The document provides an overview of correlation and regression analysis, focusing on the relationship between two or more variables. It discusses types of correlation, methods for determining correlation such as scatter plots and Pearson's coefficient, and the degrees of correlation ranging from perfect to absence of correlation. Additionally, it includes examples and formulas for calculating correlation coefficients, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationships between variables in various contexts.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views
Correlation and Regression -intro
The document provides an overview of correlation and regression analysis, focusing on the relationship between two or more variables. It discusses types of correlation, methods for determining correlation such as scatter plots and Pearson's coefficient, and the degrees of correlation ranging from perfect to absence of correlation. Additionally, it includes examples and formulas for calculating correlation coefficients, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationships between variables in various contexts.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24
CORRELATION AND REGRESSION ANALYSIS
1.1 Introduction to Correlation
So far, we have considered only univariate distributions. By the averages, dispersion and skewness of distribution, we get a complete idea about the structure of the distribution. Many times, we come across problems which involve two or more variables. If we carefully study the figures of rain fall and production of maize, figures of accidents and motor cars in a city, of demand and supply of a commodity, of sales and profit, we may find that there is some relationship between the two variables. On the other hand, if we compare the figures of rainfall in America and the production of cars in Japan, we may find that there is no relationship between the two variables. If there is any relation between two variables i.e., when one variable changes the other also changes in the same or in the opposite direction, we say that the two variables are correlated. 1.2 Correlation It means the study of existence, magnitude and direction of the relation between two or more variables. 6.3 Types of Correlation 1. Positive and negative correlation 2. Linear and non-linear correlation A) If two variables change in the same direction (i.e., if one increases the other also increases, or if one decreases, the other also decreases), then this is called a positive correlation. For example: Advertising and sales. B) If two variables change in the opposite direction (i.e., if one increases, the other decreases and vice versa), then the correlation is called a negative correlation. For example: T.V. registrations and cinema attendance. The nature of the graph gives us the idea of the linear type of correlation between two variables. If the graph is in a straight line, the correlation is called a "linear correlation" and if the graph is not in a straight line, the correlation is non-linear or curvi-linear. For example, if variable X changes by a constant quantity, say 20 then Y also changes by a constant quantity, say 4. The ratio between the two always remains the same (1/5 in this case). In case of a curvi-linear correlation this ratio does not remain constant. 1.4 Degrees of Correlation Through the coefficient of correlation, we can measure the degree or extent of the correlation between two variables. On the basis of the coefficient of correlation we can also determine whether the correlation is positive or negative and also its degree or extent. 1. Perfect correlation: If two variables change in the same direction and in the same proportion, the correlation between the two is perfect positive. According to Karl Pearson the coefficient of correlation in this case is +1. On the other hand, if the variables change in the opposite direction and in the same proportion, the correlation is perfect negative. its coefficient of correlation is -1. In practice we rarely come across these types of correlations. 2. Absence of correlation: If two series of two variables exhibit no relations between them or change in variable does not lead to a change in the other variable, then we can firmly say that there is no correlation or absurd correlation between the two variables. In such a case the coefficient of correlation is 0 3. Limited degrees of correlation: If two variables are not perfectly correlated or is there a perfect absence of correlation, then we term the correlation as Limited correlation. It may be positive, negative or zero but lies with the limits _ 1. High degree, moderate degree or low degrees are the three categories of this kind of correlation. The following table reveals the effect (or degree) of coefficient or correlation. Degrees Positive Negative Absence of correlation Zero 0 Perfect correlation + 1 -1 High degree + 0.75 to + 1 - 0.75 to -1 Moderate degree + 0.25 to + 0.75 - 0.25 to - 0.75 Low degree 0 to 0.25 0 to - 0.25 6.5 Methods Of Determining Correlation We shall consider the following most commonly used methods (1) Scatter Plot (2) Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation (3) Spearman’s Rank-correlation coefficient. 125 6.5.1 Scatter Plot (Scatter diagram or dot diagram) In this method the values of the two variables are plotted on a graph paper. One is taken along the horizontal ( (x-axis) and the other along the vertical (y-axis). By plotting the data, we get points (dots) on the graph which are generally scattered and hence the name ‘Scatter Plot’. The manner in which these points are scattered, suggest the degree and the direction of correlation. The degree of correlation is denoted by ‘ r ’ and its direction is given by the signs positive and negative. NOTES i) If all points lie on a rising straight line the correlation is perfectly positive and r = +1 (see fig.1) 126 ii) If all points lie on a falling straight line the correlation is perfectly negative and r = -1 (see fig.2) iii) If the points lie in narrow strip, rising upwards, the correlation is high degree of positive (see fig.3) iv) If the points lie in a narrow strip, falling downwards, the correlation is high degree of negative (see fig.4) v) If the points are spread widely over a broad strip, rising upwards, the correlation is low degree positive (see fig.5) vi) If the points are spread widely over a broad strip, falling downward, the correlation is low degree negative (see fig.6) vii) If the points are spread (scattered) without any specific pattern, the correlation is absent. i.e. r = 0. (see fig.7) Though this method is simple and is a rough idea about the existence and the degree of correlation, it is not reliable. As it is not a mathematical method, it cannot measure the degree of correlation 6.5.2 Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation It gives the numerical expression for the measure of correlation. it is noted by ‘ r ’. The value of ‘ r ’ gives the magnitude of correlation and sign denotes its direction. Karl Pearson correlation coefficient is also sometimes referred to as the product moment correlation coefficient and is defined as xy xy ss s r Where 127 n xxyy sxy , n xx sx 2 , n yy sy 2 xy s is called the covariance of X and Y sx is the standard deviation of X sy is the standard deviation of Y Therefore 22xxyy xxyy r Example 1 A chemical fertilizer company wishes to determine the extent of correlation between ‘quantity of compound X used’ and ‘lawn growth’ per day. The results are tabulated below: Lawn Compound X (g) Lawn Growth (mm) A13 B23 C46 D58 Find the Pearson’s correlation between the three variables. Solution 128 22xxyy xxyy r We start by obtaining the means x and y . 5 4 20 4 3368 4 3 12 4 1245 y x Now x y x x y y x xy y 2 x x 2 y y 1 3 -2 -2 4 4 4 2 3 -1 -2 2 1 4 4611111 5823649 13 10 18 Substituting in the formula above, 0.969 10 18 r 13 A positive r means that as x (the mass of the chemical compound) increases, then so does y(the lawn growth) A value of r close to 1 indicates a very strong positive correlation. 129 Alternative Formula for Calculating R Often it is cumbersome to calculate the means when the data contains decimals or it is too large. A second formula that does not require the calculation of the means is shown below. We have xyxy xy ss xy ss s r cov It can be shown that n xy s xy xy (An alternative formula for finding the covariance of X and Y.) n x sxx 2 2 (An alternative formula for finding the standard deviation of X) n syyy 2 2 (An alternative formula for finding the standard deviation of Y) Therefore, n y y n x x n xy xy r 2 2 2 2 Using this formula, we can do example 1 above as follows: x y xy (x)2 y2 130 1 3 12 1 9 23649 4 6 24 16 36 5 8 40 25 64 12 20 73 46 118 Therefore 0.969 10 18 13 4 118 400 4 46 144 4 73 12 20 r Example 2 From the following data compute the coefficient of correlation between x and y. a) sx = 14.7, sy = 19.2, and xy s = 136.8 b) x 65 , y 141 , xy 1165 , x2 505 , y2 2745 , n 11 131 Solution a) 0.485 14.7 19.2 136.8 xy xy ss s r b) n y y n x x n xy xy r 2 2 2 2 11 2745 141 11 505 65 11 1165 65 141 22 r r 0.986 Example 3 If covariance between x and y is 12.3 and the variance of x and y are 16.4 and 13.8 respectively. Find the coefficient of correlation between them. Solution: Given cov(XY) 12.3 , 2 16.4 x s and 2 13.8 y s xyss r cov(XY) 132 16.4 13.8 r 12.3 r 0.818 6.5.3 Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient This method is based on the ranks of the items rather than on their actual values. The advantage of this method over the others in that it can be used even when the actual values of items are unknown. For example if you want to know the correlation between honesty and wisdom of the boys of your class, you can use this method by giving ranks to the boys. It can also be used to find the degree of agreements between the judgments of two examiners or two judges. The formula is : 21 621 NN RD where R = Rank correlation coefficient D = Difference between the ranks of two items N = The number of observations. Note: 1 R 1 i) When R = +1: Perfect positive correlation or complete agreement in the same direction ii) When R = -1: Perfect negative correlation or complete agreement in the opposite direction. iii) When R = 0: No Correlation. 133 Computation: i. Give ranks to the values of items. Generally the item with the highest value is ranked 1 and then the others are given ranks 2, 3, 4, .... According to their values in the decreasing order. ii. Find the difference D = R1 - R2 where R1 = Rank of x and R2 = Rank of y Note that D= 0 (always) iii. Calculate D2 and then find D2 iv. Apply the formula. Note : In some cases, there is a tie between two or more items. in such a case each items have ranks 4th and 5th respectively then they are given 2 45 = 4.5th rank. If three items are of equal rank say 4th then they are given 3 4 5 6 = 5th rank each. If m be the number of items of equal ranks, the factor i m3 m 12 1 is added to S D2. If there are more than one of such cases then this factor added as many times as the number of such cases, then 134 Example Calculate ‘ R ’ from the following data. Student No.: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rank in Maths : 1 3 7 5 4 6 2 10 9 8 Rank in Stats: 3 1 4 5 6 9 7 8 10 2 Solution : Student No. Rank in Maths (R1) Rank in Stats (R2) R1 - R2 D (R1 - R2 )2 D2 1 1 3 -2 4 23124 37439 45500 5 4 6 -2 4 6 6 9 -3 9 7 2 7 -5 25 135 8 10 8 2 4 9 9 10 -1 1 10 8 2 6 36 N = 10 D 0 D2 96 Calculation of R : Example Calculate ‘ R ’ of 6 students from the following data. Marks in Stats : 40 42 45 35 36 39 Marks in English : 46 43 44 39 40 43 136 Solution: Marks in Stats R1 Marks in English R2 R1 - R2 (R1 -R2)2 =D2 40 3 46 1 2 4 42 2 43 3.5 -1.5 2.25 45 1 44 2 -1 1 35 6 39 6 0 0 36 5 40 5 0 0 39 4 43 3.5 0.5 0.25 N = 6 D 0 D2 7.50 Here m = 2 since in series of marks in English of items of values 43 repeated twice. D2 is sometimes written as SD2.[Read as sum of D squared] 137 Example The value of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for a certain number of pairs of observations was found to be 2/3. The sum of the squares of difference between the corresponding rnarks was 55. Find the number of pairs. Solution: We have 138 LECTURE 10 6.6 Introduction to Regression Analysis Correlation gives us the idea of the measure of magnitude and direction between correlated variables. Now it is natural to think of a method that helps us in estimating the value of one variable when the other is known. Also correlation does not imply causation. The fact that the variables x and y are correlated does not necessarily mean that x causes y or vice versa. For example, you would find that the number of schools in a town is correlated to the number of accidents in the town. The reason for these accidents is not the school attendance; but these two increases what is known as population. A statistical procedure called regression is concerned with causation in a relationship among variables. It assesses the contribution of one or more variable called causing variable or independent variable or one which is being caused (dependent variable). When there is only one independent variable then the relationship is expressed by a straight line. This procedure is called simple linear regression. Regression can be defined as a method that estimates the value of one variable when that of other variable is known, provided the variables are correlated. The dictionary meaning of regression is "to go backward." It was used for the first time by Sir Francis Galton in his research paper "Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature." 6.7 Lines of Regression In scatter plot, we have seen that if the variables are highly correlated then the points (dots) lie in a narrow strip. if the strip is nearly straight, we can draw a straight line, such that all points are close to it from both sides. such a line can be taken as an ideal representation of variation. This line is called the line of best fit if it minimizes the distances of all data points from it. This line is called the line of regression or line of best fit. Now prediction is easy because now all we need to do is to extend the line and read the value. Thus to obtain a line of regression, we need to have a line of best fit. But statisticians don’t measure the distances by dropping perpendiculars from points on to the line. They measure deviations ( or errors or residuals as they are called) (i) vertically and (ii) horizontally. 139 Thus we get two lines of regressions as shown in the figure (1) and (2). (1) Line of regression of y on x Its form is y = a + b x It is used to estimate y when x is given (2) Line of regression of x on y Its form is x = a + b y It is used to estimate x when y is given. 6.8 Regression Equation of y on x It can are obtained by (1) graphically - by Scatter plot (ii) Mathematically - by the method of least squares. The least squares formula is x x s s yy x xy 2 Example 1 Use the least squares formula to fit a regression line through (1,3), (3,5) and (5,6). 140 Solution x y xy (x)2 1331 3 5 15 9 5 6 30 25 9 14 48 35 So x 9 , y 14 , xy 48 , x2 35 , n 3 3 3 9 n x x and 3 14 n y y x x s s yy x xy 2 n xy s xy xy 6 3 48 9 14 xy s 8 3 35 9 22 2 2 n x sxx Therefore, 3 8 6 3 y 14 x 141 Multiplying through by 24 (L.C.M), 0.75 2.42 24 58 54 18 24 18 58 24 18 54 112 24 112 18 54 yx yx yx yx yx Example 2 The table below shows the sales for Bidii electronics established in the late 1998. Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Sales(Sh x1000) 5 9 14 18 21 27 a) Draw a scatter graph to represent this data. b) Find r2 c) Find the equation of the line of best fit using the linear regression formula. d) Predict the sales for the year 2006, giving your answer to the nearest Sh Solution a) 142 b) To get r2 x y xy (x)2 y2 1 5 5 1 25 2 9 18 4 81 3 14 42 9 196 4 18 72 16 324 5 21 105 25 441 6 27 162 36 729 21 94 404 91 1796 n y y n x x n xy xy r 2 2 2 2 6 1796 94 6 91 21 6 404 21 94 22 r = 75.22 75 91 73.5 1796 1472.66 404 329 r 0.997 143 r2 0.994 c) 3.5 6 x 21 , 15.67 6 y 94 x x s s yy x xy 2 n xy s xy xy 75 6 404 21 94 xy s 17.5 6 91 21 22 2 2 n x sxx 3.5 17.5 y 15.67 75 x 15 15.67 17.5 y 75 x Thus is the equation for the regression line of y on x. y 4.29x 0.67 In the year 2008, x 8 Therefore 144 y = (4.29)(8) + 0.67 y= 34.32+0.67 Sales =34.99 1,000 34,990 = Sh 35000 worth of sales. Example3 A panel of two judges A and B graded dramatic performance by independently awarding marks as follows: a) Obtain the correlation coefficient r b) Use the least squares method to obtain the regression equation of y on x. c) Find the mark awarded by judge B to performance 8. Solution: a) x y xy x2 y2 36 35 1260 1296 1225 32 33 1056 1024 1089 34 31 1054 1156 961 31 30 930 961 900 32 34 1088 1024 1156 32 32 1024 1024 1024 145 35 36 1260 1225 1296 232 231 7672 7710 7651 Now n y y n x x n xy xy r 2 2 2 2 7 7651 231 7 7710 232 7 7672 232 231 22 r 21 28 16 7710 7689 7651 7623 7612 7656 Therefore r=0.65 b) The equation of the line of regression of y on x x x s s yy x xy 2 16 xy s 2 21 x s 33 21 y 33 16 x y = 0.76x+7.92 146 c) Inserting x = 38, we get y = 0.76 ( 38) +7.92 y = 36.8 = 37 ( approximately ) Therefore, the Judge B would have given 37 marks to 8th performance Alternative Formula for Calculating Regression It is expressed as y = a + bx where a and b are two unknown constants which determine the position of the line completely. If the values of a and b are completely determined the equation of the regression line of y on x is obtained. The two basic equations which can be solved simultaneously to find a and b are:- …………(i) …..(ii) Example 4 From 10 observations of price x and supply y of a commodity the results obtained x = 130, y = 220, x2 = 2288, xy = 3467 Compute the regression of y on x and interpret the result. Estimate the supply when the price of 16 units. 147 Solution: The equation of the line of regression of y on x y=a+bx Also from normal equations y = n a + b x and xy = a x + b x2 we get 220 = 10 a + 130 b … ……(1) 3467 = 130 a + 2288 ……..(2) Solving (1) and (2) a 2860 = 130 a + 1690 b 3467 = 130 a + 2288 b On subtraction, 607 = 598 b b = 1.002 Putting b = 1.002 in 220 = 10 a + 130 b, we get a = 8.974. Hence the 3 equation of the line of regression of y on x is y = 8.974 + 1.002 x When x = 16, we get y = 8.974 + 1.002 ( 16 ) y = 25.006 6.9 Uses of Regression Analysis 148 1. Through the methods of interpolation and extrapolation, it provides estimates of values of the dependent variable from the values of the independent variables. 2. Regression analysis also enables us to obtain a measure of error involved in using the regression line as a basis of estimation. 3. Regression analysis also enables us to compute the coefficient of determinationwhich gives the measure of association or correlation between two variables. 6.10 Difference between correlation and regression i) The objective of regression analysis is to study the relationship between the variables involved while the coefficient of correlation is the measure of the degree of relationship between the variables. ii) The cause and effect relation is clearly indicated through regression analysis but we cannot say that one variable is the cause and the other the effect. iii) Correlation analysis is only confined to the study of linear relationship between the variables, and therefore has limited applications. Regression analysis has much wider applications as it studies both linear and nonlinear relationship between variables. iv) There may be nonsense correlation between two variables which is due to mere chance and has no practical relevance, but there is no such thing as nonsense regression. 149 Chapter Review Questions 1. The length and width of 10 leaves are shown on the scatter diagram below. Relationship between leaf length and width 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Length (mm) Width (mm) (a) Draw a suitable line of best fit. (b) Write a sentence describing the relationship between leaf length and leaf width for this sample. 2. Statements I, II, III, IV and V represent descriptions of the correlation between two variables. I High positive linear correlation II Low positive linear correlation III No correlation IV Low negative linear correlation V High negative linear correlation Which statement best represents the relationship between the two variables shown in each of the scatter diagrams below. 150 10 8 6 4 2 10 8 6 4 2 10 8 6 4 2 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 10 10 10 10 x x x x y y y y (a) (c) (b) (d) Answers: (a) …………………………………… (b) …………………………………… (c) ………………………………… (d) ………………………………… 2. The Type Fast secretarial training agency has a new computer software spreadsheet package. The agency investigates the number of hours it takes people of varying ages to reach a level of proficiency using this package. Fifteen 151 individuals are tested and the results are summarised in the table below. Age 32 40 21 45 24 19 17 21 27 54 33 37 23 45 18 (x) Time (in hours) 10 12 8 15 7 8 6 9 11 16 t 13 9 17 5 (y) (a) (i) Given that Sy = 3.5 and Sxy = 36.7, calculate the product-moment correlation coefficient r for this data. (ii) What does the value of the correlation coefficient suggest about the relationship between the two variables? (b) Given that the mean time taken was 10.6 hours, write the equation of the regression line for y on x in the form y = ax + b. (c) Use your equation for the regression line to predict (i) the time that it would take a 33 year old person to reach proficiency, giving your answer correct to the nearest hour; (ii) the age of a person who would take 8 hours to reach proficiency, giving your answer correct to the nearest year. 3. Ten students were given two tests, one on Mathematics and one on English. The table shows the results of the tests for each of the ten students. 152 Student A B C D E F G H I J Mathematics (x) 8.6 13.4 12.8 9.3 1.3 9.4 13.1 4.9 13.5 9.6 English (y) 33 51 30 48 12 23 46 18 36 50 (a) Given sxy (the covariance) is 35.85, calculate, correct to two decimal places, the product moment correlation coefficient (r). (6) (b) Use your result from part (a) to comment on the statement: 'Those who do well in Mathematics also do well in English.' 4. The heights and weights of 10 students selected at random are shown in the table below. Student 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Height x cm 155 161 173 150 182 165 170 185 175 145 Weight y kg 50 75 80 46 81 79 64 92 74 108 (a) Plot this information on a scatter graph. Use a scale of 1 cm to represent 20 cm on the x-axis and 1 cm to represent 10 kg on the y-axis. (b) Calculate the mean height. (c) Calculate the mean weight. 153 (d) It is given that Sxy = 44.31. (i) By first calculating the standard deviation of the heights, correct to two decimal places, show that the gradient of the line of regression of y on x is 0.276. (ii) Calculate the equation of the line of best fit. (iii) Draw the line of best fit on your graph. (e) Use your line to estimate (i) the weight of a student of height 190 cm; (ii) the height of a student of weight 72 kg. (f) It is decided to remove the data for student number 10 from all calculations. Explain briefly what effect this will have on the line of best fit. References i. Research methods by Mugenda Olive M and Mugenda Abel G. Pg132-134 ii. Business Calculations and statistics simplified by N.A Saleemi. Revised Edition. Pg 480-501, 508-522 iii. Essentials of statistics for Business and Economics by Anderson Sweety Williams Pg 84-9 154