Alae Elberdai

Analysis of the Article: Discourse Analysis by Gillian Brown and George

Yule
Chapter 2, "The Role of Context in Interpretation," delves into how communication relies heavily
on context. Language is not merely about the words themselves but also about the situational,
social, and linguistic factors that frame those words. Without context, much of what is said
would lack meaning. This chapter establishes a framework for understanding the pivotal role of
pragmatics, the dimensions of context, principles of interpretation, and the mechanisms that
ensure coherence in discourse. These elements are crucial in understanding how meaning is
constructed dynamically during interaction, making this chapter a cornerstone of discourse
analysis

.2.1 Pragmatics and Discourse Context

Pragmatics focuses on how language is used in real-world contexts, emphasizing the interaction
between speakers and listeners. It highlights that meaning is not only contained within words
but also shaped by how those words are employed.

1. Deictic Elements:
Deictic elements, or deixis, refer to words and phrases that require contextual
information for their interpretation. These include pronouns (e.g., “I,” “you”),
demonstratives (e.g., “this,” “that”), and adverbs (e.g., “here,” “there”). For example,
the sentence “Can you bring that over here?” is incomprehensible without knowing
what “that” refers to and the location of “here.” Deictic elements anchor language to
the immediate environment of the speaker and listener, making them highly context-
dependent.
2. Reference:
Reference is the act of identifying entities within discourse. This process relies on shared
knowledge between the speaker and listener. For instance, the phrase “the girl in the
red dress” directs attention to a specific person in a crowd. However, ambiguous
references, such as “She is amazing,” can cause confusion if the listener does not know
the intended subject. Reference often depends on the speaker’s ability to guide the
listener’s focus effectively, making it a dynamic and context-driven process.
3. Presupposition:
Presuppositions are underlying assumptions embedded in statements. For example, the
phrase “John quit smoking” presupposes that John used to smoke. These assumptions
are not explicitly stated but are necessary for the utterance to make sense.
Presuppositions enrich communication by allowing speakers to convey information
indirectly, relying on the listener’s ability to infer additional meaning.
4. Implicature:
Implicature refers to meanings that are implied rather than explicitly stated. For
instance, if someone says, “It’s raining,” while looking at an open window, the implied
request might be to close the window. Implicature relies on the listener’s ability to
interpret indirect messages, making it a powerful tool for nuanced communication.
 Alae Elberdai

5. Inference:
Inference is the process by which listeners deduce unstated meanings based on
contextual clues. For example, hearing “I forgot my umbrella” might lead to the
inference that the speaker is concerned about rain. Inference plays a crucial role in
bridging gaps between what is said and what is meant, highlighting the collaborative
nature of communication.

2.2 The Context of Situation

Context is divided into three main dimensions, each crucial for understanding utterances:

- **Physical Context**: The time, location, and environment in which the discourse occurs. For
example, 'Can you hand me that?' depends on the listener identifying 'that' based on nearby
objects.
- **Social Context**: The relationships and roles between participants. For instance, a teacher
saying 'See me after class' carries different implications than a friend saying the same thing.
- **Linguistic Context (Co-text)**: The discourse preceding an utterance. For example, 'She’s
always late' might refer to someone introduced earlier in the conversation.

Example from Text: The phrase 'I do think Adam's quick' could vary in meaning depending on
whether it’s praise for Adam’s speed or sarcasm about his delayed reaction.

2.3 Expanding Context

Context is a multi-dimensional concept that provides the framework within which language is
interpreted. It can be divided into three main dimensions:

1. Physical Context:
Physical context refers to the tangible aspects of a communication setting, such as
location, time, and objects in the environment. For example, the phrase “Pass me that”
is only meaningful if the listener can identify “that” based on the physical surroundings.
The physical context creates the immediate backdrop against which utterances are
understood, making it essential for effective communication.
2. Social Context:
Social context involves the relationships and roles between participants in a
conversation. A request such as “Let’s meet tomorrow” carries different implications
when spoken by a supervisor to an employee versus a friend to another friend. Social
hierarchies, cultural norms, and interpersonal dynamics shape how messages are
interpreted within this dimension.
3. Linguistic Context (Co-text):
Linguistic context, or co-text, refers to the discourse preceding an utterance. For
instance, the statement “He finally arrived” relies on prior discussion about who “he” is
and the circumstances surrounding his arrival. Co-text ensures that language remains
coherent and connected, enabling listeners to interpret new information in light of what
has already been said.
 Alae Elberdai

2.4 Local Interpretation and Analogy

This section examines how listeners use minimal context (local interpretation) and familiar
patterns (analogy) to make sense of discourse.

Example from Text: The sentence 'He went to the window, then to a club' leads readers to
assume the window is in the same room and the club is in the same town.

Personal Example: If someone says, 'She’s at the park,' listeners assume it’s a local park unless
told otherwise.

2.5 Coherence and Relevance

Coherence ensures that discourse makes sense as a whole. Even when explicit connections are
absent, listeners infer relationships based on relevance. Grice’s Principle of Relevance states
that speakers are expected to stay on topic unless they signal a change.

Example from Text: 'The bride and groom left early last night. He greeted the girl with a smile'
encourages readers to find a connection between the two statements.

Personal Example: If someone says, 'I overslept. Missed the meeting,' listeners infer the
oversleeping caused the missed meeting.

Conclusion
Chapter 2 thoroughly explores how context shapes interpretation in discourse. By examining
dimensions of context, principles of interpretation, and the importance of coherence, the
chapter provides a robust framework for understanding language use. Pragmatics emerges as an
essential tool for analyzing how meaning is constructed dynamically in communication.