Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Beaurucracy

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 36

is a type of organization designed to accomplish

large-scale administrative tasks by systematically


coordinating the work of many individuals.

Peter M. Blau
B u r e a u c r a c y in M o d e r n S o c i e t y
“is reflected in certain specific forms of organizational
behavior: hierarchy, subdivision, specialization, fixed
way of doing things, and professionalization.”

by Dimock,
“It is a specific form of social organization
for administrative purposes.”

Nigro and Nigro,


Socorro S. Espiritu, a Filipino sociologist. Espiritu said
that bureaucratic structures in institutions are not
necessarily confined to political organizations. They tend
to develop wherever it is necessary to coordinate the
activities of many people. Bureaucracy offers both an
efficient mechanism for reaching institutional goals and
the danger of allowing the mechanism to appear more
important than the service it is supposed to perform.
“Bureaucracy is the best form of the organization. As
an organization, it substitutes a rule of law based on
the whims of those who happen to govern.”

Maxx Weber’s point of view,


1. BASIC CONCEPTS OF BUREAUCRACY
2. DEVELOPMENT OF BUREAUCRATIC
ORGANIZATIONS
3.CHARACTERISTICS OF BUREAUCRACY
4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY
5.PHILIPPINE BUREAUCRATIC BEHAVIOR
1. BASIC CONCEPTS OF BUREAUCRACY

BUREAUCRACY is “ a specific form of social


organization for administrative purposes”
BUREAUCRACY is reflected in certain specific forms
of organizational behavior:
hierarchy, subdivision, specialization, fixed ways of
doing things, and personalization.
Marcial E. Dimock
BUREAUCRACY is “ that type of hierarchical
organization which is designed rationally to
coordinate the work of many individuals in pursuit
of large-scale administrative tasks.”
Dalton E. McFarland
2.DEVELOPMENT OF BUREAUCRATIC ORGANIZATIONS

- William G. Scott and Terence R. Mitchell


2.DEVELOPMENT OF BUREAUCRATIC ORGANIZATIONS

-Max Weber
2.DEVELOPMENT OF BUREAUCRATIC ORGANIZATIONS
2.DEVELOPMENT OF BUREAUCRATIC ORGANIZATIONS
2.DEVELOPMENT OF BUREAUCRATIC ORGANIZATIONS
3.CHARACTERISTICS OF BUREAUCRACY

 Large and complex organization as measured by


the number of people it employed;
 Majority of those employed were
performing semi-skilled and unskilled
works;
 Relatively simple product is produced.
3.CHARACTERISTICS OF BUREAUCRACY

 Position and offices are clearly defined.


 The hierarchical arrangement of authority,
rights, and obligations are specially drawn.
 The personnel are selected on basis of technical
or professional qualifications.
 There are defined rules governing official behavior.
 Security of tenure and pursuit of a career with
promotion in the hierarchy are assured.
4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY

1.Vulnerability to nepotism.
2.Perpetuation of the spoils system.
3.Apathetic public reaction to bureaucratic misconduct
4. Availability of external peaceful means of correcting
bureaucratic weaknesses.
5.Survival of historical experience.
6.Non-special typing of bureaucrats.
7.Lack of independence from politics.
8.Essential instruments of social change.
4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY

1.Vulnerability to nepotism.
.

.
2. Perpetuation of the spoils system.
3.Apathetic public reaction to bureaucratic misconduct
4.Availability of external peaceful means of correcting
bureaucratic weaknesses.
5.Survival of historical experience.
4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY

1.Vulnerability to nepotism.
2.Perpetuation of the spoils system.

3.Apathetic public reaction to bureaucratic misconduct


4.Availability of external peaceful means of correcting
bureaucratic weaknesses.
5.Survival of historical experience.
6.Non-special typing of bureaucrats.
4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY

1.Vulnerability to nepotism.
2.Perpetuation of the spoils system.
3.Apathetic public reaction to bureaucratic misconduct

4. Availability of external peaceful means of correcting


bureaucratic weaknesses.
5.Survival of historical experience.
4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY

1.Vulnerability to nepotism.
2.Perpetuation of the spoils system.
3.Apathetic public reaction to bureaucratic
misconduct.
4. Availability of external peaceful means of correcting
bureaucratic weaknesses.

5.Survival of historical experience.


6.Non-special typing of bureaucrats.
4. CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY

5.Survival of historical experience.

6.Non-special typing of bureaucrats.


7.Lack of independence from politics.
8.Essential instruments of social change.
4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY

5.Survival of historical experience.


6.Non-special typing of bureaucrats.

7.Lack of independence from politics.


8.Essential instruments of social change.
4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY

5.Survival of historical experience.


6.Non-special typing of bureaucrats.
7.Lack of independence from politics.

8.Essential instruments of social change.


4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY

5.Survival of historical experience.


6.Non-special typing of bureaucrats.
7.Lack of independence from politics.
8.Essential instruments of social change.
4.CHARACTERISTICS OF PHILIPIPPINE
BUREAUCRACY
SEVERAL ISSUES RISEN AS INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL DE
IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE PHILIPPINE BUREAUCRACY.

1.Bureaucratic resistance to change.


2. Socio-economic, political, cultural and ecological
constraints to administrative change.
3.Problems in the transfer of technology and
adaption.
5.PHILIPPINE BUREAUCRATIC BEHAVIOR

1.Conformity to policies.
2.Preference toward continuity and
routinization.
3.Loss of self-direction or self-assertion.
4.Politically supportive.
The Filipinos are status-oriented. Authority figures
determine, to a large extent, the satisfaction or
frustration of the Filipino’s aspiration for social
acceptance, economic security, and social mobility.
Other characteristics of the Filipino bureaucrats,
such as bahala na, saka na, awa(pity), amor propio
(self-esteem), also greatly affected the Philippine
bureaucratic behavior
Greed, laziness and ignorance are among the
vices that have weakend the bureaucratic system.
While the people afflicted with these vices constitute
less than one percent of the entire civil service in the
Philippines, they have tainted the vast majority of
honest, selfless, and dedicated government workers.
efficiency
personnel administration.
Thank you!
• “

You might also like