Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 75 views

    Filsafat Administrasi Publik: Nurul Fajri & Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah

    Uploaded by

    Sri Nadia
    This document discusses Aaron Wildavsky's views on public administration based on his work "Speaking Truth to Power". It summarizes that Wildavsky saw public administration as: 1. Creatively inventing policy problems that can be solved through policies. 2. Taking an approach that is both artistic in its creativity and scientific in its pursuit of knowledge and problem-solving. 3. Needing to be politically engaged to effectively make a difference, while also maintaining objectivity in its research.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Filsafat Administrasi Publik: Nurul Fajri & Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah

    Uploaded by

    Sri Nadia
    75 views12 pages
    This document discusses Aaron Wildavsky's views on public administration based on his work "Speaking Truth to Power". It summarizes that Wildavsky saw public administration as: 1. Creatively inventing policy problems that can be solved through policies. 2. Taking an approach that is both artistic in its creativity and scientific in its pursuit of knowledge and problem-solving. 3. Needing to be politically engaged to effectively make a difference, while also maintaining objectivity in its research.

    Original Title

    2. Wildavsky.ppt

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses Aaron Wildavsky's views on public administration based on his work "Speaking Truth to Power". It summarizes that Wildavsky saw public administration as: 1. Creatively inventing policy problems that can be solved through policies. 2. Taking an approach that is both artistic in its creativity and scientific in its pursuit of knowledge and problem-solving. 3. Needing to be politically engaged to effectively make a difference, while also maintaining objectivity in its research.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    75 views12 pages

    Filsafat Administrasi Publik: Nurul Fajri & Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah

    Uploaded by

    Sri Nadia
    This document discusses Aaron Wildavsky's views on public administration based on his work "Speaking Truth to Power". It summarizes that Wildavsky saw public administration as: 1. Creatively inventing policy problems that can be solved through policies. 2. Taking an approach that is both artistic in its creativity and scientific in its pursuit of knowledge and problem-solving. 3. Needing to be politically engaged to effectively make a difference, while also maintaining objectivity in its research.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 12

    Filsafat

    Administrasi
    Nurul Fajri & Publik
    Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah
    2

    Topik Perkuliahan
    1. Urgensi Tradisi Filsafat AP
    2. Wildavsky dalam AP
    3

    II. Urgensi Filsafat


     Filsafat?
     Mengapa Administrasi Publik perlu
    mempelajari filsafat?
    II. AP menurut Wildavsky
     Aaron Wildavsky (1930-1943)
    menyelesaikan Ph.D di Univ
    Yale.
     Berkarier di Univ Berkeley dan
    merupakan pendiri Sekolah
    Kebijakan Publik Univ Berkeley
     Presiden American Political
    ‘Analysis As An
    Scientist Association (APSA) Art’,
    in: Speaking
     Salah satu karya master piece Truth To Power
    adl: speaking truth to power (1979)
    5

    AP menurut Wildavsky
    What is/should be PA?

     Inventing problems that can be solved by policies


     There is no (teaching) method
     Making the world a better place
     Piece meal
     Applied science
     Active involvement in politics
     ‘union of opposites’
    6

    AP menurut Wildavsky
    What do you think?

    Anything that did surprise you,


    Any contradiction
    Did you miss anything?
    7

    Note # 1: ‘Art’ atau ‘Truth’?


    On the one hand PA is an Art
    - creatively inventing policy problem (p 3, 14, 15, 16 )
    - there is no one truth (p 7)
    - depends on how society is organised (p 9)

    On the other hand PA is a Science


    - speaking truth (p 12)
    - generating knowledge (p 9)
    - correcting error (p 9)

    Relation between creativity and knowledge?


    What is criterium for real (scientific) knowledge?
    What about post-modernism and constructivism?
    8

    Note # 2: problem solving atau


    knowledge building?
    On the one hand: PA is problem solving

    On the other hand: PA is work of scientist

    Can an ‘applied discipline’ by scientific? In what


    sence?
    9

    Note # 3. Apakah AP mesti


    bersentuhan dengan politik?
    On the one hand PA should be disengaged
    - Policy evaluation by neutral external actor (p 7);
    - No power to experts in democracy (p 12)
    - ‘speaking truth to power’ and no ‘hired gun’

    On the other hand PA really should try to


    make difference
    - Not simply descriptive like sociology, but also prescriptive (p 16)
    - facilitating application of their ideas (10)
    - to supplement knowledge with ‘persuasion’ (p 10)
    - analysis is in part rhetoric (p 13)
    - Policy analists play politics(p 17)

    Should or should not the expert in PA by politically


    engaged? Can he be disengaged?
    10

    Note # 4. Apakah AP adl netral


    atau memiliki nilai
    On the one hand PA has its own values and
    should act upon them
    - preference for policy based on interaction in stead of cogitation’.(p
    12)
    - orientation of PA is progress, enhancement. (p 5)
    - moral considerations are integral to the enterprise (p 13)
    - PA researcher has to his own moral choices to make (p 13)

    On the other hand PA research requires


    objectivity.
    - research should be conducted objectively / following objective criteria
    (p 13, 14)

    Can PA be prescriptive and neutral


    at the same time?
    Is there something special in dealing with
    human interaction as object of research?
    11

    Note # 5. Apakah AP adalah disiplin


    spt ilmu lain yg general atau tidak?
    On the one hand PA is not an discipline
    - PA is econics, political science; cannot be defined (p1, p3, p15)

    On the other hand Pa is particular


    combination
    of disciplines - we readily recognize it without
    being able to say what it is

    In what sense, if any, can PA be said to be a


    combination of disciplines?
    Does the term ‘interdisciplinary discipline’
    have any meaning?
    12

    TERIMA KASIH

    You might also like