq” 1st
Durov, S. A. (1948). Classification of natural waters and graph- Edition, published by Dolin. Brno Printed in the Czech
ical representation of their composition. Doklady Aka- Republic.
demii Nauk SSSR, 59, 87–90. Kammoun, S., Trabelsi, R., Ré, V., Zouari, K., & Henchiri,
J. (2018). Groundwater quality assessment in semi-
arid regions using integrated approaches: The case of
Vol:. (1234567890)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365 Page 17 of 18 365
Grombalia aquifer (NE Tunisia). Environmental Moni- Maskooni, E. K., Hashemi, H., Kompanizare, M., Arasteh, P.
toring and Assessment, 190(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/ D., Vagharfard, H., & Berndtsson, R. (2021). Assessment
s10661-018-6469-x of hydro-geochemical properties of groundwater under the
Katerji, N., Van Hoorn, J., Hamdy, A., & Mastrorilli, M. effect of desalination wastewater discharge in an arid area.
(2003). Salinity effect on crop development and yield, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(5),
analysis of salt tolerance according to several classifica- 6176–6194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10787-z
tion methods. Agricultural Water Management, 62(1), Memon, M. A., Soomro, M. S., Akhtar, M. A., & Memon, K.
37–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3774(03)00005-2 S. (2010). Drinking water quality assessment in South-
Kharroubi, A., Tlahigue, F., Agoubi, B., Azri, C., & Bouri, ern Sindh (Pakistan). Environmental Monitoring and
S. (2012). Hydrochemical and statistical studies of the Assessment, 177(1–4), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/
groundwater salinization in Mediterranean arid zones: s10661-010-1616-z
Case of the Jerba coastal aquifer in southeast Tunisia. Meybeck, M. (1987). Global chemical weathering of surficial
Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(7), 2089–2100. https:// rocks estimated from river dissolved loads. American
doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1648-5 Journal of Science, 287(5), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.
Khezzani, B., & Bouchemal, S. (2018). Variations in ground- 2475/ajs.287.5.401
water levels and quality due to agricultural over-exploi- Nair, I. S., Brindha, K., & Elango, L. (2020). Assessing the
tation in an arid environment: the phreatic aquifer of the origin and processes controlling groundwater saliniza-
Souf oasis (Algerian Sahara). Environmental Earth Sci- tion in coastal aquifers through integrated hydrochemi-
ences, 77(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7329-2 cal, isotopic and hydrogeochemical modelling techniques.
Kim, J. H., Kim, R. H., Lee, J., & Chang, H. (2003). Hydro- Hydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences
geochemical characterization of major factors affecting Hydrologiques, 66(1), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/
the quality of shallow groundwater in the coastal area at 02626667.2020.1826490
Kimje in South Korea. Environmental Geology, 44(4), Najib, S., Fadili, A., Mehdi, K., Riss, J., & Makan, A.
478–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0782-5 (2017). Contribution of hydrochemical and geoelectrical
Kim, K. (2003). Long-Term disturbance of ground water chem- approaches to investigate salinization process and seawa-
istry following well installation. Groundwater, 41(6), ter intrusion in the coastal aquifers of Chaouia, Morocco.
780–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb024 Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 198, 24–36. https://
19.x doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.01.003
Li, C., Gao, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2019). Impact of anthro- Nepolian, M., Chidambaram, S., Prasanna, M. V., Senapa-
pogenic activities on the enrichment of fluoride and salin- thi, V., Sekar, S., Devaraj, N. K., Gopalakrishnan, G., &
ity in groundwater in the Yuncheng Basin constrained by Mahalakshmi, M. (2022). Source, mobilization and dis-
Cl/Br ratio, δ18O, δ2H, δ13C and δ7Li isotopes. Journal of tribution of uranium in a complex aquifer system: A spa-
Hydrology, 579, 124211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol. tial and temporal evaluation using geochemical, statistics
2019.124211 and GIS approach. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(7).
Liu, J., Chen, Z., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Xu, J., & Peng, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10291-2
Y. (2016). Chemical and isotopic constrains on the ori- Panda, B., Chidambaram, S., Nagappan, G., Thilagavathi, R.,
gin of brine and saline groundwater in Hetao plain, & Kamaraj, P. (2020). Multiple thematic spatial integra-
Inner Mongolia. Environmental Science and Pollution tion technique to identify the groundwater recharge poten-
Research, 23(15), 15003–15014. https://doi.org/10.1007/ tial zones—A case study along the Courtallam region,
s11356-016-6617-1 Tamil Nadu, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,
Liu, J., Gao, Z., Wang, Z., Xu, X., Su, Q., Shu, W., Qu, W., 13(24). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06223-8
& Xing, T. (2020). Hydrogeochemical processes and suit- Papatheodorou, G., Lambrakis, N., & Panagopoulos, G.
ability assessment of groundwater in the Jiaodong Penin- (2007). Application of multivariate statistical procedures
sula, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, to the hydrochemical study of a coastal aquifer: An exam-
192(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08356-5 ple from Crete Greece. Hydrological Processes, 21(11),
Lü, C., Wang, G., Hu, F., Wang, Y., & Liang, L. (2013). 1482–1495. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6322
Groundwater hydrochemistry and isotope geochemis- Pillai, A., Chidambaram, S., Keesari, T., Thivya, C., Thila-
try in the Turpan Basin, northwestern China. Journal gavathi, R., Senapathi, V., Prasanna, M. V., & Samay-
of Arid Land, 6(4), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/ amanthu, D. R. (2020). Seasonal changes in groundwater
s40333-013-0249-9 quality deterioration and chemometric analysis of pollu-
Martin, A. (2001). Late Permian to Holocene Paleofacies evo- tion source identification in South India. Environmental
lution of the Arabian Plate and its hydrocarbon occur- Science and Pollution Research, 27(16), 20037–20054.
rences. GeoArabia, 6(3), 445–504. https://doi.org/10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08258-6
2113/geoarabia0603445 Piper, A. M. (1944). A graphic procedure in the geochemical
Mastrocicco, M., Gervasio, M. P., Busico, G., & Colombani, interpretation of water-analyses. Transactions, 25(6), 914.
N. (2021). Natural and anthropogenic factors driving https://doi.org/10.1029/tr025i006p00914
groundwater resources salinization for agriculture use in Polemio, M. (2020). Review of utilization management of
the Campania plains (Southern Italy). Science of the Total groundwater at risk of salinization. Journal of Water
Environment, 758, 144033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scito Resources Planning and Management, 146(9). https://doi.
tenv.2020.144033 org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001278
Vol.: (0123456789)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
365 Page 18 of 18 Environ Monit Assess (2024) 196:365
Prasanna, M. V., Chidambaram, S., Kumar, G., Ramanathan, Jordan. HydroResearch, 2, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.
A., & Nainwal, H. C. (2010). Hydrogeochemical assess- 1016/j.hydres.2020.02.001
ment of groundwater in Neyveli Basin, Cuddalore District Thilagavathi, R., Chidambaram, S., Thivya, C., Prasanna, M.
South India Arabian. Journal of Geosciences, 4(1–2), V., Keesari, T., & Pethaperumal, S. (2017). Assessment
319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0191-5 of groundwater chemistry in layered coastal aquifers
Pulido-Bosch, A., Rigol-Sánchez, J., Vallejos, Á., Andreu, J. using multivariate statistical analysis. Sustainable Water
M., Cerón, J. C., Molina-Sánchez, L., & Sola, F. (2018). Resources Management, 3(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.
Impacts of agricultural irrigation on groundwater salinity. 1007/s40899-017-0078-7
Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(5). https://doi.org/10. Thilagavathi, R., Chidambaram, S., Thivya, C., Prasanna, M.
1007/s12665-018-7386-6 V., Singaraja, C., Tirumalesh, K., & Pethaperumal, S.
Rao, N. S. (2005). Seasonal variation of groundwater quality in (2014). Delineation of natural and anthropogenic pro-
a part of Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh India. Environ- cess controlling hydrogeochemistry of layered aquifer
mental Geology, 49(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/ sequence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci-
s00254-005-0089-9 ences, India Section A: Physical Sciences, 84(1), 95–108.
Rashid, T., Chidambaram, S., Al-Qallaf, H., Bhandary, H., Al- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-013-0114-4
Jomaa, M., Shishter, A., & Al-Salman, B. (2022). Evo- Tomaz, A., Palma, P., Fialho, S., Lima, A., Alvarenga, P.,
lution of hydrogeochemistry in groundwater production Potes, M., Costa, M. J., & Salgado, R. (2020). Risk assess-
fields of Kuwait–Inferences from long-term data. Chem- ment of irrigation-related soil salinization and sodification
osphere, 307, 135734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemo in Mediterranean areas. Water, 12(12), 3569. https://doi.
sphere.2022.135734 org/10.3390/w12123569
Rasouli, F., Pouya, A. K., & Cheraghi, S. M. (2011). Hydro- USSL Staff. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and
geochemistry and water quality assessment of the Kor– alkali soils. USDA Agr. Handbook No.60.
Sivand Basin, Fars province Iran. Environmental Monitor- WHO. (2004). Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, Volume
ing and Assessment, 184(8), 4861–4877. https://doi.org/ 1: Recommendations. 3rd Edition, WHO, Geneva.
10.1007/s10661-011-2308-z Wilcox, L. V. (1955). Classification and Use of Irrigation
Samayamanthula, D. R., Chidambaram, S., Alayyadhi, N. A., Water. US Department of Agriculture, Circular 969,
Al-Ajeel, F. K., Al-Qallaf, H., & Akber, A. (2022). Spatial Washington DC.
and temporal variation of dissolved C O2 in rainwater from Xu, F., Li, P., Wang, Y., & Du, Q. (2023). Integration of hydro-
an arid region with special focus on its association with chemistry and stable isotopes for assessing groundwater
DIC and pCO2. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(4). recharge and evaporation in pre- and post-rainy seasons
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10176-4 in Hua County China. Natural Resources Research, 32(5),
Schoeller, H. (1967). Qualitative evaluation of ground water 2023.
resources. In H. Schoeller (Ed.), Methods and Techniques Xu, F., Li, P., Du, Q., et al. (2023). Seasonal hydrochemi-
of Groundwater Investigation and Development Water cal characteristics, geochemical evolution, and pollu-
Resource Series (Vol. 33, pp. 44–52). UNESCO. tion sources of Lake Sha in an arid and semiarid region
Singh, A. K., Mondal, G. C., Kumar, S., Singh, T. V., Tewary, of northwest China. Exposure and Health, 15, 231–244.
B. K., & Sinha, A. (2007). Major ion chemistry, weath- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-022-00488-y
ering processes and water quality assessment in upper Zhang, Y., Xu, M., Li, X., Qi, J., Qiang, Z., Guo, J., Yu, L., &
catchment of Damodar River basin India. Environmen- Zhao, R. (2018). Hydrochemical characteristics and multi-
tal Geology, 54(4), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/ variate statistical analysis of natural water system: a case
s00254-007-0860-1 study in Kangding County, southwestern China. Water,
Sissakian, V., & Mahmud, B. (2007). Stratigraphy of the Iraqi 10(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010080
Western Desert. IBGM, SCGSM, 51–125.
Stuyfzand, P. J. (1993). Hydrochemistry and hydrology of Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard
coastal dune area of the Western Netherlands. Thesis, Free to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
University of Amsterdam. affiliations.
Subramani, T., Rajmohan, N., & Elango, L. (2010). Groundwa-
ter geochemistry and identification of hydrogeochemical
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner)
processes in a hard rock region. Southern India. Environ-
holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing
mental Monitoring and Assessment, 162(1–4), 123–137.
agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0781-4
self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article
Tarawneh, M. S. M., Janardhana, M. R., & Ahmed, M. M.
is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement
(2019). Hydrochemical processes and groundwater qual-
and applicable law.
ity assessment in Northeastern region of Jordan valley,
Vol:. (1234567890)
13
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”),
for small-scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are
maintained. By accessing, sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of use
(“Terms”). For these purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or
a personal subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or
a personal subscription (to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the
Creative Commons license used will apply.
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data
internally within ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking,
analysis and reporting. We will not otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of
companies unless we have your permission as detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that
Users may not:
1. use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to
circumvent access control;
2. use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil
liability, or is otherwise unlawful;
3. falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by
Springer Nature in writing;
4. use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
5. override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
6. share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer
Nature journal content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates
revenue, royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain.
Springer Nature journal content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal
content on a large scale into their, or any other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any
information or content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or
without notice. Springer Nature may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature
journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express
or implied with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or
warranties imposed by law, including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be
licensed from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other
manner not expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at
onlineservice@springernature.com