Suppositories and Pessaries
Suppositories and Pessaries
Suppositories and Pessaries
Ideal requirements,
Bases,
Manufacturing procedure,
Packaging and
Evaluation.
S.H. Majumdar 1
Introduction
• Patient non-compliance
S.H. Majumdar 7
Vaginal suppositories
• Vaginal suppositories are commonly used to treat
gynecological ailments, including vaginal infections such as
candidiasis.
S.H. Majumdar 8
Vaginal suppositories Example
• Progesterone vaginal suppositories
– F < 10%
• Poor absorption and high 1st pass metabolism
• Lessen the possibility of miscarriage
– luteal phase defect
– In vitro fertilization (IVF) -> uterine lining development
S.H. Majumdar 9
Urethral Suppository
• Urethral therapy is one of several
proven treatment options for ED. The
therapy treats impotence by delivering
medication directly to the penis to
stimulate blood flow. The medication is
in the form of a small suppository.
• Alprostadil pellets are urethral
suppositories used for the treatment of
severe erectile dysfunction. They are
marketed under the name Muse in the
United State.
• Directly inserted into the penis, the
suppository is absorbed by the tissue
and relaxes muscles in the penis. This
allows blood flow to increase, creating
an erection.
S.H. Majumdar 10
Suppository Bases
Ideal base
• Melts, dissolves, or disperses at 37oC
• Nonirritating
• Physically stable -> manufacture & storage
• Chemically stable & inert
– No color change
– Compatible with drugs
• Convenient to handle -> break or melt
• High viscosity when melted
– Doesn't leak from rectum or vagina
S.H. Majumdar 11
Base Classification
• Oleaginous
– Cocoa-butter
– Cocoa-butter substitutes
• Water soluble (Hydrophilic Bases)
– Polyethylene - glycol mixtures
– Glycerated gelatin
• Water dispersible
– Polyethylene-glycol derivations
– Cocoa-butter substitutes with surfactants
• Non-base
– Tablets
– Soft gelatin capsules
S.H. Majumdar 12
Drug Release
• Oleaginous
• Hydrophilic
S.H. Majumdar 13
Cocoa-butter (Theobroma oil)
• Most widely used base for Rx
– Innocuous
– Bland
– Nonreactive
– Melts at body temperature
• Disadvantages
– Fatty acids can become rancid
– Melt in warm weather
– Liquefy when certain drugs are incorporated
– Variable properties (natural product)
S.H. Majumdar 14
Cocoa-butter Composition
• Obtained from roasted seed of Theobroma Cacao
• Primarily triglyceride
– Oleopalmitostearin
– Oleodistearin
• Yellowish-white solid
• Brittle fat
• Smells and tastes like chocolate
– Melting point 30-35 0C
• Stored in cool, dry, light protected
S.H. Majumdar 15
Cocoa-butter: Polymorphic properties
S.H. Majumdar 16
Cocoa Butter Substitutes
• Cocoa butter is bad for high speed manufacture
• Cocoa butter replacements
– Mixtures of synthetic or natural vegetable oils
– Triglycerides of natural saturated fatty acids
– Wax
– Fatty alcohols C10- C18
• e.g. Cotmar, Dehydag, Wecobee, Witepsol & Fatty
base
S.H. Majumdar 17
Hydrophilic: Glycerinated Gelatin
• Glycerinated Gelatin
– Mixture glycerin and gelatin
• Ratio glycerin/gelatin/H2O -> duration of action
– Oldest type
• Example
– USP 24
• Purified H2O 10 gm
• Glycerin 70 gm
• Gelatin 20 gm
• Vaginal suppositories (Above Rx used for)
– Local application of antimicrobials
S.H. Majumdar 18
Glycerinated Gelatin Cont.
• Glycerin hygroscopic protect from H2O
– Patient counseling leave in package
• Will support mold and bacterial growth
• Can use preservative
– Propylparaben 0.02% & Methylparaben 0.18%
S.H. Majumdar 22
Base Selection
• Vehicle influences drug release!
– Cocoa butter immiscible with body fluids
• Inhibits diffusion of fat-soluble drugs
• Ionized drugs partition more readily
– Water-miscible bases
• Can dissolve very slowly -> retarding release
• Systemic absorption
– Generally:
• Ionized ⇑ bioavailability
• Nonionized ⇓ bioavailability
• e.g., Codeine phosphate or sulfate is better in cocoa butter than
Codeine
S.H. Majumdar 23
Base Selection Cont.
• Oleaginous vehicles
– Less irritation of rectum
– Less popular in vaginal preparations
• Nonabsorbable residue
• Hydrophilic vehicles
– Less popular rectally
– Slow dissolution
– Vehicle -> relatively slowly cleared vaginally
• Less likely to leak (where no sphincter muscles)
S.H. Majumdar 24
Base Selection Cont.
• Chemical Stability
– Fatty Bases > PEG
S.H. Majumdar 25
Base Selection Cont.
• Cocoa butter has no emulsifier
– Low water uptake 20-30 gm H2O/100 gm
– Tween 61 5-10% increases water absorption
• Surfactants
– ⇑ bioavailability
• Breakup suppository -> faster release
• Disperse drug better
S.H. Majumdar 26
Preparation of Suppositories
• Cold Process
– Hand rolling used with Cocoa Butter base
– Compression mold used with Cocoa butter base &
PEG base
S.H. Majumdar 27
Manufacturing of Suppositories
• Four Methods are used in preparing
suppositories
1. Molding by Hands
2. Compression Molding
3. Pour Molding
4. Automatic Molding Machine
S.H. Majumdar 28
S.H. Majumdar 29
Density (Dose Replacement)
Calculations for suppositories
• The density factors of various bases & drugs need to be known to
determine the proper weights of the ingredients to be used.
• Density factors relative to cocoa butter have been determined.
• If the density factor of a base is not known, it is simply calculated as
the ratio of the blank weight of the base & cocoa butter.
• Three methods of calculating the quantity of base that the active
medication will occupy & the quantities of ingredients required
are:-
– Determination of the dosage replacement factor
– Determination of density factor method
– Determination of occupied volume method
S.H. Majumdar 30
Determination of the dosage
replacement factor
Where
E= the weight of the pure base suppositories
G= the weight of suppositories with X% of the active ingredient.
S.H. Majumdar 31
Determination of density factor
method
Where
A= Average weight of blank
B= Weight of medication per suppository
C= Average weight of medicated suppository
S.H. Majumdar 32
Determination of density factor method
contd…..
1. Determine the average blank weight, (A), per mold using the suppository base
of interest.
2. Weigh the quantity of suppository base necessary for 10 suppositories.
3. Weigh 1 g of medication. The weight of medication per suppository, (B), is
equal to 1g/10 suppositories = 0.1 g / Suppository.
4. Melt the suppository base & incorporate the medication, mix, pour into
molds, cool, trim, & remove from the molds.
5. Weigh the 10 suppositories & determine the average weight (C)
6. Take the weight of the medication required for each suppository & divide by
the density factor of the medication to find the replacement value of the
suppository base.
7. Subtract this quantity from the blank suppository weight.
8. Multiply by the number of suppositories required to obtain the quantity of
base required for prescription.
9. Multiply the weight of drug per suppository by the number of suppositories
required to obtain the quantityS.H.
ofMajumdar
active drug required for the prescription.
33
Determination of density factor method
Example
• Prepare 12 acetoaminophen 300 mg suppositories using cocoa butter. The
average weight of the cocoa butter blank is 2g & the average weight of
medicated suppository is 1.8g.
• Answer: The required weight of the base is 19.4 g & the weight of the active drug
is 2g.
S.H. Majumdar 36
Soluble Drug
• To prevent precipitation of drug powder
1. Melt the Base in order of melting point
2. Add Drug Powder after remove from water bath
3. Pouring into Mold and Let it solidify
S.H. Majumdar 37
Insoluble Drug
1. Melt the Base in Casserole
2. Grind & Mixed with Viscous Melted base on
slab
3. Warm again on Water bath
4. Pour into Mold
5. Cooling wait for Solidify
S.H. Majumdar 38
Lubricant / Lubricating Agent
1. Fatty Base / Hydrophilic
2. Water soluble Base
Liquid paraffin
Rx
• Soft soap 10 ml
• Glycerol 10 ml
• 95%EtOH 50 ml
S.H. Majumdar 39
Method of preparation
S.H. Majumdar 40
S.H. Majumdar 41
S.H. Majumdar 42
S.H. Majumdar 43
S.H. Majumdar 44
Melt the Base in Casserole
S.H. Majumdar 45
S.H. Majumdar 46
S.H. Majumdar 47
S.H. Majumdar 48
S.H. Majumdar 49
S.H. Majumdar 50
S.H. Majumdar 51
Remove excess part via warmed
Spatula
S.H. Majumdar 52
How to Remove Suppository
S.H. Majumdar 53
Packaging & Storage
• Suppositories often are packaged in partitioned
boxes, that hold the suppositories upright. Glycerin
& Glycerinated gelatin suppositories are packaged
in tightly closed screw capped glass containers .
• Commercial suppositories are wrapped individually
in aluminum foil or PVC-polyethylene strip
packaging is the common place.
• Alternatively suppositories may be molded
directly into their primary packaging (molds
formed of plastic or foil).
• Suppositories with low-melting ingredients are
stored in a cool place. Theobroma oil suppositories
in particular , should be refrigerated.
S.H. Majumdar 54
Evaluation of Suppositories
• Physical analysis
– Visual examination
• Color and the surface characteristics
• Odor
• Weight
S.H. Majumdar 56
Liquefaction or softening time test
S.H. Majumdar 57
Suppository penetration test
• A suppository penetration test can be used to
determine the temperature at which the
suppository becomes sufficiently soft for a
penetrating rod to drop through its length.
• The apparatus used is shown in Figure 9.6.
• The temperature is adjusted to that required for
the test, generally about 37◦C.
• The suppository is placed in the device and the
penetration rod gently moved into place. The
device holding the suppository and penetration
rod is lowered into the constant temperature bath
and a stopwatch is started.
• When the penetration rod drops through the
softened suppository the time is recorded.
S.H. Majumdar 58
Mechanical strength/crushing test
• Suppositories can be classified as brittle or
elastic by evaluating the mechanical force
required to break them.
• Tests are used that measure the mass (in
kilograms) that a suppository can bear without
breaking.
• A good result is at least 1.8– 2 kg pressure. In
the example laboratory set-up shown in Figure
9.7, the suppository is positioned in an upright
position and increasing weights are placed on it
until it loses its structure and collapses.
• The purpose of the test is to verify that the
suppository can be transported under normal
conditions, and administered to the patient.
59
Dissolution test
• Early testing was carried out by
simple placement in a beaker
containing a medium.
• In an effort to control the variation
in mass/ medium interface, various
means have been employed,
including a wire mesh basket, or a
membrane, to separate the sample
chamber from the reservoir.
• Samples sealed in dialysis tubing or
natural membranes have also been
studied.
• Flow cell apparatus have been used,
holding the sample in place with
cotton, wire screening, and most
recently with glass beads.
60