Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
172 views

Chapter Nine Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control

Strategy evaluation is complex, sensitive, and yet essential for organizational success. Strategy evaluation includes three basic activities: examining the underlying bases of a firm's strategy. Evaluating Strategies on a continuous rather than on a periodic basis allows benchmarks of progress.

Uploaded by

Yun Lee
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
172 views

Chapter Nine Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control

Strategy evaluation is complex, sensitive, and yet essential for organizational success. Strategy evaluation includes three basic activities: examining the underlying bases of a firm's strategy. Evaluating Strategies on a continuous rather than on a periodic basis allows benchmarks of progress.

Uploaded by

Yun Lee
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

Chapter Nine Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control

Chapter Objectives
1. Describe a practical framework for evaluating strategies. 2. Explain why strategy evaluation is complex, sensitive, and yet essential for organizational success. 3. Discuss the importance of contingency planning in strategy evaluation. 4. Discuss the role of auditing in strategy evaluation. 5. Discuss the Balanced Scorecard. 6. Discuss three twenty-first-century challenges in strategic management.
9-2

9-3

The Nature of Strategy Evaluation


Strategy evaluation includes three basic activities: 1.examining the underlying bases of a firms strategy 2.comparing expected results with actual results 3.taking corrective actions to ensure that performance conforms to plans
9-4

The Nature of Strategy Evaluation Consonance and


advantage are mostly based on a firms external assessment

Consistency and
feasibility are largely based on an internal assessment

9-5

Rumelts Criteria for Evaluating Strategies

9-6

Rumelts Criteria for Evaluating Strategies

9-7

9-8

Why Strategy Evaluation is More Difficult Today


1. A dramatic increase in the environments complexity 2. The increasing difficulty of predicting the future with accuracy 3. The increasing number of variables 4. The rapid rate of obsolescence of even the best plans

9-9

Why Strategy Evaluation is More Difficult Today


5. The increase in the number of both domestic and world events affecting organizations 6. The decreasing time span for which planning can be done with any degree of certainty

9-10

The Process of Evaluating Strategies


Strategy evaluation should initiate
managerial questioning of expectations and assumptions, should trigger a review of objectives and values, and should stimulate creativity in generating alternatives and formulating criteria of evaluation

9-11

The Process of Evaluating Strategies


Evaluating strategies on a continuous
rather than on a periodic basis allows benchmarks of progress to be established and more effectively monitored Successful strategies combine patience with a willingness to promptly take corrective actions when necessary

Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

9-12

Reviewing Bases of Strategy


How have competitors reacted to our strategies? How have competitors strategies changed? Have major competitors strengths and weaknesses changed? Why are competitors making certain strategic changes?

9-13

Reviewing Bases of Strategy


Why are some competitors strategies more successful than others? How satisfied are our competitors with their present market positions and profitability? How far can our major competitors be pushed before retaliating? How could we more effectively cooperate with our competitors?
9-14

Key Questions to Address in Evaluating Strategies


1. Are our internal strengths still strengths? 2. Have we added other internal strengths? If so, what are they? 3. Are our internal weaknesses still weaknesses? 4. Do we now have other internal weaknesses? If so, what are they?

9-15

Key Questions to Address in Evaluating Strategies


5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Are our external opportunities still opportunities? Are there now other external opportunities? If so, what are they? Are our external threats still threats? Are there now other external threats? If so, what are they? Are we vulnerable to a hostile takeover?
9-16

9-17

Measuring Organizational Performance


Strategists use common quantitative criteria to make three critical comparisons: Comparing the firms performance over different time periods Comparing the firms performance to competitors Comparing the firms performance to industry averages
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-18

Problems with Quantitative Criteria


Most quantitative criteria are geared to
annual objectives rather than long-term objectives Different accounting methods can provide different results on many quantitative criteria Intuitive judgments are almost always involved in deriving quantitative criteria
9-19

Additional Key Questions


How good is the firms balance of investments between high-risk and low-risk projects? How good is the firms balance of investments between long-term and shortterm projects? How good is the firms balance of investments between slow-growing markets and fast-growing markets?
9-20

Additional Key Questions


How good is the firms balance of investments among different divisions? To what extent are the firms alternative strategies socially responsible? What are the relationships among the firms key internal and external strategic factors? How are major competitors likely to respond to particular strategies?
9-21

9-22

The Balanced Scorecard


1. How well is the firm continually improving and creating value along measures such as innovation, technological leadership, product quality, operational process efficiencies, and so on?

9-23

The Balanced Scorecard


2. How well is the firm sustaining and even improving upon its core competencies and competitive advantages? 3. How satisfied are the firms customers?

9-24

The Balanced Scorecard


The Balanced Scorecard approach to
strategy evaluation aims to balance longterm with short-term concerns, to balance financial with nonfinancial concerns, and to balance internal with external concerns.

9-25

9-26

Characteristics of an Effective Evaluation System


Strategy evaluation activities must be
economical
too much information can be just as bad as too little information too many controls can do more harm than good

Activities should be meaningful


should specifically relate to a firms objectives
9-27

Characteristics of an Effective Evaluation System


Activities should provide timely

information Activities should be designed to provide a true picture of what is happening Activities should not dominate decisions
should foster mutual understanding, trust, and common sense

9-28

Contingency Planning
If a major competitor withdraws from
particular markets as intelligence reports indicate, what actions should our firm take? If our sales objectives are not reached, what actions should our firm take to avoid profit losses?

9-29

Contingency Planning


If demand for our new product exceeds plans, what actions should our firm take to meet the higher demand? If certain disasters occur, what actions should our firm take? If a new technological advancement makes our new product obsolete sooner than expected, what actions should our firm take?
9-30

Effective Contingency Planning


1. Identify both beneficial and unfavorable events that could possibly derail the strategy or strategies. 2. Specify trigger points. 3. Assess the impact of each contingent event. 4. Develop contingency plans.

9-31

Effective Contingency Planning


5. Assess the counter-impact of each contingency plan. 6. Determine early warning signals for key contingent events. 7. For contingent events with reliable early warning signals, develop advance action plans to take advantage of the available lead time.
9-32

Auditing
Auditing
a systematic process of objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence regarding assertions about economic actions and events to ascertain the degree of correspondence between these assertions and established criteria, and communicating the results to interested users

9-33

Twenty-First-Century Challenges in Strategic Management


Deciding whether the process should be

more an art or a science Deciding whether strategies should be visible or hidden from stakeholders Deciding whether the process should be more top-down or bottom-up in their firm

9-34

You might also like