Statistical Process Control - QPSP
Statistical Process Control - QPSP
Process Control
Seven QC Tools
Control Charts
Source : Unknown
Types of Customers
External Customers
Final Customers/End-Users
Internal Customers
Types of Customers
- Kaoru Ishikawa
Types of Customers
Exercise
Evolution
TQM
Quality
Assurance
Quality
Control
Foreman
Operator
1900 1918 1920 1940 1980
Total Quality
Management
Total Quality Management
Product/Process Excellence
Customer Focus
5-8
Major Contributors to the
development of TQM
Dr Edwards Deming
Dr Joseph Juran
Philip Crosby
Armand Feigenbaum
Prof. Kaori Ishikawa
Genichi Taguchi
Musaaki Imai
It’s not the tip
of the iceberg
It’s what you
that’s the problem….can’t see…
Variation results in cost
Waste
Rejects Customer Returns
Rework Recalls
20-40%
Complaint Customer
Handling (invisible costs) Allowances
Excessive Field
Service Costs Unused Incorrectly
Capacity Completed Sales
Excessive Lost goodwill Order
Overtime Planning
Pricing or Overdue Delays Time with Delays
Billing Errors Receivables Employee Expediti Dissatisfied Excess Inventory
Turnover ng Costs Customer
Development Unmeasured Late Incorrect
Cost of Failed Productivity Paperwor Orders
Products k Shipped
Basic Statistics
Population
Any well-defined group of individuals
whose characteristics are to be studied.
Students of a college
Books in Library
Shirts in Market
Fishes in Lake
Sample
3
Variation first,
target then.
1
2
Which pilot do you want to fly
with?
A-1
A-4
B-4
B-3
B-2
B-1
A-2
A-3
Quality Engineering Terminology
Specifications
Quality characteristics being measured are
often compared to standards or
specifications.
Nominal or target value
5
Averages
Mean, median and mode
x= ∑x
n
Averages… 2
Median – the middle observation.
Arrange the observations and find the middle
one (n+1)/2th observation
35 36 37 40 42 42 42 45 45 46 47 49 49 51 51
in this case 42
MEASURES OF DISPERSION
68.26%
95.46%
99.73%
s2 =
∑ (x − x ) 2
n −1
STANDARD DEVIATION: Positive Square Root of
Variance.
___
S=
∑ (x − x ) 2
n −1
Spreads
Standard Deviation (SD) calculated as below
calculate residuals – individual observation minus
mean square and sum these
divide by number of observations minus 1 [gives
Variance]
take square root for Standard Deviation
2
∑( i
Y − Y )
SD =
n −1
mean 187.18
SD 8.02
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL
INPUT OUTPUT
PROCESS
MEASUREMENT
ADJUST
DECIDE ON
FIX? STATISTICS
ID GAPS
EXAMINE
Selection of improvement steps
(1) Select a theme
Grasp “status to be
(3) attained”
(8) Review
Seven QC Tools
QC tools
QC tools (7 QC Tools, New 7 QC Tools) used in
solving (or improving) various types of problems
that occur in workshops.
Whether in identifying causes of problems or in
working out their countermeasures, effective use of
QC techniques can produce good results quickly
and efficiently.
It is important to get used to the use of
7 QC Tools. You are encouraged to
collect actual data and practice using
them.
Use of QC tools
Fact
In QC-style problem-solving
activity facts are grasped
based on data and analyzed
Collect data . Check sheet scientifically. Judgments are
made based on facts to take
concrete actions
Cat egor i es
Check sheet
Gr aphs
Par et o di agr am
Scat t er di agr am
Hi st ogr am
Cont r ol char t
Cause and ef f ect di agr am
Af f i ni t y char t
Li nkage char t
Syst em di agr am
Mat r i x di agr am
PDPC
Ar r ow di r agr am
Fl ow char t s
Br ai n st or mi ng
Br ai n wr i t i ng
Tool
STEPS
20 20 129.0 100 15
0 0 128.0 90
10
配線 ミス
誤組付 け
加工部品不良
組 付 け破 損
圧着不良
購入部品不良
そ の他
127.0 80
70 5
126.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 60
1月 2月 3月 4月 5月 6月 0
9.78 9.83 9.88 9.93 9.98 10.03 10.08 10.13 10.18 10.23
Get hold of a vision Get hold of the current situation Analyze the factors
- 3 factors of targets - Activity Cause/result relationship, Take data
plan
● :号機
1 ▲ :号機
2
7月14日 7月15日 7月16日 7月17日 7月18日 7月19日 1号機 2号機
130 スケジュール表 ●▲ ●● ●● ●● ●●▲ ●● ●●●
合計
縫製 14 2 16
項目 担当者 4月 5月 6月 7月 8月 9月 10月 11月 12月 1月 2月 3月
120 テーマ選定 福島 仕上がり
●●▲ ● ▲ ●● ● ●● ●●●
11 2 13
●●●▲ ●▲ ●● ●▲ ●● ●● ●▲ ●●●
現状の把握 青森 キズ 19 6 25
100 ●▲ ● ●▲ ●
▲ ●● ●● ●● ▲ ● ●● ▲ ●●
原因の解析 福岡 その他 11 3 14
90 解決策の選定 山口
合計 26 11 11 11 13 23 80 15 95
80
70
効果の把握
フォローアップ
静岡
標
View at things in layers
60
:計画 :実績
1月
2月
3月
4月
5月
6月
7月
8月
9月
1月
2月
3月
10月
11月
12月
Brain writing Affinity chart Line chart Gantt chart Confirm interrelations
Follow-up and review Confirm the effect Look at changes over time
- What, how much and until what time? 130 133.0
120 132.0
● :号機
1 ▲ :号機
2
7月14日 7月15日 7月16日 7月17日 7月18日 7月19日 1号機 2号機 合計 133.0 131.0
Solutions
110
●▲ ●● ●● ●● ●●▲ ●● ●●●
縫製 14 2 16 132.0
100 130.0
●●▲ ● ▲ ●● ● ●● ●●● 131.0
仕上がり 11 2 13
130.0
129.0
●●▲ ●●●●● ●●● ●▲ ● ●●●●●●●●●●
90
is effective
汚れ 27
25 2
128.0
Measures
129.0
proposal
●● ●
8月
2月
1月
2月
4月
5月
6月
7月
9月
1月
3月
月
月
月
11
10
12
Affinity
Chart Grasp current situation and problems
Linkage Chart Sort out relationships in the situation
System chart Systematic sorting of the situation
Matrix diagram Grasp a relationship between two matters
PDPC methods Risk management based on forecasting
Arrow diagram Plan progress
Matrix data analysis Correlation analysis
Stratification
Stratification means to “divide the whole
into smaller portions according to certain
criteria.” In case of quality control,
stratification generally means to divide data
into several groups according to common
factors or tendencies (e.g., type of defect
and cause of defect).
Dividing into groups “fosters understanding
of a situation.” This represents the basic
principle of quality control.
Example usage
Item Method of Stratification
Hour, a.m., p.m., immediately after start of work,
Elapse of time
shift, daytime, nighttime, day, week, month
120
phenomenon and sorted, for example,
by the number of occurrences or the 80 50
Usage Results
•Allows clarification of
•Used to identify a problem.
•Used to identify the cause of a important tasks.
problem. •Allows identification of a
•Used to review the effects of an starting point (which task
action to be taken. to start with).
•Used to prioritize actions. •Allows projection of the
effects of a measure to be
[Used during phases to monitor
the situation, analyze causes, and taken.
review effectiveness of an action.]
Example usage of Pareto
Diagram
(1) Assessment using (2) Confirmation of Effect
Pareto diagram (Comparison)
(prioritization)
Frequently used to
•To identify a course of check the effect of an
action to be emphasized improvement.
using a variety of data.
Details of A
Improv
ed!
B C D I J K L
A
W X Y Z X Y W Z
X Y Z X Y W Z
Cause and Effect Diagram
A cause and effect diagram is “a fish-bone diagram
that presents a systematic representation of the
relationship between the effect (result) and affecting
factors (causes).
Solving a problem in a scientific manner requires
clarification of a cause and effect relationship, where
the effect (e.g., the result of work) varies according
to factors (e.g., facilities and machines used, method
of work, workers, and materials and parts used). To
obtain a good work result, we must identify the
effects of various factors and develop measures to
improve the result accordingly.
Cause and Effect Diagram
Name of big bone factor
mini bone small bone
characteristics
big bone
medium
(result)
bone back bone
factors (causes)
When is it used and what results will be obtained?
Usage Results
•Used when clarifying a cause and •Can obtain a clear overall
effect relationship. picture of causal relation. (A
•[Used during a phase to change in the cause triggers
analyzecauses.] a variation in the result.)
•Used to develop •Can clarify the cause and
effect relationship.
•countermeasures.
•
•[Used during a phase to plan Can list up all causes to
countermeasures.] identify important causes.
•Can determine the direction of
action (countermeasure).
Histogram
Articles produced with the
same conditions may vary in
terms of quality specification range
characteristics.
A histogram is used to
a histogram.
When is it used and what results will be
obtained?
A histogram is mainly used to analyze a process by
examining the location of the mean value in the graph or
degree of variations, to find a problem point that needs to
be improved. Its other applications are listed in the table
below. Usage Results
[Used during phases to monitor the Can identify the location of the
situation, analyze causes, and review mean (central) value or degree of
effectiveness of an action.] variations.
Used to assess the actual conditions. Can find out the scope of a defect
by inserting standard values.
Used to analyze a process to identify a
problem point that needs to be improved Can identify the condition of
by finding the location of the mean value distribution (e.g., whether there is
or degree of variations in the graph. an isolated, extreme value).
Used to examine that the target quality is
maintained throughout the process.
Histogram--Example No. 1
№ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 255 259 257 254 253 254 253 257 258 252
2 253 256 255 255 256 255 257 255 256 258
3 257 255 256 251 255 253 255 256 254 256
4 257 255 257 254 254 260 258 253 260 255
5 255 252 255 253 253 258 253 259 255 257
6 253 257 258 256 253 254 255 254 257 253
7 255 254 253 255 257 252 254 256 255 255
8 254 254 254 254 255 255 257 255 253 254
9 258 256 253 256 255 254 255 256 256 256
10 256 254 255 257 254 254 259 253 258 254
S 253 252 253 251 253 252 253 253 253 252
L 258 259 258 257 257 260 259 259 260 258
(Unit;cm)
Histogram--Example No.2
Standard Standard
Lower Limit Upper Limit
Products
Standard Value
25 X
Standard Central
N=100 =255.19
20
15
10
0
250 252 254 256 258 260
[Histogram of Cutting Length of Steel Wire]
Interpretation of Data Depicted in
Histogram
Name Description Example Cause
Abrasion
means to find whether or not . .. . . .
these two data types are . . . . .
interrelated. It is also used . . . .
to determine how closely . . .
they are related to identify a
problem point that should be
controlled or improved. Number of Rotations
When is it used and what results will be obtained?
Usage Results
[Used during phases to monitor the situation, analyze Can identify cause and
causes and review effectiveness of an action.] effect relation.
Used to identify a relationship between two matters.
(Can understand the
Used to identify a relationship between two matters and relationship between two
establish countermeasures based on their cause and
effect relation. results.)
Example Usage
•Relationship between thermal treatment temperature of
a steel material and its tensile strengths.
•Relationship between visit made by a salesman and
volume of sales.
•Relationship between the number of persons visiting a
department store and volume of sales
Various Forms of Scatter Diagram
The table below shows some examples of scatter diagram’s usage. If, for example,
there is a relationship where “an increase in the number of rotations (x) causes an
increase in abrasion (y),” there exists “positive correlation.” If, on the other hand, the
existence of a relationship where “an increase in the number of rotations (x) causes a
decline in abrasion (y)” indicates that there is “negative correlation.”
・ ・ ・ ・
・・ ・ ・・・
・ ・・・・・ ・・ ・ ・・
・・・ ・・ ・ ・ ・・・ ・・
・ ・・・・・ ・ ・・・・・
・・・・ ・ ・・・ ・・
・ ・・・ ・・ ・・・
・・・ ・ ・ ・
・ ・
Where there is a positive Where there is a negative
correlation correlation
・ ・ ・・
・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・・ ・・ ・
・ ・ ・ ・・ ・ ・ ・ ・・
・ ・・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・・ ・
・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・
・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・・ ・ ・
・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・・
・ ・ ・ ・・ ・
・ ・
Where there is no Where there is a non-
correlation linear correlation
Check Sheet
A check sheet is “a sheet designed in
advance to allow easy collection and
aggregation of data.” By just entering check
marks on a check sheet, data can be
collected to extract necessary information, or
a thorough inspection can be performed in an
efficient manner, eliminating a possibility of
skipping any of the required inspection items.
A check sheet is also effective in performing
stratification (categorization).
Example Usage of Check Sheet
Vertical 34
Scratch
Scratch 11
Dent 37
When is it used and what results will be obtained?
Usage Results
• Used to collect data. •Ensures collection of
• Used when performing a thorough required data.
inspection • Allows a thorough
• Used to identify the actual inspection
condition of a situation. of all check items.
(Used during phases to monitor the • Can understand
situation, analyze causes, review tendencies and variations.
effectiveness of an action, perform • Can record required data.
standardization, and implement a
selected control measure.)
Control Chart
A control chart is used to examine a
process to see if it is stable or to
maintain the stability of a process. This
method is often used to analyze a
process. To do so, a chart is created
from data collected for a certain period of
time, and dots plotted on the chart are
examined to see how they are distributed
or if they are within the established
● ●
●
● control limit. After some actions are
X ● ● ●
● taken to control and standardize various
● ●
process stabilized.
X - R Control Chart
When is it used and what results will be obtained?
Usage Results
•[Used
Used toduring
collect phases
data. to monitor Can identify a change caused
•byEnsures
elapsecollection
of time. of
•the situation,
Used analyzea causes,
when performing thorough required data.
inspection
review effectiveness of an Can judge the process if it is in
•itsAllows
•action,
Used toperform
identify the actual condition of
Standardization normal a thorough
state or inspection
there are
a situation. some
and implement a selected of allanomalies
check items.by examining
(Used during phases to monitor the the dots plotted on the chart.
control measure.]
situation, analyze causes, review • Can understand tendencies
effectiveness of an action, perform In
and the example x(-)-R control
variations.
Used to observe
standardization, and a changea
implement chart, x(-)” represents the
• Can record required data.
caused by elapse
selected control of time.
measure.) central value, while “R”
indicates the range.
Control Chart for Managerial Purposes: Extends the line indicating the control limit used for analytical
purposes to plot data obtained daily to keep a process in a good state.
N=5 UCL=5.780
5.8 ●
●
● ● CL=5.400
X 5.4
● ● ● ● ●
● ● ● ●
● ● ● ● ●
● ● ●
5.2 ●
LCL=5.020
1.0 ×
×
× × ×
×
R 0.5 ×
×
×
× ×
×
× ×
× × × × ×
× × ×
0
0 5 10 15 20
X-R Control Chart
Graph
A graph is “a graphical representation of data, which
allows a person to understand the meaning of these
data at a glance.”
Unprocessed data simply represent a list of
numbers, and finding certain tendencies or
magnitude of situation from these numbers is
difficult, sometimes resulting in an interpretational
error.
A graph is a effective means to monitor or judge the
situation, allowing quick and precise understanding
of the current or actual situation.
A graph is a visual and summarized representation
of data that need to be quickly and precisely
conveyed to others.
When is it used and what results will be obtained?
S
Before Chemicals Oils Electricity
a
300 Taking (170)
l (430) (200)
Actions
e
s (Total:Yen 8 million)
200
Special
Causes
COMMON CAUSE
RANDOM VARIATION
SUM OF MANY SMALL VARIANCES
SYSTEM-RELATED
RESPONSIBILITY OF MANAGEMENT
ASSIGNABLE
Control charts
can tell us when a
process changes
Control Chart Applications
Establish state of statistical control
Monitor a process and signal when
it goes out of control
Determine process capability
Capability Versus Control
Control
Capability In Control Out of Control
Capable IDEAL
Not Capable
Commonly Used Control Charts
Variables data
x-bar and R-charts
x-bar and s-charts
Attribute data
For “defectives” (p-chart, np-chart)
For “defects” (c-chart, u-chart)
Developing Control Charts
1. Prepare
Choose measurement
Determine how to collect data, sample size,
and frequency of sampling
Set up an initial control chart
2. Collect Data
Record data
Calculate appropriate statistics
Plot statistics on chart
Next Steps
1. Determine trial control limits
Center line (process average)
Compute UCL, LCL
2. Analyze and interpret results
Determine if in control
Eliminate out-of-control points
Recompute control limits as necessary
Typical Out-of-Control Patterns
Point outside control limits
Sudden shift in process average
Cycles
Trends
Instability
Shift in Process Average
Identifying Potential Shifts
Cycles
Trend
Final Steps
5
The Central Limit Theorem
5
Central Limit Theorem Illustrated
99.7% of all
sample means
Sample
(Basis for specification limits) means
Population,
Individual
items
µ -3σ x µ µ +3σx
5
Control Charts
5
Control Charts
Process Overview
First, develop sampling plan:
Number of observations per sample
Frequency of sampling
Stage 1 sampling:
Conduct initial periodic sampling
Determine control limits
Perform calculations
Decide whether in control or not
Stage 2 sampling (only if Stage 1 is successful):
Continue operating with periodic sampling
Perform calculations
Decide whether in control (each sample)
SPC: Control Limits
µ +3σx UCL
µ -3σx LCL
SPC: Control Limits
In control Out of control
Process Process center
is stable has shifted
UCL •
µ +3σx •
•
• •
µ
• •
• • •
•
µ -3σx LCL
X and R Charts
Sample Number
1 2 3 4 25
Values
4 7 6 7
Select 25 small samples
(in this case, n=4) 6 3 9 6
Find X and R of each 5 8 8 6
sample.
5 6 9 5
The X chart is used to Sum 20 24 32 24 28 Total
control the process mean.
X 5 6 8 6 7 150
The R chart is used to R
control process variation. 2 5 3 2 3 75
X and R Charts
Sample Number
n A2 D4 D3 d2 1 2 3 4 25
4 7 6 7
Values
2 1.880 3.267 0 1.128 6 3 9 6
3 1.023 2.575 0 1.693 5 8 8 6
4 0.729 2.282 0 2.059 5 6 9 5
Sum 20 24 32 24 28 Total
X 5 6 8 6 7 150
R 2 5 3 2 3 75
X and R Charts
Sample Number
n A2 D4 D3 d2 1 2 3 4 25
4 7 6 7
Values
2 1.880 3.267 0 1.128 6 3 9 6
3 1.023 2.575 0 1.693 5 8 8 6
4 0.729 2.282 0 2.059 5 6 9 5
Sum 20 24 32 24 28 Total
X 5 6 8 6 7 150
X = 150 / 25 = 6 R 2 5 3 2 3 75
–
–
R = 75 / 25 = 3
–
A2R = 0.729(3) = 2.2
–
UCLX = X– + A2R
– – = 6 + 2.2 = 8.2
LCLX = X
– - A2R
– – = 6 - 2.2 = 3.8
UCLR = D4R
– = 2.282(3) = 6.8
– = 0(3) = 0
LCLR = D3R
X and R Charts
Sample Number
n A2 D4 D3 d2 1 2 3 4 25
4 7 6 7
Values
2 1.880 3.267 0 1.128 6 3 9 6
3 1.023 2.575 0 1.693 5 8 8 6
4 0.729 2.282 0 2.059 5 6 9 5
Sum 20 24 32 24 28 Total
X = 150 / 25 = 6 X 5 6 8 6 7 150
–
– = 75 / 25 = 3 R 2 5 3 2 3 75
R
– R = 0.729(3) = 2.2
A UCL X– = 8.2
2 –
–
Mean
UCL – = X + A R = 6 + 2.2 = 8.2 X = 6.0
X 2
–
– – LCL X– = 3.8
LCLX = X - A2R = 6 - 2.2 = 3.8
–
– – UCL R = 6.8
UCLR = D4R = 2.282(3) = 6.8
Range
– –
LCLR = D3R R = 3.0
– = 0(3) = 0
LCL R = 0
p Chart
Sample number
1 2 3 4 25 Total
n 50 50 50 50 50 1250
#def 2 4 0 3 2 50
p .04 .08 0 .06 .04 1.00
p Chart
– Σ #def
p= = 50/1250 = .04
Σn Sample number
3 σP = 3 p(1-p) 1 2 3 4 25 Total
n n 50 50 50 50 50 1250
=3 .04(.96) #def 2 4 0 3 2 50
50
p .04 .08 0 .06 .04 1.00
= 0.083
UCL P = p + 3 σP
–
= .04 - .083 = 0
can't be negative
p Chart
– Σ #def
p= = 50/1250 = .04
Σn Sample number
3 σP = 3 p(1-p) 1 2 3 4 25 Total
n n 50 50 50 50 50 1250
=3 .04(.96) #def 2 4 0 3 2 50
50
p .04 .08 0 .06 .04 1.00
= 0.083
UCL P = p + 3 σP
–
UCL P = 0.123
= .04 + .083 = .123 •
•
–
UCL P = p - 3 σP –
• p = 0.04
= .04 - .083 = 0 LCL P = 0
can't be negative
•
Hotel Suite Inspection -
Defects Discovered
Day Defects Day Defects Day Defects
1 2 10 4 19 1
2 0 11 2 20 1
3 3 12 1 21 2
4 1 13 2 22 1
5 2 14 3 23 0
6 3 15 1 24 3
7 1 16 3 25 0
8 0 17 2 26 1
9 0 18 0
Total 39
c Chart for Hotel Suite
Inspection
Number of defects
5 UCL = 5.16
4
3
2
c = 1.50
1
0 LCL = 0
5 10 15 20 25 Day
CONTROL CHARTS
WHY INSPECTION DOESN’T WORK
CONTROL CHART
Upper Control
Limit
Y (results)
X (Grand Average or
(Expected Result)
Lower Control
Limit
X (observations)
CONTROL CHARTS
VARIATION
CONTROLCHARTS DISTINGUISHES
BETWEEN:
NATURAL VARIATION (COMMON CAUSE)
UNNATURAL VARIATION (SPECIAL CAUSE)
UNNATURAL VARIATION
UCL
LCL
UNNATURAL VARIATION
CONTROL CHARTS
XBAR - R CHART STEPS (1)
DETERMINE SAMPLE SIZE (n=2-6)
DETERMINE FREQUENCY OF SAMPLING
COLLECT 20-25 DATA SETS
AVERAGE EACH SAMPLE (X-bar)
RANGE FOR EACH SAMPLE (R)
AVERAGE OF SAMPLE AVERAGES =
X-double bar
AVERAGE SAMPLE RANGES =
R-bar
CONTROL CHARTS
XBAR - R CHART STEPS (2)
X CONTROL LIMITS: -
BAR
Upper Control
Limit
Zone “A”
2 sigma limit
Zone “B”
Y (results)
1 sigma limit
Zone “C”
Average
Zone “C”
1 sigma limit
Zone “B”
2 sigma limit
Zone “A” Lower Control
Limit
X (observations)
Control Charts
Tests for Assignable (special) causes
Test 1 One point beyond 3 sigma
Test 2 Nine points in a row on one side of the centerline
Test 3 Six points in a row steadily increasing or decreasing
Test 4 Fourteen points in a row alternating up and down
Test 5 Two out of three points in a row beyond 2 sigma
Test 6 Four out of five points in a row beyond 1 sigma
Test 7 Fifteen points in a row within I sigma of the
centerline
Test 8 Eight points in a row on both sides of the centerline,
all beyond 1 sigma
CONTROL CHARTS
INTERPRETATION
SPECIAL: ANY POINT ABOVE UCL OR
BELOW LCL
RUN: > 7 CONSECUTIVE PTS ABOVE OR
BELOW CENTERLINE
1-IN-20: MORE THAN 1 POINT IN 20
CONSECUTIVE POINTS CLOSE TO
UCL OR LCL
TREND: 5-7 CONSECUTIVE POINTS IN
ONE DIRECTION (UP OR DOWN)
CONTROL CHARTS
IN CONTROL w/ CHANCE VARIATION
Control Chart - Chance Variation
UCL
Y (results)
Ave.
LCL
X (observations)
CONTROL CHARTS
LACK OF VARIABILITY
Control Chart - Lack of Variability
UCL
Y (results)
Ave.
LCL
X (observations)
CONTROL CHARTS
TRENDS
Control Chart - Trend
UCL
Y (results)
Ave.
LCL
X (observations)
CONTROL CHARTS
SHIFTS IN PROCESS LEVELS
Control Chart - Shifts in Process Level
UCL
Y (results)
Ave.
LCL
X (observations)
CONTROL CHARTS
RECURRING CYCLES
Control Chart - Recurring Cycles
UCL
Y (results)
Ave.
LCL
X (observations)
CONTROL CHARTS
POINTS NEAR OR OUTSIDE LIMITS
UCL
Y (results)
Ave.
LCL
X (observations)
CONTROL CHARTS
ATTRIBUTE CHARTS
TRACKS CHARACTERISTICS
- SHORT OR TALL; PASS OR FAIL
ONE CHART PER PROCESS
FOLLOW TRENDS AND CYCLES
np Chart
25
20
# of Defects
UCL
15
10 c
5
0
11
13
15
17
19
21
1
Serial Number
CONTROL CHARTS
RISKS
RISK 1: FALSE ALARM -
REJECT GOOD LOT - CALL
PROCESS OUT OF CONTROL WHEN IN
CONTROL
RISK 2: NO DETECTION OF PROBLEM
- SHIP BAD LOT -
CALL PROCESS IN CONTROL WHEN
OUT OF CONTROL
Process Capability
Analysis
Process Capability Analysis
2σ
(68%)
µ
4 σ (95.5%)
6 σ (99.7%)
5
Process Capability
Process Capability (PC) is the range in which "all" output
can be produced.
Definition:
PC = 6σ
µ
6 σ (99.7%)
5
Process Capability Chart
Process output
distribution
Output Output
out of spec out of spec
5.010
5
Process Capability
This process is
CAPABLE of
producing all good
output.
5
Process Capability
Process Capability:
Cp = Design Spec Width / Process Width
Cp = (USL-LSL) / 6σ
Cp should be a large as possible
Cpk = Cp * (1-k)
where k = Process Shift / (Design Spec Width/2)
Or
Cpk = Min (Cpl, Cpu)
Cpl = (X - LSL)/3σ
Cpu = (USL - X)/3σ
Process Capability
Cpk Meaning
Negative. Process Mean outside Spec Limits
0 - 1.0 Portion of process spread falls Outside Specs
> 1.0 Process spread falls within Spec Limits
Voice of Customer
Voice of Process
Target rule:
Cp - Cpk ≤ 0.33
Variation rule:
Cp ≥ 1.33
Process Capability Index
Index Cpk compares the spread and location
of the process, relative to the
specifications.
–
{
Upper Spec Limit - X
Cpk = the smaller of: OR – 3σ
X - Lower Spec Limit
3σ
Alternate Form
Zmin –
{
Upper Spec Limit - X
Cpk =
3 OR
σ
Where Zmin is the smaller of: –
X - Lower Spec Limit
σ
5
Process Capability: C pk Variations
(a) (b) (c)
5
PROCESS CAPABILITY MEASUREMENT
INPUT OUTPUT
PROCESS
MEASUREMENT
ADJUST
DECIDE ON
FIX? STATISTICS
ID GAPS
EXAMINE
Control
Capable Ideal
Not Capable
Contents
Seven QC Tools
Control Charts