The document discusses accomplices and the need for independent corroboration under Islamic jurisprudence and Pakistan's legal system. It notes that Islamic law requires certain witness qualifications and corroborating evidence. Pakistan's Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order allows accomplice testimony without corroboration, but its illustrations say accomplices are unworthy of credit without material corroboration. The document recommends adding a requirement for independent corroboration to the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order and bringing laws in line with the Quran and Sunnah per Pakistan's constitution.
The document discusses accomplices and the need for independent corroboration under Islamic jurisprudence and Pakistan's legal system. It notes that Islamic law requires certain witness qualifications and corroborating evidence. Pakistan's Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order allows accomplice testimony without corroboration, but its illustrations say accomplices are unworthy of credit without material corroboration. The document recommends adding a requirement for independent corroboration to the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order and bringing laws in line with the Quran and Sunnah per Pakistan's constitution.
The document discusses accomplices and the need for independent corroboration under Islamic jurisprudence and Pakistan's legal system. It notes that Islamic law requires certain witness qualifications and corroborating evidence. Pakistan's Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order allows accomplice testimony without corroboration, but its illustrations say accomplices are unworthy of credit without material corroboration. The document recommends adding a requirement for independent corroboration to the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order and bringing laws in line with the Quran and Sunnah per Pakistan's constitution.
The document discusses accomplices and the need for independent corroboration under Islamic jurisprudence and Pakistan's legal system. It notes that Islamic law requires certain witness qualifications and corroborating evidence. Pakistan's Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order allows accomplice testimony without corroboration, but its illustrations say accomplices are unworthy of credit without material corroboration. The document recommends adding a requirement for independent corroboration to the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order and bringing laws in line with the Quran and Sunnah per Pakistan's constitution.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15
EVIDENTARY VALUE OF ACCOMPLICE
AND THE ESSENTIALITY OF
INDEPENDENT CORROBORATION
Project Group Members:
Mahnoor Paracha Sundar Mahmood ACCOMPLICE UNDER THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE
• The Federal Shariat court back in 1991 declared article 16 of
the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order as un-Islamic • Islamic law lays down certain qualifications and requirements for a witness • The federal Shariat Court interpreted verse number 112 of Surrah “al-Nisa” and said that this verse refers to the concept of an approver where Allah says“anyone who earns a fault or a sin and throws their fault or sin on those who may not be a sinner he carries falsehood and a flagrant sin”. • The term Khain also holds immense importance in our prospective and means a person who betrays trust. ACCOMPLICE
• Pakistani courts defines accomplice as one who is a partner or
has a relation to the crime committed and is jointly implicated with another accused, it also indicates that the offenders were more than one. • US law defines accomplice , US law as one who actively participates in the commission of offence with intent. • Article 16 of Qanoon-e-Shadat Ordinance, 1984. An accomplice is one who is guilty associates or partners in the commission of crime or who admits that he has a conscious hand in the commission of crime. ACCOMPLICE UNDER PAKISTAN’S LEGAL SYSTEM • Qanoon e Shahdat Order , is enshrined under the article that an accomplice is a competent witness against the other co- accused even without corroboration. Though it is provided under the illustrations of article of 129 (b) than an accomplice is unworthy of credit hence material corroboration shall be there. • There seems to be a contradiction in between article 16 and illustration (b) provided under article 129 of the Qanoon-e- Shahdat Order 1984. • The courts in this regard have held that the former is a provision of law whereas the later is a rule of prudence. INDEPENDENT CORROBORATION
• The term independent corroboration means literally
that something is free from the influence of anything, it also means self-governing. • whether evidence produced by an accomplice can be corroborated with the hearsay evidence? • It was held by the court that any hearsay statement produced by an accomplice cannot be produced against an accused person but can be made a tool to corroborate or to impeach a witness’s credit but in no case they are substantive piece of evidence RECORDING OF STATEMENT UNDER THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE,1898
• Code of Criminal Procedure general provisions, as to inquire
and trials a detailed concept tender of pardon to an accomplice is given, sections varying from 337 to 339-A of CrPC.
• Any trial of whose punishment may extend to 10 years or is
punishable under section 211 of the Pakistan Penal Code or section 216-A, 369, 401, 135, 477-A, the prosecution at any stage of trial to obtain evidence may tender a pardon to a person who directly or indirectly took part in the commission of that offence. BHUTTO CASE IN CONTRADICTION WITH CrPC
• No accomplice can be made in Hudood and Criminal cases
unless and until there is corroboration of an evidence to punish the accused. But Judgment in Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto case is in contradiction with this point.
• Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto v. The State
• Bhutto was convicted and later hanged on the testimony of an
accomplice and hearsay evidence . RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Independent corroboration is necessary whenever an accomplice put
forwards his evidence before the court as a prosecution witness.
2. The term independent corroboration be added in the existing article
of the QSO ,1984. • The term independent corroboration be added within QSO,1984, the courts in Pakistan have considered it safe to convict an accused on the sole testimony of an accused whereas on the in the other legal regimes it has not only been termed as dangerous but some legal regimes have totally and wholly rejected this concept. 3. Existing article be brought within the ambit of Quran and Sunnah as per article 227 of the Constitution of Pakistan.:
• under article 227 of the Constitution of Pakistan it is mandatory
upon the state to bring all exsisting laws within the ambit of injunction provided in the Holy Qurran and Sunnah of the Prophet. • They have also made the verse of the Holy Quran a part of their judgment where it is stipulated that if information is brought to you by a Khayn then you must check it from other sources. • They have not declared the article under discussion repugnant to Islam whereas they have also declared sections varying from 337- 339-A of the code of Criminal Procedure Code repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam. Thank you