math110-hw7sol
math110-hw7sol
FALL 2007/08
PROBLEM SET 7 SOLUTIONS
1
(a) Show that
im(S ◦ T ) ⊆ im(S)
and
ker(S ◦ T ) ⊇ ker(T ).
Solution. Let w ∈ im(S ◦ T ). Then there exist some u ∈ U such that w = S ◦ T (u) =
S(T (u)). So w ∈ im(S) since w = S(v) where v = T (u) ∈ V . Hence im(S ◦ T ) ⊆
im(S). For the second part, let u ∈ ker(T ). Then T (u) = 0V and so S(T (u)) = S(0V ),
ie. S ◦ T (u) = 0W , ie. u ∈ ker(S ◦ T ). Hence ker(T ) ⊆ ker(S ◦ T ).
(b) Show that if T is surjective, then
im(S ◦ T ) = im(S).
Solution. By part (a), we know that im(S ◦ T ) ⊆ im(S). We will show the reverse
inclusion. If w ∈ im(S), then there exists some v ∈ V such that w = S(v). But since
T : U → V is surjective, there exists some u ∈ U such that v = T (u). So w = S(T (u)) =
S ◦ T (u), ie. w ∈ im(S ◦ T ). Hence im(S) ⊆ im(S ◦ T ).
(c) Show that if S is injective, then
ker(S ◦ T ) = ker(T ).
Solution. By part (a), we know that ker(S ◦ T ) ⊇ ker(T ). We will show the reverse
inclusion. If u ∈ ker(S ◦ T ), then S(T (u)) = S ◦ T (u) = 0W . But since S is injective
(and linear), by a result in the lectures, we ker(S) = {0V }. So T (u) ∈ ker(S) implies that
T (u) = 0V , which in turns implies that u ∈ ker(T ). Hence ker(S ◦ T ) ⊆ ker(T ).
2
Applying (3.2) and (3.3) to the rhs of (3.1), we obtain
nullity(S ◦ T ) ≤ nullity(S) + nullity(T ).
(b) Show that
rank(S + T ) ≤ rank(S) + rank(T ).
Solution. Let w ∈ im(S + T ). Then w = (S + T )(v) for some v ∈ V . Observe that
w = (S + T )(v) = S(v) + T (v) ∈ im(S) + im(T ).
Hence im(S + T ) ⊆ im(S) + im(T ) and hence
dim(im(S + T )) ≤ dim(im(S) + im(T )) ≤ dim(im(S)) + dim(im(T )),
where the second inequality follows from Homework 4, Problem 4(a). In other words, we
have
rank(S + T ) ≤ rank(S) + rank(T ).
(c) Show that if S ◦ T = OV , then
rank(S) + rank(T ) ≤ dim(V ).
Solution. Note that ker(OV ) = V — for any v ∈ V , OV (v) = 0, so V ⊆ ker(OV ); on
the other hand, we always have ker(OV ) ⊆ V . Hence nullity(OV ) = dim(V ). Now we will
apply part (a),
nullity(S ◦ T ) ≤ nullity(S) + nullity(T )
to get
dim(V ) ≤ nullity(S) + nullity(T ).
Adding dim(V ) to both sides of the inequality and bringing the two terms on the rhs to
the lhs, we get
dim(V ) − nullity(S) + dim(V ) − nullity(T ) ≤ dim(V ).
Finally, we apply the rank-nullity theorem twice to get
rank(S) + rank(T ) ≤ dim(V ).
3
Since ker(T ) + im(T ) is a subspace of V , the only way their dimensions could be equal is if
ker(T ) + im(T ) = V.
But since ker(T ) ∩ im(T ) = {0V }, the sum is a direct sum, ie.
ker(T ) ⊕ im(T ) = V.
(c) ⇒ (a): ker(T ) ⊕ im(T ) = V implies both (a) and (b), so it implies (a) in particular.