This document discusses organizational structure and different types of organizational designs. It begins by outlining learning objectives related to organizational structure elements, characteristics of different structures like bureaucracies and matrices, and factors that influence structure. The rest of the document describes key elements of organizational structure including work specialization, departmentalization, chains of command, and centralization. It also analyzes how strategy, technology, environment, and other factors influence structural design and provides examples of common structures like functional, divisional, matrix, and virtual organizations.
This document discusses organizational structure and different types of organizational designs. It begins by outlining learning objectives related to organizational structure elements, characteristics of different structures like bureaucracies and matrices, and factors that influence structure. The rest of the document describes key elements of organizational structure including work specialization, departmentalization, chains of command, and centralization. It also analyzes how strategy, technology, environment, and other factors influence structural design and provides examples of common structures like functional, divisional, matrix, and virtual organizations.
This document discusses organizational structure and different types of organizational designs. It begins by outlining learning objectives related to organizational structure elements, characteristics of different structures like bureaucracies and matrices, and factors that influence structure. The rest of the document describes key elements of organizational structure including work specialization, departmentalization, chains of command, and centralization. It also analyzes how strategy, technology, environment, and other factors influence structural design and provides examples of common structures like functional, divisional, matrix, and virtual organizations.
This document discusses organizational structure and different types of organizational designs. It begins by outlining learning objectives related to organizational structure elements, characteristics of different structures like bureaucracies and matrices, and factors that influence structure. The rest of the document describes key elements of organizational structure including work specialization, departmentalization, chains of command, and centralization. It also analyzes how strategy, technology, environment, and other factors influence structural design and provides examples of common structures like functional, divisional, matrix, and virtual organizations.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 40
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
After studying chapter 15 and
listening to class lecture,you should be able to: 1. Identify the six key elements that define an organizations structure. 2. Explain the characteristics of a bureaucracy. 3. Describe a matrix organization. 4. Explain the characteristics of a virtual organization. 5. Summarize why managers want to create boundaryless organizations. 6. Contrast mechanistic and organic structural models. 7. List the factors that favor different organizational structures. 8. Why do structures differ?
L
E
A
R
N
I
N
G
O
B
J
E
C
T
I
V
E
S
What Is Organizational Structure? Key Elements: Work specialization Departmentalization Chain of command Span of control Centralization and decentralization Formalization What Determines Organizational Structure? To what degree are tasks subdivided into separate jobs? On what basis will jobs be grouped together? To whom do individuals and groups report? How many individuals can a manager efficiently and effectively direct? Where does decision-making authority lie? To what degree will there be rules and regulations to direct employees and managers? Key Design Questions and Answers for Designing the Proper Organization Structure Strategy Why Do Structures Differ? Organization Size Technology Environment Common Organization Designs A Simple Structure: Jack Golds Mens Store Organizational Chart of a Manufacturing Firm Board member Board member Board member Board member Chief Executive Officer Legal counsel President Industrial Products Director- Human Resources Consumer Products Director- Human Resources Western Region Industrial Products Sales Manager Eastern Region Industrial Products Sales Manager Western Region Consumer Products Sales Manager Eastern Region Consumer Products Sales Manager etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. Industrial Products Director- Production Consumer Products Director- Production Industrial Products Director- R&D Consumer Products Director- R&D V.P Research and Development V.P Sales/ Marketing V.P Human Resources V.P Production Industrial Products Director- Sales Consumer Products Director- Sales Tall versus Flat Organizations Chief Executive Chief Executive T a l l
h i e r a r c h y
F l a t
h i e r a r c h y
Relatively wide span of control Relatively narrow span of control Tall Organization Flat Organization A Product Organization Pro- duction Acctg. Sales R&D Pro- duction Acctg. Sales R&D Pro- duction Acctg Sales R&D Product Group 2 Product Group 1 Product Group 3 President Chief Executive Officer A Horizontal Organization Team responsible for core process (e.g., generating and fulfilling orders)
Team responsible for core process (e.g., product development)
Team responsible for core process (e.g., flow of materials) Adviser Adviser Adviser Overall Manager Objective: Reduced cycle time
Objective: More new products
Objective: Enhanced product quality Common Organization Designs The Bureaucracy Strengths Functional economies of scale Minimum duplication of personnel and equipment Enhanced communication Centralized decision making Weaknesses Subunit conflicts with organizational goals Obsessive concern with rules and regulations Lack of employee discretion to deal with problems Decentralization: Benefits When Low and When High Low Decentralization (High Centralization)
Eliminates the additional responsibility not desired by people performing routine jobs
Permits crucial decisions to be made by individuals who have the big picture High Decentralization (Low Centralization)
Can eliminate levels of management, making a leaner organization
Promotes greater opportunities for decisions to be made be people closest to problems
Table 12-1 The Matrix Structure Cross-Functional Coordination Clear Accountability Allocation of Specialists Dual Chain of Command Matrix Structure (College of Business Administration) (Dean) (Director) Employee A Matrix Organization Project Gamma manager Production support group Legal support group Accounting support group Engineering support group Project Beta manager Production support group Legal support group Accounting support group Engineering support group Project Alpha manager Production support group Legal support group Accounting support group Engineering support group Production department Legal department Accounting department Engineering department Farm Machinery Division President Functional authority Project authority Mechanistic vs. Organic Designs Dimension
Stability
Specialization
Formal rules
Authority Mechanistic
Change unlikely
Many specialists
Rigid rules
Centralized in a few top people Organic
Change likely
Many generalists
Considerable flexibility
Decentralized, diffused throughout the organization Structure Table 12-2 Mechanistic Versus Organic Models A Virtual Organization Organization Structure: Its Determinants and Outcomes New Design Options Concepts: Provides maximum flexibility while concentrating on what the organization does best. Disadvantage is reduced control over key parts of the business. What Is Organizational Structure? (contd) Division of labor: Makes efficient use of employee skills Increases employee skills through repetition Less between-job downtime increases productivity Specialized training is more efficient Allows use of specialized equipment Economies and Diseconomies of Work Specialization E X H I B I T 15-2 What Is Organizational Structure? (contd) Grouping Activities By: Function Product Geography Process Customer What Is Organizational Structure? (contd) Narrow Span Drawbacks: Expense of additional layers of management. Increased complexity of vertical communication. Encouragement of overly tight supervision and discouragement of employee autonomy. Concept: Wider spans of management increase organizational efficiency. Contrasting Spans of Control E X H I B I T 15-3 What Is Organizational Structure? (contd) Common Organization Designs (contd) Key Elements: + Gains advantages of functional and product departmentalization while avoiding their weaknesses. + Facilitates coordination of complex and interdependent activities. Breaks down unity-of- command concept. New Design Options Characteristics: Breaks down departmental barriers. Decentralizes decision making to the team level. Requires employees to be generalists as well as specialists. Creates a flexible bureaucracy. New Design Options (contd) T-form Concepts: Eliminate vertical (hierarchical) and horizontal (departmental) internal boundaries. Breakdown external barriers to customers and suppliers. Why Do Structures Differ? Why Do Structures Differ? Why Do Structures Differ? Strategy The Strategy-Structure Relationship E X H I B I T 15-9 Why Do Structures Differ? Technology Characteristics of routineness (standardized or customized) in activities: Routine technologies are associated with tall, departmentalized structures and formalization in organizations. Routine technologies lead to centralization when formalization is low. Nonroutine technologies are associated with delegated decision authority. Why Do Structures Differ? Environment Key Dimensions: Capacity: the degree to which an environment can support growth. Volatility: the degree of instability in the environment. Complexity: the degree of heterogeneity and concentration among environmental elements. What Is Organizational Structure? (contd) The Three Dimensional Model of the Environment E X H I B I T 15-10 Complexity Volatility Capacity Organizational Designs and Employee Behavior Research Findings: Work specialization contributes to higher employee productivity, but it reduces job satisfaction. The benefits of specialization have decreased rapidly as employees seek more intrinsically rewarding jobs. The effect of span of control on employee performance is contingent upon individual differences and abilities, task structures, and other organizational factors. Participative decision making in decentralized organizations is positively related to job satisfaction.