The Seafarers Protection Act (RA 10706) aims to safeguard Filipino seafarers from exploitation by unscrupulous lawyers engaging in ambulance chasing, which involves soliciting legal claims under false pretenses. The Act prohibits excessive legal fees and mandates that any fees charged must not exceed 10% of the awarded compensation. It reinforces the ethical obligations of lawyers to avoid solicitation and uphold the integrity of the legal profession.
The Seafarers Protection Act (RA 10706) aims to safeguard Filipino seafarers from exploitation by unscrupulous lawyers engaging in ambulance chasing, which involves soliciting legal claims under false pretenses. The Act prohibits excessive legal fees and mandates that any fees charged must not exceed 10% of the awarded compensation. It reinforces the ethical obligations of lawyers to avoid solicitation and uphold the integrity of the legal profession.
Seafarer’s Protection; New Law Against rampant in the country, especially noted in the
Ambulance Chasing maritime industry.
Some lawyers have taken advantage of the
I am Nollora, and I’ll be presenting the RA plight of our seafarers who met an accident, 10706 also known as the Seafarers Protection illness, or death in the course of their service. Act. To exploit the compensation system, these law - It aims to promote and protect Filipino practitioners have purposely sought excessive seafarers seeking overseas employment. labor claims not commensurate to their actual entitlement, if not at all bogus. Unwittingly, our -The Act seeks to eliminate unfair practices, seafarers have fallen prey to this scheme specifically ambulance-chasing, which involves enticed by the promise of huge monetary charging excessive fees under false awards. promises of large monetary awards Apparently, these ambulance chasers do not only resort to this unacceptable practice but -The State recognizes the exploitation of also charge exorbitant legal fees and seek up seafarers by unscrupulous individuals, to 40% of the total money claims granted. particularly in cases of accidents, illness, or death. Being a lawyer, we are at the core of our main duty to help those who are in need, oppressed -The Act seeks to eliminate unfair practices, and in distress but not at the expense of the specifically ambulance-chasing, which involves administration of justice. charging excessive fees under false promises of large monetary awards. Many lawyers across the Philippines try to capitalize on other people's misfortunes. This act mainly focuses on new laws against Hence, the term "Ambulance chasing" which is ambulance chasing. an unfortunate side effect of the practice of law. One of the ways on how they do this is that Ambulance-chasing has been discussed in lawyers target one individual for representation code of professional responsibility and the moment one is injured. accountability of legal ethics of an attorney. Although it is not unheard of to actually be The Code of Professional Responsibility of chased by a lawyer while you are in an Lawyers dictates that one should not solicit ambulance, the term also encompasses other legal business and has the obligation not to approaches, like meeting an attorney in a encourage suits to prevent barratry and doctor's office, receiving a lawyer's contact ambulance chasing. information from a nurse in a hospital, or receiving a phone call from an attorney at However, despite this code of ethics, the home after an accident. practice of ambulance chasing has become Now, there is nothing wrong with the attorney shall not exceed 10% of the compensation or coming to meet you in the hospital, but this benefit awarded to the seafarer or his/her heirs. should happen only after you or a family member has contacted said Attorney. Prohibition on Ambulance Chasing ambulance chasing refers to the practice of soliciting legal business from accident victims ● Engaging in ambulance chasing is or their families at the scene of an accident or declared unlawful. disaster. ● This includes soliciting claims from seafarers or their heirs for monetary ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE recovery against employers. 1) a person or his agent solicits from a seafarer ● The act of solicitation can be direct or or his heirs, the pursuit of a claim against the through an agent. employer of the seafarer; ● Any fees charged for such services (2) such claim is for the purpose of recovery of must not be deducted from the monetary award or benefits arising from monetary claims awarded to seafarers accident, illness or death, including legal or their heirs. interest; and
- The Act seeks to eliminate unfair
practices, specifically ambulance chasing, which involves charging excessive fees under false promises of large monetary awards. - (3) the pursuit of the claim is in exchange of an amount or fee which shall be retained or deducted from the monetary award or benefit granted or awarded to the seafarers or their heirs. R.A. No. 10706 also provides that the total compensation for the person who appears (3) the pursuit of the claim is in exchange of an amount or fee which shall be retained or deducted from the monetary award or benefit granted or awarded to the seafarers or their heirs. R.A. No. 10706 also provides that the total compensation for the person who appears for or represents the seafarer or his/her heirs Case: Pedro Linsangan vs Atty. Nicomedes a loan of P50,000.00. Complainant also Tolentino - A.C. No. 6672 attached "respondent's" calling card. Respondent, in his defense, denied knowing The case at bar is a complaint for disbarment Labiano and authorizing the printing and filed by Pedro Linsangan against Atty. circulation of the said calling card. Hence, we Nicomedes Tolentino for solicitation of clients question whether or not Tolentino's actions and encroachment of professional services. warrant disbarment. Complaint alleged that respondent, with the help of paralegal Fe Marie Labiano, convinced The Supreme Court ruled that, yes, according his clients to transfer legal representation. to Rule 2.03 of the CPR provides that a lawyer Respondent promised them financial shall not do or permit to be done any act assistance and expeditious collection on their designed primarily to solicit legal business. claims. Hence, lawyers are prohibited from soliciting cases for the purpose of gain, either personally To induce them to hire his services, he or through paid agents or brokers. Such persistently called them and sent them text actuation constitutes malpractice, a ground for messages. To support his allegations, disbarment. Rule 2.03 should be read in complainant presented the sworn affidavit of connection with Rule 1.03 of the CPR which James Gregorio attesting that Labiano tried to provides that lawyer, shall not for any corrupt prevail upon him to sever his lawyer-client motive or interest, encourage any suit or relations with complainant and utilize proceeding or delay any man's cause. This rule respondent's services instead, in exchange for proscribes "ambulance chasing" (the a loan of P50,000.00. Complainant also solicitation of almost any kind of legal business attached "respondent's" calling card. by an attorney, personally or through an agent Respondent, in his defense, denied knowing in order to gain employment) as a measure to Labiano and authorizing the printing and protect the community from barratry and circulation of the said calling card. Hence, we champerty. In the case at bar, complainant question whether or not Tolentino's actions presented substantial evidence (consisting of warrant disbarment. the sworn statements of the very same persons coaxed by Labiano and referred to The Supreme Court ruled that, yes, according respondent's office) to prove that respondent to Rule 2.03 of the CPR provides that a lawyer indeed solicited legal business as well as shall not do or permit to be done any act profited from referrals' suits. Through Labiano's designed primarily to solicit legal business. actions, respondent's law practice was benefited. Hence, lawyers are prohibited from soliciting cases for the purpose of gain, either personally Hapless seamen were enticed to transfer or through paid agents or brokers. Such representation on the strength of Labiano's actuation constitutes his allegations, word that respondent could produce a more complainant presented the sworn affidavit of favorable result. Based on the foregoing, James Gregorio attesting that Labiano tried to respondent clearly solicited employment prevail upon him to sever his lawyer-client violating Rule 2.03, and Rule 1.03 and Canon 3 relations wit complainant and utilize of the CPR and section 27, Rule 138 of the respondent's services instead, in exchange for Rules of Court. Any act of solicitations constitutes malpractice which calls for the Rule 1.01 - A lawyer shall not engage in exercise of the Court's disciplinary powers. unlawful, dishonest, immoral or deceitful Violation of anti-solicitation statutes warrants conduct. serious sanctions for initiating contact with a prospective client for the purpose of obtaining There is no distinction as to whether the employment. Thus in this jurisdiction, the Court transgression is committed in the lawyer's adheres to the rule to protect the public from professional capacity or in his private life or in the Machiavellian machinations of his private transactions. This is because a unscrupulous lawyers and to uphold the nobility lawyer may not divide his personality as to be of the legal profession. Canon 2: A lawyer shall an attorney at one time and a mere citizen at make his legal services available in an efficient another, and his private life may reflect and convenient manner compatible with the unfavorably upon the good name and prestige independence, integrity and effectiveness of of the profession and the courts. It is a lawyer's the profession. duty to act with honesty, morality and lawful Conduct. Rule 2.03: A lawyer shall not do or permit to be done any act designed primarily to solicit legal Any of the three would be sufficient ground to business. file disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer. The dishonesty, gross immorality and violation Duties on the part of lawyers being upheld by of a law need not to be committed in relation to the prohibition against "ambulance chasing" his professional duties; the lawyer may be Canon 1: A lawyer shall uphold the constitution, sanctioned for acts committed in his private obey the laws of the land and promote affairs.
Canon 1 of the Code of Professional Unlawful conduct is a transgression of any
Responsibility states the first and foremost duty provision of law which not need to be a penal of a lawyer — to maintain allegiance to the law. The presence of evil intent on the part of Republic of the Philippines, uphold the the lawyer is not essential in order to bring his Constitution and obey the laws of the land. act of omission within the terms of this rule. Beyond this duty, a lawyer still has to play the Dishonest act denotes an absence of integrity, role of a servant of the law as he belongs to a a disposition to cheat, deceive, or defraud and profession to which society has entrusted the betray. Immoral or deceitful conduct is defined administration of law and dispensation of as wilful, shameless and has a moral justice. As such, a lawyer should make himself indifference to the opinion of the good and an example for others to emulate (Lee v. respectable members of the community. Tambago, A.C. No. 5281, February 12, 2008). Moral turpitude is an act of baseness or mere citizen at another, and his private life may Moreover, a lawyer, as an embodying figure of reflect unfavorably upon the good name and justice and conduct, must at all times observe prestige of the profession and the courts. It is a proper decorum and respect to the law and lawyer's duty to act with honesty, morality and legal processes and not by any means creating lawful Conduct. and following his or her own version of "legal profession." Any of the three would be sufficient ground to Lawyers are expected not to promote or assist file disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer. an organization which will violate the law and The dishonesty, gross immorality and violation afterwards, defend them. of a law need not to be committed in relation to Rule 1.03 - A lawyer shall not, for any corrupt his professional duties; the lawyer may be motive or interest, encourage any suit or sanctioned for acts committed in his private proceeding or delay any man's cause. affairs. A lawyer has a duty against barratry which is Unlawful conduct is a transgression of any the offense of frequently exciting or stirring up provision of law which not need to be a penal quarrels and suits, either at law or otherwise law. The presence of evil intent on the part of and this rule prevents ambulance chasing the lawyer is not essential in order to bring his which is defined as a solicitation of almost any act of omission within the terms of this rule. kind of legal business by laymen employed by a lawyer or by the attorney himself. Dishonest act denotes an absence of integrity, Volunteering advice to bring lawsuit comes a disposition to cheat, deceive, or defraud and within the prohibition, except where ties of betray. Immoral or deceitful conduct is defined blood, relationship, and trust make it a duty to as wilful, shameless and has a moral do so as stated in the Rules of Court, Canons indifference to the opinion of the good and of Professional Ethics, Canon 28. A lawyer respectable members of the community. Moral owes to the society and to the court the duty turpitude is an act of baseness or depravity in not to stir up litigation. It Is their duty to the duties which one person owes to another or encourage suits or legal actions with noble to society in general which is contrary to the intent to pursue or protect a right a person and usually accepted and customary rule of right not to delay any man's cause which was also and duty which a person should follow. Thus, it mentioned in the lawyer's oath. is an act contrary to justice, good morals and modesty. Crimes involving moral turpitude are falsification of public documents, bribery, estafa, murder, abduction, seduction, concubinage, smuggling and violation of BP 22.
Rule 1.02 - A lawyer shall not counsel or abet
activities aimed at defiance of the law or at lessening confidence in the legal system.
According to Rules of Court, Code of
Professional Ethics, Canon 32, a lawyer advances the honor of his profession and the best interest of his client when he renders services tending to impress upon the client and his undertaking exact compliance with the principles of moral law.