The Simple Regression Model

y = b0 + b1x + u
Some Terminology
In the simple linear regression model,
where y = b0 + b1x + u, we typically refer
to y as the
 Dependent Variable, or
 Left-Hand Side Variable, or
 Explained Variable, or
 Regressand
Some Terminology, cont.
In the simple linear regression of y on x,
we typically refer to x as the
 Independent Variable, or
 Right-Hand Side Variable, or
 Explanatory Variable, or
 Regressor, or
 Covariate, or
 Control Variables
A Simple Assumption
The average value of u, the error term, in
the population is 0. That is,

E(u) = 0

This is not a restrictive assumption, since

we can always use b0 to normalize E(u) to 0
Zero Conditional Mean
We need to make a crucial assumption
about how u and x are related
We want it to be the case that knowing
something about x does not give us any
information about u, so that they are
completely unrelated. That is, that
E(u|x) = E(u) = 0, which implies
E(y|x) = b0 + b1x
E(y|x) as a linear function of x, where for any x
the distribution of y is centered about E(y|x)
y
f(y)

.E(y|x) = b + b x
.
0 1

x1 x2
Ordinary Least Squares
Basic idea of regression is to estimate the
population parameters from a sample
Let {(xi,yi): i=1, …,n} denote a random
sample of size n from the population
For each observation in this sample, it will
be the case that
yi = b0 + b1xi + ui
Population regression line, sample data points
and the associated error terms
y E(y|x) = b0 + b1x
y4 .{
u4

y3 .} u3
y2 u2 {.

y1 .} u1

x1 x2 x3 x4 x
Deriving OLS Estimates
To derive the OLS estimates we need to
realize that our main assumption of E(u|x) =
E(u) = 0 also implies that

Cov(x,u) = E(xu) = 0

Why? Remember from basic probability

that Cov(X,Y) = E(XY) – E(X)E(Y)
Deriving OLS continued
We can write our 2 restrictions just in terms
of x, y, b0 and b1 , since u = y – b0 – b1x

E(y – b0 – b1x) = 0
E[x(y – b0 – b1x)] = 0

These are called moment restrictions

Deriving OLS using M.O.M.
The method of moments approach to
estimation implies imposing the population
moment restrictions on the sample moments

What does this mean? Recall that for

E(X), the mean of a population distribution,
a sample estimator of E(X) is simply the
arithmetic mean of the sample
More Derivation of OLS
We want to choose values of the parameters that
will ensure that the sample versions of our
moment restrictions are true
The sample versions are as follows:

 y 
n
n 1
i  ˆ 0  ˆ 1 x i  0
i 1

 
n
n 1

i 1
x i y i  ˆ 0  ˆ 1 x i  0
More Derivation of OLS
Given the definition of a sample mean, and
properties of summation, we can rewrite the first
condition as follows

y  ˆ0  ˆ1 x ,
or
ˆ0  y  ˆ1 x
More Derivation of OLS

   
n

 i i
x
i 1
y  y  ˆ x  ˆ x  0
 1 1 i

n n
x 
 i iy  y   ˆ
 1  xi  xi  x 
i 1 i 1
n n

  xi  x  yi  y   1   xi  x 
ˆ 2

i 1 i 1
So the OLS estimated slope is
n

  x  x  y
i i  y
ˆ1  i 1
n

 x  x
2
i
i 1
n
provided that   xi  x   0
2

i 1
Summary of OLS slope estimate
The slope estimate is the sample
covariance between x and y divided by the
sample variance of x
If x and y are positively correlated, the
slope will be positive
If x and y are negatively correlated, the
slope will be negative
Only need x to vary in our sample
More OLS
Intuitively, OLS is fitting a line through the
sample points such that the sum of squared
residuals is as small as possible, hence the
term least squares
The residual, û, is an estimate of the error
term, u, and is the difference between the
fitted line (sample regression function) and
the sample point
Sample regression line, sample data points
and the associated estimated error terms
y
y4 .
û4 {
yˆ  ˆ0  ˆ1 x
y3 .} û3
y2 û2 {.

} û1
y1 .
x1 x2 x3 x4 x
Alternate approach to derivation
Given the intuitive idea of fitting a line, we can
set up a formal minimization problem
That is, we want to choose our parameters such
that we minimize the following:

 
n n

 ui   yi   0  1 xi
2
ˆ ˆ ˆ
i 1 i 1
Alternate approach, continued
If one uses calculus to solve the minimization
problem for the two parameters you obtain the
following first order conditions, which are the
same as we obtained before, multiplied by n

 y 
n

i  ˆ 0  ˆ1 x i  0
i 1

 
n

i 1
x i y i  ˆ 0  ˆ1 x i  0
Algebraic Properties of OLS
The sum of the OLS residuals is zero
Thus, the sample average of the OLS
residuals is zero as well
The sample covariance between the
regressors and the OLS residuals is zero
The OLS regression line always goes
through the mean of the sample
Algebraic Properties (precise)
n

n  uˆ i

 uˆi  0 and thus,

i 1
i 1
n
0
n

 x uˆ
i 1
i i 0

y  ˆ 0  ˆ1 x
More terminology
We can think of each observation as being made
up of an explained part, and an unexplained part,
yi  yˆ i  uˆi We then define the following :
  y  y  is the total sum of squares (SST)
2
i

  yˆ  y  is the explained sum of squares (SSE)

2
i

 uˆ is the residual sum of squares (SSR)

2
i

Then SST  SSE  SSR

Proof that SST = SSE + SSR

  y  y      y  yˆ    yˆ  y  
2 2
i i i i

   uˆ   yˆ  y  
2
i i

  uˆ  2 uˆ  yˆ  y     yˆ  y 
2 2
i i i i

 SSR  2 uˆ  yˆ  y   SSE
i i

and we know that  uˆ  yˆ  y   0 i i

Goodness-of-Fit
How do we think about how well our
sample regression line fits our sample data?

Can compute the fraction of the total sum

of squares (SST) that is explained by the
model, call this the R-squared of regression

R2 = SSE/SST = 1 – SSR/SST
Using Stata for OLS regressions
Now that we’ve derived the formula for
calculating the OLS estimates of our
parameters, you’ll be happy to know you
don’t have to compute them by hand
Regressions in Stata are very simple, to run
the regression of y on x, just type
reg y x
Unbiasedness of OLS
Assume the population model is linear in
parameters as y = b0 + b1x + u
Assume we can use a random sample of
size n, {(xi, yi): i=1, 2, …, n}, from the
population model. Thus we can write the
sample model yi = b0 + b1xi + ui
Assume E(u|x) = 0 and thus E(ui|xi) = 0
Assume there is variation in the xi
Unbiasedness of OLS (cont)
In order to think about unbiasedness, we need to
rewrite our estimator in terms of the population
parameter
Start with a simple rewrite of the formula as

  x  x y
ˆ1  i
2
i
, where
s x

s    xi  x 
2 2
x
Unbiasedness of OLS (cont)

  x  x  y   x  x     x
i i i 0 1 i  ui  
  x  x     x  x  x
i 0 i 1 i

   x  x u 
i i

   x  x      x  x x
0 i 1 i i

   x  x u
i i
Unbiasedness of OLS (cont)
  x  x   0,
i

 x  xx   x  x
2
i i i

so, the numerator can be rewritten as

 s    xi  x ui , and thus
2
1 x

  x  x u
ˆ1  1  i
2
i

s x
Unbiasedness of OLS (cont)

let d i   xi  x  , so that
 1 
 i  1   2  d i ui , then
ˆ
 sx 

 
ˆ  1 
E  1  1   2   d i E  ui   1
 sx 
Unbiasedness Summary
The OLS estimates of b1 and b0 are
unbiased
Proof of unbiasedness depends on our 4
assumptions – if any assumption fails, then
OLS is not necessarily unbiased
Remember unbiasedness is a description of
the estimator – in a given sample we may
be “near” or “far” from the true parameter
Variance of the OLS Estimators
Now we know that the sampling
distribution of our estimate is centered
around the true parameter
Want to think about how spread out this
distribution is
Much easier to think about this variance
under an additional assumption, so
Assume Var(u|x) = s2 (Homoskedasticity)
Variance of OLS (cont)
Var(u|x) = E(u2|x)-[E(u|x)]2
E(u|x) = 0, so s2 = E(u2|x) = E(u2) = Var(u)
Thus s2 is also the unconditional variance,
called the error variance
s, the square root of the error variance is
called the standard deviation of the error
Can say: E(y|x)=b0 + b1x and Var(y|x) = s2
Homoskedastic Case
y
f(y|x)

.E(y|x) = b + b x
.
0 1

x1 x2
 Heteroskedastic Case
f(y|x)

y
.
. E(y|x) = b0 +

. b1x

x1 x2 x3 x
Variance of OLS (cont)
ˆ     1 
Var  1  Var   1  

2  d i ui 
 
  sx  
2 2

2  Var   d i u i   
 1   1 

 sx 
2
 sx 
 i Var  ui 
d 2

2 2
 1   1 
 2
 sx 
 d     s x2 
i
2 2 2
 i 
d 2

 
2
 1  2 2 ˆ
 2
2  sx  2  Var  1
 sx  sx
Variance of OLS Summary
The larger the error variance, s2, the larger
the variance of the slope estimate
The larger the variability in the xi, the
smaller the variance of the slope estimate
As a result, a larger sample size should
decrease the variance of the slope estimate
Problem that the error variance is unknown
Estimating the Error Variance
We don’t know what the error variance, s2,
is, because we don’t observe the errors, ui

What we observe are the residuals, ûi

We can use the residuals to form an

estimate of the error variance
Error Variance Estimate (cont)

uˆi  yi  ˆ0  ˆ1 xi

   0  1 xi  ui   ˆ0  ˆ1 xi
i 
 u  ˆ    ˆ  
0 0   1 1 
Then, an unbiased estimator of  2 is
1
 
ˆ2
 ui  SSR /  n  2 
ˆ 2

 n  2
Error Variance Estimate (cont)
ˆ  ˆ 2  Standard error of the regression
 
recall that sd ˆ  
sx
if we substitute ˆ for  then we have
the standard error of ˆ , 1

  
se ˆ1  ˆ /   xi  x 
2
 1
2