The Charnel-House

FROM BAUHAUS TO BEINHAUS

Main menu
:
 The brothers Vesnin 6
:
 It’s rare enough for a family to produce one genius. Two is even more rare. One
thinks of the romantic literary critics Karl and August Schlegel, the brothers
William and Henry James, and maybe the basketball siblings Reggie and Cheryl
Miller. A family with three geniuses is almost unheard of. Sure, there were
the Brontë sisters. But only Charlotte lived long enough to really make a name
for herself. For the first few decades of the twentieth century, however, there
was one family that dominated Russian and Soviet architectural production: the
Vesnins.

Leonid, Viktor, and Aleksandr Vesnin — brothers born in 1880, 1882, and 1883,
respectively — were each trained in the traditional Beaux-Arts style that was
standard within the academy at the time, yet would come to embrace the
emerging avant-garde movement in building. More than that, though. They
played a pivotal part in defining the movement, as well.
:
 Particularly Aleksandr, whose abilities outshone those of his older brothers,
made a name for himself early on as a painter of some talent. Vesnin came
under the influence of Kazimir Malevich’s suprematist school of abstract,
mystical geometry. Eventually he went on to design a number of monumental
street displays for festivals and street parades during the revolution, between
1919 and 1923. Here he collaborated with the great artist Liubov Popova, who
along with Aleksandr Rodchenko, Vladimir Tatlin, and Varvara Stepanova were
beginning to form the constructivist current in modern art.

At this point, he began to work on stage design in conjunction with Popova.

They worked together on a project for Vsevolod Meirkhol’d’s play The
Magnanimous Cuckold (1922) and a production of G.K. Chesterton’s The Man
:
 Who Was Thursday. Both sets were groundbreaking in terms of their mobility,
scale, and artistic composition, fully functional for the proscenium or surrounded
by an audience on all sides. Some of the futurists and constructivists of the
early 1920s advocated bringing art and live theater into factories themselves, as
part of their general program of collapsing art into life.

Beginning in 1924, Aleksandr rejoined his brothers Viktor and Leonid for a
competition entry for a proposed Palace of Labor in Moscow. El Lissitzky
reflected in 1929 on the context and content of their submission, having had
time to assess its significance:

“
In 1923, Soviet architecture was presented with its first new task. A plan was advanced to build
a massive complex in the center of Moscow, a so-called “Palace of Labor,” for the new collective
ruler, the worker. It was to serve for large congresses, mass rallies, meetings, theatrical
productions, and so on. The task was as colossal as were the times. However, time had yet to
produce a crystallization of definite architectural concepts. Thus, most of the proposed designs
were amorphous and fragmented conglomerations, drawing their inspiration both from the past
:
 and from the mechanistic present, and based to a large degree on literary rather than
architectural ideas. The design of the three brothers Vesnin marks the first step away from
destruction toward new construction. By elevating a closed plan by means of an exposed
reinforced concrete frame, a clear stereometric volume is produced. The whole is still conceived
as an isolated, single object, independent of urban design considerations. The compulsion to
rely on columnar organization remains pervasive. The complex is crowned by a romantic
allusion to radio-tower technology, and the large space designed to accommodate 8,000 persons
is still completely conventional. Nevertheless, this design represents the first attempt to create
a new form for a social task that in itself was still ill-defined at the time. The ensuing period
offered an increasing number of more concrete tasks, their purpose and aim becoming gradually
more defined, and what was accomplished improved accordingly.

In 1924, the brothers A.A. and V.A. Vesnin worked out a design for the office building of the
newspaper Leningradskaia Pravda. The building lot measured a mere 6 × 6 meters. The design
of this building represents a characteristic solution in a period yearning for glass, steel, and
concrete. All accessories — which on a typical street are usually tacked onto the building — such
as signs, advertising, clocks, loudspeakers, and even the elevators inside, have been
incorporated as integral elements of the design and combined into a unified whole. This is the
aesthetic of constructivism.

Moving on from this competition, the Vesnins continued to work with one
another on further plans. From the Arkos building to the Likachev Palace of
Culture, the Palace of Soviets, and People’s Commissariat of Heavy Industry
[Narkomtiazhprom], the Vesnins blazed a trail across all the major concourses
over the next decade.
:
:
:
:
 They met the architect and theorist Moisei Ginzburg in 1924, allowing him to
become the main spokesman for OSA, the Society of Modern Architects.
Ginzburg edited its primary organ, Modern Architecture, while the Vesnins
spread constructivism in architecture through their pedagogy at
VKhUTEMAS/VKhUTEIN in Moscow.

Ginzburg on the significance of the Vesnins’ Palace of Labor entry:

“
In 1923 we have a landmark for constructivism in its first concrete architectural action — the
Vesnins’ project for a “Palace of Labor” completed for a competition which the Moscow
Architectural Society was commissioned to announce by the Moscow Soviet.

For the first time we see embodied in this work the vital principles of the new approach to the
resolution of architectural problems. This work is uniquely important and valuable for its new
plan. Instead of an intricate, involved configuration, with many courtyards and passages, giving
a better or worse, but almost always a stereotyped symmetrical and purely ornamental
impression; instead of, in other words, an old-style specific plan, the Vesnin brothers alone, for
all the defects and shortcomings of their work, nevertheless provided in this competition a new
approach to the same assignment, concentrating all the locations in a new way, rejecting all
internal courtyards, attempting the creation of a new social organism, whose inner life flowed as
a whole not from the stereotypes of the past, but from the novelty of the job itself. The whole of
its further development was subordinate to and anticipated by an elliptical hall for 8,000 people,
joined by a sliding wall to another hall for 2,500 people, providing in this case a colossal
meeting-place for the representatives of the working people of the whole world — an
architectural conception of grandiose proportions. Such is the simple monolithic three-
dimensional expression of the “palace” from the outside, flowing logically from its internal
conception, and interrupted rhythmically only by the few horizontal and vertical lines of a
reinforced concrete framework as well as some utilitarian additions, such as a radio mast, a
clock, and so on.

There is a curious comparison between the Vesnins’ palace and Walter Gropius’ project of a
building for the Chicago Tribune, which was also completed in 1923, and which — in the laconic
:
 simplicity of the same framework of horizontal and vertical lines — in fact has close parallels
with the palace.

But these two almost simultaneous projects, which arrived at a single system of external
partition as the function of a single construction, clearly highlight the difference between the
tasks confronting each other.

At a time when Gropius’ Chicago Tribune, a brilliantly executed, radically constructed object
designed with a new simplicity, has for its inner content the typical American conception of the
“Business House,” the Vesnins’ “palace” originates from a new social conception of the organism
of a building, so establishing a fundamental characteristic of constructivism.

The similarity between Gropius’ Chicago Tribune tower and the Vesnins’ Palace
of Labor was more material than formal. Not material in the sense of what the
building would be made of, or the way it would be built, but the function it
would serve within the social totality.
:
 Here later, on the Vesnins’ Arcos project:

“
Although the Vesnins’ next work — the joint-stock company ARCOS building — is on the surface
completely unlike the Chicago Tribune building, it comes far closer to it in its essence for the
simple reason that by dint of the peculiarities of the job and the site, it represents the typical
planned conception of comparable banks, and reduces all the revolutionary achievements of the
authors to a mere external design.

Accordingly, only the Palace of Labor can be regarded as the first landmark of genuine
constructivism, for while the ARCOS building, with its system of vertical and horizontal planes,
with the clarity of its proportions, the restrained simplicity of the whole and its details — is a
beautifully executed object, it lacks the authentically revolutionary stamp of constructivism.
Nevertheless, the Palace of Labor did not receive the appreciation it deserved, and the ARCOS
building made an immense impact in the broader circles of modern architects and on our
student youth. The explanation of this phenomenon is extremely simple. The Palace of Labor
was the first realization of the method of constructivism. It cannot be imitated. It can only be
followed — along the thorny path of independent, thoughtful, and creative work. The ARCOS
building is a new formulation of the “conception of façades.” It is externally revolutionary and
internally inoffensive. It is the line of least resistance, which the majority takes.

Enjoy.
:
 Posted in articles, images, media, writings

Tagged G.K. Chesterton, Leonid Vesnin, Moisei Ginzburg, Vsevolod Meyerhold

6 THOUGHTS ON “THE BROTHERS VESNIN”

Cathy Turner
— MAY 4, 2014 AT 6:11 AM

Thanks for this great article. But I don’t think Alexandr Vesnin worked on ‘The
Magnanimous Cuckold’? The pictures you have here are from the mass spectacle
planned (never staged) in collaboration with Popova and Meirk’hold, but
although this does have a relationship with the Crommelynk stage set, it is not
the same thing. Having said this, I don’t know to what extent Vesnin had an
influence on the Magnanimous Cuckold set, as one can see the relationship to
‘The Man Who Was Thursday’ too. I tended to see it that the mass spectacle
staging ideas were reworked by Popova and Vesnin in their own ways. However,
as a non-Russian speaker I can only have this view 2nd hand.

Loading...
:
 Reply

Ian Abley
— MAY 4, 2014 AT 12:46 PM

Ross – what is the origin of the “conception of façades”? Can it be traced from
constructivism, or are the constructivists learning from Sullivan in America?
Regards

Loading...

Reply

Pingback: Grigorii Barkhin, Izvestiia newspaper building in Moscow (1926-1928)

| The Charnel-House

Pingback: Современная архитектура: Organ of architectural modernism in the

Soviet Union, 1926-1930 | The Charnel-House

Pingback: VKhUTEMAS exhibition in Berlin: Rediscovery of a Russian

revolutionary art school | The Charnel-House

Pingback: Ivan Leonidov: Artist, dreamer, poet | The Charnel-House

Leave a Reply
:
 ← May Day Mauer dreamstory →

THE CHARNEL-HOUSE
“Our world, like a charnel-house, lies strewn with the detritus of dead epochs.” ⎯ Le
Corbusier, Urbanisme (1925)

EXHUMATIONS

Search Search

FOLLOW THE CHARNEL-HOUSE

CATEGORIES
event (19)
panel (19)
guest post (213)
images (55)
interviews (23)
:
 media (369)
images (293)
PDFs (46)
videos (12)
modernity (161)
news (45)
PDFs (7)
translations (164)
writings (501)
articles (228)
essays (67)
fragments (58)
poetry (3)
reviews (53)
book reviews (34)
event reviews (12)
movie reviews (4)
music reviews (2)
short stories (3)
write-ups (112)

DREAMWORLDS OF MODERNITY
:
 RECENT ENTRIES
Jean-Louis Cohen, 1949-2023
Special issue of Insurgent Notes on the conflict in Ukraine
Yuri Rozhkov’s photomontages for the Mayakovsky poem “To the Workers of Kursk”
(1924)
Public discussion on “War and Capitalist Crisis” in NYC
:
 Grigory Yudin on the antiwar protests in Russia
Early Soviet avant-garde journal of Contemporary Architecture, 1926-1930
Mac Intosh, 1940-2021
Lazar Khidekel’s aerial city of the future (1925-1932)
Remembering Rosa Luxemburg, 150 years after her birth
Noel Ignatiev, 1940-2019
Issue seven release party for Hard Crackers this weekend
Bauhaus: Evolution of an Idea

BLOG STATS
There was an issue retrieving stats. Please try again later.

RECENT COMMENTS
jnedd1935 on The Jews and Europe
jnedd1935 on Political efficacy and the “right to resist”
jnedd1935 on Political efficacy and the “right to resist”
jnedd1935 on Political efficacy and the “right to resist”
JOHN CROSSE on Walter Gropius’ International Architecture (1925)
On the radical left and national liberation – Anarchist Federation on Catastrophe,
historical memory, and the Left: 60 years of Israel-Palestine
Quiz: Whose Antisemitism Is It Anyway? on Reflections on Left antisemitism
Ver fotos e vídeos de guerra – VCONLINE on Ernst Friedrich, War against war (1924)
Se agrega un jardín biodiverso en la azotea de la icónica fábrica Lingotto en Turín –
variedad on A rooftop racetrack: The Fiat Lingotto factory in Turin, Italy (1923)
Pablo Ballatinas on About Me
sam on The oikos of Wittgenstein
Michael Pugliese on The (anti-)German ideology: Towards a critique of anti-German
“communism”

PAST VISIONS OF THE FUTURE

:
 SCIENCE FICTION AND THE SLAUGHTER-BENCH OF HISTORY

ART/ARCHITECTURAL LINKS
@phorismes
aggregat456
Alternative Architecture Lens
Aristide Antonas
Arran Q. Henderson
Art Margins
Artificial Order
ArtWrit
Awaking Lucid
axonométrica
Brad Troemel
Cartographies of the Absolute
City of Sound
Classic Cartoons Blog
Collage Lab
continent
Create an Accident
Critical Architecture Network
Cured Quail
Daniel Marcus
DBR-Barcelona
Diffusive Architectures
disasturbation
Disorientalism
DoKC Lab
Eikonographia
Entschwindet
Façades Confidential
fantastic journal
Interstices
Janus Project
Kevin Rhowbotham
KLAUS
Kosmograd
Ktismatics
Laboratoire Urbanisme Insurrectionnel
lemonslemons
Life Without Buildings
machine machine
Margo Wolowiec
Megan Panzano design
microcities
Monoskop
:
 Nasty, Brutalist, and Short
Nuits sans nuit
Ogino Knauss
Patterns that Connext
Progressive Geographies
Psychocartography
Rekolektiv
Remix Theory
RHEOmode
Robert Andrade
Robert Cowherd
Ruins of the 20th Century
Sarah Elliot
sesquipedalist
SOCKS
Subtopia
The Funambulist
The Functionality
The Paperny Times
The Sleep of Rigour
Thomas Wensing
Urbain, Trop Urbain
Words in Space
Архитектор

MARXISM/CRITICAL THEORY LINKS

A Critique of Crisis Theory
Agon Hamza
All that is Solid
Brockley
Civilized Discontent
Critical Grounds
Darth Nader
datacide
David Harvey
Drift Lines
eleutheromania
Essays of the Absurd
eye splinters
For the Desk Drawer
Grim and Dim
Gruppen gegen Kapital und Nation
i cite
Idiot Joy Showland
Infinite Thought
John Riddell
Jonas Kyratzes
kapitalisation
:
 Left at the Lights
Lenin's Tomb
Linguistic Capital
Louis Sterrett
Marx: Dialectical Studies
Marxism in Culture
Marxist Marginalia
Mr. Teacup
New Institute for Social Research
No Useless Leniency
Obsolete Capitalism
Old Alexius
Paths to Utopia
Principia Dialectica
Reading the Maps
Reification of Persons and Personification of Things
Rekolektiv
Renegade Eye
RHEOmode
Rough Theory
Sherry Wolf talks back
Spirit is a Bone
Stalin's Moustache
Steven Lydon
Tendancecoatesy
The Last Marxist
The Luxemburgist
trigger warning
Unemployed Cinema
War of Position
Wasted Ideology
Weapon of Class Instruction
Теории и практики

PHILOSOPHY LINKS
Aberrant Monism
Accelerationism
Accursed Share
ads without products
An und für sich
Archive Fire
Arts and Letters
Attempts at living
Box 3, spool 5
continent
Continental Drift
Diet Soap podcast
Duncan Law
:
 Emrah Göker'in İstifhanesi
Fractal Ontology
Ian Bogost
Installing (Social) Order
Larval Subjects
monas oikos nomos
Mr. Teacup
Naught Thought
Object-Oriented Philosophy
Perverse Egalitarianism
Philosophers for Change
Speculative Heresy
Speculum Criticum
Stellar Cartographies
synthetic zero
The Book to Come
The Invisible Truth
Time's Flow Stemmed

POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS
3CT
CP-GB
CP-USA
DSA
FRSO-FightBack!
FRSO/OSCL
IBT
ICL-FI
IMH
IMT
IP-PI
ISO
Kasama Project
Kosmoprolet
LibCom
LRP-COFI
MHI
PCR-RCP
RCP-USA
Socialist Party (SP-USA)
SWP-UK
Théorie Communiste
Troploin
U.S. Marxist-Humanists

PUBLICATIONS
306090
Antipode Foundation
:
 Blaumachen
Case
Endnotes
EXIT!
Gemeinwesen
Historical Materialism
IMH Journal
ISJ
Jacobin
Kerb
Krisis: Journal for contemporary philosophy
krisis: Kritik der Warengesellschaft
Letters
Log
Mute
n+1
New Left Review
Notes
Phase Zwei
Quaderns d'arquitectura i urbanisme
review 31
SIC
Socialist Review
The Brooklyn Rail
The Militant
The New Inquiry
The North Star
Theorie Communiste
urbanomic
Vectors
Verso
Viewpoint
Weekly Worker
World Picture

RUSSIAN/SOVIET HISTORY
Calvert Journal
Chto Delat
Giuviv Russian Film
Nasty, Brutalist, and Short
Nuits sans nuit
Ogino Knauss
Riding the Third Rail
Stalin's Moustache
Теории и практики

FACEBOOK
:
 The Charnel-House
21,685 followers

Follow Page Sign Up

GRAVATAR

ROSS WOLFE

Writer, historian, and architecture critic living in NYC.

View Full Profile →

INTERNATIONALISM

The fate of the avant-garde

INCEPTO NE DESISTAM
This blog is intended to serve as a place where I can share my work and thoughts
online. On the one hand, it will provide a convenient place for me to store an online
portfolio for future reference. At the same time, I am interested in connecting and
engaging with others who are interested in the subjects it covers.

Disclaimer: Needless to say, all of the opinions expressed on my blog are mine alone,
unless otherwise indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views of any other
group or organization. No one else is responsible for them. That being said, any
comments, questions, and criticisms are welcome.
:
 FANTASTIC STRUCTURES
“Comrades!

The twin fires of war and revolution have devastated both our souls and our cities. The
palaces of yesterday’s grandeur stand as burnt-out skeletons. The ruined cities await
new builders[…]

To you who accept the legacy of Russia, to you who will (I believe!) tomorrow become
masters of the whole world, I address the question: with what fantastic structures will
you cover the fires of yesterday?” ⎯ Vladimir Maiakovskii, “An Open Letter to the
Workers” (1918)

“Utopia transforms itself into actuality. The fairy tale becomes a reality. The contours of
socialism will become overgrown with iron flesh, filled with electric blood, and begin to
dwell full of life. The speed of socialist building outstrips the most audacious daring. In
this lies the distinctive character and essence of the epoch.” ⎯ I. Chernia,“The Cities of
Socialism” (1929)

“The idea of the conquest of the substructure, the earthbound, can be extended even
further and calls for the conquest of gravity as such. It demands floating structures, a
physical-dynamic architecture.” ⎯ El Lissitzky, The Reconstruction of Architecture in
the Soviet Union (1929)

MENACING RECTILINEAR SHAPES

:
 META
Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

CALENDAR OF PAST ENTRIES

May 2014
:
 M T W T F S S

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30 31

« Apr Jun »

PHANTOSCOPE

Camera obscura

ARCHIVES
August 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
March 2022
November 2021
August 2021
April 2021
March 2021
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
:
 December 2018
November 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
November 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
:
 January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2008
June 2008

THE CITY OF THE SUN

:
 Utopian Urbanism

CATEGORIES
event (19)
panel (19)
guest post (213)
images (55)
interviews (23)
media (369)
images (293)
PDFs (46)
videos (12)
modernity (161)
news (45)
PDFs (7)
translations (164)
writings (501)
articles (228)
essays (67)
fragments (58)
poetry (3)
reviews (53)
book reviews (34)
event reviews (12)
movie reviews (4)
music reviews (2)
short stories (3)
write-ups (112)

ARCHITECTURE AND UTOPIA

:
 Futurist Cities

STATS
There was an issue retrieving stats. Please try again later.

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Reddle by WordPress.com.

: