The Asean Business Outlook Survey 2011: Thailand Report
The Asean Business Outlook Survey 2011: Thailand Report
The Asean Business Outlook Survey 2011: Thailand Report
THAILAND REPORT
Compiled by:
Copyright Standards
This document contains proprietary research, copyrighted materials, and literary property of the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore and the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand. It is for the guidance of your company only, and is not to be copied, quoted, published, or divulged to others outside of your organization without the permission of the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore and the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand. This document is of great value to the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore and the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand. Accordingly, international and domestic laws and penalties guaranteeing patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret protection secure the ideas, concepts, and recommendations related within this document. No changes may be made to this document without the permission of The American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore and the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction
Research Background & Objectives Survey Methodology Brief Outline of Results
4 4 4 5 6 6 7 7 9 11 13 14 15 16 17 17 17 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 25
2. Business Outlook
World Economic Outlook Current Business Climate Importance of ASEAN Markets in Global Business Effectiveness of ASEAN Business Direction and Movement in ASEAN Profit Outlook Workforce Expansion Employment of Expatriates Expatriate Concerns
4. Conclusion Appendices
(A) Local Factors Impacting Business Table A-1: Satisfaction with Factors Impacting Business Table A-2: Satisfaction with Local Government Institutions Reasons for Business Expansion in ASEAN over the Next Two Years Table B-1: Reasons for Business Expansion
(B)
26 26 27
(C) Importance of ASEAN Markets over the Next Two Years Table C-1: Reasons for saying ASEAN markets will be more important (D) Sample Profile Table D-1: Workforce and Turnover Table D-2: Scope of Responsibility/Primary Activity (E) Reasons behind the choice of country for business expansion
28
INTRODUCTION
Research Background & Objectives The American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore (AmCham Singapore), in cooperation with other AmChams in the ASEAN region, conducted a study among U.S. companies based in seven Southeast Asian countries: Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. This study is now in its 10th year. The purpose of the study is to understand members outlook on business growth in Southeast Asia and their perceptions about a series of local factors. The members surveyed were senior executives, working with a company held by or with an American majority interest. AmCham Singapore developed a survey design using a web-based instrument. This report presents the feedback received from executives of U.S. companies in Thailand. Survey Methodology
Senior Executives of U.S. Companies based in Thailand A list of 286 AmCham members with e-mail contacts was provided by AmCham Thailand. Response rate was about 31% (88) at the end of the data collection period. Web-based, self-administered survey. No enforcement on participation. May 18 to June 8, 2011
Note: Percentages in graphs may not add to 100 due to respondents selecting I dont know or Not applicable.
About half of the Thailand respondents (53%) have responsibility for multiple countries. The portion of respondents whose companies are in the services sector increased from 44% in 2009 to 52% in 2010, and remains at that figure in 2011. The percentage of respondents in the manufacturing sector decreased slightly from 38% in 2009 to 34% in 2010, and continued the decrease in 2011 to 29%.The combined force of these changes results in a slight increase in the services to manufacturing ratio (from 1.5:1 in 2010 to 1.8:1 in 2011). This shift occurred mostly because of relatively significant decrease in two manufacturing sectorsthe manufacturing of electronics and of machinery and equipment. 32% of respondents said that their companies had less than 50 employees in the region, and 48% stated that their companies had a workforce of between 50 and 500 employees in the region. The largest portion of respondents (48%) had a turnover of between $1 million and $50 million in Thailand, and Thailand turnover accounted for less than 5% of global turnover for more than half of respondents and between 5 and 25% of ASEAN turnover for 31% of respondents. Singapore held the next highest ASEAN turnover for 25% of respondents.
BRIEF SUMMARY
BUSINESS OUTLOOK World Economic Outlook: 44% predict a better or much better performing economy in 2011 than in 2010. 54% of respondents predicted a better economy in 2010 than in 2009. Current Business Climate: Respondents facing significant financing constraints decreased from 27% in 2010 to 21% in 2011. A small but increasing portion of respondents face higher costs of borrowing (34% in 2011, 27% in 2010) Importance of ASEAN Markets in Global Business: 66% of respondents feel that ASEAN markets have increased in importance to their companies in the past two years. Respondents expecting ASEAN importance to increase in the next two years rose from 60% in 2009 to 71% in 2010 and 82% in 2011. Effectiveness of ASEAN: 79% of respondents find ASEAN integration important to helping their companies do business in the region. 80% of respondents use the ASEAN FTA. 61% of respondents use the ASEAN-China agreement. Business Direction and Movement in ASEAN: 71% of respondents companies expanded in ASEAN in the past two years. 85% of respondents plan to expand in the next two years. The largest portion (31%) of respondents plans to expand in Thailand. Profit Outlook: 64% expect a profit increase in 2011. 81% expect a profit increase in 2012. Workforce Expansion: 62% expect a workforce increase in 2011. 33% of respondents expect an increase of 5% to 10%. 49% expected such a workforce increase in 2010. FACTORS IMPACTING BUSINESS IN THAILAND Economic Conditions: 76% expect the overall Thailand economy to expand. 83% expect an increase in cost of living. 72% expect an increase in interest rate. 67% expect the Thai Baht to appreciate against the U.S. Dollar. 60% expect an increase in housing cost. Major Strengths (% Satisfied) Sentiment Towards the U.S. (67%) Infrastructure (59%) Housing Cost (58%) Personal Security (58%) Office Lease Cost (57%) Availability of Low Cost Labor (48%) Major Concerns (% Dissatisfied) Corruption (61%) Stable Government & Political System (59%) Local Protectionism (50%) Figure 1: World Economic Outlook in 2011 in Comparison With 2010 Economy
Much Better 6% Worse 10%
Better 44%
37% 40%
20%
14% 9% 1% 3% 4% 1%
0% More Important 2007 2008 Remain the Same 2009 2010 Less Important 2011
2. BUSINESS OUTLOOK
2.1 World Economic Outlook
Figure 2.1.1: Expectations for performance of world economy compared with 2010
Figure 2.1.2: Expectations for performance of world economy compared with past years
Economic outlook is positive in 2011, with half of the respondents (50%) expecting a better or much better performance of the world economy this year than last year, and none expecting a much worse performance of the world economy compared to last year. The economic outlook is slightly less positive than in 2010, when 70% of respondents expected a better or much better performance of the world economy than the previous year.
The percentage of businesses facing significant financing constraints continues to decrease in 2011, reaching a low of 21%. This is more than a 50% decrease from 2009, in which 48% of respondents faced significant financing constraints. In contrast, the percentage of businesses facing higher costs of borrowing has continued to grow, reaching a high of 34% this year, compared with 26% in 2009 and 27% in 2010.
ASEAN markets continue to grow in importance, with 66% of respondents stating that ASEAN markets became more important in terms of worldwide revenue to their company in the last two years. Only 5% of respondents believe ASEAN markets have become less important. 7
82%
80%
67% 60%
60%
71%
53% 37%
40%
20%
14% 9% 1% 3% 4% 1%
0%
Less Important
Most respondents (82%) believe that ASEAN markets will be more important in the next two years. Only 1% of respondents believe that ASEAN markets will be less important in the next two years.
Economic recovery continues to be a top reason for believing that ASEAN markets will be more important in the next two years, cited by 85% of respondents. Limited growth opportunities in other regions more than doubled from 2010 to 2011, reaching 40%. Increased availability of trained personnel decreased in 2011 to 18%, from 34% in 2010 and 46% in 2009. Change in business strategy also decreased as a top reason, from 51% last year to 35% this year. 8
What does your company view as the most significant barrier to conducting business within ASEAN?
This was an open-ended response; selected responses are listed.
Availability of trained work force Corruption and over-regulation by non-transparent government bureaucracies,
especially in the authoritarian countries of Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia and Myanmar
Political Instability Differences in cross border customs regulations and ratings Local regulatory requirements on tax and compliance and American tax code for American Companies abroad
2.4 Effectiveness of ASEAN
Figure 2.4.1: ASEAN trade agreements
The ASEAN FTA is the most used trade agreement, with 80% of respondents using its tariff benefits. The percentage of respondents using the ASEAN- Australia /New Zealand agreement increased from 31% in 2010 to 46% in 2011. The percentage using the ASEAN-Korea agreement increased from 17% to 24%. 9
We are a consulting company and trade in services not goods, these agreements cover goods only Non-tariff trade barriers such as local content rules and preferential consideration of domestic suppliers Not easy to use and understand between the countries. Standards are not standards. Low cost but under qualified manufacturers No FTA with the US
Importance of ASEAN Integration
Figure 2.4.2: Importance of ASEAN integration
Figure 2.4.3: Impact of ASEAN integration. Respondents were asked to choose top two responses.
10
ASEAN integration continues to be important in 2011. 79% of respondents stated that it is important to helping their companies do business. The majority of respondents stated that the impact that further ASEAN integration will have on their business activity is to make it easier to produce and sell goods across markets (62%). This is an increase from the 49% of respondents who chose this response in 2009 and 2010. Responses to other include free movement of labor and more investment opportunities.
In the past two years, has your business contracted or expanded within ASEAN?
100% 80%
61% 71% 57%
Expand
During the past two years, 71% of respondents increased or significantly increased their business in ASEAN, an increase from the 2010 figure of 57%. Most respondents (85%) plan to expand in ASEAN over the next two years, the highest rate recorded so far. No respondents plan to contract their presence in ASEAN over the next two years.
11
Economic recovery decreased slightly as a reason for ASEAN expansion, from 52% of respondents in 2010 citing it as a top reason to 45% in 2011. Potential for business growth grew significantly as a top reason for ASEAN expansion, with nearly all respondents (95%) citing it as one of their top reasons in 2011, compared to 81% in 2010. Increasing market share decreased slightly as a top reason for ASEAN expansion in 2011 to 44% from 52% in 2010. See Appendix B for more reasons.
Thailand is the most popular site for expansion at 31%. Vietnam is the second most popular site for ASEAN expansion at 29%. Indonesia increased significantly as a site for ASEAN expansion this year to 20%, from only 4% in 2010. Malaysia decreased in 2011, from 9% the previous year to 3% this year.
See Appendix E for reasons behind choice.
12
The majority (61%) of respondents stated that their companies do not plan to diversify some investments or business from China into ASEAN over the next two years. 27% of respondents are unsure if their companies will diversify investments or business from China into ASEAN over the next two years.
2.6 Profit Outlook Compared to last year do you expect your profits in ASEAN in the current and coming years to increase, decrease, or remain the same?
Figure 2.6: ASEAN profit outlook
Year of Survey Current Year Profit Expectation Coming Year Increase Remain Decrease Increase Remain Decrease
2010
63% 23% 10% 88% 10% 0%
2011
64% 28% 3% 81% 13% 0%
Profit outlook remains positive, with the vast majority of respondents (92%) expecting profits to remain the same or increase for the current year, and 94% expecting profits to remain the same or increase in the coming year. A lower percentage of respondents this year expect profits to decrease the current year (3%), compared to those in 2010 (10%).
13
Year of Survey Workplace 0 to less than 5% Expansion 5 to less than 10% 10 to less than 15% 15 to less than 20% 20 to less than 50% >50%
2003 44%
2004 27%
2005 38%
2006 46%
2007 42%
2008 44%
2009 47%
2010 44%
28%
47%
43%
38%
45%
36%
23%
37% 12%
22% 6%
23% 3%
12% 8%
10% 6%
11% 3%
14% 6%
20% 0%
5% 10%
12% 9%
In 2011 for the first time, 0-10% was further split into 0-5% and 5-10%. 10-20% was split into 10-15% and 15-20%.
Most respondents (62%) expect their number of employees to increase, a significant increase from those who expected it last year (48%). Out of these respondents, 33% expect an increase of 5% to 10%, and 24% expect an increase of 10% to 15%. The percentage of respondents who expect the number of employees to decrease dropped to 2% in 2011, from 13% in 2010. Out of the respondents who expect the number of employees to decrease (2%), 50% expect a decrease of 20% to 50%, and the other 50% expect a decrease of 10% to 15%.
14
Future Expansion
Figure 2.7.2: Expansion or contraction
The majority (77%) of companies plan to expand or expand significantly in the response location. The top reasons for expansion include potential for business growth (87%), increasing market share (54%), and economic recovery (46%). Respondents were asked to choose their top three reasons.
15
What are the TOP THREE reasons the number of expatriates working for your company will INCREASE?
Table 2.8.2: Reasons for increased employment of expatriates
Year of Survey Policy decision by Head Office Lack of skilled manpower in the local market Business expansion Improved security conditions for expatriates Other
A higher portion of respondents stated that their company will increase the number of expatriate employees in 2011 (23%), compared with the 2010 figure (13%). The number of respondents who stated that their company will decrease the number of expatriate employees dropped in 2011 to 9% from 17%. The top reason for expecting an increase in the number of expatriate employee is business expansion, with 85% of respondents citing it as a top three reason. The top reasons for expecting a decrease in number of expatriates are a decision from the Head Office (62%) and availability of skilled manpower in the local market (62%). Year of Survey 2009 2010 2011 Does your company regularly receive requests from employees based in other locations to work in your response location? Yes 34% 44% 51% No 66% 56% 49% Are your expatriate employees generally satisfied with their assignments in your response location? Yes 94% 99% 98% No 6% 1% 2% Do your expatriate employees attempt to extend their time in your response location? Yes 84% 89% 83% No 11% 16% 17%
Overall expatriate employee satisfaction remains high at 98%. There is a slight decrease in the percentage of respondents who had expatriate employees attempt to extend their time in Thailand, from 89% in 2010 to 83% in 2011. About half the respondents (51%) stated that their company regularly receives requests from employees based in other locations to work in Thailand.
16
Factors Infrastructure Office Lease Cost Housing Cost Personal Security Sentiment Towards the U.S.
2004
2005
2006
2007
60% 76%
60% 76%
62% 82%
58% 65%
See Appendix, Table A -1 for responses on all listed factors). *Empty boxes indicate areas that were neither strengths nor concerns for the year indicated. Responses bolded represent that years response with the highest rate of satisfaction.
Thailand is rated highly for infrastructure (59% satisfaction), sentiment towards the U.S. (67%), housing cost (58%), and personal security (58%). Satisfaction levels generally decreased in major strengths from 2010 levels, with satisfaction down a few percentage points in all categories. The most significant change is in the category of availability of low cost labor, which decreased from 68% in 2010 to 48% in 2011, and is not longer a major strength. Personal security reached its lowest point in satisfaction since 2003, with 58% of 2011s respondents stating that they are satisfied with this factor.
Major Concerns
(Responded Dissatisfied or Extremely Dissatisfied at a considerable rate)
Table 3.1.2: Time Comparison of satisfaction with major concerns.
Factors
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Corruption Local Protectionism Stable Government & Political System Laws and Regulations
62% 41%
69% 42%
40%
50%
(See Appendix, Table A-1 for responses on all listed factors). *Empty boxes indicate areas that are neither strengths nor concerns. Responses bolded represent that years response with the highest rate of dissatisfaction.
There is high dissatisfaction with corruption (61%), local protectionism (50%), and stable government & political system (59%). Dissatisfaction grew in the local protectionism, from 47% last year to a high of 50% this year. Dissatisfaction decreased in corruption, from 66% last year to a low of 61% this year, and in stable government & political system, from a high of 77% last year to 59% this year. 2011 marks the first time since 2007 that stable government and political system was not the top concern.
17
3.2 Other Local Business Factors Government Guidelines and the Fairness of their Application
Figure 3.2.1: Government guidelines
Government guidelines and the fairness of their application: In your response location, are you satisfied with:
60%
50%
40%
38% 31% 25% 25% 21% 15% 13% 13% 9% 14% 10%
40% 37%
30%
29%
20%
12%
10%
0%
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
There is less satisfaction with the clarity of government guidelines on payment of IPR royalties, from 15% in 2010 to 9% in 2011. Respondents who selected neutral increased in this category in 2011, from 38% to 45%. The percentage dissatisfied dropped from 21% last year to 13% this year. The clarity of transfer pricing regulations has the highest rate of satisfaction, with 18% of respondents selecting satisfied as their answer. Most respondents are neutral towards all three government guidelines.
18
3.3 Economic Conditions Over this year, 2011, what do you think will happen in your response location regarding?
Table 3.3: Expectations about local factors.
Total Appreciate/I ncrease Local currency vs. US dollar Housing Cost Living Cost Interest Rate Overall economic growth
Appreciate/ increase
Neutral
Depreciate/ decrease
7% 1% 9% 2% 2%
11% 2% 0% 1% 3%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
11% 2% 0% 1% 3%
Outlook among respondents is positive overall, with the majority (76%) believing that there will be an increase in economic growth. Most respondents predict that the cost of living will increase (83%), and the majority expects the housing cost to also increase (60%). Most respondents (72%) expect the interest rate to increase. 67% of respondents predict that the local currency will appreciate.
19
*The U.S. Taxation, International Schools, and Corporate Social Responsibility sections were optional questions on the 2010 and 2011 surveys, and thus have a significantly smaller sample size. Of the 88 respondents that took the 2011 survey, 47 answered the optional questions (53%). Results may have been affected by this change.
3.4 Taxation
Table 3.4.1: U.S taxation
Year of Survey 2008 2009 2010 2011 Have you experienced a significant increase in the amount you must pay toward U.S. income tax on your foreign earned income since the recent legislative changes in 2006? Yes 36% 34% 44% 43% No 64% 66% 56% 57%
A minority of respondents cited that they have experienced a significant increase in the amount they must pay toward U.S. income tax on their foreign earned income (43%). This figure decreased slightly from the 2010 response of 44%.
A majority of the respondents companies (55%) do not provide tax equalization for their expatriate employees.
A majority of the respondents (63%) cited that local taxes in Thailand do not offset the negative effects of U.S. tax policy towards Americans living abroad. 20
A majority of respondents (53%) reported that this increase in the amount of U.S. taxes on foreign earned income affected their companies decision to employ Americans abroad.
It may impact the willingness of Americans to work abroad It has increased as the total amount of deduction has not kept pace with inflation,
and I feel that my U.S. based counterparts have had the benefits of tax reductions while those of us who live abroad and are spreading the business opportunities for U.S. companies and products to world markets are being penalized
Most jobs foreign assignments now go to Europeans, Australians, UK, and Canada, all which have favorable tax treatment
The main problem is not just increased taxes, but increased burdens for filing, especially with regard to foreign passive investment companies and foreign bank accounts
21
Year of survey 2008 2009 2010 2011 Will the ability to find adequate space at international educational institutions in your response location be a significant problem in the next 1-3 years? Yes 14% 20% 15% 13% No 86% 80% 85% 87% Do you feel that the government of your response location is actively pursuing solutions to correct the space constraint at international educational institutions? Yes 27% 47% 33% 0% No 73% 53% 67% 100% Will the lack of adequate space at international educational institutions at your response location affect your companys decision to hire more local employees over foreign employees? Yes 36% 18% 50% 50% No 64% 82% 50% 50% The ability to find adequate space at international educational institutions is not a significant problem for most respondents this year (87%), compared with 85% in 2010. There is a significant decrease in the percentage of respondents who stated that the Thai government is actively pursuing solutions to correct this space constraint, down to 0% in 2011 from 33% in 2010 and 47% in 2009. Respondents are evenly split on if the lack of space at international educational institutions affects their companies decision to hire more local employees.
Space is generally available; however, tuition costs are now very high in most schools Not sure. Seems that schooling is getting tighter but we
have not had anyone denied entry into their choice of school
Space is available, but the costs are astronomical. This is the single highest personal expense borne by expat employees with children [There are] many international schools in Bangkok
22
Year of Survey 2009 2010 2011 Is your company involved in CSR efforts? 71% 72% Yes 77% 30% 28% No 23% Do you expect your companys CSR efforts to increase or decrease in 2011 compared with 2010? 28% 61% Increase 72% 58% 39% Remain the Same 25% 11% 0% Decrease 0% How frequent are your companys CSR efforts? 45% 57% Ongoing 43% 6% 4% Monthly 11% 32% 39% Multiple times per year 38% 20% 4% Yearly 8% What form does your companys CSR efforts take? (check all that apply) 32% 48% Fundraising 69% 79% 78% Employee volunteering 78% 69% 82% Cash donations 86% Most respondents (77%) stated that their company is involved in CSR efforts. This is an increase from the 72% who chose this response in 2010. A large majority (72%) expect their companys CSR efforts to increase in 2011, an increase compared with 2010 (61%), and none expect a decrease in efforts. 43% of respondents stated that the frequency of their companys CSR efforts is ongoing, the most popular response. Cash donations are the most popular form of CSR effort (86%), followed by employee volunteering (78%). Fundraising increased as a form of CSR effort, from 48% in 2010 to 69% in 2011.
23
4. CONCLUSION
Outlook The overall outlook of respondents in Thailand is optimistic in 2011. On a global scale, half of the respondents predict a better performance of the world economy compared to 2010, and 76% of them expect an expansion in the growth of the Thai economy this year. Respondents also have positive expectations for their own companies. The majority predict that there will be an increase in the total number of employees in their businesses, and only 2% expect shrinkage in the workforce. About a quarter of companies also expect an increase in the number of expatriate employees. Workforce increases are linked to business expansion, as 77% predict an expansion of their company in Thailand, due to the potential for business growth as well as an increasing market share. ASEAN ASEAN markets are becoming increasingly important to the respondents from Thailand, due to the economic recovery as well as improvements in infrastructure in the region. Most businesses expect the importance of ASEAN to their business to increase in the next two years. Additionally, 85% of respondents plan to expand their business in ASEAN during the next two years due to what they see as potential for business growth. ASEAN integration is therefore beneficial, mainly because integration makes it easier to produce and sell goods across markets. Most members also use the ASEAN free trade agreement. However, there still exist many problems with doing business in ASEAN. Respondents cited issues such as corruption, lack of transparency, and differences in cross-border regulations that act as barriers to business in the region. Location Specific The business environment in Thailand has many strengths. The sentiment towards the U.S. has been rated consistently highly for the past few years. Respondents also enjoy a good level of personal security, adequate infrastructure, and reasonable housing and office lease costs. Most report that the ability to find space in international education institutions is not a concern. However, the majority predict that housing and living costs, as well as the interest rate, will increase in 2011. Additionally, there exist concerns about the stability of the government and political system of Thailand, and corruption. These factors could have a negative effect on doing business in the country. Nonetheless, companies continue to expand in Thailand, and respondents report that 98% of expatriate employees are satisfied with their assignments.
24
APPENDICES
(A) Local Factors Impacting Business How Satisfied Are You With These Local Factors?
Table A: Satisfaction with factors
Total Extremely Extremely Total Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied
Infrastructure Availability of raw materials Availability of low cost labor Availability of trained personnel Office lease costs Housing costs Laws & regulations Corruption Local protectionism Tax structure Personal security Stable government and political system New business incentives by government Sentiment towards the U.S. Free movement of goods within the region 59% 38% 48% 44% 57% 58% 24% 6% 16% 26% 68% 13% 26% 67% 36% 6% 2% 7% 8% 13% 13% 2% 0% 1% 2% 22% 1% 9% 18% 9% 53% 36% 41% 36% 44% 45% 22% 6% 15% 24% 46% 12% 17% 49% 27% 17% 31% 29% 21% 30% 28% 31% 31% 30% 33% 22% 28% 33% 26% 34% 23% 5% 9% 28% 8% 8% 36% 40% 39% 30% 6% 43% 28% 3% 13% 1% 1% 1% 7% 0% 0% 7% 21% 11% 7% 1% 16% 3% 0% 3% 24% 6% 10% 35% 8% 8% 43% 61% 50% 37% 7% 59% 31% 3% 16%
28%
3%
25%
28%
21%
6%
27%
Total Satisfied Agency to promote/develop investment Customs Immigration Taxation/Revenue 32% 16% 26% 19%
Extremely Satisfied 5% 0% 1% 2%
29% 29%
1% 1%
28% 28%
42% 38%
7% 6%
2% 6%
9% 12%
25
(B) Reasons for Business Expansion in ASEAN over the Next Two Years
Table B: Top 3 Reasons for ASEAN Expansion.
Year of Survey
Economic recovery Potential for business growth Increasing market share Reasonable production cost Diversity of customer base Lack of growth in current market/countries Availability of trained personnel/efficient manpower Availability of raw materials High level of personal security Low level of corruption Adequate laws and regulations to protect business Adequate laws and regulations to encourage foreign investment Stable government and political system Low level of local protectionism Weak competition in market/countries Other
2008
58% 58% 68% 28% 45% 12% 24% 11% 1% 0% 3% 7% 0% 0% 17% 16%
2009
49% 89% 61% 31% 33% 11% 7% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 9% 4%
2010
52% 81% 52% 18% 40% 15% 12% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 7% 12%
Empty boxes indicate that no comparative data is available for those years.
2007
68% 50% 63% 15% 15% 23%
2008
64% 61% 28% 20% 61% 11% 34%
2009
84% 53% 46% 16% 28% 11% 33%
2010
86% 53% 34% 19% 19% 5% 51% 14%
Empty boxes indicate that no comparative data is available for those years.
26
2003 One country Multiple countries Below 50 employees 50 to <500 employees 500 to <1000 employees 1000 to <1500 employees 1500 to <2000 employees 2000 employees or above Below $1 million $1 to <$50 million $50 to <$100 million $100 to <$500 million $500 to <$1 billion $1 billion or above Below 5% 5 to <25% (Before 2006: 5 to <20%) 25 to <50% (Before 2006: 20- <50%) 50 to <75% (Before 2006: 50% or above) 75 to <100% 100%
2004
2005
2006
38% 62% 22% 53% 7% 2% 7% 9% 14% 45% 20% 14% 2% 5% 58% 11% 11% 20%
55% 45% 29% 45% 14% 3% 0% 9% 14% 41% 22% 10% 7% 3% 64% 11% 4% 2% 7% 13%
24% 45% 11% 4% 0% 15% 13% 43% 12% 19% 1% 7% 57% 10% 13% 3% 8% 10% 2009
33% 40% 12% 4% 1% 10% 17% 39% 9% 23% 2% 8% 56% 16% 7% 5% 6% 11% 2010
17% 30% 19% 8% 12% 15% 9% 1% 12% 1% 13% 22% 15% 25%
28% 42% 11% 5% 1% 13% 23% 40% 10% 16% 4% 5% 58% 16% 9% 4% 4% 10% 2011 17% 31% 15% 10% 12% 15% 10% 1% 15% 1% 10% 27% 13% 22% 27
Empty boxes indicate that no comparative data is available for those years.
Below 5% 5 to less than 25% 25 to less than 50% 50 to less than 75% 75 to less than 100% 100% Vietnam Cambodia Indonesia Laos Malaysia Thailand Philippines Singapore
ASEAN Country That Holds the Next Largest Turnover for Company
2009 Accounting Architecture and Engineering Services Banking Consulting Education Healthcare HR Services Insurance brokers Legal Marketing & Communications Services Other Financial Services Software, IT, Telecommunications Services Transportation & Logistics Wholesale & Retail Business Process Outsourcing/ Shares Services Other Total Services Consumer Goods Electronics Food & Food Products Oil & Petrochemical Pharmaceuticals/Medical Machinery & Equipment Other Total Manufacturing
0% 2% 1% 7% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 5% 8% 5% 0%
2010
0% 4% 2% 8% 1% 2% 4% 1% 1% 4% 1% 6% 7% 6% 1%
3% 44%
12% 8% 3% 3% 2% 3% 7%
3% 52%
6% 7% 6% 1% 2% 5% 6%
Manufacturing
Other
E) Reasons behind the choice of ASEAN country for business expansion
Table E: ASEAN Expansion
38% 15%
33% 14%
Year of Survey Reasonable production costs Availability of raw materials Availability of trained personnel/efficient manpower Increasing market share Diversification of customer base High level of personal security Low level of corruption Adequate laws and regulations to protect business Adequate laws and regulations to encourage foreign investment Stable government and political system Low level of local protectionism Weak competition in the market/country Other
2011 25% 11% 13% 52% 41% 3% 0% 10% 8% 18% 1% 18% 17%
28