MRS.

BOLU BANJO

ASSESSMENT ONE:
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion in Health and Social Care

December 2023
 Part 1

1.1 Define the Terms Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

Equality in health and social care refers to the fair and equal treatment of individuals,
regardless of their age, gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. It means
that everyone should have equal access to healthcare services, regardless of their background or
circumstances. Equality also means that individuals should be treated with respect, dignity, and
compassion, and that their cultural and personal beliefs should be taken into account. In practice,
this means that healthcare professionals should ensure that their services are accessible to
everyone, regardless of their background or circumstances. This may involve providing
interpreters or translation services for individuals with limited English proficiency, providing
accommodations for individuals with disabilities, or taking into account cultural or religious
beliefs when providing care. Healthcare professionals should also ensure that their services do
not discriminate against individuals based on their background, and that they are provided with
the same level of care and support as everyone else.

On the other hand, diversity in health and social care refers to the variety of differences
between people, including their culture, ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion,
and disability. It means that healthcare professionals should recognize and respect these
differences and provide care that is sensitive to the needs of each individual. In practice, this
means that healthcare professionals should be aware of the diversity of their patients and provide
care that is culturally appropriate and sensitive to the needs of each individual. Healthcare
professionals should also be aware of the potential biases and stereotypes that may impact their
care and work to ensure that they are providing care that is unbiased and non-discriminatory. By
recognizing and respecting diversity, healthcare professionals can provide care that is sensitive to
the needs of each individual, leading to better health outcomes and improved patient satisfaction.

In addition, inclusion in health and social care refers to the practice of ensuring that
everyone, regardless of their background or circumstances, is included and involved in decisions
about their care. It means that healthcare professionals should work to ensure that everyone feels
valued, respected, and supported, and that their voices are heard. In practice, this means that
healthcare professionals should work to build relationships with their patients, taking the time to
understand their needs and preferences and involving them in decisions about their care. This
may involve providing information in a way that is accessible to the individual, taking into
account their cultural or religious beliefs, or providing support to help them make decisions
about their care. Healthcare professionals should also work to create an environment that is
welcoming and inclusive, where everyone feels comfortable and supported. Through promotion
of inclusion, healthcare professionals can help improve patient satisfaction and outcomes, and
ensure that everyone receives the care and support they need.

1.2 Explain the legislation underpinning diversity, equality and inclusion in the health and
social care sector

There are several pieces of legislation that relate to equality, diversity, and inclusion in
service provision in health and social care. These include:

i. The Equality Act 2010: This legislation provides a legal framework to protect individuals from
discrimination based on protected characteristics, including age, disability, gender reassignment,
marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual
orientation. The Act requires that healthcare providers make reasonable adjustments to ensure
that individuals with disabilities are not disadvantaged in accessing healthcare services.

ii. The Human Rights Act 1998: This legislation incorporates the European Convention on
Human Rights into UK law, and requires public authorities, including healthcare providers, to
respect individuals' human rights, including the right to life, the right to privacy, and the right to
freedom from discrimination.

iii. The Mental Capacity Act 2005: This legislation sets out the legal framework for making
decisions on behalf of individuals who lack capacity to make decisions for themselves. It
requires healthcare providers to ensure that individuals are involved in decisions about their care
to the greatest extent possible, and that any decisions made on their behalf are made in their best
interests.

iv. The Care Act 2014: This legislation sets out the legal framework for providing social care
services in England. It requires that healthcare providers take into account the needs and
preferences of individuals when providing care and support, and that they promote individuals'
well-being and independence.
 In this context, these pieces of legislation provide a legal framework to ensure that
healthcare providers promote equality, diversity, and inclusion in service provision, and that they
respect individuals' human rights and dignity. Healthcare providers are required to take steps to
ensure that their services are accessible and inclusive for all individuals, and to provide care and
support that is tailored to the needs and preferences of each individual.

1.3 Explain the Models of practice that underpin Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

In health and social care, there are various models of practice which underpins equality,
diversity, and inclusion. To start with, legal frameworks such as the Equality Act establishes the
foundation, emphasizing compliance with laws to ensure fair treatment for all. This implies that
every individual must be the same and not treated in different ways on the basis of irrelevant
criteria or societal factors such as race, gender, age etc. Simultaneously, a human rights approach
underscores the intrinsic dignity and equal rights of every individual, forming a principled basis
for inclusive practices. Cultural competence is equally vital, urging practitioners to understand
and respect diverse cultural backgrounds. Hence, positive organizational culture values diversity
as the workers essentially need to have the knowledge of the cultural values for the organization
and should adhere strictly to them.

Person-centered care further refines this by placing individuals at the forefront, tailoring
care plans to unique needs and involving them in decision-making as it requires service providers
to make sure that the care and treatment of service users should be adequate, must meet their
preferences, and must reflect their choices. Also, while acknowledging the complexity of
discrimination, the intersectionality model recognizes the overlapping impact of factors like race
and gender. This prompts a more nuanced and inclusive approach to care. Meanwhile, the social
model of disability as well shifts the focus from impairments to societal barriers, advocating for
the removal of obstacles to foster inclusivity. This model recognizes that societal barriers
contribute to disability. It aims to remove these barriers, promoting inclusivity and accessibility
for individuals with disabilities. In the same vein, inclusive leadership plays a pivotal role,
creating a culture that values diversity, promotes equal opportunities, and actively engages all
stakeholders in decision-making processes. Anti-oppressive practice is also a model which seeks
to identify and challenge oppressive structures within the system, promoting empowerment and
social justice. To this extent, if all of these models are well integrated, it is believed that health
and social care practitioners will be enabled to create environments that are not only medically
effective but also respectful, inclusive, and responsive to the diverse needs of individuals.

1.4 Explain the impact of Barriers to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

Individuals may be prevented from using health and social care services and facilities,
which they need or are vital to them due to various reasons. It is understood that supporting
individuals to access services and facilities is one of the support or care worker role and
responsibilities if operating in health and social care settings. However, there exist various
barriers or obstacles, which can prevent individuals from accessing, using services and facilities.
Some of these include: ethnicity, physical, psychological, environmental, structural and process
barriers. Likewise, barriers to inclusion in health and social care can have a significant impact on
the quality of care that individuals receive. When individuals are excluded or marginalized, they
may feel less comfortable or less willing to engage with healthcare professionals, which can lead
to a breakdown in communication and a lack of trust. This can make it more difficult for
healthcare professionals to provide effective care and support, and can lead to poorer health
outcomes and reduced patient satisfaction for the individual.

More so, barriers to inclusion can take many forms, including physical barriers, such as
inaccessible facilities or equipment, communication barriers, such as language or cultural
differences, and attitudinal barriers, such as biases or stereotypes. These barriers can make it
more difficult for individuals to access healthcare services, receive the care and support they
need, and feel valued and respected. For example, if a healthcare facility is not accessible to
individuals with disabilities, they may be unable to receive the care and support they need.
Similarly, if healthcare professionals are not culturally sensitive or do not take into account the
needs and preferences of their patients, they may not be able to provide effective care. These
barriers can lead to frustration, alienation, and a lack of trust, which can ultimately impact the
individual's health and well-being. Therefore, it is essential for healthcare professionals to work
to identify and address these barriers, and to promote an environment that is welcoming,
inclusive, and supportive for all individuals as this can aid to improve patient outcomes, reduce
healthcare disparities, and promote overall health and well-being.
2.1 Evaluate the Effectiveness of Policies in ensuring legislatory requirements are met

The effectiveness of policies in ensuring legislative requirements in health and social care
hinges on several key factors. To begin with, policies need to align clearly and specifically with
legislative frameworks. Ambiguities can impede compliance. Robust implementation and
enforcement mechanisms are crucial; without them, policies may fall short in ensuring adherence
to legal standards. More so, comprehensive training and awareness programs are essential to
inform practitioners about legislative requirements. Stakeholder engagement, involving
professionals, service users, and organizations also enhances the practicality and relevance of
policies. Similarly, regular review and updates are imperative to keep policies aligned with
evolving legislative standards. Clear accountability measures, including consequences for non-
compliance, contribute to adherence. Likewise, feedback mechanisms integrated into policies
provide insights from practitioners and service users, enabling continuous improvement.
Adequate resource allocation, encompassing staffing, training, and technology is also crucial for
effective policy implementation for without sufficient resources, meeting legislative
requirements becomes challenging. Health and care providers are therefore responsible for
incorporating legislation relating to equality, diversity and discrimination into their policies and
procedures.

2.2 Evaluate the effectiveness of procedures in promoting equality, diversity and inclusion
in the workplace

The effectiveness of procedures in promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in

health and social care workplaces is a multifaceted process. It starts with the clarity and
communication of these procedures. If they are not clearly articulated or known to employees,
their ability to actively promote EDI is compromised. Also, supporting these procedures with
ongoing training and education is essential as this empowers employees to understand the
significance of EDI, recognize biases, and develop the necessary skills to implement inclusive
practices. Leadership commitment also plays a pivotal role. When leaders actively endorse and
prioritize EDI initiatives, it sets a positive tone throughout the organization. This commitment is
fundamental to creating an inclusive culture. Specifically, regular monitoring and evaluation are
essential components as this involves assessing the impact of EDI measures, identifying areas for
improvement, and making necessary adjustments to ensure continued effectiveness. Employee
involvement is another major factor. This implies that inclusive procedures must engage
employees at all levels, seeking feedback from diverse perspectives as this ensures that
procedures are responsive to the actual needs and challenges faced by the workforce. Promoting
diversity in leadership positions is equally vital for systemic change. This includes procedures
that actively encourage diversity in decision-making roles which contributes to a more inclusive
workplace culture. Effective procedures also addresses incidents of discrimination or bias
promptly and appropriately. This involves providing clear reporting mechanisms and ensuring a
fair and transparent investigation process. Flexibility and adaptability are also paramount. In this
light, procedures should be able to accommodate the evolving needs of a diverse workforce,
considering changes in demographics, societal norms, and emerging issues related to EDI.
Lastly, alignment with organizational values and procedures promoting work-life balance
contributes to EDI by accommodating diverse needs, such as family responsibilities, disabilities,
and/or cultural considerations.

Part 2

3.1 Explain how person-centred ways of working support equality and inclusion within the
workplace

Person-centered ways of working in health and social care usually make a significant
impact in fostering equality and inclusion within the workplace. Let us imagine a workplace
where each employee is seen as an individual with unique needs, preferences, and strengths. This
individualized approach, central to person-centered care, extends to the workplace, promoting
equality by recognizing and respecting the diversity among team members. In person-centered
care, decisions are made collaboratively with the individual. Translating this to the workplace
means involving employees in decision-making processes related to their work and
responsibilities. This empowerment ensures that diverse perspectives are valued and considered.
Also, respect for diversity is a core principle of person-centered care. In the workplace, this
translates into a culture that understands and respects the diverse backgrounds, experiences, and
identities of employees, creating an inclusive environment where everyone feels valued.
Effective communication in person-centered care is equally tailored to individual needs as this
involves adapting communication styles, languages, and methods to ensure that information is
accessible to all, supporting inclusivity. Meanwhile, flexible work arrangements are other aspect
of person-centered care in which applying this principle in the workplace means offering
flexibility that considers individual circumstances, supporting equality by recognizing and
responding to diverse needs. Another major feature is collaborative goal-setting which involves
employees setting performance and development goals to foster a sense of inclusivity and shared
ownership.

Recognition of individual strengths is another principle of person-centered care that

applies to the workplace by acknowledging and leveraging the diverse skills, experiences, and
strengths of employees, contributing to a more inclusive and equitable environment. Feedback
and continuous improvement are encouraged in person-centered care. Likewise, creating a
workplace culture that values feedback and actively seeks ways to improve inclusivity ensures
that the organization evolves in response to the diverse needs of its workforce. Most essentially,
the promotion of well-being, central to person-centered care also extends to the workplace by
considering not only professional development but also the overall well-being of employees.
This involves policies and practices that promote work-life balance and mental health to
contribute to an inclusive and supportive workplace.

3.2 Discuss how to Promote Equality and Diversity when Working with Service Users

Equality and diversity can be promoted when working with service users in the health and social
care if everyone could be given similar opportunity, in which individuals get the regard and
dignity they merit and that their various personal characteristics are celebrated as well as treated
fairly in accordance with the law and their needs. Also, care workers are advised to always use
non-discriminatory language. They should challenge discrimination such as racist or sexist
remarks made by a staff member or another individual. This can be done by promoting a culture
of respect and inclusion within the workplace, and by providing training and support to staff to
help them recognize and challenge discrimination. They should also meet an individual’s
specific needs for example, providing assistance with mobility such as helping to take a shower
or helping them to get dressed. Thus, there are several other ways to promote equality, diversity,
and inclusion in work practice in health and social care. These include:

i. Valuing diversity: It is important to recognize and value the diversity of individuals and
communities, including their different backgrounds, cultures, and experiences. This can be done
by promoting diversity within the workforce, and by providing training and support to staff to
help them understand and appreciate diversity.

ii. Providing accessible services: Healthcare providers should ensure that their services are
accessible to all individuals, regardless of their background or circumstances. This may involve
making reasonable adjustments to ensure that individuals with disabilities are not disadvantaged
in accessing healthcare services, or providing language support to individuals who do not speak
English as their first language.

iii. Empowering individuals: Healthcare providers should empower individuals to take an active
role in their own care and support, and to make decisions about their own lives. This can be done
by providing information and support to individuals, and by involving them in the planning and
delivery of their own care.

iv. Promoting human rights: Healthcare providers should promote and protect the human rights
of all individuals, including their right to privacy, dignity, and respect. This can be done by
ensuring that individuals are treated with respect and dignity at all times, and by providing care
and support that is tailored to their individual needs and preferences.

3.3 Support others to actively promote equality, diversity and inclusion within the
workplace

In a bid to support others to actively promote equality, diversity, and inclusion in the
workplace in health and social care, it's important to lead by example. We can demonstrate our
commitment to diversity and inclusion by treating everyone with respect and fairness. This
means embracing different perspectives and being mindful of any unconscious biases we may
have. We should also encourage our colleagues to create an open dialogue by sharing their
experiences, ideas, and concerns in a safe and supportive environment. Through active listening
and empathizing, we can equally foster understanding and create a space where everyone feels
comfortable expressing themselves. Similarly, education and training play a crucial role. This is
a way of providing diversity and inclusion programs that can help raise awareness, challenge
stereotypes, and promote cultural competence. These initiatives can help us recognize and
address any biases we may have, ultimately creating a more inclusive workplace. Collaboration
is another important aspect in which we encourage teamwork and collaboration among
colleagues from diverse backgrounds, we can break down barriers and promote understanding as
this does not only enhance the work environment but also leads to better outcomes for the
individuals we serve. More so, we can acknowledge, celebrate and appreciate the different
cultures, traditions, and perspectives that exist within our workplace. Organizing events or
activities that showcase this diversity can help foster a sense of belonging and create a positive
atmosphere. Regularly reviewing policies and procedures is equally vital in a way of ensuring
that our workplace policies are inclusive and free from discrimination. Seeking input from
employees and making necessary improvements based on their feedback is also crucial in
creating an equitable environment. Another major aspect to take cognizance of is through
advocating for the establishment of support employee resource groups (ERGs) that represent
different communities within the workplace. These groups will actually provide a platform for
employees to share experiences, support one another, and contribute to organizational diversity
initiatives. To sum up, it is important to address any instances of discrimination or bias promptly.
Taking immediate action, providing support to those affected, and implementing measures to
prevent future incidents are adequate steps in creating a safe and inclusive workplace.
4.1 Describe Ethical Dilemmas in the workplace when balancing individual rights with the
duty of care

Ethical dilemmas in health and social care often surface when trying to navigate the
delicate balance between respecting individual rights and fulfilling the duty of care. When
working in health and social care environment, one is sometimes challenged with situations
involving moral dilemmas. Hence, it is crucial to have a substantial comprehension of morality
and the essence of moral decisions as well as ways through which they are connected to health
and social practice. We will equally require to have the knowledge of one’s legal position,
including the ethics and morals which sums up the basis of the code of one’s professional
practice. As a result, in a situation where a patient, exercising their autonomy, refuses a
recommended medical treatment essential for their well-being, healthcare professionals usually
grapple with the ethical challenge of honoring the patient's autonomy while ensuring their safety;
a classic dilemma between individual rights and the duty of care.

More so, confidentiality versus disclosure is quite vital, which basically implies that
being governed by the data protection act, one needs to understand that when sharing
confidential details we can go against the person’s rights if making them get exposed to abuse or
harm. Thus, healthcare professionals may find themselves torn between respecting a patient's
right to privacy and the responsibility to disclose information if there's a potential threat to the
patient or others. Issues related to informed consent further complicate the ethical landscape.
Healthcare professionals face the dilemma of ensuring that patients fully comprehend the risks
and benefits of a treatment while also fulfilling the duty to provide necessary care balancing
individual rights with the duty of care. Resource allocation also poses yet another ethical
challenge. In situations where resources are limited, healthcare professionals must decide how to
allocate them fairly while meeting the individual needs of patients. This involves balancing the
duty to provide optimal care for each person with the broader duty to distribute resources
equitably. Meanwhile, cultural sensitivity introduces a nuanced dilemma when individual beliefs
clash with evidence-based best practices. Navigating this requires finding a delicate balance
between respecting cultural preferences and adhering to the duty to provide effective and
evidence-based care. In the same vein, end-of-life decision-making brings forth complex ethical
considerations. This is because when balancing a patient's wishes, the duty to alleviate suffering,
and the duty to prolong life becomes intricate, particularly when there are differing opinions
among healthcare professionals, the patient, and their family. Also, dual relationships add
another layer of ethical complexity, especially when healthcare professionals find themselves in
roles that extend beyond caregiving, such as being friends or family members. Balancing these
dual roles while ensuring the individual's best interests and maintaining professional boundaries
requires careful consideration. Addressing discrimination and promoting equality is equally an
ongoing ethical challenge. Healthcare professionals therefore often navigate issues of bias and
inequality, ensuring the duty to provide equitable care aligns with the individual's right to be
treated fairly.

4.2 Explain the principles of informed choice and capacity

The principles of informed choice and capacity in health and social care are fundamental
aspects of respecting an individual's autonomy and ensuring ethical decision-making.
Consequently, informed choice often refers to the sharing and comprehension of vital
information and details so that a proficient, reasonable and un-hurried decision could be made by
the health care user, or the delegated representative of the consumer, who can competently and
has the legal capacity to make such choices. Informed choices supports the autonomy of an
individual and the rights of that individual to determine their own decisions and shape their
outcomes. For instance, when an individual is receiving healthcare services, there are two key
principles which guide how decisions are made about the care and these includes, informed
choice and capacity. Thus, informed choice recognizes one’s right to make decisions about their
health based on a clear understanding of relevant information. When an individual interact with
healthcare professionals, they are obligated to share comprehensive, unbiased information about
their condition, available treatments, and potential outcomes. This is not merely a one-way street;
it usually involves a dialogue. So the individual should be able to understand the information
provided, ask questions if needed, and have the freedom to accept or refuse treatment based on
their preferences. Their decision-making process should be free from coercion or pressure,
ensuring that their choices also align with their values.

On the other hand, capacity is about one’s ability to understand and make decisions about
their own care. It involves several elements, such as comprehending the information given to the
individual, appreciating the consequences of their decisions, and weighing the options based on
their values. Essentially, it's about being mentally equipped to make decisions that align with a
person’s best interests. When the health consumers communicate their decision, whether it's
agreeing to treatment or refusing it, their capacity to make that decision is considered.
Nevertheless, in the real world of healthcare, these principles often intersect, especially when
obtaining informed consent. Let us assume one is about to undergo a medical procedure.
Healthcare professionals not only share information but also ensure one understand it. They want
to be sure the individual is mentally equipped to appreciate the consequences and make a
reasoned decision. Informed consent is thus, the result; it is the individual’s voluntary agreement
to a treatment based on the information provided. While, in a situation where one capacity to
make decisions is in question, perhaps due to an illness. In such cases, healthcare professionals
may explore ways to support one’s decision-making, which could involve discussing matters
with advocates or family members. The goal is therefore to strike a balance by respecting the
individual’s preferences while ensuring their well-being simultaneously.
 References

Anon, K. (2017). Informed Choices (EBook) Available at:

http://advantage.ok.gov/WhitePapers/InformedChoiceInformenConsent.pdf (Accessed
15th. Dec. 2023).

Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7e). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

Petty, L. (2016). How To: Promoting Equality & Diversity in Health & Social Care. [Online]
High Speed Training Hub. Available at: https://www.highspeedtraining.co.uk/hub/promoting
equality-diversity-health-social-care/ (Accessed 15th Dec. 2023).

Schyve, P. (2007) “Language difference as a barrier to quality and safety in health care: The joint
commission perspective”. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22:2

Scheer J., T. Kroll, M. T. Neri, P. (2003) “Access barriers for persons with disabilities: the
consumer's perspective”. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 13:221–230