Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views51 pages

10.1016@j.biortech.2020.124394

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 51

Journal Pre-proofs

Emerging nano-structured innovative materials as adsorbents in wastewater


treatment

Sivasubramanian Manikandan, Natchimuthu Karmegam, Ramasamy


Subbaiya, Guruviah Karthiga Devi, Ramaswamy Arulvel, Balasubramani
Ravindran, Mukesh Kumar Awasthi

PII: S0960-8524(20)31668-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124394
Reference: BITE 124394

To appear in: Bioresource Technology

Received Date: 4 October 2020


Revised Date: 31 October 2020
Accepted Date: 5 November 2020

Please cite this article as: Manikandan, S., Karmegam, N., Subbaiya, R., Karthiga Devi, G., Arulvel, R.,
Ravindran, B., Kumar Awasthi, M., Emerging nano-structured innovative materials as adsorbents in wastewater
treatment, Bioresource Technology (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124394

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover
page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version
will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are
providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors
may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Emerging nano-structured innovative materials as adsorbents in
wastewater treatment
Sivasubramanian Manikandanb, Natchimuthu Karmegamc, Ramasamy Subbaiyad, Guruviah

Karthiga Devib, Ramaswamy Arulvelb, Balasubramani Ravindrane, Mukesh Kumar Awasthia*


aCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Taicheng Road

3#, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China


bDepartment of Biotechnology, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of

Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha Nagar, Thandalam, Chennai – 602 105,

Tamil Nadu, India


cDepartment of Botany, Government Arts College (Autonomous), Salem 636 007, Tamil

Nadu, India
dDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, The

Copperbelt University, Riverside, Jambo Drive, P O Box 21692, Kitwe, Zambia


eDepartment of Environmental Energy and Engineering, Kyonggi University, Youngtong –

Gu, Suwon, 16227, South Korea

* Corresponding author:

Dr. Mukesh Kumar Awasthi

College of Natural Resources and Environment,

Northwest A&F University, Taicheng Road 3#,

Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

E-mail: mukesh_awasthi45@yahoo.com

1
Abstract

Water supply around the globe is struggling to meet the rapidly increasing demand by the

population, drastic changes in climate and degrading water quality. Even though, many large-

scale methods are employed for wastewater treatment they display several negative impacts

owing to the presence of pollutants. Technological innovation is required for integrated water

management with different groups of nanomaterials for the removal of toxic metal ions,

microbial disease, organic and inorganic solutes. The method of manipulating atoms on a

nanoscale is nanotechnology. Nanomembranes are used in nanotechnology to soften water

and eliminate physical, chemical and biological pollutants. The present review concentrates

on various nanotechnological approaches in wastewater remedy, mechanisms involved to

promote implementation, benefits and limitations in comparison with current processes,

properties, barriers and commercialization research needs. Also the review identifies

opportunities for further exploiting the exclusive features for green water management by

following the advances in nanotechnology.

Keywords: Adsorbents; Carbon nanotubes; Heavy metals; Nanomaterials; Sewage.

2
1. Introduction

For all life on earth, water is the most important material and a vital resource for

human civilization (Morrison et al., 2020; Rubilar et al., 2020). Trustworthy access to safe

and available water is one of the fundamental priorities for the 21st century and remains a

significant challenge world-wide. Nevertheless, supply of safe potable water has, because of

significant water contamination, become a global concern today (Acharya et al., 2020; Ponce-

Rodríguez et al., 2020). The United Nations has reported that more people have died from

any sort of violence including war, aggression, destruction, and mortality, although more

people have died from tainted water relative to war and violence (WHO/UNICEF, 2000).

Regarding the imminent global water crisis, Nature highlights in its website that “things in

the world are becoming worse and more than one trillion people lack access to clean water

(Edokpayi et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2019). The estimated supply of water per person over the

next two decades is down by one third, likely leading to premature deaths for many millions

of people (Rieu-Clarke et al., 2015).

Organic, inorganic and biological water pollutants originating from different sources

can be present (Cheng et al., 2020; Haq et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Mandeep et al., 2020; Z.

Yu et al., 2020). Some chemicals are harmful and carcinogenic and cause harm to humans

and ecosystems (Rahman, 2020). Recent studies reveal that the contamination and toxicity of

microplastics in marine water leading to their existence in marine salts of human use

(Sivagami et al., 2020). At the same time, the heavy metals are notorious highly toxic water

contaminants (Liu et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020). Arsenic is one of the most lethal

components, well-known from the old days. Certain heavy metals of extremely hazardous

water contaminants include cadmium, chromium, arsenic, plum, zinc, nickel, copper, etc.,

and their remediation is becoming complicated due to the complexity of contaminants (Leong

and Chang, 2020; Qi et al., 2015; Rahman, 2020; Sajid et al., 2018). At high concentrations,

3
chromates, NO3-, SO42-, PO³, F-, Cl-, Se2- and oxalates have hazardous consequences; ions of

these also modify the smell of mud. For example, fluorosis is caused by enhanced levels of

fluoride in the water (Nasr et al., 2013; Udhayakumar et al., 2016). Toxicity is associated

with various types of contaminants, including those of chemical fertilizers, different forms of

pesticides, plasticisers, petrochemical products, phenols and biphenyls, detergents, oils and

greases (Terrado et al., 2010; Xing et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2020). In freshwater

environments worldwide, pharmaceutical products and personal care products (PPCPs) are

prevalent and are regarded as pollutants of significance. Currently, their persistence,

bioaccumulation and toxicity levels as pollutants are concerned. PPCPs are not classified as

persistent organic pollutants (POPs), whereas PPCPs have characteristic similar to POPs (Li

et al., 2018; Sharma et al., 2019). Drugs and veterinary medicinal products for the prevention

or treatment of human and animal disease are known as prescription, while PCP (personnel-

care products) is primarily used to improve everyday living standards. In recent years, the

involuntary presence of PPCPs in different aquatic compartments (such as water, sediments

and biota) in amounts that can have adverse effects on aquatic organisms has become

common. This is a major concern because PPCPs are increasingly commonly used, resulting

in their continuous release into the environment, in human and veterinary medical devices.

The concentration of PPCP concentration in water ranges from mg/L up to μg/L. For this

reason, customary water treatment processes provide substandard results, since the processing

provisions are ill-prepared to eliminate stable low-levels of pollutants. The emerging organic

contaminants, PPCPs, antibiotic resistance genes, nitrogen, steroids and pesticides are

increasing at an alarming rate which poses the scientific community to develop suitable and

feasible alternate methods (Asif et al., 2018; M. Chen et al., 2020; García et al., 2020; Sun et

al., 2019).

4
Nanotechnology's recent success provides leapfrogging incentives to build water

supply networks of the next decade. The present water treatment systems have no more

sustainability, distribution and disposal methods, which depend heavily on transport and

central systems (Jiang et al., 2013). The nanotechnology-capable processes are highly

efficient, modular, and multifunctional, which provide affordable solutions for water

treatment and wastewater treatment that depend the least on key infrastructures (Deshpande

et al., 2020; Olvera et al., 2017; Wong et al., 2019). The water and wastewater treatment

processing system with nanotechnology promises not only to solve major challenges with

current therapies but also to deliver a new therapy capability which could enable emerging

water sources to be used efficiently and increase water supply which has been schematically

explained in Fig. 1.

Here is a summary of recent developments in water and wastewater treatment

nanotechnologies. Large nanomaterial technologies are objectively studied on the basis of

their unit activity functions. The challenges to their systematic implementation and the need

for work to address these challenges are also addressed. This analysis will not take into

account the potential consequence of nano-based materials on the environment and public

health or any possible disturbance in treatment processes and will therefore not be explored in

depth (De La Cueva Bueno et al., 2017; Kamali et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). Several

nanomaterial types which could be used in water rehabilitation are mentioned, such as

zeolites, polymer and metal nanoparticles, and Carbon-based nanomaterials (CbN)

(Madannejad et al., 2019; Vedhanayagam et al., 2019), mesoporous supporting self-

assembled monolayers (SAMMS) (Yantasee et al., 2004), biopolymers, iron nanoparts and

nanoscale photo catalysts in semiconductors. Many nanotechnological pathways have so far

been developed for wastewater treatment. Within the following broad categories, among the

most commonly used techniques can be classified:

5
a. Nanotechnology focused on adsorption of waste and toxic materials.

b. Technology focused on nanomembranes for wastewater treatment.

c. Technology based on antimicrobial nanomaterials to destroy pathogens in treated water.

d. Nano-catalyst-based photocatalysis is a very promising approach for the treatment of

polluted water.

e. Sensing and control equipment for wastewater treatment.

The various types of water treatment approaches have been discussed in the following

sections of the review paper. A brief overview of the existing problems in the use of nano-

based technologies and their potential risks has been provided.

2. Existing and future uses for treating sewage and wastewater

Nanomaterials are generally classified in a minimum of one dimension as materials

smaller than 100 nm (Chhabra and Kumar, 2020, 2019). Products at this scale also possess

different dimension-dependent properties, many of which were studied in the treatment of

wastewater and water. Many devices use the smoothly scalable nanomaterial properties of

larger surface areas, including rapid disintegration, heavy sorption and high reactivity. Other

benefits of their discontinuous properties have been superparamagnetism, localised

plasmoplasm resonation, and quantum containment.

Four main groups can be considered to be the most widely used nanomaterials:

a. Carbon-dependent nano-adsorbents in wastewater treatment.

b. Metal-based nano-adsorbents in wastewater treatment.

c. Polymer-based nano-adsorbents in wastewater treatment.

d. Zeolites: Zeolites and its composites in wastewater treatment.

Each of these groups of nano-adsorbents are discussed in the following section

briefly.

6
2.1. Organic waste replacement of carbon nano-adsorbents

Adsorption is widely used as a finishing step in the treatment of water and wastewater

to eliminate pollutants of organic and inorganic nature (Kadam et al., 2019; Kalaitzidou et al.,

2020; J. Wang et al., 2020). Conventional adsorbents typically have a weakness in their

effectiveness by the surface or active sites, inadequacy of selectivity and adsorption kinetics.

With its exceptionally accurate surface and associated sorption sites, fast intra-particle

diffusion distance and pore size and surface chemical tuning, nano-sorbents give substantial

improvement (Gallo-Cordova et al., 2020; Kgatitsoe et al., 2019; Moharrami and Motamedi,

2020; Nouri et al., 2020).

Nanomaterials have suitable surface modification scopes. Organic ligands allow the

binding of metal ions with that of nanomaterials or any other specific contaminants from

water. A large number of Nano structuring resources for use with adsorption of pollutants

have been reported in the literature for use in wastewater treatment. Checked for the removal

of metal ions and water teeth molecules from modified carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide and

nanocomposite Graphene-Fe3O4 (Raghu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018). The core

nanoparticles from Fe3O4 / C, amino and hydroxyl gel, many silica-based adsorbents have

been identified, such as SBA-15 amino-functionalized (Betiha et al., 2020; Fiorilli et al.,

2017; Zhang et al., 2018), magnetic mesoporous silica (Jaafar et al., 2019), mesoporous

multiamine grafting silica, amino-functionalized silica and synthetic gel loops, amino-

functionalized, EDTA-functional, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, and silica gel for effective

heavy metal ion adsorption from water. Magnetic nanoparticles and their composition are

also the perfect absorbers of water pollutants (organic and inorganic). It can be easily

separated by a simple adsorption bar magnet, which helps you to resolve other adsorbents.

2.2. Nanoparticles for heavy metal ions removal

7
The oxidized carbon nanotubes are highly adsorbed to high kinetic metal ions. Carbon

nanotube surfaces are the most important functional surfaces (e.g. carboxyl, hydroxyl and

phenol) predominantly through electrostatic appeal and chemical bonding. Significantly, it

increases the potential of carbon nanotubes adsorption through surface oxidation (Adelabu et

al., 2020; Hayati et al., 2017). Several studies have shown better adsorbtion of heavy metals

with carbon nanotubes than activated carbon (for example Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ and Cd2+, for

example); the kinetics of adsorption on carbon nanotubes are rapid because of the extremely

accessible sites for adsorption and the close range between intraparticles (Chandrashekhar

Nayak et al., 2020; Z. Liu et al., 2020; Verma and Balomajumder, 2020).

Generally, carbon nanotubes as broad spectrum adsorbents might not be a right choice

with reference to the activated carbon. These may also have unique applications for polishing

measures in order to eliminate recalcitrant compounds or organic contaminants in trace for

analytical grounds, as the surface chemistry could possibly be tailored towards different

contaminants. Limited amounts of materials are required for these applications and therefore

are less prone to costs. Among the adsorbents, graphite oxide is cheap alternative which is

developed from exfoliating graphite with strong acids and oxidizers (Avetta et al., 2015). It

has been recently stated that graphite oxide-coated sand granules were effective in Hg2+

removal and a bulky Rhodamine B (colouration molecule).

2.3. Nanoparticles as cheap adsorbents for radionuclides and toxic heavy metals

Surface oxidized carbon nanotubes with H2O2, KMnO4 and HNO3 are used to extract

Cd2+ from aquatic solutions (Slobodian et al., 2013). The elevated adsorption capabilities

towards the ions of metals consisting quicker kinetics may result from the oxidation of carbon

nanotubes. Oxidized carbon nanotubes surfaces contain functional groups including

carboxylic, hydroxyl and carbonyl acid. Such groups have strong heavy metal ions adsorption

potential as long as the pH of oxidized carbon nanotubes is above the isoelectric level.

8
Several studies have shown that the carbon nanotubes adsorb heavy metal ions with very

strong nanomaterials, including Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ and Cd2+ (Abukhadra et al., 2019; Hayati et

al., 2017, 2016; Xu et al., 2018). A carbon nanotube sponge with a boron dash showed a very

good water oil adsorbing ability. Such sponges are reusable once oil is drained and pledge to

prevent oil spills for oil recovery.

3. Nano membranes and membrane systems for treatment of wastewater

Water treatment is mainly aimed at eliminating undesired components from water.

Regardless of their thickness, the membranes form a physical obstacle to new sources of

water to these constituents. These offer a considerable degree of automation which requires

reduced land area in which the chemical intake is the major part of water treatment and reuse

and a modular design allows for scalable design. The intrinsic jeopardize between the

selectivity and permeability of membranes is a major problem in membrane technology. A

main obstacle to the broad utilization of pressurized processes with membranes is the

consumption of lots of energy. The fouling of membrane increases the energy consumption,

process design and operation complexity. This in turn reduces the life of membranes and

membrane modules. The membrane material is the sole factor which determines the

performance of the systems to a greater extent. An excellent opportunity to improve

membrane permeability, fouling resistance, mechanical and thermal stability is offered by the

incorporation of functional nanomaterials as membranes (Lu and Astruc, 2020;

Rassoulinejad-Mousavi et al., 2020; Rehman et al., 2020).

According to the mode of porosity, structure and application, membranes are

classified into different forms, such as nano-filtration membranes (Ang et al., 2020; Himstedt

et al., 2019; Nawaz et al., 2021), nanocomposite membranes (Alammar et al., 2020;

Moharrami and Motamedi, 2020; Salazar et al., 2020; Valamohammadi et al., 2020), self-

assembly membranes (C. Chen et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2019; Yong Wu et al., 2020; Xiao et

9
al., 2020), thin film composites (Karami et al., 2020; Mollahosseini and Abdelrasoul, 2019),

aquaporin-based membranes (Balkenov et al., 2020; Li et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020),

biological membranes (Saleh et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2018), and reverse osmosis membranes

(Couto et al., 2020; Vinardell et al., 2020; W. Wu et al., 2020). They are divisible into several

forms of membranes. The preparation and application of wastewater treatment of various

forms of membranes are dealt in the following section. Nanofiltration is a pressurized process

in which unclean water flows through a thin polymers containing pores 1 to 10 nm in length,

separating the contaminants larger than the pores from the water. Dissolving of dissolved

solids, organic matter and water versatile cations by nanofiltration is beneficial.

Nanofiltration membrane is used most frequently for suppressing water, because Ca and Mg

ions have been captured, while monovalent ions can pass through the water in a hydrated

way. Nano filtration membranes are used in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries for

solvent recovery. They are also used for purification of gas condensates in petrochemical

industries. For the extraction of amino acids and lipids from cell cultures in the field of life

sciences, the nanofiltration membranes are highly useful (Esteves et al., 2020). The nano

membranes and their optimistic characteristics have been detailed in Table 1.

Various techniques have been developed to produce and modify the surface of

filtration membranes (Werner et al., 2018). A thin, composite nano-filtered membrane film

was deployed by Yang and his colleagues on an ultra-filtration substrict through an interlayer

of polydopamine polyethyleneeminic deposition (Yang et al., 2017). Such membranes show

that Na2SO4 is eliminated by 97% and Na2SO4 salt rejection order by MgSO4 and

MgCl2.NaCl.

It is very useful to extract ions like Na, K and reverse osmosis (RO) chloride.

Consequently, it is considered extensive applications in marine desalination. In the last

several decades considerable efforts were made to develop cheap membrane filtration

10
technologies with high efficiency for desalination. Most industrial RO membranes in use are

thin film composite structures in which the polyamide layer on top of the microporous

support membrane is shielded. The selectivity of permeation is controlled efficiently by the

polyamide films. However, the efficiency of their membrane fouling decreases over time due

to organic matter accumulation and pores in microbes. Chlorine-assisted oxidative

degradation often also degrades membranes (Y. Wang et al., 2020). In addition, the most

common practice is to modify the membrane through grafting / covering it by using suitable

functional groups to overcome these problems (Nadizadeh and Mahdavi, 2021).

The inclusion of nano-composite materials into the production of new membrane

materials has also been reported (Al-Najar et al., 2020). Graphene oxide (GO) has been

shown to be a two-functional protective cap to increase both anti-fouling membrane and

resistance against chlorine, whilst retaining its efficiency in separation. In recent years, much

emphasis has been put on the use of functional carbon nanotubes in Composite RO

membranes. A very interesting study shows that the flow of water and the salt rejection can

be greatly improved through the incorporation of the polyamide membrane as zwitterion-

friendly nanotubes. The polyamide-RO membranes have functional carbon nanotubes for

higher water streams. Furthermore, the carbon nanotubes loaded membranes were more

robust and chemically resistant when compared with plain membranes. The advantages of

using composite membranes can be due to the hydrophobic nanotubes, which are formed

from uniform interactions between the carbon nanotubes and polyamide within active levels

via the nanotubes of carbon and their membrane homogeneity. Biochar adsorption technology

in wastewater treatment is currently being steadily introduced (Chen et al., 2011; Jung and

Ahn, 2016; Yao et al., 2019; Zubair et al., 2020). Biochar is known to adsorb standard animal

wastewater pollutants such as organic pollutants, heavy metals, nitrogen and phosphorus

(Xiang et al., 2020; Zhuang et al., 2020; Zubair et al., 2020). However, nano-composites

11
based on bio-char in wastewater remediation is found to be effective (Tan et al., 2016; Yang

et al., 2019) and much attention is required for the efficient utility of such nanocomposites.

Mixed-matrix reverse osmosis membranes, commercially available, are used where

polyamide film-embedded super hydrophilic nanoparticles are used for the repulsion of

microorganisms, solutes and impurities. Nanosilver and titanium dioxide coating are

normally used on composite RO membranes for the prevention of fouling of organic

pollutants by oxidative degradation. Membrane modifications have been recently developed

with biomolecules, such as protein, to boost selectivity. Copolymer block membranes that are

self-assembling were also tested for ultra-filtration and found to be more selective and

permeable. The use of polymer nanofibers and electro-spinning ceramics is another

significant class of membranes. The high water flow in nanofiber-based membranes is

imparted via an optimized thickness of the polymers' membrane. The bio nanofiber

membranes are also designed to achieve a higher antipollination property for polylactic acid,

polyurethane and polyethylene oxide. There are considered to be greater selectivity and

higher water flow in biomimetic membranes. The aquaporin inside this membrane is greatly

efficient in desalination of the marine water, for example, the polymer-built vesicle-

supporting aquaporin-based Nano filtering membrane.

3.1. Nanofiber diaphragms in wastewater treatment

The processing of ultra-finely nanofibres with different materials (e.g. polymers,

ceramics or meme metals) is simpler, effective, and cheaper than the other metallic and

composite nanomaterials in wastewater treatment. It produces highly unique porosities and

nanosurfaces forming matte, porous structured nanofibers. Electro spun nanofibers can be

easily tailored to particular applications by diameter, composition, secondary structure,

morphology and spatial alignment. While nanofiber membranes are used on the market for air

filters, their water treatment capacity remains largely untapped. Nanofiber membranes are

12
able to extract particles of micron size from the watery process at a high reject rate without

significant failure. Therefore, before ultrafiltration or reverse osmosis (RO), pre-treatment is

recommended.

Functional nanomaterials can easily be doped into the spinning solutions for the

manufacture or on-site creation of nanoparticles. The exceptional features and adjustable

characteristics create electrofiber an ideal medium for the construction of multifunctional

media / membrane filters by means of inherent materials like TiO2 and MgO with multiple

functions (Pourrahim et al., 2020) or using nanofibers with their functional materials. The

integrated nanomaterials made up of ceramics or unique captive materials into a nanofiber,

for instance, allowing the removal of heavy metals and organic contaminants in the course of

filtration can be carried out by affinity nanofiber (Park et al., 2020).

3.2. Biologically based membranes and thin film nanocomposite

The selectivity and permeability of biological membranes are very high, and the

protein channels in Aquaporins are the controlling factors of cell membrane water flow, and

they play a vital role in contaminant removal (Chang et al., 2019; Luo et al., 2018). Its high

selectivity and water permeability make an appealing approach to improving membrane

efficiency in polymer membranes. The Escherichia coli aquaporin Z when introduced to the

amphiphilic triblock water permeability polymer vesicles over the initial vesicles with

minimum glucose, glycerol, salt, and urea rejection at least in an order of magnitudes. One of

the future designs is to coat the lipid bilayers embedded in aquaporin on industrial Nano

filtration membranes. The list of polymers and biopolymers for their solubility,

hydrophobicity, stable mechanics and chemical stability is given in Table 2.

The atomic sweetening design of the nano-sized channel and a single-file ordering of

molecules of water via the nanotubes have shown that aligned carbon nanotubes provide

water permeation much quicker than the Hagene Poiseuille Equation predicted. It was

13
expected to have fluxes above existing commercial RO marine membranes in a membrane

containing just 0.03 percent surface area of associated carbon nanotubes. However, because

of the lack of carbon nanotubes with a uniformly sub-nanometer diameter, high refusal of salt

or smaller molecules is difficult for aligned carbon nanotubes membranes. In order to boost

selectivity of aligning carbon nanotubes membranes, functional group gating on the opening

nanotube was proposed. The ninety eight percent rejection of Fe(CN6)3- was achieved with

low ionic strength by Donnan exclusion, by grafting carboxyl functional groups with a carbon

nanotubes substratum of 2 nm. KCl rejection at 0.3mm, however, decreased to nearly null at

10mM, was just 50 percent. Salt can physically be removed by grabbing bulky functional

groups on the tube opening. Yet steric exclusion decreases permeability considerably.

Therefore, compatible carbon nanotubes membranes cannot be desalinated at the current

level. The diameter of the carbon nanotubes needs to be consistently <0.8 nm to achieve

effective salt rejection.

The nanomaterial development in large scale and membrane development is a

significant hurdle for aquaporin and aligned carbon nanotubes membranes. Aquaporin’s are

very demanding in large-scale processing and purification. Currently the most usual method

to create aligned nanotubes is chemical vapour deposition (CVD) (Abdullah et al., 2020;

Maruyama et al., 2020). A CVD prototype with high-performance has been developed for the

production of carbon nanotubes in vertical alignment that paves the route for the scale-up

production. A magnetic field alignment system was also developed for post-manufacturing.

The membranes of nanocomposites and TFNs are highly versatile can be produced from

existing industrial production processes. The high degree permeability of water can reduce

the pressures or the required surface of the membrane. This technique could significantly

increase the energy efficiency of low osmosis pressure water treatment. Nonetheless, it may

have a minimal gain in RO seawater, which already has a thermodynamic cap energy

14
consumption. A recent study evaluated existing nanotechnology membranes based on their

future performance improvement and market readiness.

4. Disinfection and microbial prevention nanotechnology

The challenge for the water industry is to deal with this problem between efficient

disinfection and toxic disinfection by products (DBPs) (Mazhar et al., 2020; Srivastav et al.,

2020; Tang et al., 2020). Conventional disinfectants like chloride and ozone are now well

known to form toxic DBP (i.e. halogenated by products of the disinfection, cancer-infective

nitrosamines, bromate, etc.), they are widely recognized. As an alternative to oxidative

disinfection, UV disinfection has grown as a minimum in DBPs. Such limitations promote

the creation of substituting methods to enhance the disinfection robustness while preventing

the formulation of DBP.

Nanomaterials are also less likely to induce DBPs without heavy oxidation, such as

silver, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, carbon nanotubes, cerium oxide, and fullerenes. This

review article gives careful consideration to the antimicrobial methods of these

nanomaterials, their advantages, disadvantages, usefulness and important research

requirements for water treatment (Kidd et al., 2020; Rienzie et al., 2020; Sagir et al., 2020;

Verma et al., 2020).

The optimal disinfectant has the following properties,

 Highly high ambient temperatures antimicrobial activity in short time (Zhang et al.,

2021);

 During and after use of harmful sub-products cannot be produced (Hossain et al.,

2014);

 may not impact the wellbeing of humans (Mazhar et al., 2020);

 For the intended usage apply inexpensively and easily (Hossain et al., 2014);

15
 Simple to transport, highly water soluble and not corrosive for any appliance or

surface (Deshmukh et al., 2019);

 Convenient for safe disposal (Mazhar et al., 2020).

Nanomaterials have antimicrobial properties that have lower propensity to form DBPs

without major oxidation.

4.1. Mechanisms of nanoparticles based antimicrobial agents and possible uses in water

treatment

Researchers have been paying great attention to nanoparticles and nanocomposites

because of their unique features, including high contaminant adsorption power, excellent

photocatalytic and antimicrobial activity. Nanoparticles disable microbial pathogens by

presenting wide variety of antimicrobial mechanisms. Nanoparticles also extract inorganic

and organic pollutants from wastewater and demonstrate their potential application in the

management of wastewater. A list of nano-based antimicrobial agents and potential uses for

water treatment has been elaborated in Table 3.

Titanium dioxide is an extremely common nanoparticle type in potable water, surface

water, drinking water and other water resources to inactive microbes. Titanium dioxide's

antibacterial function is due to the generation of reactive oxygen species. The created ROS

can kill the cytoplasmic membrane, damage protein and DNA, release of dangerous ions,

interrupt the flow of electrons, and interfere with respiratory functioning. High UV-A

absorbance of titanium dioxide activation by solar radiation, substantially increasing solar

disinfection. Solar disinfection based on titanium dioxide is a very sluggish method which

can be a low proportion of UV-A in sunlight. Flourishing works in doping with metals or

nitrogen is crucial for application of Titanium dioxide solar disinfection to enhance visible

light absorption of Titanium dioxide or UV-A (Gao et al., 2019; Hassan et al., 2019; W.

16
Wang et al., 2020). Titanium dioxide nanomaterial also demonstrated bacterial death in the

dark, suggesting the possibility of certain unknown mechanisms.

Since ancient times, Silver is known for its antimicrobial influence. The use of silver

nanoparticles in medical services and external medicine is diverse in the industrial

applications. Silver nanoparticles have been used as an antifungal nanomaterial in recent

years. The substance they use to decontaminate water is the following: effective and wide-

ranging antimicrobial activity, health and manufacturing (Albukhari et al., 2019; Kumar et

al., 2020; Metreveli et al., 2020; Najafpoor et al., 2020; Sherin et al., 2020). Through water

binding to −SH groups, the Nano silver absorbs ions from silver into and destroys essential

enzymes. Silver nanoparticle toxicity depends on the rate of silver ion discharge. The shape,

size, padding and crystallographic facets affect silver ion release. The presence of

omnipresent ligands increases their bioavailability and their toxicity. Silver nanoparticles

have been used as a shield for pathogens in ceramic micro filters that can be used in

developing countries.

Because of the high UV absorption ability and transparentness to visible light, Zinc

oxide nanoparticles were used in sunscreen lotions, paints and coatings. Zinc oxide

nanoparticles show excellent antibacterial activity in a wide range of bacteria. Nevertheless,

because the researchers have obtained opposite findings, for instance, the antibacterial

function of Zinc oxide nanoparticles has not been apparent. The explanation has been

suggested for the photocatalytic production of H2O2 for antimicrobial Zinc oxide action.

While nanoparticles of Zinc oxide and Zn+2 display antibacterial activity, water organisms

may be very vulnerable to dissolved zinc (Kyeong Hee et al., 2019; Mirgane et al., 2020;

Shkir et al., 2020; Sultana et al., 2020). Due to the ease of its dissolution, zinc oxide

nanoparticles are limited in the treatment of drinking water.

4.2. Sensing and tracking nanotechnologies in water treatment

17
A large number of sensors based on nanotechnology were used to detect various

biological and chemical species in the area. Nano-sensors are also used for trace

contaminants and to control the rates of microbial and bacterial infections in wastewater

treatment (Liu et al., 2020; Ramezani et al., 2020). From a protection point of view, it is

extremely important to sense and track these in-water toxic entities (Abubaker et al., 2019;

Graboski et al., 2020; S. Zhang et al., 2020). This is a very difficult and exciting field of

research because very specific techniques are needed in order to detect minute amounts of

inorganic, biological and organic pollutants in the water.

The detection of pathogenic microbes in water bodies is an important step in order to

ensure proper public health. In order to take adequate control steps, the identification of

contaminating organisms is also important. Conventional markers of pathogens were not

extremely successful and certain lethal viruses, bacteria and minerals have not been detected.

New sensing and tracking technologies based on nano-materials have also started to develop

over the last 10 years. Worldwide researchers have made enormous efforts to synthesize

highly effective pathogen detecting nanostructured materials. Generally, nanomaterial-based

pathogens are functionalized to enable selective identification of targeting entities using

appropriate molecules, such as carbohydrates, aptamers, antimicrobial peptides and

antibodies. With their particular electrical, magnetic properties, people have been sensitive to

microbial cells and other biomolecules found in water which has been sensitive to these

materials. Nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes, quantum dots, magnetic nanoparticles,

dye doped and noble metals have been thoroughly investigated for pathogens identification.

Quantum dots have a high sensing ability since their optical properties can be easily targeted.

The level of microbial contamination in water can easily be identified by tracking changes in

the fluorescent spectrum or the phenol-electrochemical activity of quantum dots when

communicating with pathogens and biomolecules. The identification in wastewater of

18
different pathogens is mostly achieved using quantum dots including titanium dioxide, ZnO,

cadmium selenide, ZnSO4 and MgO. Proteins, antibodies and other biomolecules are found to

be useful in altering their surfaces to improve the sensitiveness and selectivity of sensors

based with quantum dots.

Gold nanoparticles are commonly used for detection purposes significantly because of

the resonance effect of surface plasmon depending on their size and shape. For instance, high

sensitivity bacteria (E. coli) are reported for the cysteine-functionalized gold nanoparticles.

Functional silica fluorescent color nanoparticles were also used for sensing applications;

carbon nanotubes have adequate room for electrochemical pathogens, thanks to their high

conductivity, quick surface shift and excellent adsorption capabilities. A biologically

responsive object (for example, proteins, cell receptors, enzymes, antibodies, oligoes or

polynucleotides, microorganisms, or even entire biological tissues) and a transducer are

required to turn the measurement concentration into other observable signals, sound variants,

currents, absorbance and masses. Owing to the high sensitivity and photo stability, nano-

sensors are beneficial but specificity in most current nano-sensors is a challenge.

5. Conclusions

The potential nanotechnology with unique properties is the perfect candidate for fast

technology growth. Different groups of nanomaterials – metal nanoparticles, carbonic

nanomaterials, zeolites and dendrimers can effectively be used to extract toxic metal ions,

microbial, organic and inorganic solutes from water. Recovered contaminants and depleted

nano-partners remain largely unexplored in risk assessment. Ecological waste management

methods are therefore needed to prevent toxicity hazards. The future in water processing for

nanoparticles is very promising, but a joint effort by academic, natural development projects

and industrial resources is required for quick, economic and useful equipment for water

treatment to be realized.

19
Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to The Management of Saveetha School of Engineering

(SIMATS), Chennai, India and The Management, Vice-Chancellor, Dean and Head of

Biological Sciences, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia for their constant support to

complete the review article. The Shaanxi Introduced Talent Research Funding

(A279021901), China and The Introduction of Talent Research Start-up fund (No.

Z101021904), College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University,

Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal

relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

1. Abdullah, H.B., Irmawati, R., Ismail, I., Yusof, N.A., 2020. Utilization of waste

engine oil for carbon nanotube aerogel production using floating catalyst chemical

vapor deposition. J. Clean. Prod. 261, 121188.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121188

2. Abubaker, M., Ngah, C.W.Z.C.W., Ahmad, M., Kuswandi, B., 2019. Chapter 19 -

Functionalized gold nanoparticles as optical nanosensors for determination of

aluminum (III) ions in water samples, in: Shukla, A.K., Iravani Characterization and

Applications of Nanoparticles, S.B.T.-G.S. (Eds.), Micro and Nano Technologies.

Elsevier, pp. 459–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102579-

6.00020-4

3. Abukhadra, M.R., Bakry, B.M., Adlii, A., Yakout, S.M., El-Zaidy, M.E., 2019. Facile

conversion of kaolinite into clay nanotubes (KNTs) of enhanced adsorption properties

for toxic heavy metals (Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and Cr6+) from water. J. Hazard. Mater.

20
374, 296–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.047

4. Acharya, K., Blackburn, A., Mohammed, J., Haile, A.T., Hiruy, A.M., Werner, D.,

2020. Metagenomic water quality monitoring with a portable laboratory. Water Res.

184, 116112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116112

5. Adelabu, I.O., Saleh, T.A., Garrison, T.F., Al Hamouz, O.C.S., 2020. Synthesis of

polyamine-CNT composites for the removal of toxic cadmium metal ions from

wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 297, 111827.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111827

6. Adira Jaafar, J., Hidayatul Nazirah Kamarudin, N., Dina Setiabudi, H., Najiha

Timmiati, S., Lee Peng, T., 2019. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles and waste derived-

siliceous materials for doxorubicin adsorption and release. Mater. Today Proc. 19,

1420–1425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.163

7. Al-Najar, B., Peters, C.D., Albuflasa, H., Hankins, N.P., 2020. Pressure and

osmotically driven membrane processes: A review of the benefits and production of

nano-enhanced membranes for desalination. Desalination 479, 114323.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114323

8. Alammar, A., Park, S.-H., Williams, C.J., Derby, B., Szekely, G., 2020. Oil-in-water

separation with graphene-based nanocomposite membranes for produced water

treatment. J. Memb. Sci. 603, 118007.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118007

9. Albukhari, S.M., Ismail, M., Akhtar, K., Danish, E.Y., 2019. Catalytic reduction of

nitrophenols and dyes using silver nanoparticles @ cellulose polymer paper for the

resolution of waste water treatment challenges. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem.

Eng. Asp. 577, 548–561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.05.058

10. Ang, M.B.M.Y., Tang, C.-L., De Guzman, M.R., Maganto, H.L.C., Caparanga, A.R.,

21
Huang, S.-H., Tsai, H.-A., Hu, C.-C., Lee, K.-R., Lai, J.-Y., 2020. Improved

performance of thin-film nanofiltration membranes fabricated with the intervention of

surfactants having different structures for water treatment. Desalination 481, 114352.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114352

11. Asif, M.B., Hai, F.I., Kang, J., van de Merwe, J.P., Leusch, F.D.L., Price, W.E.,

Nghiem, L.D., 2018. Biocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals, personal care

products, industrial chemicals, steroid hormones and pesticides in a membrane

distillation-enzymatic bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 247, 528–536.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.129

12. Avetta, P., Sangermano, M., Lopez-Manchado, M., Calza, P., 2015. Use of graphite

oxide and/or thermally reduced graphite oxide for the removal of dyes from water. J.

Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 312, 88–95.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.07.015

13. Balkenov, A., Anuarbek, A., Satayeva, A., Kim, J., Inglezakis, V., Arkhangelsky, E.,

2020. Complex organic fouling and effect of silver nanoparticles on aquaporin

forward osmosis membranes. J. Water Process Eng. 34, 101177.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101177

14. Betiha, M.A., Moustafa, Y.M., El-Shahat, M.F., Rafik, E., 2020.

Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Aminopropyl-SBA-15 schiff Base hybrid for efficient removal

of divalent heavy metal cations from wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 397, 122675.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122675

15. Chandrashekhar Nayak, M., Isloor, A.M., Inamuddin, Lakshmi, B., Marwani, H.M.,

Khan, I., 2020. Polyphenylsulfone/multiwalled carbon nanotubes mixed ultrafiltration

membranes: Fabrication, characterization and removal of heavy metals Pb2+, Hg2+,

and Cd2+ from aqueous solutions. Arab. J. Chem. 13, 4661–4672.

22
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2019.10.007

16. Chang, H.M., Sun, Y.C., Chien, I.C., Chang, W.S., Ray, S.S., Cao, D.T.N., Cong

Duong, C., Chen, S.S., 2019. Innovative upflow anaerobic sludge osmotic membrane

bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 287, 121466.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121466

17. Chen, B., Chen, Z., Lv, S., 2011. A novel magnetic biochar efficiently sorbs organic

pollutants and phosphate. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 716–723.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.067

18. Chen, C., Chen, L., Chen, S., Yu, Y., Weng, D., Mahmood, A., Wang, G., Wang, J.,

2020. Preparation of underwater superoleophobic membranes via TiO2 electrostatic

self-assembly for separation of stratified oil/water mixtures and emulsions. J. Memb.

Sci. 602, 117976. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117976

19. Chen, M., Ren, L., Qi, K., Li, Q., Lai, M., Li, Y., Li, X., Wang, Z., 2020. Enhanced

removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products from real municipal

wastewater using an electrochemical membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 311,

123579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123579

20. Cheng, D., Hao Ngo, H., Guo, W., Wang Chang, S., Duc Nguyen, D., Liu, Yiwen,

Zhang, X., Shan, X., Liu, Yi, 2020. Contribution of antibiotics to the fate of antibiotic

resistance genes in anaerobic treatment processes of swine wastewater: A review.

Bioresour. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122654

21. Chhabra, H., Kumar, M., 2020. Size and shape dependent equation of state for

nanomaterials with application to bulk materials. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 139, 109308.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109308

22. Chhabra, H., Kumar, M., 2019. Modeling for size and shape dependence of critical

temperature for different type of nanomaterials. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 135, 109075.

23
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109075

23. Couto, C.F., Santos, A.V., Amaral, M.C.S., Lange, L.C., de Andrade, L.H., Foureaux,

A.F.S., Fernandes, B.S., 2020. Assessing potential of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis

and membrane distillation drinking water treatment for pharmaceutically active

compounds (PhACs) removal. J. Water Process Eng. 33, 101029.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101029

24. De La Cueva Bueno, P., Gillerman, L., Gehr, R., Oron, G., 2017. Nanotechnology for

sustainable wastewater treatment and use for agricultural production: A comparative

long-term study. Water Res. 110, 66–73.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.060

25. Deshmukh, S.P., Patil, S.M., Mullani, S.B., Delekar, S.D., 2019. Silver nanoparticles

as an effective disinfectant: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 97, 954–965.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.102

26. Deshpande, B.D., Agrawal, P.S., Yenkie, M.K.N., Dhoble, S.J., 2020. Prospective of

nanotechnology in degradation of waste water: A new challenges. Nano-Structures &

Nano-Objects 22, 100442.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100442

27. Ding, S.-Y., Faraj, Y., Wei, J., Wang, W., Xie, R., Liu, Z., Ju, X.-J., Chu, L.-Y., 2020.

Antimicrobial peptide-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles for rapid capture and

removal of pathogenic bacteria. Microchem. J. 159, 105493.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105493

28. Edokpayi, J.N., Makungo, R., Mathivha, F., Rivers, N., Volenzo, T., O. Odiyo, J.,

2020. Chapter 5 - Influence of global climate change on water resources in South

Africa: toward an adaptive management approach, in: Singh, P., Milshina, Y., Tian,

K., Gusain, D., Bassin, J.P.B.T.-W.C. and W.T. in B.N. (Eds.), . Elsevier, pp. 83–115.

24
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818339-7.00005-9

29. Esteves, T., Mota, A.T., Barbeitos, C., Andrade, K., Afonso, C.A.M., Ferreira, F.C.,

2020. A study on lupin beans process wastewater nanofiltration treatment and

lupanine recovery. J. Clean. Prod. 277, 123349.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123349

30. Fauzi, A., Hapidin, D.A., Munir, M.M., Iskandar, F., Khairurrijal, K., 2020. A

superhydrophilic bilayer structure of a nylon 6 nanofiber/cellulose membrane and its

characterization as potential water filtration media. RSC Adv. 10, 17205–17216.

https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA01077D

31. Feng, X., Imran, Q., Zhang, Y., Sixdenier, L., Lu, X., Kaufman, G., Gabinet, U.,

Kawabata, K., Elimelech, M., Osuji, C.O., 2019. Precise nanofiltration in a fouling-

resistant self-assembled membrane with water-continuous transport pathways. Sci.

Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav9308

32. Fiorilli, S., Rivoira, L., Calì, G., Appendini, M., Bruzzoniti, M.C., Coïsson, M.,

Onida, B., 2017. Iron oxide inside SBA-15 modified with amino groups as reusable

adsorbent for highly efficient removal of glyphosate from water. Appl. Surf. Sci. 411,

457–465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.206

33. Gallo-Cordova, A., Lemus, J., Palomares, F.J., Morales, M.P., Mazarío, E., 2020.

Superparamagnetic nanosorbent for water purification: Assessment of the adsorptive

removal of lead and methyl orange from aqueous solutions. Sci. Total Environ. 711,

134644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134644

34. Gao, D., Zheng, S., Wang, L., Wang, C., Zhang, H., Wang, Q., 2019. SILAR

preparation of visible-light-driven TiO2 NTs/Ag2WO4-AgI photoelectrodes for waste

water treatment and photoelectric conversion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 224, 308–314.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.050

25
35. García, J., García-Galán, M.J., Day, J.W., Boopathy, R., White, J.R., Wallace, S.,

Hunter, R.G., 2020. A review of emerging organic contaminants (EOCs), antibiotic

resistant bacteria (ARB), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the environment:

Increasing removal with wetlands and reducing environmental impacts. Bioresour.

Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123228

36. Gheidari, D., Mehrdad, M., Maleki, S., Hosseini, S., 2020. Synthesis and potent

antimicrobial activity of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles under visible light. Heliyon 6,

e05058. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05058

37. Graboski, A.M., Martinazzo, J., Ballen, S.C., Steffens, J., Steffens, C., 2020. Chapter

4 - Nanosensors for water quality control, in: Amrane, A., Rajendran, S., Nguyen,

T.A., Assadi, A.A., Sharoba, A.M.B.T.-N. in the B.I. (Eds.), Micro and Nano

Technologies. Elsevier, pp. 115–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-

12-819941-1.00004-3

38. Haq, I., Mazumder, P., Kalamdhad, A.S., 2020. Recent advances in removal of lignin

from paper industry wastewater and its industrial applications – A review. Bioresour.

Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123636

39. Hassan, M.E., Liu, G., Omer, E.O.M., Goja, A.M., Acharya, S., 2019. Silver

embedded C-TiO2 exhibits improved photocatalytic properties with potential

application in waste water treatment. Arab. J. Chem. 12, 1134–1140.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.12.004

40. Hayati, B., Maleki, A., Najafi, F., Daraei, H., Gharibi, F., McKay, G., 2017. Super

high removal capacities of heavy metals (Pb2+ and Cu2+) using CNT dendrimer. J.

Hazard. Mater. 336, 146–157.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.059

41. Hayati, B., Maleki, A., Najafi, F., Daraei, H., Gharibi, F., McKay, G., 2016. Synthesis

26
and characterization of PAMAM/CNT nanocomposite as a super-capacity adsorbent

for heavy metal (Ni2+, Zn2+, As3+, Co2+) removal from wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 224,

1032–1040. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.053

42. Himstedt, H.H., Sengupta, A., Qian, X., Wickramasinghe, S.R., 2019. Magnetically

responsive nano filtration membranes for treatment of coal bed methane produced

water. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 94, 97–108.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.01.007

43. Hossain, F., Perales-Perez Oscar J., Hwang, S., Román, F., 2014. Antimicrobial

nanomaterials as water disinfectant: Applications, limitations and future perspectives.

Sci. Total Environ. 466–467, 1047–1059.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.009

44. Jiang, J.-Q., Zhou, Z., Sharma, V.K., 2013. Occurrence, transportation, monitoring

and treatment of emerging micro-pollutants in waste water — A review from global

views. Microchem. J. 110, 292–300.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2013.04.014

45. Jiang, Y., Carrijo, D., Huang, S., Chen, J., Balaine, N., Zhang, W., van Groenigen,

K.J., Linquist, B., 2019. Water management to mitigate the global warming potential

of rice systems: A global meta-analysis. F. Crop. Res. 234, 47–54.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.010

46. Jiříček, T., Komárek, M., Lederer, T., 2017. Polyurethane Nanofiber Membranes for

Waste Water Treatment by Membrane Distillation. J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 7143035.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7143035

47. Jung, K.W., Ahn, K.H., 2016. Fabrication of porosity-enhanced MgO/biochar for

removal of phosphate from aqueous solution: Application of a novel combined

electrochemical modification method. Bioresour. Technol. 200, 1029–1032.

27
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.008

48. Kadam, A., Saratale, R.G., Shinde, S., Yang, J., Hwang, K., Mistry, B., Saratale,

G.D., Lone, S., Kim, D.-Y., Sung, J.-S., Ghodake, G., 2019. Adsorptive remediation

of cobalt oxide nanoparticles by magnetized α-cellulose fibers from waste paper

biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 273, 386–393.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.041

49. Kalaitzidou, K., Zouboulis, A., Mitrakas, M., 2020. Cost evaluation for Se(IV)

removal, by applying common drinking water treatment processes:

Coagulation/precipitation or adsorption. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8, 104209.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104209

50. Kamali, M., Persson, K.M., Costa, M.E., Capela, I., 2019. Sustainability criteria for

assessing nanotechnology applicability in industrial wastewater treatment: Current

status and future outlook. Environ. Int. 125, 261–276.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.055

51. Karami, P., Khorshidi, B., McGregor, M., Peichel, J.T., Soares, J.B.P., Sadrzadeh, M.,

2020. Thermally stable thin film composite polymeric membranes for water

treatment: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 250, 119447.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119447

52. Kgatitsoe, M.M., Ncube, S., Tutu, H., Nyambe, I.A., Chimuka, L., 2019. Synthesis

and characterization of a magnetic nanosorbent modified with Moringa oleifera leaf

extracts for removal of nitroaromatic explosive compounds in water samples. J.

Environ. Chem. Eng. 7, 103128.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103128

53. Kidd, J., Westerhoff, P., Maynard, A.D., 2020. Public perceptions for the use of

nanomaterials for in-home drinking water purification devices. NanoImpact 18,

28
100220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2020.100220

54. Kumar, A., Mishra, B., Tripathi, B.P., 2020. Polydopamine assisted synthesis of

ultrafine silver nanoparticles for heterogeneous catalysis and water remediation.

Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects 23, 100489.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100489

55. Kyeong Hee, O., Rupa, E.J., Anandapadmanaban, G., Chokkalingam, M., Li, J.F.,

Markus, J., Soshnikova, V., Perez, Z.E.J., Yang, D.C., 2019. Cationic and anionic dye

degradation activity of Zinc oxide nanoparticles from Hippophae rhamnoides leaves

as potential water treatment resource. Optik (Stuttg). 181, 1091–1098.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.12.152

56. Leong, Y.K., Chang, J.S., 2020. Bioremediation of heavy metals using microalgae:

Recent advances and mechanisms. Bioresour. Technol.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122886

57. Li, H., Watson, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Liu, Z., 2020. Environment-enhancing process

for algal wastewater treatment, heavy metal control and hydrothermal biofuel

production: A critical review. Bioresour. Technol.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122421

58. Li, X., Chu, Z., Yang, J., Li, M., Du, M., Zhao, X., Zhu, Z. (Joy), Li, Y., 2018.

Chapter 7. Synthetic musks: A class of commercial fragrance additives in personal

care products (PCPs) causing concern as emerging contaminants, in: Chen, B., Zhang,

B. (Helen), Zhu, Z. (Joy), Lee, K.B.T.-A. in M.B. (Eds.), Emerging Pollutants and

Their Effects on Marine Ecosystems. Academic Press, pp. 213–280.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2018.09.008

59. Li, Y., Qi, S., Tian, M., Widjajanti, W., Wang, R., 2019. Fabrication of aquaporin-

based biomimetic membrane for seawater desalination. Desalination 467, 103–112.

29
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.06.005

60. Liu, F., Zhu, S., Li, D., Chen, G., Ho, S.-H., 2020. Detecting ferric iron by microalgal

residue-derived fluorescent nanosensor with an advanced kinetic model. iScience 23,

101174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101174

61. Liu, W., Yao, H., Xu, W., Liu, G., Wang, X., Tu, Y., Shi, P., Yu, N., Li, A., Wei, S.,

2020. Suspect screening and risk assessment of pollutants in the wastewater from a

chemical industry park in China. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114493.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114493

62. Liu, Z., Cui, X., Piao, C., Tang, J., Li, S., Fang, D., Wang, J., 2020. Construction and

preparation of a coated Z-scheme (CNT-Ni2P-CNT/Er3+:Y3Al5O12)@Bi12GeO20

photocatalyst for the enhanced photocatalytic conversion of hexavalent chromium

with the simultaneous degradation of concomitant organic pollutants. Powder

Technol. 368, 213–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.04.067

63. Liu, Z., Tang, Y., Zhao, K., Chen, W., 2019. Self-assembly of positively charged

SiO2/Y2O3 composite nanofiber membranes with plum-flower-like structures for the

removal of water contaminants. Appl. Surf. Sci. 489, 717–724.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.013

64. Lu, F., Astruc, D., 2020. Nanocatalysts and other nanomaterials for water remediation

from organic pollutants. Coord. Chem. Rev. 408, 213180.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213180

65. Luo, W., Xie, M., Song, X., Guo, W., Ngo, H.H., Zhou, J.L., Nghiem, L.D., 2018.

Biomimetic aquaporin membranes for osmotic membrane bioreactors: Membrane

performance and contaminant removal. Bioresour. Technol. 249, 62–68.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.170

66. Madannejad, R., Shoaie, N., Jahanpeyma, F., Darvishi, M.H., Azimzadeh, M., Javadi,

30
H., 2019. Toxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials: Reviewing recent reports in

medical and biological systems. Chem. Biol. Interact. 307, 206–222.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2019.04.036

67. Mandeep, Kumar Gupta, G., Shukla, P., 2020. Insights into the resources generation

from pulp and paper industry wastes: Challenges, perspectives and innovations.

Bioresour. Technol. 297, 122496.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122496

68. Maruyama, T., Okada, T., Sharma, K.P., Suzuki, T., Saida, T., Naritsuka, S., Iizumi,

Y., Okazaki, T., Iijima, S., 2020. Vertically aligned growth of small-diameter single-

walled carbon nanotubes by alcohol catalytic chemical vapor deposition with Ir

catalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 509, 145340.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145340

69. Mazhar, M.A., Khan, N.A., Ahmed, S., Khan, A.H., Hussain, A., Rahisuddin,

Changani, F., Yousefi, M., Ahmadi, S., Vambol, V., 2020. Chlorination disinfection

by-products in municipal drinking water – A review. J. Clean. Prod. 273, 123159.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123159

70. Merugu, R., Garimella, S., Velamakanni, R., Vuppugalla, P., Chitturi, K.L., Jyothi,

M., 2020. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of bimetallic silver

and copper nanoparticles using fruit pulp aqueous extracts of Moringa oleifera.

Mater. Today Proc. In Press.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.549

71. Metreveli, G., David, J., Schneider, R., Kurtz, S., Schaumann, G.E., 2020.

Morphology, structure, and composition of sulfidized silver nanoparticles and their

aggregation dynamics in river water. Sci. Total Environ. 739, 139989.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139989

31
72. Mirgane, N.A., Shivankar, V.S., Kotwal, S.B., Wadhawa, G.C., Sonawale, M.C.,

2020. Waste pericarp of ananas comosus in green synthesis zinc oxide nanoparticles

and their application in waste water treatment. Mater. Today Proc.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.045

73. Moharrami, P., Motamedi, E., 2020. Application of cellulose nanocrystals prepared

from agricultural wastes for synthesis of starch-based hydrogel nanocomposites:

Efficient and selective nanoadsorbent for removal of cationic dyes from water.

Bioresour. Technol. 313, 123661.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123661

74. Mollahosseini, A., Abdelrasoul, A., 2019. Recent advances in thin film composites

membranes for brackish groundwater treatment with critical focus on Saskatchewan

water sources. J. Environ. Sci. 81, 181–194.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.01.014

75. Morrison, E.S., Shields, M.R., Bianchi, T.S., Liu, Y., Newman, S., Tolic, N., Chu,

R.K., 2020. Multiple biomarkers highlight the importance of water column processes

in treatment wetland organic matter cycling. Water Res. 168, 115153.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115153

76. Nadizadeh, Z., Mahdavi, H., 2021. Grafting of zwitterion polymer on polyamide

nanofiltration membranes via surface-initiated RAFT polymerization with improved

antifouling properties as a new strategy. Sep. Purif. Technol. 254, 117605.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117605

77. Najafpoor, A., Norouzian-Ostad, R., Alidadi, H., Rohani-Bastami, T., Davoudi, M.,

Barjasteh-Askari, F., Zanganeh, J., 2020. Effect of magnetic nanoparticles and silver-

loaded magnetic nanoparticles on advanced wastewater treatment and disinfection. J.

Mol. Liq. 303, 112640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112640

32
78. Nasr, A. Ben, Charcosset, C., Amar, R. Ben, Walha, K., 2013. Defluoridation of water

by nanofiltration. J. Fluor. Chem. 150, 92–97.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.01.021

79. Nawaz, H., Umar, M., Ullah, A., Razzaq, H., Zia, K.M., Liu, X., 2021.

Polyvinylidene fluoride nanocomposite super hydrophilic membrane integrated with

Polyaniline-Graphene oxide nano fillers for treatment of textile effluents. J. Hazard.

Mater. 403, 123587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123587

80. Niza, E., Božik, M., Bravo, I., Clemente-Casares, P., Lara-Sanchez, A., Juan, A.,

Klouček, P., Alonso-Moreno, C., 2020. PEI-coated PLA nanoparticles to enhance the

antimicrobial activity of carvacrol. Food Chem. 328, 127131.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127131

81. Nouri, N., Khorram, P., Duman, O., Sibel, T., Hassan, S., 2020. Overview of

nanosorbents used in solid phase extraction techniques for the monitoring of emerging

organic contaminants in water and wastewater samples. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem.

25, e00081. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2020.e00081

82. Olvera, R.C., Silva, S.L., Robles-Belmont, E., Lau, E.Z., 2017. Review of

nanotechnology value chain for water treatment applications in Mexico. Resour.

Technol. 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2017.01.008

83. Park, J.C., Kim, J.-C., Park, S., Kim, D.-W., 2020. Efficient waste polyvinyl(butyral)

and cellulose composite enabled carbon nanofibers for oxygen reduction reaction and

water remediation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 510, 145505.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145505

84. Pendergast, M.M., Hoek, E.M. V, 2011. A review of water treatment membrane

nanotechnologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1946–1971.

https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00541J

33
85. Perveen, R., Shujaat, S., Qureshi, Z., Nawaz, S., Khan, M.I., Iqbal, M., 2020. Green

versus sol-gel synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and antimicrobial activity evaluation

against panel of pathogens. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9, 7817–7827.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.004

86. Ponce-Rodríguez, H.D., Verdú-Andrés, J., Herráez-Hernández, R., Campíns-Falcó,

P., 2020. Exploring hand-portable nano-liquid chromatography for in place water

analysis: Determination of trimethylxanthines as a use case. Sci. Total Environ. 747,

140966. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140966

87. Pourrahim, S., Salem, A., Salem, S., Tavangar, R., 2020. Application of solid waste of

ductile cast iron industry for treatment of wastewater contaminated by reactive blue

dye via appropriate nano-porous magnesium oxide. Environ. Pollut. 256, 113454.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113454

88. Punitha, V.N., Vijayakumar, S., Sakthivel, B., Praseetha, P.K., 2020. Protection of

neuronal cell lines, antimicrobial and photocatalytic behaviours of eco-friendly TiO2

nanoparticles. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8, 104343.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104343

89. Qi, J., Zhang, G., Li, H., 2015. Efficient removal of arsenic from water using a

granular adsorbent: Fe–Mn binary oxide impregnated chitosan bead. Bioresour.

Technol. 193, 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.102

90. Raghu, M.S., Yogesh Kumar, K., Prashanth, M.K., Prasanna, B.P., Vinuth, R.,

Pradeep Kumar, C.B., 2017. Adsorption and antimicrobial studies of chemically

bonded magnetic graphene oxide-Fe3O4 nanocomposite for water purification. J.

Water Process Eng. 17, 22–31.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.03.001

91. Rahman, Z., 2020. An overview on heavy metal resistant microorganisms for

34
simultaneous treatment of multiple chemical pollutants at co-contaminated sites, and

their multipurpose application. J. Hazard. Mater. 396, 122682.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122682

92. Ramezani, M., Taghdisi, S.M., Yazdian-Robati, R., Oroojalian, F., Abnous, K.,

Alibolandi, M., 2020. Chapter 17 - Nanosensors for water safety, in: Han, B., Tomer,

V.K., Nguyen, T.A., Farmani, A., Kumar Singh, P.B.T.-N. for S.C. (Eds.), Micro and

Nano Technologies. Elsevier, pp. 285–301.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819870-4.00016-5

93. Rassoulinejad-Mousavi, S.M., Azamat, J., Khataee, A., Zhang, Y., 2020. Molecular

dynamics simulation of water purification using zeolite MFI nanosheets. Sep. Purif.

Technol. 234, 116080. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116080

94. Rehman, F., Thebo, K.H., Aamir, M., Akhtar, J., 2020. Chapter 8 - Nanomembranes

for water treatment, in: Amrane, A., Rajendran, S., Nguyen, T.A., Assadi, A.A.,

Sharoba, A.M.B.T.-N. in the B.I. (Eds.), Micro and Nano Technologies. Elsevier, pp.

207–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819941-1.00008-0

95. Rienzie, R., Sendanayake, L.R., Adassooriya, N.M., 2020. Chapter 11 -

Nanotechnology applications for removal of disinfection by-products from water, in:

Prasad, M.N.V.B.T.-D.B. in D.W. (Ed.), . Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 253–277.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102977-0.00012-3

96. Rieu-Clarke, A., Moynihan, R., Magsig, B.O., 2015. Transboundary water

governance and climate change adaptation: international law, policy guidelines and

best practice application - UNESCO Digital Library. UNESCO World Water

Assessment Program.

97. Rubilar, R., Hubbard, R., Emhart, V., Mardones, O., Quiroga, J.J., Medina, A.,

Valenzuela, H., Espinoza, J., Burgos, Y., Bozo, D., 2020. Climate and water

35
availability impacts on early growth and growth efficiency of Eucalyptus genotypes:

The importance of GxE interactions. For. Ecol. Manage. 458, 117763.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117763

98. Sagir, M., Tahir, M.B., Rafique, M., Rafique, M.S., Nawaz, T., 2020. Chapter 10 -

Photocatalytic nanomaterials for CO2 photoreduction and disinfection of bacteria, in:

Tahir, M.B., Rafique, M., Rafique, M.S.B.T.-N. and P. for E.A. (Eds.), Micro and

Nano Technologies. Elsevier, pp. 159–189.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821192-2.00010-3

99. Sajid, M., Nazal, M.K., Ihsanullah, Baig, N., Osman, A.M., 2018. Removal of heavy

metals and organic pollutants from water using dendritic polymers based adsorbents:

A critical review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 191, 400–423.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.011

100. Salazar, H., Martins, P.M., Santos, B., Fernandes, M.M., Reizabal, A., Sebastián, V.,

Botelho, G., Tavares, C.J., Vilas-Vilela, J.L., Lanceros-Mendez, S., 2020.

Photocatalytic and antimicrobial multifunctional nanocomposite membranes for

emerging pollutants water treatment applications. Chemosphere 250, 126299.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126299

101. Saleh, I.A., Zouari, N., Al-Ghouti, M.A., 2020. Removal of pesticides from water and

wastewater: Chemical, physical and biological treatment approaches. Environ.

Technol. Innov. 19, 101026. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101026

102. Sharma, B.M., Bečanová, J., Scheringer, M., Sharma, A., Bharat, G.K., Whitehead,

P.G., Klánová, J., Nizzetto, L., 2019. Health and ecological risk assessment of

emerging contaminants (pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and artificial

sweeteners) in surface and groundwater (drinking water) in the Ganges River Basin,

India. Sci. Total Environ. 646, 1459–1467.

36
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.235

103. Sherin, L., Sohail, A., Amjad, U.-S., Mustafa, M., Jabeen, R., Ul-Hamid, A., 2020.

Facile green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Terminalia bellerica kernel extract

for catalytic reduction of anthropogenic water pollutants. Colloid Interface Sci.

Commun. 37, 100276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2020.100276

104. Shkir, M., Al-Shehri, B.M., Pachamuthu, M.P., Khan, A., Chandekar, K. V, AlFaify,

S., Hamdy, M.S., 2020. A remarkable improvement in photocatalytic activity of ZnO

nanoparticles through Sr doping synthesized by one pot flash combustion technique

for water treatments. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 587, 124340.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124340

105. Sivagami, M., Selvambigai, M., Devan, U., Velangani, A.A.J., Karmegam, N.,

Biruntha, M., Arun, A., Kim, W., Govarthanan, M., Kumar, P., 2020. Extraction of

microplastics from commonly used sea salts in India and their toxicological

evaluation. Chemosphere 263, 128181.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128181

106. Slobodian, P., Riha, P., Olejnik, R., Cvelbar, U., Saha, P., 2013. Enhancing effect of

KMnO4 oxidation of carbon nanotubes network embedded in elastic polyurethane on

overall electro-mechanical properties of composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 81, 54–60.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.023

107. Srivastav, A.L., Patel, N., Chaudhary, V.K., 2020. Disinfection by-products in

drinking water: Occurrence, toxicity and abatement. Environ. Pollut. 115474.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115474

108. Sultana, K.A., Islam, M.T., Silva, J.A., Turley, R.S., Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A.,

Gardea-Torresdey, J.L., Noveron, J.C., 2020. Sustainable synthesis of zinc oxide

nanoparticles for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant and generation of

37
hydroxyl radical. J. Mol. Liq. 307, 112931.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112931

109. Sun, H., Wang, T., Yang, Z., Yu, C., Wu, W., 2019. Simultaneous removal of

nitrogen and pharmaceutical and personal care products from the effluent of waste

water treatment plants using aerated solid-phase denitrification system. Bioresour.

Technol. 287, 121389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121389

110. Tan, X.F., Liu, Y.G., Gu, Y.L., Xu, Y., Zeng, G.M., Hu, X.J., Liu, S.B., Wang, X.,

Liu, S.M., Li, J., 2016. Biochar-based nano-composites for the decontamination of

wastewater: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 212, 318-333.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.093

111. Tang, X., Ding, A., Pronk, W., Ziemba, C., Cheng, X., Wang, J., Xing, J., Xie, B., Li,

G., Liang, H., 2018. Biological pre-treatments enhance gravity-driven membrane

filtration for the decentralized water supply: Linking extracellular polymeric

substances formation to flux stabilization. J. Clean. Prod. 197, 721–731.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.155

112. Tang, Y., Long, X., Wu, M., Yang, S., Gao, N., Xu, B., Dutta, S., 2020. Bibliometric

review of research trends on disinfection by-products in drinking water during 1975–

2018. Sep. Purif. Technol. 241, 116741.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116741

113. Terrado, M., Barceló, D., Tauler, R., 2010. Multivariate curve resolution of organic

pollution patterns in the Ebro River surface water–groundwater–sediment–soil

system. Anal. Chim. Acta 657, 19–27.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.026

114. Udhayakumar, R., Manivannan, P., Raghu, K., Vaideki, S., 2016. Assessment of

physico-chemical characteristics of water in Tamilnadu. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

38
134, 474–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.014

115. Valamohammadi, E., Behdarvand, F., Tofighy, M.A., Mohammadi, T., 2020.

Preparation of positively charged thin-film nanocomposite membranes based on the

reaction between hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile containing carbon nanomaterials and

HPEI for water treatment application. Sep. Purif. Technol. 242, 116826.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116826

116. Vedhanayagam, M., Nair, B.U., Sreeram, K.J., 2019. Dimension effect: Dendrimer

functionalized carbon based nanomaterial mediated collagen scaffold for wound

healing application. Materialia 7, 100354.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100354

117. Verma, B., Balomajumder, C., 2020. Surface modification of one-dimensional Carbon

Nanotubes: A review for the management of heavy metals in wastewater. Environ.

Technol. Innov. 17, 100596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2019.100596

118. Verma, N., Vaidh, S., Vishwakarma, G.S., Pandya, A., 2020. Chapter 18 -

Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection, in: Rajendran, S., Mukherjee, A.,

Nguyen, T.A., Godugu, C., Shukla, R.K.B.T.-N. (Eds.), Micro and Nano

Technologies. Elsevier, pp. 365–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-

12-819943-5.00018-X

119. Vinardell, S., Astals, S., Mata-Alvarez, J., Dosta, J., 2020. Techno-economic analysis

of combining forward osmosis-reverse osmosis and anaerobic membrane bioreactor

technologies for municipal wastewater treatment and water production. Bioresour.

Technol. 297, 122395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122395

120. Wang, J., Tang, X., Xu, Y., Cheng, X., Li, G., Liang, H., 2020. Hybrid UF/NF

process treating secondary effluent of wastewater treatment plants for potable water

reuse: Adsorption vs. coagulation for removal improvements and membrane fouling

39
alleviation. Environ. Res. 188, 109833.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109833

121. Wang, W., Lin, F., Yan, B., Cheng, Z., Chen, G., Kuang, M., Yang, C., Hou, L.,

2020. The role of seashell wastes in TiO2/Seashell composites: Photocatalytic

degradation of methylene blue dye under sunlight. Environ. Res. 188, 109831.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109831

122. Wang, Y., Xue, Y., Zhang, C., 2020. Generation and application of reactive chlorine

species by electrochemical process combined with UV irradiation: Synergistic

mechanism for enhanced degradation performance. Sci. Total Environ. 712, 136501.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136501

123. Wang, Z., Zhao, P., Zhu, B., Jiang, Z., Guo, X., 2018. Magnetic solid-phase

extraction based on Fe3O4/graphene nanocomposites for enantioselective

determination of representative profens in the environmental water samples and

molecular docking study on adsorption mechanism of graphene. J. Pharm. Biomed.

Anal. 156, 88–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2018.04.023

124. Wen, Y., Yuan, J., Ma, X., Wang, S., Liu, Y., 2019. Polymeric nanocomposite

membranes for water treatment: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-019-00895-9

125. Werner, S., Kätzl, K., Wichern, M., Buerkert, A., Steiner, C., Marschner, B., 2018.

Agronomic benefits of biochar as a soil amendment after its use as waste water

filtration medium. Environ. Pollut. 233, 561–568.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.048

126. WHO/UNICEF, 2000. World Health Organization/United Nations Children’s

Fund/Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council. Global water supply and

sanitation assessment, 2000 report, New York.

40
127. Wong, J.K.H., Tan, H.K., Lau, S.Y., Yap, P.-S., Danquah, M.K., 2019. Potential and

challenges of enzyme incorporated nanotechnology in dye wastewater treatment: A

review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 7, 103261.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103261

128. Wu, W., Shi, Y., Liu, G., Fan, X., Yu, Y., 2020. Recent development of graphene

oxide based forward osmosis membrane for water treatment: A critical review.

Desalination 491, 114452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114452

129. Wu, Yong, Chen, C., Wang, G., Xiong, B., Zhou, W., Xue, F., Qi, W., Qiu, C.S., Liu,

Z., 2020. Mechanism underlying earthworm on the remediation of cadmium-

contaminated soil. Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138904.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138904

130. Wu, Yang, Guan, C.-Y., Griswold, N., Hou, L., Fang, X., Hu, A., Hu, Z., Yu, C.-P.,

2020. Zero-valent iron-based technologies for removal of heavy metal(loid)s and

organic pollutants from the aquatic environment: Recent advances and perspectives. J.

Clean. Prod. 123478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123478

131. Xia, L., Andersen, M.F., Hélix-Nielsen, C., McCutcheon, J.R., 2017. Novel

commercial aquaporin flat-sheet membrane for forward osmosis. Ind. Eng. Chem.

Res. 56, 11919–11925. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02368

132. Xiang, Y., Rene, E.R., Lun, X., Ma, W., 2020. Enhanced reductive defluorination and

inhibited infiltration of fluoroglucocorticoids in a river receiving reclaimed water

amended by nano zero-valent iron-modified biochar: Performance and mechanisms.

Bioresour. Technol. 306, 123127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123127

133. Xiao, Y., Guo, D., Li, T., Zhou, Q., Shen, L., Li, R., Xu, Y., Lin, H., 2020. Facile

fabrication of superhydrophilic nanofiltration membranes via tannic acid and irons

layer-by-layer self-assembly for dye separation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 515, 146063.

41
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146063

134. Xing, B., Dong, J., Yang, G., Jiang, N., Liu, X., Yuan, J., 2020. An insight into N,S-

codoped activated carbon for the catalytic persulfate oxidation of organic pollutions in

water: Effect of surface functionalization. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 602, 117714.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117714

135. Xu, J., Cao, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, Z., Lou, Z., Xu, X., Wang, X., 2018. A review of

functionalized carbon nanotubes and graphene for heavy metal adsorption from water:

Preparation, application, and mechanism. Chemosphere 195, 351–364.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.061

136. Yang, F., Zhang, S., Sun, Y., Du, Q., Song, J., Tsang, D.C.W., 2019. A novel

electrochemical modification combined with one-step pyrolysis for preparation of

sustainable thorn-like iron-based biochar composites. Bioresour. Technol. 274, 379–

385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.042

137. Yang, H.J., Jeong, H.J., Bong, K.M., Jin, D.R., Kang, T.-W., Ryu, H.-S., Han, J.H.,

Yang, W.J., Jung, H., Hwang, S.H., Na, E.H., 2020. Organic matter and heavy metal

in river sediments of southwestern coastal Korea: Spatial distributions, pollution, and

ecological risk assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 159, 111466.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111466

138. Yang, Z., Wu, Y., Guo, H., Ma, X.H., Lin, C.E., Zhou, Y., Cao, B., Zhu, B.K., Shih,

K., Tang, C.Y., 2017. A novel thin-film nano-templated composite membrane with in

situ silver nanoparticles loading: Separation performance enhancement and

implications. J. Memb. Sci. 544, 351–358.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.046

139. Yantasee, W., Lin, Y., Fryxell, G.E., Busche, B.J., 2004. Simultaneous detection of

cadmium, copper, and lead using a carbon paste electrode modified with

42
carbamoylphosphonic acid self-assembled monolayer on mesoporous silica

(SAMMS). Anal. Chim. Acta 502, 207–212.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.001

140. Yao, S., Li, X., Cheng, H., Zhang, C., Bian, Y., Jiang, X., Song, Y., 2019. Resource

utilization of a typical vegetable waste as biochars in removing phthalate acid esters

from water: A sorption case study. Bioresour. Technol. 293, 122081.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122081

141. Yu, H., Ma, Z., Meng, S., Qiao, S., Zeng, X., Tong, Z., Jeong, K.C., 2020. A novel

nanohybrid antimicrobial based on chitosan nanoparticles and antimicrobial peptide

microcin J25 with low toxicity. Carbohydr. Polym. 117309.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117309

142. Yu, Z., Han, H., Feng, P., Zhao, S., Zhou, T., Kakade, A., Kulshrestha, S., Majeed, S.,

Li, X., 2020. Recent advances in the recovery of metals from waste through biological

processes. Bioresour. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122416

143. Zhang, S., Jin, L., Liu, J., Wang, Q., Jiao, L., 2020. A label-free yellow-emissive

carbon dot-based nanosensor for sensitive and selective ratiometric detection of

chromium (VI) in environmental water samples. Mater. Chem. Phys. 248, 122912.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.122912

144. Zhang, S., Tian, Y., Guo, Y., Shan, J., Liu, R., 2021. Manganese release from

corrosion products of cast iron pipes in drinking water distribution systems: Effect of

water temperature, pH, alkalinity, SO42− concentration and disinfectants.

Chemosphere 262, 127904.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127904

145. Zhang, W., Zhang, D., Liang, Y., 2019. Nanotechnology in remediation of water

contaminated by poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances: A review. Environ. Pollut. 247,

43
266–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.045

146. Zhang, Y., Wang, K.-T., Jiang, W.-L., He, J.-Y., Wang, H., Li, B., Gao, M., 2020.

Black odorous water concentrating by forward osmosis (FO) with aquaporin

biomimetic membranes: Pollutants concentrating and membrane fouling

characteristics. Chem. Eng. J. 400, 125938.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125938

147. Zhang, Z., Cheng, J., Luo, Y., Shi, W., Wang, W., Zhang, B., Zhang, R., Bao, X.,

Guo, Y., Cui, F., 2018. Pt nanoparticles supported on amino-functionalized SBA-15

for enhanced aqueous bromate catalytic reduction. Catal. Commun. 105, 11–15.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2017.11.004

148. Zhuang, H., Zhu, H., Zhang, J., Shan, S., Fang, C., Tang, H., Xie, Q., 2020. Enhanced

2,4,6-trichlorophenol anaerobic degradation by Fe3O4 supported on water hyacinth

biochar for triggering direct interspecies electron transfer and its use in coal

gasification wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 296, 122306.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122306

149. Zubair, M., Ihsanullah, I., Abdul Aziz, H., Azmier Ahmad, M., Al-Harthi, M.A.,

2020. Sustainable wastewater treatment by biochar/layered double hydroxide

composites: Progress, challenges, and outlook. Bioresour. Technol. 319, 124128.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124128

44
List of Figures:

Fig. 1: Waste water treatment based on nanotechnology.

45
Fig. 1.

List of Tables:

Table 1.
List of nano-membranes of their optimistic characteristics and approaches.
Nano- Characteristics Approaches Water treatment
membranes Optimistic Negotiary Nanomembranes
thickness
Nano-composite Improve Resistant bulk Extremely 4.1 to 49.8 μm2
membranes hydrophobicity, material needed to complex (Wen et al., 2019)
thermal / release potential conditions, such as
mechanical Nanoparticles while micro-pollutant
stability and using oxidizing elimination and
fouling resistance nanomaterial reverse osmosis

Nano-filtration Repulsion Blocking of Heavy metals Zeolite membranes


membranes dependent on load, membrane reduction, odour, (thickness ≈ 3 µm)
low relative (polarization of the colour and (Pendergast and
pressure and high concentration) hardness Hoek, 2011)
selectivity

46
Aquaporin Permeability and Mechanical Desalination under Aquaporin Flat-
based high ionic impairment low pressure Sheet Membrane
membranes resistance (thickness ∼110 μm)
(Xia et al., 2017)

Nano self- Membranes Accessible in small Phase of ultra ∼ 40 μm thick (Feng


assembly designed to fit, amounts (laboratory filtration et al., 2019)
membranes homogenous scale)
nanopores

Nano-fiber High efficiency of Nanofibers may be Stand alone filter, PUR10 is mere 6
membranes permeability, released, pore ultra filtration, μm, nylon 6
customized, blocking possible cartilage filters, nanofiber/cellulose
bactericidal and Water filtering, 205 μm (Fauzi et al.,
porous prefiltration 2020; Jiříček et al.,
2017)

47
Table 2.
List of polymers and biopolymers for their solubility, hydrophobicity, stable mechanics and chemical
stability.
Polymers and Molecular Hydrophilicity Solubility Steady Chemical
bio-polymers weight (g/mol) and mechanics stability
hydrophobicity
Propionate and 1811.7 Hydrophobic In ink Strong point Stable
cellulose acetate solvents of fusion interface
(benzene,
toluene,
etc.)
Polyacrylonitrile 53.0626 ± Hydrophobic In Weniger Strong Has
0.0028 polar tolerance to excellent
solvents temperature chemical
and power stability

PSF/PVP 1600- Hydrophilic Highly Obtained Strong water


5170/2,500 – soluble in good miscibility
2,500,000 water mechanical
stability

Polysulfone 442.52 Hydrophobic Soluble in Obtained Compaction


organic good resistance
solvents for mechanical and high
example stability strength
DMF

SPS/PES 110,000- Hydrophilic Resistance Strong Has


141,000/232.26 to chemicals tolerance to excellent
temperature chemical
and power stability

48
Table 3.
List of Nano-based antimicrobial agents and possible uses in water treatment
Various sources of pollutants Nanomaterials based Pathogens (targeted microorganisms)
contaminating water antimicrobial agents
resources
Municipal pollution: (Water Chitosan nanoparticles Active against Gram-negative and
treatment (some of the Gram-positive bacteria (H. Yu et al.,
sewage is not properly 2020)
handled or handled), Storm
Bimetallic silver and copper Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria
drains, Septic tanks (home
nanoparticles gonorrhoeae and Escherichia coli
sewage), Vessels that
(Gram negative) (Merugu et al.,
discharge sewage, Yard
2020)
runoff (fertiliser and herbicide
waste).
Titanium di-oxide (TiO2) Staphylococcus aureus and
nanoparticles Staphylococcus epidermidis (Gram-
Industrial pollution:
positive), Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Radioactive contaminants
and Klebsiella pneumonia (Gram-
from nuclear power plants
negative), Candida albicans and
and medical and scientific
Aspergillus niger (Fungi) (Punitha et
sources, Heavy metals,
al., 2020)
organic contaminants, oils
and solids in industrial waste, PEI-coated PLA nanoparticles Escherichia coli and Salmonella
Pollutants, such as sulphur, enterica (Gram negative); Listeria
fossil fuel combustion, oil and monocytogenes and Staphylococcus
other petroleum products aureus (Gram positive) (Niza et al.,
from super-tank spills and 2020)
offshore drilling incidents,
Heated water with chemical Peptide-functionalized magnetic Staphylococcus sp. (Gram positive)
residues from industrial nanoparticles (AMP-MNPs) (Ding et al., 2020)
operations, such as power
stations.
Cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and
nanoparticles Escherichia coli (Gram-negative);
Agricultural pollution: Grain,
Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus
livestock and poultry farming
cereus (Gram-positive) (Gheidari et
discharges pollutants such as
al., 2020)
fertilizers, pesticides and
animal waste into local
waterways. Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles Alternaria alternata, Sclerotium
rolfsii and Stemphylium solani
Medical waste pollutants: (Fungi); Escherichia coli (Gram-
During health care activities. negative) (Perveen et al., 2020)

Highlights:

 Nanotechnology is the most innovative method suitable for wastewater treatment.

 By adsorption, carbon-nanomaterials eliminate organic and inorganic pollutants.

49
 Nanoparticles are low-cost adsorbents for radionuclides and heavy metals.

 Nanomaterials serve as excellent antimicrobials in wastewater treatment.

50

You might also like