Powergrid Presentation
Powergrid Presentation
Powergrid Presentation
EFFECTIVENESS OF
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
SYSTEM
AT
POWER
GRID, RHQ, ERTS – II,
KOLKATA
Presented by
ABHISEK SINGH TOMAR
Roll No. - 04
MPMIR (2018-2020)
• COMPANY PROFILE.
FLOW OF
• INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY.
PRESENTATION • OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY.
• RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & LIMITATIONS.
• QUESTIONNAIRE.
• DATA ANALYSIS.
• CONCLUSIONS DRAWN.
• SUGGESTIONS.
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
This questionnaire is prepared for executive staffs at workplace for the survey that is meant for
investigation of believe and expectations about workplace and their own performance at workplace.
To understand how effective the current performance appraisal system functioning at POWERGRID.
COMPANY PROFILE
VISION
“World Class, Integrated, Global Transmission Company With Dominant Leadership in Emerging Power
Markets Ensuring Reliability, Safety and Economy”
MISSION
To become a Global Transmission Company with Dominant Leadership in Emerging Power Markets with
World Class Capabilities by becoming world class, global, innovative and by committing to highest
standards in health, safety, security and environment.
It was established under companies act, 1956 on October 23, 1989.
Headquartered in Gurugram, India.
Transmits about 50% of the total power generating in India.
Span of 11 RHQs and 13 Subsidiaries all over the Indian continent.
A " MAHARATNA" central public sector enterprise which is the largest electric power transmission
utility.
INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Performance Appraisal is a method of evaluating the behavior of employees in the work spot,
normally including both the qualitative and qualitative aspects of job performance. It is a systematic
and objective way of evaluating both work-related behavior and potential of employees.
METHODS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AT POWEGRID RHQ KOLKATA
POWERGRID has its own set up module which is mainly based on KRA (Key Result
Area).POWERGRID mostly involve three performance appraisal method which are Rating Scale,
Management-By-Objective (MBO) and Force Distribution Method.
KRAs -: KRAs stand for Key Result Areas i.e. important areas of work for which an employee is
responsible and accountable for.
ESSENTIALS OF KRA (KEY RESULT AREAS) PROCESS
I. Mutual discussion between appraiser and appraisee.
II. KRAs setting exercise at the beginning of appraisal period.
III. Monitoring of the KRA achievement.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY &
LIMITATIONS
METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
The data collection for this study consists of two types namely:-
I. Primary Data.
II. Secondary Data.
INFORMATION FROM THE PRIMARY DATA
The primary data are collected through the questionnaire survey method and direct communication with the
employees as and when needed.
INFORMATION FROM SECONDARY DATA
I. Previous report and websites of the organization.
II. Internet.
SAMPLING UNIT
The sampling units for the purpose of the survey were employees of the POWERGRID, RHQ, ER-
II, KOLKATA.
CONT'D
SAMPLE SIZE
The sample size for the study was 25 respondents.
SAMPLE PROCEDURE
The procedure followed in choosing the respondents is a simple random sample
PLAN OF ANALYSIS
The data collected through questionnaires from 25 employees were in crude form. In order to convert it into
readable form; the data collected was presented in the form of tables. The information in the tables was converted
into percentage form to ease the analysis. Also, pie chart has been presented for more clarity of the analysis.
LIMITATIONS
1. The scope of the study was restricted only to RHQ, ER-II, KOLKATA
2. Some of the employees were not so cooperative in nature. Many of employees did not agree to the need and
utility of the project and hence did not agree to provide with information.
3. The respondents chosen were mainly from AM, TELECOM and HRM department so the results don’t include
the responses of employees from other departments.
4. The answers given by the respondents have to be believed and have to be taken as truly reflecting their
perception.
DATA
ANALYSIS
Gender of
respondents:-
How would you
rate the
performance
appraisal
method in your
organization?
The
Performance
appraisal
process of
your
organization is
fair?
To what extent
performance
appraisal system in
your organization
assess training &
development needs?
How much you
are involved in
setting objective
& target for your
future
performance?
You believe that
performance
appraisal system in
your organization
gives your
accurate
performance
review?
Performance
appraisal system
helps to create a
cooperative
environment and
healthy
competition
among
employees?
To what extent
you are satisfied
with
performance
appraisal system
of your
organization?
Performance
appraisal system
helps you to
understand how
your performance
impacts your
organization?
The performance
appraisal system
in your
organization
helps you to
identify your
strength and
weakness?
Performance
appraisal system
helps you to
improve your job
performance?
To what extent
performance
appraisal system in
your organization
determine
promotion/demotion
/ termination
decisions?
CONCLUSIONS DRAWN
GLASS CEILING.
INGROUP FAVOURITISM.