Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 134 views

    Yeats, Eliot, and Modernism: A Sprint Thru Subtleties

    Uploaded by

    Rangothri Sreenivasa Subramanyam
    Yeats and Eliot were two of the most influential modernist poets of the early 20th century. They both expressed the fragmentation, alienation, and loss of meaning that characterized modernism through experimental styles and difficult works. Yeats wove mythology and politics into personal poetry while Eliot used stream of consciousness and allusions to create ambiguous, deconstructed narratives that were challenging to readers. Their works, like The Waste Land and The Second Coming, came to define modernist poetry and its grappling with the anxieties of a post-war world.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Yeats, Eliot, and Modernism: A Sprint Thru Subtleties

    Uploaded by

    Rangothri Sreenivasa Subramanyam
    134 views15 pages
    Yeats and Eliot were two of the most influential modernist poets of the early 20th century. They both expressed the fragmentation, alienation, and loss of meaning that characterized modernism through experimental styles and difficult works. Yeats wove mythology and politics into personal poetry while Eliot used stream of consciousness and allusions to create ambiguous, deconstructed narratives that were challenging to readers. Their works, like The Waste Land and The Second Coming, came to define modernist poetry and its grappling with the anxieties of a post-war world.

    Original Description:

    English Literature

    Original Title

    Yeats Eliot

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Yeats and Eliot were two of the most influential modernist poets of the early 20th century. They both expressed the fragmentation, alienation, and loss of meaning that characterized modernism through experimental styles and difficult works. Yeats wove mythology and politics into personal poetry while Eliot used stream of consciousness and allusions to create ambiguous, deconstructed narratives that were challenging to readers. Their works, like The Waste Land and The Second Coming, came to define modernist poetry and its grappling with the anxieties of a post-war world.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    134 views15 pages

    Yeats, Eliot, and Modernism: A Sprint Thru Subtleties

    Uploaded by

    Rangothri Sreenivasa Subramanyam
    Yeats and Eliot were two of the most influential modernist poets of the early 20th century. They both expressed the fragmentation, alienation, and loss of meaning that characterized modernism through experimental styles and difficult works. Yeats wove mythology and politics into personal poetry while Eliot used stream of consciousness and allusions to create ambiguous, deconstructed narratives that were challenging to readers. Their works, like The Waste Land and The Second Coming, came to define modernist poetry and its grappling with the anxieties of a post-war world.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 15

    YEATS, ELIOT, AND MODERNISM

    A SPRINT THRU SUBTLETIES

    CHARACTERISTIC ATTITUDES & CONCERNS OF MODERNISM


    Alienation from belief structures, social structures Resentment at Victorian mind-set Fragmentation & Loss Cynicism Sterility Rejection of genres, literary traditions Imagist narrative instead of dramatic monologue

    ART AND FUSION


    Poetry must be impersonal, that is, greater than and outside of the personality of the poet.

    It is not the greatness, the intensity of the emotions, the components but the intensity of the artistic process, the pressureunder which the fusion takes place, that counts. T.S. Eliot, Tradition and the Individual Talent, 1219.

    WILLIAM BUTLER YEATS 1865-1939


    There is now overwhelming evidence that man stands between eternities, that of his family and that of his soul. I apply those beliefs to literature and politics and show the change they must make. . . . My belief must go into what I write, even if I estrange friends; some when they see my meaning set out in plain print will hate me for poems which they have thought meant nothing.

    T.S. ELIOT 1888-1965


    Language, especially the language of poetry, is a different matter. Poetry, it might seem, separates peoples instead of uniting them. But on the other hand we must remember, that while language constitutes a barrier, poetry itself gives us a reason for trying to overcome the barrier.

    TWO CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT WORKS


    The Second Coming: Most significant statement of early Modernism The Waste Land: Most significant statement of post-war Modernism, and one of the most influential literary works of the last century

    MODERNIST VIEWS OF POETRY


    Eliot, Tradition and the Individual Talent:
    Poetry is not a turning loose of emotion but an escape from emotion; it is not the expression of personality, but an escape from personality. (1221) The emotion of art is impersonal. And the poet cannot reach this impersonalityunless he lives in what is not merely the present, but the present moment of the past, unless he is conscious, not of what is dead, but of what is already living. (1221)

    WHAT ARE THEIR SOURCES OF ANXIETY?


    For Yeats, constant tension of Irish history and tradition vs. modernism; the Irish Rebellion of 1916: All changed, changed utterly: A terrible beauty is born.enough to know they dreamed and are dead. For Eliot, WWI and the 20th century: the search for some kind of Grail, the displaced Countess, the reduction of love to something the typist does after dinner, etc.

    WHERE DO WE SEE FRAGMENTATION AND LOSS?


    The Second Coming: Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; mere anarchy is loosed upon the world. Sailing to Byzantium: Whatever is begotten, born, and dies. The Wasteland: The husband and wife who can no longer communicate, Lil and her man, Tiresias the blind prophet: I can connect Nothing with nothing.

    IN WHAT WAYS DO YEATS AND ELIOT DISCUSS ALIENATION?


    No Second Troy: Why should I blame her. Why, what could she have done, being what she is? (Contrast with In Memoriam she is also a type.) Eliot: Typists inability to make human connections, blind Tiresias, the dry desert of section V; We think of the key, each in his prison / Thinking of the key, each confirms a prison

    HOW DO THEY MAKE IT NEW?


    Yeats: unrhymed iambic pentameter that is not blank verse, sonnets that are not sonnets (Leda and the Swan), Irish perspective

    Eliot: Vers libre (free verse), allusions to anthropology, cultural mythologies, stream of conscious, deconstructing experience down to fragments of images (The Fire Sermon section of The Waste Land, for instance, or the last 10 lines of the poem)

    HOW DO THEY MAKE IT DIFFERENT?


    Yeats: Verse as an exacting instrument of introspection and national inquiry (p. 113).
    Weaving mythology, history, mysticism, and politics into an intensely personal poetic.

    Eliot: Monologues and soliloquies by characters previously unimagined in British literature; writing as outsider against British tradition yet within it (see Tradition and the Individual Talent); the anxiety of influence

    HOW DO THEY MAKE IT HARD?


    Yeats: Deliberate ambiguity, mythohistorical system of gyres, imagist poetry Eliot: Deliberate ambiguity, deconstructed and fragmented narrative, language changes, shifting points of view, stream of consciousness, pastiche of voices, images, cultural referents . Provides his own footnotes. Both argue that difficulty is importantthese questions dont have easy answers.

    SENSE OF LOSS AND MOURNING


    Yeats, Easter 1916: Too long a sacrifice can make a stone of the heart. O when may it sufficeWas it needless death after all?

    Eliot: These fragments I have shored against my ruins; the Countess; Lils dialogue in the pub; Mr. Eugenides proposition

    EPITAPH FOR THE MODERN PERIOD

    You might also like