Group 12 - Havas
Group 12 - Havas
Group 12 - Havas
Group 12
Aditya Singh PGP09128
Pardeep Singh PGP10159
Surbhi PGP10181
Varis Kumar Kalia PGP10185
Sanyam Kumar PGP10229
Background
● As of 2013, Havas was the 6th largest global advertising, digital, and
communications group in the world
● Headquartered in Paris, France, the group was highly decentralized, with
semi-independent agencies in more than 100 countries offering a variety of
services
● The largest unit of Havas was Havas Worldwide, an integrated marketing
communications agency headquartered in New York
● CEO David Jones was determined to make Havas Worldwide the most future-
focused agency in the industry by becoming a leader in digital innovation
Problem Analysis: Adjusting to the new normal
● In an age of social media sharing, advertisements that caught the public's
imagination could be disseminated rapidly and widely at little cost to the
company
● Roller Babies commercial for Evian mineral water had almost 200 million
views and led to a sales increase of 7% and a market share increase of 13%
for Evian
● With digital, access to detailed, specific consumer data made it possible for
clients to manage return on investment in new creative ways
● Creating successful campaigns online required different talents than creating
successful ads for print or TV
● Requirement to revisit and reintegrate the internal structure to leverage digital
capabilities better and meet customer expectations more effectively
Working Their Way: The Victors & Spoils Experiment
● Crowdsourcing model to be adopted to generate content with wide variety
● Victors & Spoils was the first advertising agency built on crowdsourcing
principles, acquired by Havas in 2012
○ John Winsor remained CEO of V&S, and also took on the role of chief innovation officer at
Havas
● Potential of Open Innovation: the low prices of crowdsourced campaigns and
the opportunity to maximize social media exposure would attract clients
● Difficulties in transitioning because of intrinsic decentralized structure and
employee resistance to disruption and possibly insecurity
Conclusion: Change Faster
● Digital revolution was underway and Havas would need to change faster to
survive
● In a cautious industry, bureaucratic structure and rigid top employees can be
resistant to change, proving catastrophic for the firm
● VIctors & Spoils brough great innovators but struggled to gain acceptance
● Needed a top-down cultural revolution in a race against time
Thank You