Designing The Distribution Network in A Supply Chain
Designing The Distribution Network in A Supply Chain
Designing The Distribution Network in A Supply Chain
Chapter 4
Designing the Distribution
Network in a Supply Chain
4-1
Important Topic
4-2
Outline
The Role of Distribution in the Supply Chain
Factors Influencing Distribution Network Design
Design Options for a Distribution Network
The Value of Distributors in the Supply Chain
Distribution Networks in Practice
Summary of Learning Objectives
4-3
Goal
4-4
The Role of Distribution
in the Supply Chain
Distribution: the steps taken to move and store a
product from the supplier stage to the customer stage
in a supply chain
Distribution directly affects cost and the customer
experience and therefore drives profitability
Choice of distribution network can achieve supply
chain objectives from low cost to high responsiveness
Examples: Wal-Mart, Dell, HP, Proctor & Gamble
4-5
Some key questions????
Which distribution network is the best?
What value does each distributor provide?
When should a new distributor be added?
E-business killes distributors, so?
Why are distributors more significant in some
countries, like India?
4-6
Factors Influencing
Distribution Network Design
Distribution network performance is evaluated along
two dimensions at the highest level:
– Customer needs that are met
– Cost of meeting customer needs
Distribution network design options must therefore be
compared according to their impact on customer
service and the cost to provide this level of service
4-7
Factors Influencing
Distribution Network Design
Elements of customer service influenced by network structure:
– Response time
– Product variety
– Product availability Priority among these is important!
– Customer experience
– Order visibility
– Returnability
Supply chain costs affected by network structure:
– Inventories
– Transportation
– Facilities and handling
– Information
4-8
Service and Number of Facilities
(Fig. 4.1)
Response Time
Number of
Facilities
4-9
The Cost-Response Time Frontier
High Local FG
Mix
Regional FG
Local WIP
Cost Central FG
Central WIP
4-10
Inventory Costs and Number
of Facilities (Fig. 4.2)
Inventory
Costs
Number of facilities
4-11
Transportation costs
Inbound transportation costs: cost of bringing the material into a facility
4-12
Transportation Costs and
Number of Facilities (Fig. 4.3)
Transportation
Costs
Number of facilities
4-13
Facility Costs and Number
of Facilities (Fig. 4.4)
Facility
Costs
Number of facilities
4-14
Total Costs Related to
Number of Facilities
Total Costs
Total Costs
Facilities
Inventory
Transportation
Number of Facilities
4-15
Variation in Logistics Costs and Response Time with Number of Facilities (Fig.
4.5)
Response Time
Number of Facilities
4-16
Key Decisions in Designing a
Distribution Network
1. Will product be delivered to the customer location or
picked up from a preordinated site?
4-17
Design Options for a
Distribution Network
Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping
Manufacturer Storage with Direct Shipping and In-
Transit Merge
Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery
Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery
Manufacturer or Distributor Storage with Consumer
Pickup
Retail Storage with Consumer Pickup
4-18
Manufacturer Storage with
Direct (Drop) Shipping (Fig. 4.6)
Manufacturer
Retailer
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
4-19
Drop Shipping
Centralization is beneficial if there is high variety, high value
items with low and unpredictable demand.
Centralized inventories leading to high product availability,
low inventory levels (higher inventory turnovers), better
forecasts.
Manufacturer can postpone customization until order arrival.
Partial shipments introduce complexity, hard to implement if
there are more than 20-30 sourcing locations
Ex: Furniture orders from both Kelebek Mobilya and Sauders
4-20
Performance Characteristics:
Drop Shipping
Inventory Lower due to aggregation. Benefit is larger if low demand,
high value items, if there is postponement
Transportation Higher due to increased distances and partial shipping
Cost
Facilities and Lower fixed costs. Better handling costs if direct shipment
Factor handling from production line.
Information Higher, since info flow is essential b/w manuf. and retailer.
Service Customer experience Good since there is home delivery but partial shipments
factor may increase complexity.
Order visibility Very important for customer but more difficult since an
integration of retailer and manuf. info systems is needed
Returnability Expensive and difficult. Return to manuf. vs. return to 4-21
In-Transit Merge Network (Fig. 4.7)
Factories
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
4-22
In-Transit Merge Network
In-transit merge combines pieces of order coming from
different locations, so the customer receives the order by single
delivery.
Ex: Order a Dell pc with a Sony Monitor.
Beneficial for high value items with low to medium demand,
4-5 sources.
Main advantage over drop shipping: Lower transportation cost
and improved customer experience!
4-23
Performance Characteristics:
In-Transit Merge Network
Inventory Similar to drop shipping
Transportation Somewhat lower than drop shipping
Cost Facilities and Higher handling costs than drop shipping; lower receiving
Factor handling costs at customer
Information Higher than drop shipping
4-24
Distributor Storage with
Carrier Delivery (Fig. 4.8)
Factories
Warehouse Storage by
Distributor/Retailer
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
4-25
Distributor Storage with
Carrier Delivery
Inventory is not held by the manufacturers, but is held by
distributor/retailer in intermediate warehouses.
Package carriers are used to transport items from the retailer to
the customer. Ex: Amazon
Higher inventory capacity is needed than the manufacturer,
since demand uncertainty is aggregated at a lower level!
Better for medium to fast moving items. Better response time,
lower transportation costs when compared to manufacturer
storage.
Distributor storage can handle somewhat lower variety than
manufacturer storage but it is better than a chain of retailers.
4-26
Performance Characteristics:
Distributor Storage with Carrier Delivery
Inventory Higher than manufacturer storage. Difference is not large
for fast moving items.
Transportation Lower than manufacturer storage. Reduction is highest for
Cost fast moving items.
Factor Facilities and Somewhat higher than manufacturer storage
handling
Information Simpler structure compared to manufacturer storage.
Factories
Distributor/Retailer
Warehouse
Customers
Product Flow
Information Flow
4-28
Distributor Storage with
Last Mile Delivery
Disributor/retailer delivers the product to the customer’s home
instead of using a package carrier.
Requires distributor warehouse to be very close to the customer,
so more warehouses are needed when compared to package
delivery.
Suitable for fast moving items where disaggregation does not
lead to significant increase of inventory.
Hard to justify this option when labor cost is high.
Can only be justified when there is large customer demand at
this higher price. Very short response time, better customer
experience and returnability.
Last mile delivery should be integrated with the existing
distribution network.
4-29
Performance Characteristics:
Distributor Storage with Last Mile Delivery
Inventory Higher than distributer storage with package delivery, since
uncertainty is aggregated in lower level with larger # of
distributers
Transportation Higher than any other distribution option. Maybe somewhat
Cost cheaper in large and dense cities
Factor Facilities and Higher than all options but lower than chain of retail stores.
handling
Information Similar to distributor storage with package carrier delivery.
Pickup Sites
Customers
Customer Flow
Product Flow
Information Flow 4-31
Manufacturer or Distributor Storage
with Customer Pickup
Inventory is stored at the manufacturer or distributor
warehouse (cross dock), customer place orders on line or via
call center and come to designated pickup points to collect
their orders.
Ex: 7-Eleven Japan
Inventory and transportation costs are low due to appropriate
aggregation
4-32
Performance Characteristics:
Manufacturer or Distributor Storage
with Customer Pickup
Inventory Can be as low as possible by appropriate aggregation
Transportation Lower than the use of package carriers
Cost Facilities and Can be very high if new facilities have to be built. The
Factor handling increase in the handling cost at the pickup site can be large.
Information High investment is required
4-34
Performance Characteristics:
Retailer Storage with Customer Pickup
Inventory Higher than all options
Transportation Lower than all other options
Cost Facilities and Higher than other options. The increase in the handling cost
Factor handling at the pickup site can be large.
Information High investment is required for online and phone orders
4-35
Comparative Performance of Delivery
Network Designs (Table 4.7)
Retail Storage
Manufacturer Manufacturer Distributor Storage Distributor Manufacturer or
with Customer
Storage with Direct Storage with In- with Package storage with last distributor storage
Pickup
Shipping Transit Merge Carrier Delivery mile delivery with pickup
Response Time 4 4 3 2 4 1
Product Variety 4
1 1 2 3 1
Product Availability 2 3 4
1 1 1
Customer Experience
4 3 2 1 5 5
Order Visibility 5 4 3 2 6 1
Returnability 5 5 4 3 2 1
Inventory 1 1 2 3 1 4
Transportation 4 3 2 5 1 1
4-37
The Value of Distributors
in the Supply Chain
Distributing Consumer Goods in India
– Selling fast moving consumer goods with large # retailers,
– Distributors close to retailers is crutial to reduce transportation costs and
reduce response time
Distributing MRO (maintenance, repair, operations) Products
– Demand is uncertain, low product value, high variety
– Distributors close to customers is crutial to reduce transportation costs
and reduce response time
– Keep aggregate safety inventory
Distributing Electronic Components
– Intel, Texas Inst., Motorola are few suppliers for large # of original
equipment manufacturers (OIMs).
– 80:20 applies so sell directly to big OIMs.
– Use distributors for small OIMs.
4-38
Value of Distributors
Distributors add value to the SC when
– Demand is large in small quantities
– There are several manufacturers.
SC performance improves due to
– Reduced inbound transportation cost due to TL shipments from
manufacturer to distributor.
– Reduced outbound trans. cost since several retailers are satisfied in one
shipment.
– Reduction in inventory costs by keeping aggregate safety stocks as
compared to retailer stocks.
– Stable orders from manufacturer to retailer.
– Better response time than manufacturers.
– High product variety at one large store
4-39
Distribution Networks in Practice
The ownership structure of the distribution network
can have as big as an impact as the type of distribution
network
The choice of a distribution network has very long-
term consequences
Consider whether an exclusive distribution strategy is
advantageous
Product, price, commoditization, and criticality have
an impact on the type of distribution system preferred
by customers
4-40
E-Business and the Distribution
Network
Impact of E-Business on Customer Service
Impact of E-Business on Cost
Using E-Business: Dell, Amazon, Peapod, Grainger
4-41
Distribution Networks in Practice
The ownership structure of the distribution network
can have as big as an impact as the type of distribution
network
The choice of a distribution network has very long-
term consequences
Consider whether an exclusive distribution strategy is
advantageous
Product, price, commoditization, and criticality have
an impact on the type of distribution system preferred
by customers
4-42
Summary of Learning Objectives
What are the key factors to be considered when
designing the distribution network?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of various
distribution options?
What roles do distributors play in the supply chain?
4-43