Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
90 views

Implementing SSL

This document provides an overview of real-world cryptography as used in SSL/TLS. It discusses cryptographic concepts like symmetric cryptography, public key cryptography, and digital signatures. It then describes how these concepts are applied in the SSL/TLS handshake protocol to establish a secure connection, including advanced components like certificates, encryption algorithms, digital signatures, and security considerations.

Uploaded by

Savas Kaplan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
90 views

Implementing SSL

This document provides an overview of real-world cryptography as used in SSL/TLS. It discusses cryptographic concepts like symmetric cryptography, public key cryptography, and digital signatures. It then describes how these concepts are applied in the SSL/TLS handshake protocol to establish a secure connection, including advanced components like certificates, encryption algorithms, digital signatures, and security considerations.

Uploaded by

Savas Kaplan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 61

Real-world cryptography

SSL/TLS
Joshua Davies
Director of Architecture 2Xoffice
Author of Implementing SSL/TLS
Using Cryptography and PKI

Outline
Cryptographic concepts
Symmetric Cryptography
Public-key cryptography
Digital Signatures
Certificates

SSL/TLS
Handshake
Advanced/optional components

Digital Security

Privacy
Integrity
Authentication
Authorization
Non-repudiation (I can prove you did
it)

Privacy - Encryption
C = Ek(P), P = Dk(C); K is a secret parameter
Ciphers: standard algorithms such as DES,
3DES, AES, RC4, Blowfish, IDEA hundreds
more
SSL/TLS provisionally supports any cipher
Most implementations support DES, 3DES,
AES and RC4
Called symmetric because the same key is
used for encryption and decryption

DES
Oldest digital cipher still in use
Developed by IBM for the NSA in
1974
Fixed 56-bit key size

DES High level

DES One round

3DES
Triples DES key size by running the
DES algorithm three times
Encrypt

K1

Decrypt

K2

Encrypt

K3

Rijndael/AES
NIST started looking for a
replacement for DES in 2001
Rijndael supports 128, 192 and 256bit keys

AES Encryption

Block Ciphers and Padding


Block ciphers require exactly n bytes
of input if the plaintext is shorter, it
must be padded
Padding must be done securely to
avoid giving away keying material

Block Ciphers and CBC


mode
If the plaintext block P is encrypted
twice with the same key, C will be
identical
Gives attacker some information on
the structure of P
CBC mode XORs each block with the
output of the previous block (first
block is XORed with a special value
called the initialization vector)

RC4
Stream, rather than a block, cipher
Generates a single keystream as long
as the plaintext
No need for CBC or padding

RC4 Encryption

The problem with encryption key


exchange
Keys must be managed securely, but
a secure channel cant be
established without a key
Public-key cryptography creates two
separate keys one for encryption,
one for decryption

Public-key cryptography - RSA


Three numbers e, d, n such that (me)d
%n=m
e and n are the public key, d is the
private key
c = me%n
m = cd%n (distributivity of modulus
operator)
e, d, and n are long at least 512
bits
Slow runtime - generally used to

Diffie-Hellman Key
Exchange
Virtually unused, but TLS 1.0
mandates it be supported
Can only be used for secret
exchange, not for general encryption

Diffie-Hellman

Client
generate random a
Yc = (ga%p)
Z = Ysa%p

Server
generate random b
Ys=(gb%p)
Z = Ycb%p

Elliptic-Curve Cryptography
Relatively new, not much commercial
support
Based on operations on the curve
y2=x3+ax+b
Similar to Diffie-Hellman, but
replaces exponentiation with elliptic
curve operations
Provides similar security to DiffieHellman and RSA with far smaller
numbers

Adding Points on an elliptic


curve

Computing P3 from P1 and P2


x3=2-x1-x2
y3=(x1-x3)-y1
=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
Unless P1=P2
=3x12+a/2y1

Large Number Arithmetic


Public key cryptography requires
arbitrary precision math
Floating point decimals arent good
enough, because they lose precision
Large number arithmetic takes a long
time and uses a lot of memory

Large Number Multiplication

123
x456
738
+ 6150
+49200
56088
[(4x103)+(5x102)+6(101)]123
(4x103)123+(5x102)123+6(101)123

Binary Multiplication double and


add
1101
1010
x1010
0000
1101
11010
11010
000000 110100
1101000 1101000
10000010

Binary Exponentiation square and


multiply

x10
xxxxxxxxxx
(xxxxx)(xxxxx)
(xxxxx)2
((xx)(xx)x)2
((xx)2x)2
(((x2)2x)2

Efficient, but leads to timing attacks


Each operation takes long enough
that it can be measured
Missing multiplication operations
allow an attacker to measure how
many 1s are in the exponent
Solution is to perform the
multiplication at each step and throw
the results away

Key exchange over an insecure


channel
Client

Server
y pub
e
k
c
li
b
u
p
d
sen
Epub(K)

C = Ek(M)

Man-in-the middle attack


Client

Attacker
key
send public
pub
Epub(K)

C = Ek(M)

Server

key
send public
pub
Epub(Dpriv(K))

C = Ek(M)

Prove Identity through digital


signatures
Upside-down public key cryptography
s = md%n
m = se%n

Document surrogates with secure


hashes
Public-key cryptography is slow
Sign secure hashes of original
documents
MD5 (128-bit)
SHA (-1=160-bit, -256, -384, -512)

DSA Signature generation


NIST standard for document
signatures; doesnt actually encrypt
anything
k = (c%(q-1)) + 1
r = (gk % p) % q
z = secure message hash
s = ((k-1%q)(z+xr))%q
r and s are the signature, g, p & q are
shared and public

DSA Signature Verification

w = s-1%q
z = hash(message)
u1 = (zw) % q
u2 = (rw) % q
v = (( gu1yu2)%p)%q
if v r, signature is rejected
Can replace exponentiation with Elliptic
Curve operations to create ECDSA

Providing Message Integrity with


HMAC
Can secure hashes be used
symmetrically?

X.509 Certificates distribution of


public keys
Public keys are
distributed in x.509
certificate files
X.509 certificates
are signed by a
certificate
authority (CA)
CA public keys are
in turn distributed
as x.509 certificate
files

Root CA

2nd Level
CA

Certifica
te

Certifica
te

2nd Level
CA

Certifica
te

Certificate-Related Browser errors:


Certificate Expired

Certificate-Related Browser errors:


Domain-name mismatch

Certificate-Related Browser errors:


Untrusted Signer

What do all of these actually mean?


A certificate serves two primary
purposes:
1) Provide a public key by which the
browser and the server may
exchange data securely over a public
medium
2) Prove correct ownership of a
website

Certificate Format - Issuer

Certificate Trust Chains

Trusted Certificate
Authorities
Keep a mapping of
public keys of
trusted CAs
Look up public key
and validate
signature on each
certificate

Certificate Format Validity


Period

Certificate Format - Subject

Must match domain


name

Roles and Responsibilities


CA
Generate
Key Pair, self
sign
Distribute
certificate
Verify Info,
Must
be
Sign
done
Certificate
out of
band

Sender

Generate
Key Pair

Receiver
Must be
done
Store CA key
out of
band

Wrap in CSR
Distribute
Signed Cert

Validate CA
Signature

Sign with
private key

Verify
Signature

Putting it all together SSL


handshake
Server

Client
Client Hello (sup
ported suites)

r suite)
e
h
ip
c
a
t
c
(sele
Server Hello
ificate
t
r
e
C
r
e
v
r
e
S
Done

Epub(Key Exchan
ge)
Change Cipher S
pe c

her Spec
Change Cip

Vulnerable to replay attacks


This works, but an attacker can
record an exchange and replay it
again and again
In order to guard against replay
attacks, work a variable state into
the handshake and authenticate the
entire handshake

The finished messages contain a


hash of all messages
Server

Client
Client Hello (sup
ported suites)

hash

r suite)
e
h
ip
c
a
t
c
(sele
Server Hello
ificate
t
r
e
C
r
e
v
r
e
S
Done

Change Cipher S
pe c
Ek(Finished)

her Spec
Change Cip
Ek(Finished)

hash

Epub(Key Exchan
ge)

Client Hello

Server Hello

Keys arent exchange


directly
Client Key Exchange includes a
premaster secret
This is passed to the Pseudo-Random
function, which is based on secure
hashes, to generate the master
secret
The master secret is split into
cryptography and HMAC keys

Bleichenbacher Attack
Try to deduce the private key by
returning an invalid key exchange
message
If the server responds with a
handshake completion error rather
than an invalid message error, one
bit of private key information is
leaked
Solution: ignore malformed key
exchange and complete the

Computing master secret

Server Name Extension


TLS has no notion of host names
Problematic with shared sites which
certificate to respond with?
SNI client hello extension allows the
client to specify which host its trying
to connect to

Session Resumption
Key exchange is time-consuming
HTTP is based around a lot of short
transactions
Session resumption allows both sides
to remember keying material to be
reused

Ephemeral Key Exchange


Certificate-less key exchange
Must be based on Diffie-Hellman
No authentication of server,
vulnerable to man-in-the middle
attacks

Mutual Authentication
The server can insist that the client
verify itself as well
Client and server may have a
different list of trusted certificate
authorities
Client doesnt have an identity to
validate

Session Renegotiation
Discard keying material, negotiate
new keys
Either side can initiate client
initiates by sending new client hello,
server initiates by sending explicit
renegotiation request (called a hello
request)
Renegotiation handshake is
encrypted using previously
negotiated key material

Prefix attacks
Client

Attacker
connect

handshake
complete

connect
prepend some
data
renegotiate

send data

Server

Extension 0xFF01
Simple solution reject renegotiation
attempts
RFC 5746 describes a client and
server extension that allows one
session to be securely tied back to
another

History of SSL/TLS
1995: Netscape releases a browser
with SSLv2
1996: SSLv2 is found to be flawed,
SSLv3 is specified
1999: IETF takes over SSL, renames
it TLS, blesses version 1.0
2006: TLS 1.1 is released, minor
revisions
2008: TLS 1.2 is released, major
revisions

More Information

You might also like