10.1016@j.biortech.2020.124394
10.1016@j.biortech.2020.124394
10.1016@j.biortech.2020.124394
PII: S0960-8524(20)31668-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124394
Reference: BITE 124394
Please cite this article as: Manikandan, S., Karmegam, N., Subbaiya, R., Karthiga Devi, G., Arulvel, R.,
Ravindran, B., Kumar Awasthi, M., Emerging nano-structured innovative materials as adsorbents in wastewater
treatment, Bioresource Technology (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124394
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover
page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version
will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are
providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors
may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Emerging nano-structured innovative materials as adsorbents in
wastewater treatment
Sivasubramanian Manikandanb, Natchimuthu Karmegamc, Ramasamy Subbaiyad, Guruviah
Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha Nagar, Thandalam, Chennai – 602 105,
Nadu, India
dDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, The
* Corresponding author:
E-mail: mukesh_awasthi45@yahoo.com
1
Abstract
Water supply around the globe is struggling to meet the rapidly increasing demand by the
population, drastic changes in climate and degrading water quality. Even though, many large-
scale methods are employed for wastewater treatment they display several negative impacts
owing to the presence of pollutants. Technological innovation is required for integrated water
management with different groups of nanomaterials for the removal of toxic metal ions,
microbial disease, organic and inorganic solutes. The method of manipulating atoms on a
and eliminate physical, chemical and biological pollutants. The present review concentrates
properties, barriers and commercialization research needs. Also the review identifies
opportunities for further exploiting the exclusive features for green water management by
2
1. Introduction
For all life on earth, water is the most important material and a vital resource for
human civilization (Morrison et al., 2020; Rubilar et al., 2020). Trustworthy access to safe
and available water is one of the fundamental priorities for the 21st century and remains a
significant challenge world-wide. Nevertheless, supply of safe potable water has, because of
significant water contamination, become a global concern today (Acharya et al., 2020; Ponce-
Rodríguez et al., 2020). The United Nations has reported that more people have died from
any sort of violence including war, aggression, destruction, and mortality, although more
people have died from tainted water relative to war and violence (WHO/UNICEF, 2000).
Regarding the imminent global water crisis, Nature highlights in its website that “things in
the world are becoming worse and more than one trillion people lack access to clean water
(Edokpayi et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2019). The estimated supply of water per person over the
next two decades is down by one third, likely leading to premature deaths for many millions
Organic, inorganic and biological water pollutants originating from different sources
can be present (Cheng et al., 2020; Haq et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Mandeep et al., 2020; Z.
Yu et al., 2020). Some chemicals are harmful and carcinogenic and cause harm to humans
and ecosystems (Rahman, 2020). Recent studies reveal that the contamination and toxicity of
microplastics in marine water leading to their existence in marine salts of human use
(Sivagami et al., 2020). At the same time, the heavy metals are notorious highly toxic water
contaminants (Liu et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020). Arsenic is one of the most lethal
components, well-known from the old days. Certain heavy metals of extremely hazardous
water contaminants include cadmium, chromium, arsenic, plum, zinc, nickel, copper, etc.,
and their remediation is becoming complicated due to the complexity of contaminants (Leong
and Chang, 2020; Qi et al., 2015; Rahman, 2020; Sajid et al., 2018). At high concentrations,
3
chromates, NO3-, SO42-, PO³, F-, Cl-, Se2- and oxalates have hazardous consequences; ions of
these also modify the smell of mud. For example, fluorosis is caused by enhanced levels of
fluoride in the water (Nasr et al., 2013; Udhayakumar et al., 2016). Toxicity is associated
with various types of contaminants, including those of chemical fertilizers, different forms of
pesticides, plasticisers, petrochemical products, phenols and biphenyls, detergents, oils and
greases (Terrado et al., 2010; Xing et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2020). In freshwater
environments worldwide, pharmaceutical products and personal care products (PPCPs) are
bioaccumulation and toxicity levels as pollutants are concerned. PPCPs are not classified as
persistent organic pollutants (POPs), whereas PPCPs have characteristic similar to POPs (Li
et al., 2018; Sharma et al., 2019). Drugs and veterinary medicinal products for the prevention
or treatment of human and animal disease are known as prescription, while PCP (personnel-
care products) is primarily used to improve everyday living standards. In recent years, the
and biota) in amounts that can have adverse effects on aquatic organisms has become
common. This is a major concern because PPCPs are increasingly commonly used, resulting
in their continuous release into the environment, in human and veterinary medical devices.
The concentration of PPCP concentration in water ranges from mg/L up to μg/L. For this
reason, customary water treatment processes provide substandard results, since the processing
provisions are ill-prepared to eliminate stable low-levels of pollutants. The emerging organic
contaminants, PPCPs, antibiotic resistance genes, nitrogen, steroids and pesticides are
increasing at an alarming rate which poses the scientific community to develop suitable and
feasible alternate methods (Asif et al., 2018; M. Chen et al., 2020; García et al., 2020; Sun et
al., 2019).
4
Nanotechnology's recent success provides leapfrogging incentives to build water
supply networks of the next decade. The present water treatment systems have no more
sustainability, distribution and disposal methods, which depend heavily on transport and
central systems (Jiang et al., 2013). The nanotechnology-capable processes are highly
efficient, modular, and multifunctional, which provide affordable solutions for water
treatment and wastewater treatment that depend the least on key infrastructures (Deshpande
et al., 2020; Olvera et al., 2017; Wong et al., 2019). The water and wastewater treatment
processing system with nanotechnology promises not only to solve major challenges with
current therapies but also to deliver a new therapy capability which could enable emerging
water sources to be used efficiently and increase water supply which has been schematically
explained in Fig. 1.
their unit activity functions. The challenges to their systematic implementation and the need
for work to address these challenges are also addressed. This analysis will not take into
account the potential consequence of nano-based materials on the environment and public
health or any possible disturbance in treatment processes and will therefore not be explored in
depth (De La Cueva Bueno et al., 2017; Kamali et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). Several
nanomaterial types which could be used in water rehabilitation are mentioned, such as
assembled monolayers (SAMMS) (Yantasee et al., 2004), biopolymers, iron nanoparts and
been developed for wastewater treatment. Within the following broad categories, among the
5
a. Nanotechnology focused on adsorption of waste and toxic materials.
polluted water.
The various types of water treatment approaches have been discussed in the following
sections of the review paper. A brief overview of the existing problems in the use of nano-
smaller than 100 nm (Chhabra and Kumar, 2020, 2019). Products at this scale also possess
wastewater and water. Many devices use the smoothly scalable nanomaterial properties of
larger surface areas, including rapid disintegration, heavy sorption and high reactivity. Other
Four main groups can be considered to be the most widely used nanomaterials:
briefly.
6
2.1. Organic waste replacement of carbon nano-adsorbents
Adsorption is widely used as a finishing step in the treatment of water and wastewater
to eliminate pollutants of organic and inorganic nature (Kadam et al., 2019; Kalaitzidou et al.,
2020; J. Wang et al., 2020). Conventional adsorbents typically have a weakness in their
effectiveness by the surface or active sites, inadequacy of selectivity and adsorption kinetics.
With its exceptionally accurate surface and associated sorption sites, fast intra-particle
diffusion distance and pore size and surface chemical tuning, nano-sorbents give substantial
improvement (Gallo-Cordova et al., 2020; Kgatitsoe et al., 2019; Moharrami and Motamedi,
Nanomaterials have suitable surface modification scopes. Organic ligands allow the
binding of metal ions with that of nanomaterials or any other specific contaminants from
water. A large number of Nano structuring resources for use with adsorption of pollutants
have been reported in the literature for use in wastewater treatment. Checked for the removal
of metal ions and water teeth molecules from modified carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide and
nanocomposite Graphene-Fe3O4 (Raghu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018). The core
nanoparticles from Fe3O4 / C, amino and hydroxyl gel, many silica-based adsorbents have
been identified, such as SBA-15 amino-functionalized (Betiha et al., 2020; Fiorilli et al.,
2017; Zhang et al., 2018), magnetic mesoporous silica (Jaafar et al., 2019), mesoporous
multiamine grafting silica, amino-functionalized silica and synthetic gel loops, amino-
functionalized, EDTA-functional, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, and silica gel for effective
heavy metal ion adsorption from water. Magnetic nanoparticles and their composition are
also the perfect absorbers of water pollutants (organic and inorganic). It can be easily
separated by a simple adsorption bar magnet, which helps you to resolve other adsorbents.
7
The oxidized carbon nanotubes are highly adsorbed to high kinetic metal ions. Carbon
nanotube surfaces are the most important functional surfaces (e.g. carboxyl, hydroxyl and
increases the potential of carbon nanotubes adsorption through surface oxidation (Adelabu et
al., 2020; Hayati et al., 2017). Several studies have shown better adsorbtion of heavy metals
with carbon nanotubes than activated carbon (for example Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ and Cd2+, for
example); the kinetics of adsorption on carbon nanotubes are rapid because of the extremely
accessible sites for adsorption and the close range between intraparticles (Chandrashekhar
Nayak et al., 2020; Z. Liu et al., 2020; Verma and Balomajumder, 2020).
Generally, carbon nanotubes as broad spectrum adsorbents might not be a right choice
with reference to the activated carbon. These may also have unique applications for polishing
analytical grounds, as the surface chemistry could possibly be tailored towards different
contaminants. Limited amounts of materials are required for these applications and therefore
are less prone to costs. Among the adsorbents, graphite oxide is cheap alternative which is
developed from exfoliating graphite with strong acids and oxidizers (Avetta et al., 2015). It
has been recently stated that graphite oxide-coated sand granules were effective in Hg2+
2.3. Nanoparticles as cheap adsorbents for radionuclides and toxic heavy metals
Surface oxidized carbon nanotubes with H2O2, KMnO4 and HNO3 are used to extract
Cd2+ from aquatic solutions (Slobodian et al., 2013). The elevated adsorption capabilities
towards the ions of metals consisting quicker kinetics may result from the oxidation of carbon
carboxylic, hydroxyl and carbonyl acid. Such groups have strong heavy metal ions adsorption
potential as long as the pH of oxidized carbon nanotubes is above the isoelectric level.
8
Several studies have shown that the carbon nanotubes adsorb heavy metal ions with very
strong nanomaterials, including Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ and Cd2+ (Abukhadra et al., 2019; Hayati et
al., 2017, 2016; Xu et al., 2018). A carbon nanotube sponge with a boron dash showed a very
good water oil adsorbing ability. Such sponges are reusable once oil is drained and pledge to
Regardless of their thickness, the membranes form a physical obstacle to new sources of
water to these constituents. These offer a considerable degree of automation which requires
reduced land area in which the chemical intake is the major part of water treatment and reuse
and a modular design allows for scalable design. The intrinsic jeopardize between the
main obstacle to the broad utilization of pressurized processes with membranes is the
consumption of lots of energy. The fouling of membrane increases the energy consumption,
process design and operation complexity. This in turn reduces the life of membranes and
membrane modules. The membrane material is the sole factor which determines the
membrane permeability, fouling resistance, mechanical and thermal stability is offered by the
classified into different forms, such as nano-filtration membranes (Ang et al., 2020; Himstedt
et al., 2019; Nawaz et al., 2021), nanocomposite membranes (Alammar et al., 2020;
Moharrami and Motamedi, 2020; Salazar et al., 2020; Valamohammadi et al., 2020), self-
assembly membranes (C. Chen et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2019; Yong Wu et al., 2020; Xiao et
9
al., 2020), thin film composites (Karami et al., 2020; Mollahosseini and Abdelrasoul, 2019),
aquaporin-based membranes (Balkenov et al., 2020; Li et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020),
biological membranes (Saleh et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2018), and reverse osmosis membranes
(Couto et al., 2020; Vinardell et al., 2020; W. Wu et al., 2020). They are divisible into several
forms of membranes are dealt in the following section. Nanofiltration is a pressurized process
in which unclean water flows through a thin polymers containing pores 1 to 10 nm in length,
separating the contaminants larger than the pores from the water. Dissolving of dissolved
Nanofiltration membrane is used most frequently for suppressing water, because Ca and Mg
ions have been captured, while monovalent ions can pass through the water in a hydrated
way. Nano filtration membranes are used in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries for
solvent recovery. They are also used for purification of gas condensates in petrochemical
industries. For the extraction of amino acids and lipids from cell cultures in the field of life
sciences, the nanofiltration membranes are highly useful (Esteves et al., 2020). The nano
Various techniques have been developed to produce and modify the surface of
filtration membranes (Werner et al., 2018). A thin, composite nano-filtered membrane film
was deployed by Yang and his colleagues on an ultra-filtration substrict through an interlayer
that Na2SO4 is eliminated by 97% and Na2SO4 salt rejection order by MgSO4 and
MgCl2.NaCl.
It is very useful to extract ions like Na, K and reverse osmosis (RO) chloride.
several decades considerable efforts were made to develop cheap membrane filtration
10
technologies with high efficiency for desalination. Most industrial RO membranes in use are
thin film composite structures in which the polyamide layer on top of the microporous
polyamide films. However, the efficiency of their membrane fouling decreases over time due
degradation often also degrades membranes (Y. Wang et al., 2020). In addition, the most
common practice is to modify the membrane through grafting / covering it by using suitable
materials has also been reported (Al-Najar et al., 2020). Graphene oxide (GO) has been
resistance against chlorine, whilst retaining its efficiency in separation. In recent years, much
emphasis has been put on the use of functional carbon nanotubes in Composite RO
membranes. A very interesting study shows that the flow of water and the salt rejection can
friendly nanotubes. The polyamide-RO membranes have functional carbon nanotubes for
higher water streams. Furthermore, the carbon nanotubes loaded membranes were more
robust and chemically resistant when compared with plain membranes. The advantages of
using composite membranes can be due to the hydrophobic nanotubes, which are formed
from uniform interactions between the carbon nanotubes and polyamide within active levels
via the nanotubes of carbon and their membrane homogeneity. Biochar adsorption technology
in wastewater treatment is currently being steadily introduced (Chen et al., 2011; Jung and
Ahn, 2016; Yao et al., 2019; Zubair et al., 2020). Biochar is known to adsorb standard animal
wastewater pollutants such as organic pollutants, heavy metals, nitrogen and phosphorus
(Xiang et al., 2020; Zhuang et al., 2020; Zubair et al., 2020). However, nano-composites
11
based on bio-char in wastewater remediation is found to be effective (Tan et al., 2016; Yang
et al., 2019) and much attention is required for the efficient utility of such nanocomposites.
polyamide film-embedded super hydrophilic nanoparticles are used for the repulsion of
microorganisms, solutes and impurities. Nanosilver and titanium dioxide coating are
with biomolecules, such as protein, to boost selectivity. Copolymer block membranes that are
self-assembling were also tested for ultra-filtration and found to be more selective and
imparted via an optimized thickness of the polymers' membrane. The bio nanofiber
membranes are also designed to achieve a higher antipollination property for polylactic acid,
polyurethane and polyethylene oxide. There are considered to be greater selectivity and
higher water flow in biomimetic membranes. The aquaporin inside this membrane is greatly
efficient in desalination of the marine water, for example, the polymer-built vesicle-
ceramics or meme metals) is simpler, effective, and cheaper than the other metallic and
nanosurfaces forming matte, porous structured nanofibers. Electro spun nanofibers can be
morphology and spatial alignment. While nanofiber membranes are used on the market for air
filters, their water treatment capacity remains largely untapped. Nanofiber membranes are
12
able to extract particles of micron size from the watery process at a high reject rate without
recommended.
Functional nanomaterials can easily be doped into the spinning solutions for the
media / membrane filters by means of inherent materials like TiO2 and MgO with multiple
functions (Pourrahim et al., 2020) or using nanofibers with their functional materials. The
for instance, allowing the removal of heavy metals and organic contaminants in the course of
The selectivity and permeability of biological membranes are very high, and the
protein channels in Aquaporins are the controlling factors of cell membrane water flow, and
they play a vital role in contaminant removal (Chang et al., 2019; Luo et al., 2018). Its high
efficiency in polymer membranes. The Escherichia coli aquaporin Z when introduced to the
amphiphilic triblock water permeability polymer vesicles over the initial vesicles with
minimum glucose, glycerol, salt, and urea rejection at least in an order of magnitudes. One of
the future designs is to coat the lipid bilayers embedded in aquaporin on industrial Nano
filtration membranes. The list of polymers and biopolymers for their solubility,
The atomic sweetening design of the nano-sized channel and a single-file ordering of
molecules of water via the nanotubes have shown that aligned carbon nanotubes provide
water permeation much quicker than the Hagene Poiseuille Equation predicted. It was
13
expected to have fluxes above existing commercial RO marine membranes in a membrane
containing just 0.03 percent surface area of associated carbon nanotubes. However, because
of the lack of carbon nanotubes with a uniformly sub-nanometer diameter, high refusal of salt
or smaller molecules is difficult for aligned carbon nanotubes membranes. In order to boost
selectivity of aligning carbon nanotubes membranes, functional group gating on the opening
nanotube was proposed. The ninety eight percent rejection of Fe(CN6)3- was achieved with
low ionic strength by Donnan exclusion, by grafting carboxyl functional groups with a carbon
nanotubes substratum of 2 nm. KCl rejection at 0.3mm, however, decreased to nearly null at
10mM, was just 50 percent. Salt can physically be removed by grabbing bulky functional
groups on the tube opening. Yet steric exclusion decreases permeability considerably.
level. The diameter of the carbon nanotubes needs to be consistently <0.8 nm to achieve
significant hurdle for aquaporin and aligned carbon nanotubes membranes. Aquaporin’s are
very demanding in large-scale processing and purification. Currently the most usual method
to create aligned nanotubes is chemical vapour deposition (CVD) (Abdullah et al., 2020;
Maruyama et al., 2020). A CVD prototype with high-performance has been developed for the
production of carbon nanotubes in vertical alignment that paves the route for the scale-up
production. A magnetic field alignment system was also developed for post-manufacturing.
The membranes of nanocomposites and TFNs are highly versatile can be produced from
existing industrial production processes. The high degree permeability of water can reduce
the pressures or the required surface of the membrane. This technique could significantly
increase the energy efficiency of low osmosis pressure water treatment. Nonetheless, it may
have a minimal gain in RO seawater, which already has a thermodynamic cap energy
14
consumption. A recent study evaluated existing nanotechnology membranes based on their
The challenge for the water industry is to deal with this problem between efficient
disinfection and toxic disinfection by products (DBPs) (Mazhar et al., 2020; Srivastav et al.,
2020; Tang et al., 2020). Conventional disinfectants like chloride and ozone are now well
known to form toxic DBP (i.e. halogenated by products of the disinfection, cancer-infective
the creation of substituting methods to enhance the disinfection robustness while preventing
Nanomaterials are also less likely to induce DBPs without heavy oxidation, such as
silver, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, carbon nanotubes, cerium oxide, and fullerenes. This
requirements for water treatment (Kidd et al., 2020; Rienzie et al., 2020; Sagir et al., 2020;
Highly high ambient temperatures antimicrobial activity in short time (Zhang et al.,
2021);
During and after use of harmful sub-products cannot be produced (Hossain et al.,
2014);
For the intended usage apply inexpensively and easily (Hossain et al., 2014);
15
Simple to transport, highly water soluble and not corrosive for any appliance or
Nanomaterials have antimicrobial properties that have lower propensity to form DBPs
4.1. Mechanisms of nanoparticles based antimicrobial agents and possible uses in water
treatment
because of their unique features, including high contaminant adsorption power, excellent
and organic pollutants from wastewater and demonstrate their potential application in the
management of wastewater. A list of nano-based antimicrobial agents and potential uses for
water, drinking water and other water resources to inactive microbes. Titanium dioxide's
antibacterial function is due to the generation of reactive oxygen species. The created ROS
can kill the cytoplasmic membrane, damage protein and DNA, release of dangerous ions,
interrupt the flow of electrons, and interfere with respiratory functioning. High UV-A
disinfection. Solar disinfection based on titanium dioxide is a very sluggish method which
can be a low proportion of UV-A in sunlight. Flourishing works in doping with metals or
nitrogen is crucial for application of Titanium dioxide solar disinfection to enhance visible
light absorption of Titanium dioxide or UV-A (Gao et al., 2019; Hassan et al., 2019; W.
16
Wang et al., 2020). Titanium dioxide nanomaterial also demonstrated bacterial death in the
Since ancient times, Silver is known for its antimicrobial influence. The use of silver
years. The substance they use to decontaminate water is the following: effective and wide-
ranging antimicrobial activity, health and manufacturing (Albukhari et al., 2019; Kumar et
al., 2020; Metreveli et al., 2020; Najafpoor et al., 2020; Sherin et al., 2020). Through water
binding to −SH groups, the Nano silver absorbs ions from silver into and destroys essential
enzymes. Silver nanoparticle toxicity depends on the rate of silver ion discharge. The shape,
size, padding and crystallographic facets affect silver ion release. The presence of
omnipresent ligands increases their bioavailability and their toxicity. Silver nanoparticles
have been used as a shield for pathogens in ceramic micro filters that can be used in
developing countries.
Because of the high UV absorption ability and transparentness to visible light, Zinc
oxide nanoparticles were used in sunscreen lotions, paints and coatings. Zinc oxide
because the researchers have obtained opposite findings, for instance, the antibacterial
function of Zinc oxide nanoparticles has not been apparent. The explanation has been
suggested for the photocatalytic production of H2O2 for antimicrobial Zinc oxide action.
While nanoparticles of Zinc oxide and Zn+2 display antibacterial activity, water organisms
may be very vulnerable to dissolved zinc (Kyeong Hee et al., 2019; Mirgane et al., 2020;
Shkir et al., 2020; Sultana et al., 2020). Due to the ease of its dissolution, zinc oxide
17
A large number of sensors based on nanotechnology were used to detect various
biological and chemical species in the area. Nano-sensors are also used for trace
contaminants and to control the rates of microbial and bacterial infections in wastewater
treatment (Liu et al., 2020; Ramezani et al., 2020). From a protection point of view, it is
extremely important to sense and track these in-water toxic entities (Abubaker et al., 2019;
Graboski et al., 2020; S. Zhang et al., 2020). This is a very difficult and exciting field of
research because very specific techniques are needed in order to detect minute amounts of
ensure proper public health. In order to take adequate control steps, the identification of
extremely successful and certain lethal viruses, bacteria and minerals have not been detected.
New sensing and tracking technologies based on nano-materials have also started to develop
over the last 10 years. Worldwide researchers have made enormous efforts to synthesize
antibodies. With their particular electrical, magnetic properties, people have been sensitive to
microbial cells and other biomolecules found in water which has been sensitive to these
dye doped and noble metals have been thoroughly investigated for pathogens identification.
Quantum dots have a high sensing ability since their optical properties can be easily targeted.
The level of microbial contamination in water can easily be identified by tracking changes in
18
different pathogens is mostly achieved using quantum dots including titanium dioxide, ZnO,
cadmium selenide, ZnSO4 and MgO. Proteins, antibodies and other biomolecules are found to
be useful in altering their surfaces to improve the sensitiveness and selectivity of sensors
Gold nanoparticles are commonly used for detection purposes significantly because of
the resonance effect of surface plasmon depending on their size and shape. For instance, high
sensitivity bacteria (E. coli) are reported for the cysteine-functionalized gold nanoparticles.
Functional silica fluorescent color nanoparticles were also used for sensing applications;
carbon nanotubes have adequate room for electrochemical pathogens, thanks to their high
responsive object (for example, proteins, cell receptors, enzymes, antibodies, oligoes or
required to turn the measurement concentration into other observable signals, sound variants,
currents, absorbance and masses. Owing to the high sensitivity and photo stability, nano-
5. Conclusions
The potential nanotechnology with unique properties is the perfect candidate for fast
nanomaterials, zeolites and dendrimers can effectively be used to extract toxic metal ions,
microbial, organic and inorganic solutes from water. Recovered contaminants and depleted
methods are therefore needed to prevent toxicity hazards. The future in water processing for
nanoparticles is very promising, but a joint effort by academic, natural development projects
and industrial resources is required for quick, economic and useful equipment for water
treatment to be realized.
19
Acknowledgement
(SIMATS), Chennai, India and The Management, Vice-Chancellor, Dean and Head of
Biological Sciences, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia for their constant support to
complete the review article. The Shaanxi Introduced Talent Research Funding
(A279021901), China and The Introduction of Talent Research Start-up fund (No.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal
relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
1. Abdullah, H.B., Irmawati, R., Ismail, I., Yusof, N.A., 2020. Utilization of waste
engine oil for carbon nanotube aerogel production using floating catalyst chemical
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121188
2. Abubaker, M., Ngah, C.W.Z.C.W., Ahmad, M., Kuswandi, B., 2019. Chapter 19 -
aluminum (III) ions in water samples, in: Shukla, A.K., Iravani Characterization and
6.00020-4
3. Abukhadra, M.R., Bakry, B.M., Adlii, A., Yakout, S.M., El-Zaidy, M.E., 2019. Facile
for toxic heavy metals (Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and Cr6+) from water. J. Hazard. Mater.
20
374, 296–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.047
4. Acharya, K., Blackburn, A., Mohammed, J., Haile, A.T., Hiruy, A.M., Werner, D.,
2020. Metagenomic water quality monitoring with a portable laboratory. Water Res.
5. Adelabu, I.O., Saleh, T.A., Garrison, T.F., Al Hamouz, O.C.S., 2020. Synthesis of
polyamine-CNT composites for the removal of toxic cadmium metal ions from
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111827
6. Adira Jaafar, J., Hidayatul Nazirah Kamarudin, N., Dina Setiabudi, H., Najiha
Timmiati, S., Lee Peng, T., 2019. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles and waste derived-
siliceous materials for doxorubicin adsorption and release. Mater. Today Proc. 19,
1420–1425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.163
7. Al-Najar, B., Peters, C.D., Albuflasa, H., Hankins, N.P., 2020. Pressure and
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114323
8. Alammar, A., Park, S.-H., Williams, C.J., Derby, B., Szekely, G., 2020. Oil-in-water
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118007
9. Albukhari, S.M., Ismail, M., Akhtar, K., Danish, E.Y., 2019. Catalytic reduction of
nitrophenols and dyes using silver nanoparticles @ cellulose polymer paper for the
10. Ang, M.B.M.Y., Tang, C.-L., De Guzman, M.R., Maganto, H.L.C., Caparanga, A.R.,
21
Huang, S.-H., Tsai, H.-A., Hu, C.-C., Lee, K.-R., Lai, J.-Y., 2020. Improved
surfactants having different structures for water treatment. Desalination 481, 114352.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114352
11. Asif, M.B., Hai, F.I., Kang, J., van de Merwe, J.P., Leusch, F.D.L., Price, W.E.,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.129
12. Avetta, P., Sangermano, M., Lopez-Manchado, M., Calza, P., 2015. Use of graphite
oxide and/or thermally reduced graphite oxide for the removal of dyes from water. J.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.07.015
13. Balkenov, A., Anuarbek, A., Satayeva, A., Kim, J., Inglezakis, V., Arkhangelsky, E.,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101177
14. Betiha, M.A., Moustafa, Y.M., El-Shahat, M.F., Rafik, E., 2020.
of divalent heavy metal cations from wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 397, 122675.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122675
15. Chandrashekhar Nayak, M., Isloor, A.M., Inamuddin, Lakshmi, B., Marwani, H.M.,
22
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2019.10.007
16. Chang, H.M., Sun, Y.C., Chien, I.C., Chang, W.S., Ray, S.S., Cao, D.T.N., Cong
Duong, C., Chen, S.S., 2019. Innovative upflow anaerobic sludge osmotic membrane
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121466
17. Chen, B., Chen, Z., Lv, S., 2011. A novel magnetic biochar efficiently sorbs organic
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.067
18. Chen, C., Chen, L., Chen, S., Yu, Y., Weng, D., Mahmood, A., Wang, G., Wang, J.,
19. Chen, M., Ren, L., Qi, K., Li, Q., Lai, M., Li, Y., Li, X., Wang, Z., 2020. Enhanced
123579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123579
20. Cheng, D., Hao Ngo, H., Guo, W., Wang Chang, S., Duc Nguyen, D., Liu, Yiwen,
Zhang, X., Shan, X., Liu, Yi, 2020. Contribution of antibiotics to the fate of antibiotic
21. Chhabra, H., Kumar, M., 2020. Size and shape dependent equation of state for
nanomaterials with application to bulk materials. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 139, 109308.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109308
22. Chhabra, H., Kumar, M., 2019. Modeling for size and shape dependence of critical
temperature for different type of nanomaterials. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 135, 109075.
23
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109075
23. Couto, C.F., Santos, A.V., Amaral, M.C.S., Lange, L.C., de Andrade, L.H., Foureaux,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101029
24. De La Cueva Bueno, P., Gillerman, L., Gehr, R., Oron, G., 2017. Nanotechnology for
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.060
25. Deshmukh, S.P., Patil, S.M., Mullani, S.B., Delekar, S.D., 2019. Silver nanoparticles
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.102
26. Deshpande, B.D., Agrawal, P.S., Yenkie, M.K.N., Dhoble, S.J., 2020. Prospective of
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100442
27. Ding, S.-Y., Faraj, Y., Wei, J., Wang, W., Xie, R., Liu, Z., Ju, X.-J., Chu, L.-Y., 2020.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105493
28. Edokpayi, J.N., Makungo, R., Mathivha, F., Rivers, N., Volenzo, T., O. Odiyo, J.,
Africa: toward an adaptive management approach, in: Singh, P., Milshina, Y., Tian,
K., Gusain, D., Bassin, J.P.B.T.-W.C. and W.T. in B.N. (Eds.), . Elsevier, pp. 83–115.
24
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818339-7.00005-9
29. Esteves, T., Mota, A.T., Barbeitos, C., Andrade, K., Afonso, C.A.M., Ferreira, F.C.,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123349
30. Fauzi, A., Hapidin, D.A., Munir, M.M., Iskandar, F., Khairurrijal, K., 2020. A
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA01077D
31. Feng, X., Imran, Q., Zhang, Y., Sixdenier, L., Lu, X., Kaufman, G., Gabinet, U.,
Kawabata, K., Elimelech, M., Osuji, C.O., 2019. Precise nanofiltration in a fouling-
Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav9308
32. Fiorilli, S., Rivoira, L., Calì, G., Appendini, M., Bruzzoniti, M.C., Coïsson, M.,
Onida, B., 2017. Iron oxide inside SBA-15 modified with amino groups as reusable
adsorbent for highly efficient removal of glyphosate from water. Appl. Surf. Sci. 411,
457–465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.206
33. Gallo-Cordova, A., Lemus, J., Palomares, F.J., Morales, M.P., Mazarío, E., 2020.
removal of lead and methyl orange from aqueous solutions. Sci. Total Environ. 711,
134644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134644
34. Gao, D., Zheng, S., Wang, L., Wang, C., Zhang, H., Wang, Q., 2019. SILAR
water treatment and photoelectric conversion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 224, 308–314.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.050
25
35. García, J., García-Galán, M.J., Day, J.W., Boopathy, R., White, J.R., Wallace, S.,
resistant bacteria (ARB), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the environment:
Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123228
36. Gheidari, D., Mehrdad, M., Maleki, S., Hosseini, S., 2020. Synthesis and potent
e05058. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05058
37. Graboski, A.M., Martinazzo, J., Ballen, S.C., Steffens, J., Steffens, C., 2020. Chapter
4 - Nanosensors for water quality control, in: Amrane, A., Rajendran, S., Nguyen,
T.A., Assadi, A.A., Sharoba, A.M.B.T.-N. in the B.I. (Eds.), Micro and Nano
12-819941-1.00004-3
38. Haq, I., Mazumder, P., Kalamdhad, A.S., 2020. Recent advances in removal of lignin
from paper industry wastewater and its industrial applications – A review. Bioresour.
Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123636
39. Hassan, M.E., Liu, G., Omer, E.O.M., Goja, A.M., Acharya, S., 2019. Silver
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.12.004
40. Hayati, B., Maleki, A., Najafi, F., Daraei, H., Gharibi, F., McKay, G., 2017. Super
high removal capacities of heavy metals (Pb2+ and Cu2+) using CNT dendrimer. J.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.059
41. Hayati, B., Maleki, A., Najafi, F., Daraei, H., Gharibi, F., McKay, G., 2016. Synthesis
26
and characterization of PAMAM/CNT nanocomposite as a super-capacity adsorbent
for heavy metal (Ni2+, Zn2+, As3+, Co2+) removal from wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 224,
1032–1040. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.053
42. Himstedt, H.H., Sengupta, A., Qian, X., Wickramasinghe, S.R., 2019. Magnetically
responsive nano filtration membranes for treatment of coal bed methane produced
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.01.007
43. Hossain, F., Perales-Perez Oscar J., Hwang, S., Román, F., 2014. Antimicrobial
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.009
44. Jiang, J.-Q., Zhou, Z., Sharma, V.K., 2013. Occurrence, transportation, monitoring
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2013.04.014
45. Jiang, Y., Carrijo, D., Huang, S., Chen, J., Balaine, N., Zhang, W., van Groenigen,
K.J., Linquist, B., 2019. Water management to mitigate the global warming potential
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.010
46. Jiříček, T., Komárek, M., Lederer, T., 2017. Polyurethane Nanofiber Membranes for
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7143035
47. Jung, K.W., Ahn, K.H., 2016. Fabrication of porosity-enhanced MgO/biochar for
27
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.008
48. Kadam, A., Saratale, R.G., Shinde, S., Yang, J., Hwang, K., Mistry, B., Saratale,
G.D., Lone, S., Kim, D.-Y., Sung, J.-S., Ghodake, G., 2019. Adsorptive remediation
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.041
49. Kalaitzidou, K., Zouboulis, A., Mitrakas, M., 2020. Cost evaluation for Se(IV)
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104209
50. Kamali, M., Persson, K.M., Costa, M.E., Capela, I., 2019. Sustainability criteria for
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.055
51. Karami, P., Khorshidi, B., McGregor, M., Peichel, J.T., Soares, J.B.P., Sadrzadeh, M.,
2020. Thermally stable thin film composite polymeric membranes for water
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119447
52. Kgatitsoe, M.M., Ncube, S., Tutu, H., Nyambe, I.A., Chimuka, L., 2019. Synthesis
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103128
53. Kidd, J., Westerhoff, P., Maynard, A.D., 2020. Public perceptions for the use of
28
100220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2020.100220
54. Kumar, A., Mishra, B., Tripathi, B.P., 2020. Polydopamine assisted synthesis of
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100489
55. Kyeong Hee, O., Rupa, E.J., Anandapadmanaban, G., Chokkalingam, M., Li, J.F.,
Markus, J., Soshnikova, V., Perez, Z.E.J., Yang, D.C., 2019. Cationic and anionic dye
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.12.152
56. Leong, Y.K., Chang, J.S., 2020. Bioremediation of heavy metals using microalgae:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122886
57. Li, H., Watson, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Liu, Z., 2020. Environment-enhancing process
for algal wastewater treatment, heavy metal control and hydrothermal biofuel
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122421
58. Li, X., Chu, Z., Yang, J., Li, M., Du, M., Zhao, X., Zhu, Z. (Joy), Li, Y., 2018.
care products (PCPs) causing concern as emerging contaminants, in: Chen, B., Zhang,
B. (Helen), Zhu, Z. (Joy), Lee, K.B.T.-A. in M.B. (Eds.), Emerging Pollutants and
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2018.09.008
59. Li, Y., Qi, S., Tian, M., Widjajanti, W., Wang, R., 2019. Fabrication of aquaporin-
29
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.06.005
60. Liu, F., Zhu, S., Li, D., Chen, G., Ho, S.-H., 2020. Detecting ferric iron by microalgal
101174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101174
61. Liu, W., Yao, H., Xu, W., Liu, G., Wang, X., Tu, Y., Shi, P., Yu, N., Li, A., Wei, S.,
2020. Suspect screening and risk assessment of pollutants in the wastewater from a
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114493
62. Liu, Z., Cui, X., Piao, C., Tang, J., Li, S., Fang, D., Wang, J., 2020. Construction and
63. Liu, Z., Tang, Y., Zhao, K., Chen, W., 2019. Self-assembly of positively charged
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.013
64. Lu, F., Astruc, D., 2020. Nanocatalysts and other nanomaterials for water remediation
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213180
65. Luo, W., Xie, M., Song, X., Guo, W., Ngo, H.H., Zhou, J.L., Nghiem, L.D., 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.170
66. Madannejad, R., Shoaie, N., Jahanpeyma, F., Darvishi, M.H., Azimzadeh, M., Javadi,
30
H., 2019. Toxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials: Reviewing recent reports in
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2019.04.036
67. Mandeep, Kumar Gupta, G., Shukla, P., 2020. Insights into the resources generation
from pulp and paper industry wastes: Challenges, perspectives and innovations.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122496
68. Maruyama, T., Okada, T., Sharma, K.P., Suzuki, T., Saida, T., Naritsuka, S., Iizumi,
Y., Okazaki, T., Iijima, S., 2020. Vertically aligned growth of small-diameter single-
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145340
69. Mazhar, M.A., Khan, N.A., Ahmed, S., Khan, A.H., Hussain, A., Rahisuddin,
Changani, F., Yousefi, M., Ahmadi, S., Vambol, V., 2020. Chlorination disinfection
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123159
70. Merugu, R., Garimella, S., Velamakanni, R., Vuppugalla, P., Chitturi, K.L., Jyothi,
and copper nanoparticles using fruit pulp aqueous extracts of Moringa oleifera.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.549
71. Metreveli, G., David, J., Schneider, R., Kurtz, S., Schaumann, G.E., 2020.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139989
31
72. Mirgane, N.A., Shivankar, V.S., Kotwal, S.B., Wadhawa, G.C., Sonawale, M.C.,
2020. Waste pericarp of ananas comosus in green synthesis zinc oxide nanoparticles
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.045
73. Moharrami, P., Motamedi, E., 2020. Application of cellulose nanocrystals prepared
Efficient and selective nanoadsorbent for removal of cationic dyes from water.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123661
74. Mollahosseini, A., Abdelrasoul, A., 2019. Recent advances in thin film composites
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.01.014
75. Morrison, E.S., Shields, M.R., Bianchi, T.S., Liu, Y., Newman, S., Tolic, N., Chu,
R.K., 2020. Multiple biomarkers highlight the importance of water column processes
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115153
76. Nadizadeh, Z., Mahdavi, H., 2021. Grafting of zwitterion polymer on polyamide
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117605
77. Najafpoor, A., Norouzian-Ostad, R., Alidadi, H., Rohani-Bastami, T., Davoudi, M.,
Barjasteh-Askari, F., Zanganeh, J., 2020. Effect of magnetic nanoparticles and silver-
32
78. Nasr, A. Ben, Charcosset, C., Amar, R. Ben, Walha, K., 2013. Defluoridation of water
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.01.021
79. Nawaz, H., Umar, M., Ullah, A., Razzaq, H., Zia, K.M., Liu, X., 2021.
80. Niza, E., Božik, M., Bravo, I., Clemente-Casares, P., Lara-Sanchez, A., Juan, A.,
Klouček, P., Alonso-Moreno, C., 2020. PEI-coated PLA nanoparticles to enhance the
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127131
81. Nouri, N., Khorram, P., Duman, O., Sibel, T., Hassan, S., 2020. Overview of
nanosorbents used in solid phase extraction techniques for the monitoring of emerging
organic contaminants in water and wastewater samples. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem.
82. Olvera, R.C., Silva, S.L., Robles-Belmont, E., Lau, E.Z., 2017. Review of
83. Park, J.C., Kim, J.-C., Park, S., Kim, D.-W., 2020. Efficient waste polyvinyl(butyral)
and cellulose composite enabled carbon nanofibers for oxygen reduction reaction and
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145505
84. Pendergast, M.M., Hoek, E.M. V, 2011. A review of water treatment membrane
https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00541J
33
85. Perveen, R., Shujaat, S., Qureshi, Z., Nawaz, S., Khan, M.I., Iqbal, M., 2020. Green
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.004
140966. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140966
87. Pourrahim, S., Salem, A., Salem, S., Tavangar, R., 2020. Application of solid waste of
ductile cast iron industry for treatment of wastewater contaminated by reactive blue
dye via appropriate nano-porous magnesium oxide. Environ. Pollut. 256, 113454.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113454
88. Punitha, V.N., Vijayakumar, S., Sakthivel, B., Praseetha, P.K., 2020. Protection of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104343
89. Qi, J., Zhang, G., Li, H., 2015. Efficient removal of arsenic from water using a
90. Raghu, M.S., Yogesh Kumar, K., Prashanth, M.K., Prasanna, B.P., Vinuth, R.,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.03.001
91. Rahman, Z., 2020. An overview on heavy metal resistant microorganisms for
34
simultaneous treatment of multiple chemical pollutants at co-contaminated sites, and
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122682
92. Ramezani, M., Taghdisi, S.M., Yazdian-Robati, R., Oroojalian, F., Abnous, K.,
Alibolandi, M., 2020. Chapter 17 - Nanosensors for water safety, in: Han, B., Tomer,
V.K., Nguyen, T.A., Farmani, A., Kumar Singh, P.B.T.-N. for S.C. (Eds.), Micro and
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819870-4.00016-5
93. Rassoulinejad-Mousavi, S.M., Azamat, J., Khataee, A., Zhang, Y., 2020. Molecular
dynamics simulation of water purification using zeolite MFI nanosheets. Sep. Purif.
94. Rehman, F., Thebo, K.H., Aamir, M., Akhtar, J., 2020. Chapter 8 - Nanomembranes
for water treatment, in: Amrane, A., Rajendran, S., Nguyen, T.A., Assadi, A.A.,
Sharoba, A.M.B.T.-N. in the B.I. (Eds.), Micro and Nano Technologies. Elsevier, pp.
207–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819941-1.00008-0
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102977-0.00012-3
96. Rieu-Clarke, A., Moynihan, R., Magsig, B.O., 2015. Transboundary water
governance and climate change adaptation: international law, policy guidelines and
Assessment Program.
97. Rubilar, R., Hubbard, R., Emhart, V., Mardones, O., Quiroga, J.J., Medina, A.,
Valenzuela, H., Espinoza, J., Burgos, Y., Bozo, D., 2020. Climate and water
35
availability impacts on early growth and growth efficiency of Eucalyptus genotypes:
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117763
98. Sagir, M., Tahir, M.B., Rafique, M., Rafique, M.S., Nawaz, T., 2020. Chapter 10 -
Tahir, M.B., Rafique, M., Rafique, M.S.B.T.-N. and P. for E.A. (Eds.), Micro and
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821192-2.00010-3
99. Sajid, M., Nazal, M.K., Ihsanullah, Baig, N., Osman, A.M., 2018. Removal of heavy
metals and organic pollutants from water using dendritic polymers based adsorbents:
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.011
100. Salazar, H., Martins, P.M., Santos, B., Fernandes, M.M., Reizabal, A., Sebastián, V.,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126299
101. Saleh, I.A., Zouari, N., Al-Ghouti, M.A., 2020. Removal of pesticides from water and
102. Sharma, B.M., Bečanová, J., Scheringer, M., Sharma, A., Bharat, G.K., Whitehead,
P.G., Klánová, J., Nizzetto, L., 2019. Health and ecological risk assessment of
sweeteners) in surface and groundwater (drinking water) in the Ganges River Basin,
36
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.235
103. Sherin, L., Sohail, A., Amjad, U.-S., Mustafa, M., Jabeen, R., Ul-Hamid, A., 2020.
Facile green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Terminalia bellerica kernel extract
104. Shkir, M., Al-Shehri, B.M., Pachamuthu, M.P., Khan, A., Chandekar, K. V, AlFaify,
for water treatments. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 587, 124340.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124340
105. Sivagami, M., Selvambigai, M., Devan, U., Velangani, A.A.J., Karmegam, N.,
Biruntha, M., Arun, A., Kim, W., Govarthanan, M., Kumar, P., 2020. Extraction of
microplastics from commonly used sea salts in India and their toxicological
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128181
106. Slobodian, P., Riha, P., Olejnik, R., Cvelbar, U., Saha, P., 2013. Enhancing effect of
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.023
107. Srivastav, A.L., Patel, N., Chaudhary, V.K., 2020. Disinfection by-products in
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115474
108. Sultana, K.A., Islam, M.T., Silva, J.A., Turley, R.S., Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.,
37
hydroxyl radical. J. Mol. Liq. 307, 112931.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112931
109. Sun, H., Wang, T., Yang, Z., Yu, C., Wu, W., 2019. Simultaneous removal of
nitrogen and pharmaceutical and personal care products from the effluent of waste
110. Tan, X.F., Liu, Y.G., Gu, Y.L., Xu, Y., Zeng, G.M., Hu, X.J., Liu, S.B., Wang, X.,
Liu, S.M., Li, J., 2016. Biochar-based nano-composites for the decontamination of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.093
111. Tang, X., Ding, A., Pronk, W., Ziemba, C., Cheng, X., Wang, J., Xing, J., Xie, B., Li,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.155
112. Tang, Y., Long, X., Wu, M., Yang, S., Gao, N., Xu, B., Dutta, S., 2020. Bibliometric
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116741
113. Terrado, M., Barceló, D., Tauler, R., 2010. Multivariate curve resolution of organic
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.026
114. Udhayakumar, R., Manivannan, P., Raghu, K., Vaideki, S., 2016. Assessment of
38
134, 474–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.014
115. Valamohammadi, E., Behdarvand, F., Tofighy, M.A., Mohammadi, T., 2020.
HPEI for water treatment application. Sep. Purif. Technol. 242, 116826.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116826
116. Vedhanayagam, M., Nair, B.U., Sreeram, K.J., 2019. Dimension effect: Dendrimer
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100354
117. Verma, B., Balomajumder, C., 2020. Surface modification of one-dimensional Carbon
118. Verma, N., Vaidh, S., Vishwakarma, G.S., Pandya, A., 2020. Chapter 18 -
Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection, in: Rajendran, S., Mukherjee, A.,
Nguyen, T.A., Godugu, C., Shukla, R.K.B.T.-N. (Eds.), Micro and Nano
12-819943-5.00018-X
119. Vinardell, S., Astals, S., Mata-Alvarez, J., Dosta, J., 2020. Techno-economic analysis
120. Wang, J., Tang, X., Xu, Y., Cheng, X., Li, G., Liang, H., 2020. Hybrid UF/NF
process treating secondary effluent of wastewater treatment plants for potable water
reuse: Adsorption vs. coagulation for removal improvements and membrane fouling
39
alleviation. Environ. Res. 188, 109833.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109833
121. Wang, W., Lin, F., Yan, B., Cheng, Z., Chen, G., Kuang, M., Yang, C., Hou, L.,
degradation of methylene blue dye under sunlight. Environ. Res. 188, 109831.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109831
122. Wang, Y., Xue, Y., Zhang, C., 2020. Generation and application of reactive chlorine
mechanism for enhanced degradation performance. Sci. Total Environ. 712, 136501.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136501
123. Wang, Z., Zhao, P., Zhu, B., Jiang, Z., Guo, X., 2018. Magnetic solid-phase
124. Wen, Y., Yuan, J., Ma, X., Wang, S., Liu, Y., 2019. Polymeric nanocomposite
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-019-00895-9
125. Werner, S., Kätzl, K., Wichern, M., Buerkert, A., Steiner, C., Marschner, B., 2018.
Agronomic benefits of biochar as a soil amendment after its use as waste water
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.048
Fund/Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council. Global water supply and
40
127. Wong, J.K.H., Tan, H.K., Lau, S.Y., Yap, P.-S., Danquah, M.K., 2019. Potential and
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103261
128. Wu, W., Shi, Y., Liu, G., Fan, X., Yu, Y., 2020. Recent development of graphene
oxide based forward osmosis membrane for water treatment: A critical review.
129. Wu, Yong, Chen, C., Wang, G., Xiong, B., Zhou, W., Xue, F., Qi, W., Qiu, C.S., Liu,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138904
130. Wu, Yang, Guan, C.-Y., Griswold, N., Hou, L., Fang, X., Hu, A., Hu, Z., Yu, C.-P.,
organic pollutants from the aquatic environment: Recent advances and perspectives. J.
131. Xia, L., Andersen, M.F., Hélix-Nielsen, C., McCutcheon, J.R., 2017. Novel
commercial aquaporin flat-sheet membrane for forward osmosis. Ind. Eng. Chem.
132. Xiang, Y., Rene, E.R., Lun, X., Ma, W., 2020. Enhanced reductive defluorination and
133. Xiao, Y., Guo, D., Li, T., Zhou, Q., Shen, L., Li, R., Xu, Y., Lin, H., 2020. Facile
layer-by-layer self-assembly for dye separation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 515, 146063.
41
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146063
134. Xing, B., Dong, J., Yang, G., Jiang, N., Liu, X., Yuan, J., 2020. An insight into N,S-
codoped activated carbon for the catalytic persulfate oxidation of organic pollutions in
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117714
135. Xu, J., Cao, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, Z., Lou, Z., Xu, X., Wang, X., 2018. A review of
functionalized carbon nanotubes and graphene for heavy metal adsorption from water:
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.061
136. Yang, F., Zhang, S., Sun, Y., Du, Q., Song, J., Tsang, D.C.W., 2019. A novel
385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.042
137. Yang, H.J., Jeong, H.J., Bong, K.M., Jin, D.R., Kang, T.-W., Ryu, H.-S., Han, J.H.,
Yang, W.J., Jung, H., Hwang, S.H., Na, E.H., 2020. Organic matter and heavy metal
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111466
138. Yang, Z., Wu, Y., Guo, H., Ma, X.H., Lin, C.E., Zhou, Y., Cao, B., Zhu, B.K., Shih,
K., Tang, C.Y., 2017. A novel thin-film nano-templated composite membrane with in
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.046
139. Yantasee, W., Lin, Y., Fryxell, G.E., Busche, B.J., 2004. Simultaneous detection of
cadmium, copper, and lead using a carbon paste electrode modified with
42
carbamoylphosphonic acid self-assembled monolayer on mesoporous silica
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.001
140. Yao, S., Li, X., Cheng, H., Zhang, C., Bian, Y., Jiang, X., Song, Y., 2019. Resource
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122081
141. Yu, H., Ma, Z., Meng, S., Qiao, S., Zeng, X., Tong, Z., Jeong, K.C., 2020. A novel
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117309
142. Yu, Z., Han, H., Feng, P., Zhao, S., Zhou, T., Kakade, A., Kulshrestha, S., Majeed, S.,
Li, X., 2020. Recent advances in the recovery of metals from waste through biological
143. Zhang, S., Jin, L., Liu, J., Wang, Q., Jiao, L., 2020. A label-free yellow-emissive
chromium (VI) in environmental water samples. Mater. Chem. Phys. 248, 122912.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.122912
144. Zhang, S., Tian, Y., Guo, Y., Shan, J., Liu, R., 2021. Manganese release from
corrosion products of cast iron pipes in drinking water distribution systems: Effect of
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127904
145. Zhang, W., Zhang, D., Liang, Y., 2019. Nanotechnology in remediation of water
43
266–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.045
146. Zhang, Y., Wang, K.-T., Jiang, W.-L., He, J.-Y., Wang, H., Li, B., Gao, M., 2020.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125938
147. Zhang, Z., Cheng, J., Luo, Y., Shi, W., Wang, W., Zhang, B., Zhang, R., Bao, X.,
for enhanced aqueous bromate catalytic reduction. Catal. Commun. 105, 11–15.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2017.11.004
148. Zhuang, H., Zhu, H., Zhang, J., Shan, S., Fang, C., Tang, H., Xie, Q., 2020. Enhanced
biochar for triggering direct interspecies electron transfer and its use in coal
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122306
149. Zubair, M., Ihsanullah, I., Abdul Aziz, H., Azmier Ahmad, M., Al-Harthi, M.A.,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124128
44
List of Figures:
45
Fig. 1.
List of Tables:
Table 1.
List of nano-membranes of their optimistic characteristics and approaches.
Nano- Characteristics Approaches Water treatment
membranes Optimistic Negotiary Nanomembranes
thickness
Nano-composite Improve Resistant bulk Extremely 4.1 to 49.8 μm2
membranes hydrophobicity, material needed to complex (Wen et al., 2019)
thermal / release potential conditions, such as
mechanical Nanoparticles while micro-pollutant
stability and using oxidizing elimination and
fouling resistance nanomaterial reverse osmosis
46
Aquaporin Permeability and Mechanical Desalination under Aquaporin Flat-
based high ionic impairment low pressure Sheet Membrane
membranes resistance (thickness ∼110 μm)
(Xia et al., 2017)
Nano-fiber High efficiency of Nanofibers may be Stand alone filter, PUR10 is mere 6
membranes permeability, released, pore ultra filtration, μm, nylon 6
customized, blocking possible cartilage filters, nanofiber/cellulose
bactericidal and Water filtering, 205 μm (Fauzi et al.,
porous prefiltration 2020; Jiříček et al.,
2017)
47
Table 2.
List of polymers and biopolymers for their solubility, hydrophobicity, stable mechanics and chemical
stability.
Polymers and Molecular Hydrophilicity Solubility Steady Chemical
bio-polymers weight (g/mol) and mechanics stability
hydrophobicity
Propionate and 1811.7 Hydrophobic In ink Strong point Stable
cellulose acetate solvents of fusion interface
(benzene,
toluene,
etc.)
Polyacrylonitrile 53.0626 ± Hydrophobic In Weniger Strong Has
0.0028 polar tolerance to excellent
solvents temperature chemical
and power stability
48
Table 3.
List of Nano-based antimicrobial agents and possible uses in water treatment
Various sources of pollutants Nanomaterials based Pathogens (targeted microorganisms)
contaminating water antimicrobial agents
resources
Municipal pollution: (Water Chitosan nanoparticles Active against Gram-negative and
treatment (some of the Gram-positive bacteria (H. Yu et al.,
sewage is not properly 2020)
handled or handled), Storm
Bimetallic silver and copper Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria
drains, Septic tanks (home
nanoparticles gonorrhoeae and Escherichia coli
sewage), Vessels that
(Gram negative) (Merugu et al.,
discharge sewage, Yard
2020)
runoff (fertiliser and herbicide
waste).
Titanium di-oxide (TiO2) Staphylococcus aureus and
nanoparticles Staphylococcus epidermidis (Gram-
Industrial pollution:
positive), Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Radioactive contaminants
and Klebsiella pneumonia (Gram-
from nuclear power plants
negative), Candida albicans and
and medical and scientific
Aspergillus niger (Fungi) (Punitha et
sources, Heavy metals,
al., 2020)
organic contaminants, oils
and solids in industrial waste, PEI-coated PLA nanoparticles Escherichia coli and Salmonella
Pollutants, such as sulphur, enterica (Gram negative); Listeria
fossil fuel combustion, oil and monocytogenes and Staphylococcus
other petroleum products aureus (Gram positive) (Niza et al.,
from super-tank spills and 2020)
offshore drilling incidents,
Heated water with chemical Peptide-functionalized magnetic Staphylococcus sp. (Gram positive)
residues from industrial nanoparticles (AMP-MNPs) (Ding et al., 2020)
operations, such as power
stations.
Cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and
nanoparticles Escherichia coli (Gram-negative);
Agricultural pollution: Grain,
Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus
livestock and poultry farming
cereus (Gram-positive) (Gheidari et
discharges pollutants such as
al., 2020)
fertilizers, pesticides and
animal waste into local
waterways. Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles Alternaria alternata, Sclerotium
rolfsii and Stemphylium solani
Medical waste pollutants: (Fungi); Escherichia coli (Gram-
During health care activities. negative) (Perveen et al., 2020)
Highlights:
49
Nanoparticles are low-cost adsorbents for radionuclides and heavy metals.
50