Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Project Summary: Guide: Dr. Amit Prashant

    Uploaded by

    Anirudh Saboo
    This project summary describes slope stability analysis of an embankment and earth dam using different methods. It also describes soil nailing and MSE wall designs for slope retaining structures. The embankment slope was analyzed using methods like ordinary slices, Bishop, and GLE. Factors of safety between 1.4-2.6 were calculated. A nailed slope and MSE wall were designed, with analysis showing adequate internal and external stability under static and seismic conditions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Project Summary: Guide: Dr. Amit Prashant

    Uploaded by

    Anirudh Saboo
    29 views23 pages
    This project summary describes slope stability analysis of an embankment and earth dam using different methods. It also describes soil nailing and MSE wall designs for slope retaining structures. The embankment slope was analyzed using methods like ordinary slices, Bishop, and GLE. Factors of safety between 1.4-2.6 were calculated. A nailed slope and MSE wall were designed, with analysis showing adequate internal and external stability under static and seismic conditions.

    Original Description:

    123456789

    Original Title

    PROJECT-1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This project summary describes slope stability analysis of an embankment and earth dam using different methods. It also describes soil nailing and MSE wall designs for slope retaining structures. The embankment slope was analyzed using methods like ordinary slices, Bishop, and GLE. Factors of safety between 1.4-2.6 were calculated. A nailed slope and MSE wall were designed, with analysis showing adequate internal and external stability under static and seismic conditions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    29 views23 pages

    Project Summary: Guide: Dr. Amit Prashant

    Uploaded by

    Anirudh Saboo
    This project summary describes slope stability analysis of an embankment and earth dam using different methods. It also describes soil nailing and MSE wall designs for slope retaining structures. The embankment slope was analyzed using methods like ordinary slices, Bishop, and GLE. Factors of safety between 1.4-2.6 were calculated. A nailed slope and MSE wall were designed, with analysis showing adequate internal and external stability under static and seismic conditions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 23

    PROJECT SUMMARY

    CE-627

    GUIDE: DR. AMIT PRASHANT

    Presented by:
    ANIRUDH SABOO
    KOLLI MOHAN KRISHNA

    EMBANKEMENT SLOPE STABILITY

    METHOD

    ORDINARY EFFECTIVE
    METHODOF
    STRESS
    SLICES
    ANALYSIS

    FOS-EXCEL

    FOSGEOSTU
    DIO

    1.416232031
    METHOD

    ORDINARY
    METHOD
    OFSLICES

    EFFECTIVE
    STRESS ANALYSIS

    TOTAL STRESS
    ANALYSIS

    1.579

    BISHOP
    METHOD

    GENERAL
    LIMIT
    EQULIBRIU
    MMETHOD

    TOTAL
    STRESS
    ANALYSIS
    EFFECTIVE
    STRESS
    ANALYSIS
    TOTAL
    STRESS
    ANALYSIS
    EFFECTIVE
    STRESS
    ANALYSIS

    TOTAL
    STRESS
    ANALYSIS

    2.349759824

    1.456401642

    2.428

    1.615

    RADIUS

    START

    END

    (17.649,25.753)

    23.657

    (0,10)

    (40,18)

    22.172

    (0,10)

    (40,18)

    (18.295,22.526)
    BISHOP
    METHOD

    2.344432972

    SLIPCIRCLE
    CENTRE

    EFFECTIVE
    STRESS ANALYSIS

    2.434

    (17.335,27.327)

    2.652079207

    1.613

    2.434

    (0,10)

    (40,18)

    TOTAL STRESS
    ANALYSIS
    (17.989,24.056)

    1.588843616

    24.509

    GENERAL
    LIMIT
    EQULIBRIU
    MMETHOD

    EFFECTIVE
    STRESS ANALYSIS

    TOTAL STRESS
    ANALYSIS

    (17.4, 26.999)

    (17.989,24.056)

    22.829

    (0,10)

    (40,18)

    24.326

    (0,10)

    (40,18)

    22.829

    (0,10)

    (40,18)

    1.58
    ORDINARY METHOD OF SLICESEFFECTIVE STRESS ANLYSIS

    1.61
    BISHOP METHOD-EFFECTIVE
    STRESS ANLYSIS

    1.61

    GLE-EFFECTIVE STRESS ANLYSIS

    2.43
    ORDINARY METHOD OF SLICESTOTAL STRESS ANLYSIS

    2.43

    BISHOP METHODTOTAL
    STRESSES

    2.43

    GLE-TOTAL STRESS ANALYSIS

    EARTHEN DAM SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS

    METHOD

    UP
    STREAM

    GENERAL
    LIMIT
    EQUILIBRI
    UM
    METHOD

    EFFECTIVE
    STRESS
    ANALYSIS

    GENERAL
    LIMIT
    EQUILIBRI
    UM
    METHOD

    EFFECTIVE
    STRESS
    ANALYSIS

    DOWN
    STREAM

    UP
    STR
    EAM

    METHOD

    GENERAL
    LIMIT
    EQUILIBRIU
    M METHOD

    DOW GENERAL
    N
    LIMIT
    STR EQUILIBRIU
    EAM M METHOD

    FOSEXCEL

    FOSGEOSTUDI
    O

    1.6
    1.829

    0.8(spenc
    er)

    SLIPCIR
    CLE
    CENTRE

    RA
    DI
    US

    11.349,38
    .774

    68.728,
    37.695

    1.14

    STA
    RT

    END

    40.
    4

    (0,0)

    (46,1
    8)

    38.
    197

    (36,
    18)

    (74.9
    ,0)

    EFFECTIV
    E STRESS
    ANALYSIS

    EFFECTIV
    E STRESS
    ANALYSIS

    FLOWNET AND PHREATIC LINE

    MONTE-CARLOSIMULATION
    PROBABILITYDISTRIBUTIONFUNCTIONOFTHEFACTOROFSAFETY

    ForUniformdistribution
    (Mean=2.50;StandardDeviation=0.20)(fp=0.02)

    (CummulativePDFtillCriticalFOSgivespf)

    Blue:PDF&Green:CPDF
    ForTriangulardistribution
    (Mean=2.56;StandardDeviation=0.19)(fp=0.1)

    Blue:PDF&Violet:CPDF

    X-AXIS:FOS
    Y-AXIS:probabilitydensity

    GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTION FOR ROAD


    PROJECT

    PROVIDE SOIL NAILING ON CUTSIDE

    PROVIDE MSE WALL ON FILLING SIDE

    DESIGN OF SLOPE RETAINING STRUCTURES

    NAILED SLOPE

    DESIGN RECOMENDATIONS
    Nail
    Steel

    Ultimate
    Bond
    Fe 415 (32
    mm)

    Facia
    Concrete

    M 20 (200 mm
    thick)

    Steel

    Fe 415

    60 kPa

    Hole Diameter

    100 mm

    Grout

    M 20

    FACIAL
    REINFORCEMENT

    Tensile
    strength(kN)

    3 16 dia bar
    (mm2)/m
    Pullout
    resistance(kN/m)

    NAILHEAD
    STRENGTH(kN)

    222.5

    12.57

    33.51

    Nail

    528mm2/m

    ANALYSIS RESULTS
    InternalStability External
    Stability

    Internal
    Stability

    External
    Stability

    For Plane
    Failure

    For Plane
    Failure

    1.49 Overturnin 1.42


    g

    1.76 Overturnin 200.


    g
    7
    Slip

    25.7
    5

    Slip

    2.38

    Bearing
    Capacity

    15.0
    9

    Bearing
    Capacity

    8.82

    Deep
    Seated

    2.42

    Deep
    Seated(Bi
    shop
    method)

    1.85

    Static Case

    Seismic Case

    Static

    Dynamic

    GLOBAL STABILITY OF WHOLE PROFILE


    STATIC CASE
    3.47

    SEISMICCASE
    1.99

    MSE-MOHAN

    DESIGN RECOMENDATIONS

    Length(m)

    VerticalSpacing(m)

    Noofreinforcements

    9.50

    .60

    16

    ANALYSIS RESULTS
    Static Case
    InternalStability
    Tensile
    1.74
    Strength
    Slip on
    4.34
    reinforceme
    nt
    Connection

    3.12

    Seismic Case

    ExternalStability
    Overturning 24.13
    Slip

    8.35

    Bearing
    Capacity

    2.71

    Deep
    Seated

    1.55

    InternalStability ExternalStability
    Tensile
    Strength

    1.71

    Slip on
    2.71
    reinforceme
    nt
    Connection

    3.06

    Overturning 4.45
    Slip
    Bearing
    Capacity

    2.24

    Deep
    Seated

    1.21

    Global Stability Static

    Internal Stability Static

    Global Stability Seismic

    Internal Stability Seismic

    MSE- ANIRUDH

    DESIGN RECOMENDATIONS

    Length(m)
    9.00

    VerticalSpacing Noof
    (m)
    reinforcements
    .30
    30

    Continuous
    Layersare
    Provided(1.20
    mbelow)

    ANALYSIS RESULTS
    Static Case
    InternalStability
    Tensile
    1.74
    Strength

    ExternalStability
    Overturning 23.83
    Slip

    Slip on
    reinforceme
    nt

    4.34

    Connection

    3.12

    Dynamic Case
    InternalStability
    Tensile
    1.74
    Strength

    5.83

    Bearing
    Capacity

    2.55

    Deep
    Seated

    1.56

    Slip on
    4.34
    reinforceme
    nt
    Connection 3.12

    ExternalStability
    Overturning 4.55
    Slip

    1.60

    Bearing
    Capacity

    2.07

    Deep
    Seated

    1.21

    Global Stability Static

    Internal Stability Static

    Global Stability Seismic

    Internal Stability Seismic

    THANK YOU

    You might also like