Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Interrupts

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 59

Interrupts and

Exceptions
COMS W6998
Spring 2010

Overview

The Hardware Part


Interrupts and Exceptions
Exception Types and Handling
Interrupt Request Lines (IRQs)
Programmable Interrupt Controllers (PIC)
Interrupt Descriptor Table (IDT)
Hardware Dispatching of Interrupts
The Software Part
Nested Execution
Kernel Stacks
SoftIRQs, Tasklets
Work Queues
Threaded Interrupts

Simplified Architecture Diagram


Central
Processing
Unit

Main
Memory

system bus

I/O
device

I/O
device

I/O
device

I/O
device

Motivation

Utility of a general-purpose computer depends on its


ability to interact with I/O devices attached to it (e.g.,
keyboard, display, disk-drives, network, etc.)
Devices require a prompt response from the CPU
when various events occur, even when the CPU is
busy running a program
Need a mechanism for a device to gain CPUs
attention
Interrupts provide a way doing this

CPUs fetch-execute cycle


User
Program
ld

Fetch instruction at IP

add

IP

st

Save context

Decode the fetched instruction

mul
ld

Execute the decoded instruction

sub

Lookup ISR

bne
add

Advance IP to next instruction


Execute ISR

jmp

Get INTR ID

Interrupt?
no

yes

IRET

Interrupts
Forcibly

change normal flow of control


Similar to context switch (but lighter weight)

Hardware saves some context on stack; Includes


interrupted instruction if restart needed
Enters kernel at a specific point; kernel then
figures out which interrupt handler should run
Execution resumes with special iret instruction

Many

different types of interrupts

Types of Interrupts

Asynchronous

From external source, such as I/O device


Not related to instruction being executed

Synchronous (also called exceptions)

Processor-detected exceptions:
Faults correctable; offending instruction is retried
Traps often for debugging; instruction is not retried
Aborts major error (hardware failure)
Programmed exceptions:
Requests for kernel intervention (software intr/syscalls)

Faults

Instruction would be illegal to execute


Examples:

Writing to a memory segment marked read-only


Reading from an unavailable memory segment (on disk)
Executing a privileged instruction

Detected before incrementing the IP


The causes of faults can often be fixed
If a problem can be remedied, then the CPU can
just resume its execution-cycle

Traps
A

CPU might have been programmed to


automatically switch control to a debugger
program after it has executed an instruction
That type of situation is known as a trap
It is activated after incrementing the IP

Error Exceptions

Most error exceptions divide by zero, invalid


operation, illegal memory reference, etc. translate
directly into signals
This isnt a coincidence. . .
The kernels job is fairly simple: send the appropriate
signal to the current process

force_sig(sig_number, current);

That will probably kill the process, but thats not the
concern of the exception handler
One important exception: page fault
An exception can (infrequently) happen in the kernel

die(); // kernel oops

Intel-Reserved ID-Numbers

Of the 256 possible interrupt ID numbers, Intel reserves the first 32


for exceptions
OSs such as Linux are free to use the remaining 224 available
interrupt ID numbers for their own purposes (e.g., for servicerequests from external devices, or for other purposes such as
system-calls)
Examples:
0: divide-overflow fault
6: Undefined Opcode
7: Coprocessor Not Available
11: Segment-Not-Present fault
12: Stack fault
13: General Protection Exception
14: Page-Fault Exception

Interrupt Hardware
Legacy PC Design
(for single-proc
systems)

Ethernet

IRQs

Slave
PIC
(8259)

SCSI Disk

Master
PIC
(8259)

INTR

x86
CPU

Real-Time Clock
Keyboard Controller

Programmable Interval-Timer

I/O devices have (unique or shared) Interrupt Request


Lines (IRQs)
IRQs are mapped by special hardware to interrupt
vectors, and passed to the CPU
This hardware is called a Programmable Interrupt
Controller (PIC)

The `Interrupt Controller

Responsible for telling the CPU when a specific external


device wishes to interrupt
Needs to tell the CPU which one among several devices is
the one needing service
PIC translates IRQ to vector
Raises interrupt to CPU
Vector available in register
Waits for ack from CPU
Interrupts can have varying priorities
PIC also needs to prioritize multiple requests
Possible to mask (disable) interrupts at PIC or CPU
Early systems cascaded two 8 input chips (8259A)

Example: Interrupts on 80386

80386 core has one interrupt line, one interrupt


acknowledge line
Interrupt sequence:

Interrupt controller raises INT line


80386 core pulses INTA line low, allowing INT to go low
80386 core pulses INTA line low again, signaling controller
to put interrupt number on data bus
INT:
INTA:
Data bus:

Interrupt #

Multiple Logical Processors


Multi-CORE CPU
CPU
0

CPU
1

LOCAL
APIC

LOCAL
APIC

I/O
APIC

Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller is needed to


perform routing of I/O requests from peripherals to CPUs
(The legacy PICs are masked when the APICs are enabled)

APIC, IO-APIC, LAPIC

Advanced PIC (APIC) for SMP systems

Local APIC (LAPIC) versus frontend IO-APIC

Used in all modern systems


Interrupts routed to CPU over system bus
IPI: inter-processor interrupt
Devices connect to front-end IO-APIC
IO-APIC communicates (over bus) with Local APIC

Interrupt routing

Allows broadcast or selective routing of interrupts


Ability to distribute interrupt handling load
Routes to lowest priority process
Special register: Task Priority Register (TPR)
Arbitrates (round-robin) if equal priority

Hardware to Software
Memory Bus

IRQs

idtr

PIC

INTR

CPU

IDT

vector
N

handler

Mask points
255

Assigning IRQs to Devices

IRQ assignment is hardware-dependent


Sometimes its hardwired, sometimes its set physically,
sometimes its programmable
PCI bus usually assigns IRQs at boot
Some IRQs are fixed by the architecture
IRQ0: Interval timer
IRQ2: Cascade pin for 8259A
Linux device drivers request IRQs when the device is opened
Note: especially useful for dynamically-loaded drivers, such as
for USB or PCMCIA devices
Two devices that arent used at the same time can share an IRQ,
even if the hardware doesnt support simultaneous sharing

Assigning Vectors to IRQs

Vector: index (0-255) into interrupt descriptor table


Vectors usually IRQ# + 32

Below 32 reserved for non-maskable intr & exceptions


Maskable interrupts can be assigned as needed
Vector 128 used for syscall
Vectors 251-255 used for IPI

Interrupt Descriptor Table

The entry-point to the interrupt-handler is located


via the Interrupt Descriptor Table (IDT)
IDT: gate descriptors

Segment selector + offset for handler


Descriptor Privilege Level (DPL)
Gates (slightly different ways of entering kernel)

Task gate: includes TSS to transfer to (not used by


Linux)
Interrupt gate: disables further interrupts
Trap gate: further interrupts still allowed

Interrupt Masking
Two

different types: global and per-IRQ


Global delays all interrupts
Selective individual IRQs can be masked
selectively
Selective masking is usually whats needed
interference most common from two
interrupts of the same type

Putting It All Together


Memory Bus

IRQs

idtr

PIC

INTR

CPU

IDT

vector
N

handler

Mask points
255

Dispatching Interrupts

Each interrupt has to be handled by a special deviceor trap-specific routine


Interrupt Descriptor Table (IDT) has gate descriptors
for each interrupt vector
Hardware locates the proper gate descriptor for this
interrupt vector, and locates the new context
A new stack pointer, program counter, CPU and
memory state, etc., are loaded
Global interrupt mask set
The old program counter, stack pointer, CPU and
memory state, etc., are saved on the new stack
The specific handler is invoked

Overview

The Hardware Part


Interrupts and Exceptions
Exception Types and Handling
Interrupt Request Lines (IRQs)
Programmable Interrupt Controllers (PIC)
Interrupt Descriptor Table (IDT)
Hardware Dispatching of Interrupts
The Software Part
Nested Execution
Kernel Stacks
SoftIRQs, Tasklets
Work Queues
Threaded Interrupts

Nested Interrupts
What

if a second interrupt occurs while an


interrupt routine is excuting?
Generally a good thing to permit that is it
possible?
And why is it a good thing?

Maximizing Parallelism
You

want to keep all I/O devices as busy as


possible
In general, an I/O interrupt represents the
end of an operation; another request should
be issued as soon as possible
Most devices dont interfere with each others
data structures; theres no reason to block
out other devices

Handling Nested Interrupts


As

soon as possible, unmask the global


interrupt
As soon as reasonable, re-enable interrupts
from that IRQ
But that isnt always a great idea, since it
could cause re-entry to the same handler
IRQ-specific mask is not enabled during
interrupt-handling

Nested Execution

Interrupts can be interrupted

Exceptions can be interrupted

By different interrupts; handlers need not be reentrant


No notion of priority in Linux
Small portions execute with interrupts disabled
Interrupts remain pending until acked by CPU
By interrupts (devices needing service)

Exceptions can nest two levels deep

Exceptions indicate coding error


Exception code (kernel code) shouldnt have bugs
Page fault is possible (trying to touch user data)

Interrupt Handling Philosophy


Do

as little as possible in the interrupt handler


Defer non-critical actions till later
Structure: top and bottom halves

Top-half: do minimum work and return (ISR)


Bottom-half: deferred processing (softirqs,
tasklets, workqueues, kernel threads)
Top half

tasklet

softirq

workqueue

kernel thread

Bottom
half

Top Half: Do it Now!

Technically is the interrupt handler


Perform minimal, common functions: save registers, unmask other interrupts. Eventually,
undoes that: restores registers, returns to previous context.

IRQ is typically masked for duration of top half


Most important: call proper interrupt handler provided in device drivers (C program)
Dont want to do too much here

Often written in assembler

IRQs are masked for part of the time


Dont want stack to get too big

Typically queue the request and set a flag for deferred processing in a bottom half

Top Half: Find the Handler


On

modern hardware, multiple I/O devices


can share a single IRQ and hence interrupt
vector
First differentiator is the interrupt vector
Multiple interrupt service routines (ISR) can
be associated with a vector
Each devices ISR for that IRQ is called
Device determines whether IRQ is for it

Bottom Half: Do it Later!


Mechanisms

to defer work to later:

softirqs
tasklets (built on top of softirqs)
work queues
kernel threads

All

can be interrupted
Top half

tasklet

softirq

workqueue

kernel thread

Bottom
half

Warning: No Process Context


Interrupts

(as opposed to exceptions) are not


associated with particular instructions
Theyre also not associated with a given
process (user program)
The currently-running process, at the time of
the interrupt, as no relationship whatsoever to
that interrupt
Interrupt handlers cannot sleep!

What Cant You Do?

You cannot sleep

You cannot refer to current


You cannot allocate memory with GPF_KERNEL
(which can sleep), you must use GPF_ATOMIC
(which can fail)
You cannot call schedule()
You cannot do a down() semaphore call

or call something that might sleep

However, you can do an up()

You cannot transfer data to/from user space

E.g., copy_to_user(), copy_from_user()

Interrupt Stack
When

used?

an interrupt occurs, what stack is

Exceptions: The kernel stack of the current


process, whatever it is, is used (Theres always
some process running the idle process, if
nothing else)
Interrupts: hard IRQ stack (1 per processor)
SoftIRQs: soft IRQ stack (1 per processor)

These

stacks are configured in the IDT and


TSS at boot time by the kernel

Softirqs

Statically allocated: specified at kernel compile time


Limited number:
Priority Type
0
High-priority tasklets
1
Timer interrupts
2
Network transmission
3
Network reception
4
Block devices
5
Regular tasklets

When Do Softirqs Run?

Run at various points by the kernel:

Softirq routines can be executed simultaneously on


multiple CPUs:

After system calls


After exceptions
After interrupts (top halves/IRQs, including the timer intr)
When the scheduler runs ksoftirqd

Code must be re-entrant


Code must do its own locking as needed

Hardware interrupts always enabled when softirqs


are running.

Rescheduling Softirqs
A

softirq routine can reschedule itself


This could starve user-level processes
Softirq scheduler only runs a limited number
of requests at a time
The rest are executed by a kernel thread,
ksoftirqd, which competes with user
processes for CPU time

Tasklets

Built on top of softirqs


Can be created and destroyed dynamically
Run on the CPU that scheduled it (cache affinity)
Individual tasklets are locked during execution; no
problem about re-entrancy, and no need for locking
by the code
Tasklets can run in parallel on multiple CPUs

Same tasklet can only run on one CPU

Were once the preferred mechanism for most


deferred activity, now changing

The Trouble with Tasklets


Hard

to get right
One has to be careful about sleeping
They run at higher priority than other tasks in
the systems
Can produce uncontrolled latency if coded
badly
Ongoing discussion about eliminating tasklets
Will likely slowly fade over time

Work Queues

Always run by kernel threads

Softirqs and tasklets run in an interrupt context; work


queues have a pseudo-process context

i.e., have a kernel context but no user context

Because they have a pseudo-process context, they


can sleep

Are scheduled by the scheduler

Work queues are shared by multiple devices


Thus, sleeping will delay other work on the queue

However, theyre kernel-only; there is no user mode


associated with it

Dont try copying data into/out of user space

Kernel Threads
Always

operate in kernel mode

Again, no user context

2.6.30

introduced the notion of threaded


interrupt handlers

Imported from the realtime tree


request_threaded_irq()
Now each bottom half has its own context, unlike
work queues
Idea is to eventually replace tasklets and work
queues

Comparing Approaches
ISR

SoftIRQ

Tasklet

WorkQueue

KThread

Will disable all interrupts?

Briefly

No

No

No

No

Will disable other instances of self?

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

Higher priority than regular scheduled tasks?

Yes

Yes*

Yes*

No

No

Will be run on same processor as ISR?

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

Maybe

More than one run can on same CPU?

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Same one can run on multiple CPUs?

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Full context switch?

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Can sleep? (Has own kernel stack)

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Can access user space?

No

No

No

No

No

*Within limits, can be run by ksoftirqd

Return Code Path

Interleaved assembly entry points:

ret_from_exception()
ret_from_intr()
ret_from_sys_call()
ret_from_fork()

Things that happen:

Run scheduler if necessary


Return to user mode if no nested handlers

Restore context, user-stack, switch mode


Re-enable interrupts if necessary

Deliver pending signals

Monitoring Interrupt Activity


Linux

has a pseudo-file system, /proc, for


monitoring (and sometimes changing) kernel
behavior
Run
cat /proc/interrupts
to see whats going on

/proc/interrupts
$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 865119901
1:
4
2:
0
8:
1
12:
20
14:
6532494
15:
34
16:
0
19:
0
23:
0
32:
40
33:
40
48: 273306628
NMI:
0
ERR:
0

IO-APIC-edge
IO-APIC-edge
XT-PIC
IO-APIC-edge
IO-APIC-edge
IO-APIC-edge
IO-APIC-edge
IO-APIC-level
IO-APIC-level
IO-APIC-level
IO-APIC-level
IO-APIC-level
IO-APIC-level

timer
keyboard
cascade
rtc
PS/2 Mouse
ide0
ide1
usb-uhci
usb-uhci
ehci-hcd
ioc0
ioc1
eth0

Columns: IRQ, count, interrupt controller, devices

More in /proc/pci:
$ cat /proc/pci
PCI devices found:
Bus 0, device
0, function 0:
Host bridge: PCI device 8086:2550 (Intel Corp.) (rev 3).
Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe8000000 [0xebffffff].
Bus 0, device 29, function 1:
USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB USB (Hub #2) (rev 2).
IRQ 19.
I/O at 0xd400 [0xd41f].
Bus 0, device 31, function 1:
IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DB ICH4 IDE (rev 2).
IRQ 16.
I/O at 0xf000 [0xf00f].
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0x80000000 [0x800003ff].
Bus 3, device
1, function 0:
Ethernet controller: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5703X Gigabit Eth (rev 2).
IRQ 48.
Master Capable. Latency=64. Min Gnt=64.
Non-prefetchable 64 bit memory at 0xf7000000 [0xf700ffff].

Portability
Which

has a higher priority, a disk interrupt or


a network interrupt?
Different CPU architectures make different
decisions
By not assuming or enforcing any priority,
Linux becomes more portable

Summary

Exception vs. Interrupt


Synchronous vs. Asynchronous
Fault vs. Trap
Relation between exceptions and signals
Device IRQs APICs Interrupt
Hardware handling (vector)
Interrupt masking
ISRs can share IRQs
Interrupt stacks (Kernel, HardIRQ, SoftIRQ)
Top half vs. bottom half
SoftIRQs, tasklets, workqueues, ksoftirqd, kernel threads, ksoftirqd
Interrupt context vs. process context
Who can block
Opportunities for rescheduling (preempting)

Backup Foils

Three crucial data-structures


The

Global Descriptor Table (GDT)

defines the systems memory-segments and their


access-privileges, which the CPU has the duty to
enforce
The

Interrupt Descriptor Table (IDT)

defines entry-points for the various code-routines that


will handle all interrupts and exceptions
The

Task-State Segment (TSS)

holds the values for registers SS and ESP that will get
loaded by the CPU upon entering kernel-mode

How does CPU find GDT/IDT?


Two

dedicated registers: GDTR and IDTR


Both have identical 48-bit formats:
Segment Base Address
47

Segment Limit
16 15

Kernel must setup these registers during system startup (set-and-forget)


Privileged instructions: LGDT and LIDT used to set these register-values
Unprivileged instructions: SGDT and SIDT used for reading register-values

How does CPU find the TSS?


Dedicated

system segment-register TR holds


a descriptors offset into the GDT

The kernel must set up the


GDT and TSS structures
and must load the GDTR
and the TR registers

TR

GDTR

GDT

TSS

The CPU knows the layout


of fields in the Task-State
Segment

IDT Initialization

Initialized once by BIOS in real mode

Must not expose kernel to user mode access

Linux re-initializes during kernel init


start by zeroing all descriptors

Linux lingo:

Interrupt gate (same as Intel; no user access)


Not accessible from user mode
System gate (Intel trap gate; user access)
Used for int, int3, into, bounds
Trap gate (same as Intel; no user access)
Used for exceptions

Interrupt Processing

BUILD_IRQ macro generates:

IRQn_interrupt:
pushl $n-256 // negative to distinguish syscalls
jmp common_interrupt

Common code:

common_interrupt:
SAVE_ALL // save a few more registers than hardware
call do_IRQ
jmp $ret_from_intr
do_IRQ() is C code that handles all interrupts

Low-level IRQ Processing

do_IRQ():

get vector, index into irq_desc for appropriate struct


grab per-vector spinlock, ack (to PIC) and mask line
set flags (IRQ_PENDING)
really process IRQ? (may be disabled, etc.)
call handle_IRQ_event()
some logic for handling lost IRQs on SMP systems

handle_IRQ_event():

enable interrupts if needed (SA_INTERRUPT clear)


execute all ISRs for this vector:
action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs);

IRQ Data Structures

irq_desc: array of IRQ descriptors

status (flags), lock, depth (for nested disables)


handler: PIC device driver!
action: linked list of irqaction structs (containing ISRs)

irqaction: ISR info

handler: actual ISR!


flags:

SA_INTERRUPT: interrupts disabled if set


SA_SHIRQ: sharing allowed
SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM: input for /dev/random entropy pool

name: for /proc/interrupts


dev_id, next

irq_stat: per-cpu counters (for /proc/interrupts)

Hardware Handling

On entry:

Which vector?
Get corresponding descriptor in IDT
Find specified descriptor in GDT (for handler)
Check privilege levels (CPL, DPL)

Save eflags, cs, (original) eip on stack

Jump to appropriate handler

If entering kernel mode, set kernel stack

Assembly code prepares C stack, calls handler

On return (i.e. iret):

Restore registers from stack


If returning to user mode, restore user stack
Clear segment registers (if privileged selectors)

Interrupt Handling

More complex than exceptions

Requires registry, deferred processing, etc.

Three types of actions:

Critical: Top-half (interrupts disabled briefly!)

Non-critical: Top-half (interrupts enabled)

Example: acknowledge interrupt


Example: read key scan code, add to buffer

Non-critical deferrable: Do it later (interrupts enabled)

Example: copy keyboard buffer to terminal handler process


Softirqs, tasklets

You might also like