The article delves into the Australian government

ASSESEMENT 2:
The article delves into the Australian government's persistent challenges in

addressing the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians and
advocates for the urgent implementation of a Voice to Parliament as a crucial
step towards reconciliation and closing this gap. Despite numerous policy
initiatives and commitments over the years, significant disparities persist across
various key indicators such as health, education, employment, and incarceration
rates. These disparities underscore the failure of successive governments to
effectively tackle the deep-rooted structural issues that perpetuate Indigenous
disadvantage.
The authors argue that a fundamental reason for this failure lies in the lack of
meaningful Indigenous participation and decision-making in the development
and implementation of policies that directly impact their communities. Past
approaches have often been paternalistic, failing to acknowledge and
incorporate Indigenous perspectives, priorities, and knowledge systems. This
approach has resulted in policies that are often disconnected from the realities
and needs of Indigenous communities, ultimately leading to limited progress in
closing the gap.
In contrast, the proposed Voice to Parliament, as outlined in the Uluru Statement

from the Heart, offers a promising avenue for Indigenous Australians to have a
direct say in the laws and policies that affect their lives. It represents a
significant step towards self-determination and empowerment, enabling
Indigenous peoples to shape their own futures and address the systemic
injustices that have perpetuated intergenerational disadvantage.
Furthermore, the authors emphasize that the establishment of a Voice to

Parliament is not only a matter of practical necessity but also a moral imperative.
It signifies a commitment to genuine reconciliation and a recognition of
Indigenous sovereignty and rights. However, despite bipartisan support for the
concept, progress towards its implementation has been slow, with the
government failing to prioritize and act decisively on this issue.
The article concludes by urging the government to heed the calls for a Voice to
Parliament and to engage in genuine dialogue and partnership with Indigenous
communities. Only through meaningful collaboration and shared decision-making
can Australia move towards true reconciliation and effectively address the
persistent disparities that continue to plague Indigenous peoples.
The article indirectly links to the social determinant of health by highlighting the
systemic factors contributing to Indigenous health disparities, such as historical
trauma, socioeconomic inequality, and limited access to culturally appropriate
healthcare. These factors are recognized as key determinants of health outcomes
within Indigenous communities. While the Close the Gap targets primarily focus
ASSESEMENT 2:
on improving health outcomes, they also address underlying social determinants,

including education, employment, and housing, which are intricately linked to
health. For instance, Target 4 aims to ensure access to effective healthcare for
Indigenous Australians, indirectly addressing the social determinants that
influence health disparities.
Yes, the health issue discussed in the article, specifically the disparities between
Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, can be linked to various social
determinants of health. One prominent determinant is socioeconomic status,
which encompasses factors such as income, employment, and education.
Socioeconomic inequality significantly impacts health outcomes, including access
to healthcare services, nutrition, and living conditions. Additionally, historical and
ongoing systemic factors, such as colonization and discrimination, contribute to
Indigenous health disparities.
This health issue is closely linked to Close the Gap Target 1: "Close the life
expectancy gap within a generation (by 2031)." The disparities in health
outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians directly reflect
the gap in life expectancy, highlighting the urgent need to address underlying
social determinants of health to achieve this target. By addressing
socioeconomic inequality, improving access to healthcare, and addressing
systemic factors contributing to Indigenous disadvantage, progress can be made
towards closing the gap in life expectancy and ensuring that everyone lives long
and healthy lives.]
In the discipline of Pharmacy, inclusivity and cultural safety are paramount to

providing effective and equitable healthcare services to diverse populations. As
pharmacists, we play a crucial role in medication management, counseling, and
health promotion for patients from various cultural backgrounds. It is essential
that we understand and respect the cultural beliefs, values, and practices of our
patients to ensure optimal health outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Several policies, guidelines, and standards emphasize the importance of cultural

safety and inclusivity in pharmacy practice. For example, the Pharmaceutical
Society of Australia's (PSA) Code of Ethics highlights the obligation of
pharmacists to respect the dignity, autonomy, and cultural diversity of all
patients. The PSA also provides guidance on culturally responsive communication
and the provision of culturally appropriate healthcare services.
Additionally, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) Code

of Conduct emphasizes the need for pharmacists to provide care that is
respectful of cultural and individual differences. This includes recognizing and
addressing cultural barriers to healthcare access, promoting patient-centered
care, and fostering trust and rapport with patients from diverse backgrounds.
ASSESEMENT 2:
Being culturally safe and inclusive in pharmacy practice has significant

implications for both professional colleagues and consumers of our work. For
colleagues, promoting cultural safety fosters a supportive work environment that
values diversity and encourages collaboration. By enhancing cultural
competence among pharmacy staff, we can effectively address the needs of
diverse patient populations and work collaboratively to provide culturally
responsive care.
For consumers, including patients, clients, and participants, cultural safety is

essential for ensuring that pharmacy services are respectful, relevant, and
responsive to their needs. Culturally safe pharmacy environments promote trust
and confidence among consumers, encouraging them to engage proactively in
their own healthcare and seek support when needed. By incorporating culturally
sensitive communication strategies and tailoring healthcare services to
individual cultural preferences, pharmacists can improve patient satisfaction and
adherence to treatment regimens.
Moreover, culturally safe and inclusive pharmacy practice is essential for

addressing health disparities and promoting health equity. By acknowledging and
addressing the social determinants of health, including cultural factors,
pharmacists can play a key role in reducing health inequities and improving
health outcomes for marginalized populations.
In conclusion, being inclusive and culturally safe in pharmacy practice is not only
a professional responsibility but also a moral imperative. By adhering to policies,
guidelines, and standards that promote cultural safety and inclusivity,
pharmacists can create environments that are welcoming and supportive for
patients from diverse cultural backgrounds, ultimately leading to better health
outcomes and improved quality of care.

The article delves into the Australian government

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The article delves into the Australian government

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The article delves into the Australian government

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ASSESEMENT 2:

The article delves into the Australian government's persistent challenges in

In contrast, the proposed Voice to Parliament, as outlined in the Uluru Statement

Furthermore, the authors emphasize that the establishment of a Voice to

on improving health outcomes, they also address underlying social determinants,

In the discipline of Pharmacy, inclusivity and cultural safety are paramount to

Several policies, guidelines, and standards emphasize the importance of cultural

Additionally, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) Code

Being culturally safe and inclusive in pharmacy practice has significant

For consumers, including patients, clients, and participants, cultural safety is

Moreover, culturally safe and inclusive pharmacy practice is essential for

You might also like