Assessment and Evaluation

ARNEL B. HAJAN
School Head – Malamawi NHS
Isabela City Schools Division
3
2
1
START
THE FOUR CANDLES
THE FOUR CANDLES BURN SLOWLY.
THE AMBIANCE WAS
SO SOFT YOU COULD
HEAR THEM TALKING.
 THE FIRST ONE SAID:

”I AM PEACE !
HOWEVER, NOBODY CAN KEEP
ME LIT .
I BELIEVE I WILL GO OUT."

It’s flame rapidly diminishes and goes out completely.

 THE SECOND ONE SAYS:

”I AM FAITH !
MOST OF ALL, I AM NO LONGER
INDISPENSABLE ,
SO IT DOESN’T MAKE ANY SENSE
THAT I STAY LIT ANY
LONGER ."

When it finished talking, a breeze softly blew on it putting it out.

SADLY, THE THIRD CANDLE SPOKE IN ITS
TURN:

”I AM LOVE !
I HAVEN’T GOT THE STRENGTH TO STAY
LIT. PEOPLE PUT ME ASIDE AND DON’T
UNDERSTAND MY IMPORTANCE. THEY
EVEN FORGET TO LOVE THOSE WHO ARE
NEAREST TO THEM ."

And waiting no longer it goes out.

SUDDENLY...

A CHILD ENTERS THE ROOM AND

SEES THREE CANDLES NOT
BURNING.

”WHY ARE YOU NOT BURNING?

YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO STAY LIT
TILL THE END."

Saying this, the child begins to cry.

THEN THE FOURTH CANDLE SAID:

”DON’T BE AFRAID, WHILE I AM

STILL BURNING WE CAN RE-LIGHT
THE OTHER CANDLES,

I AM

HOPE !"
WITH SHINING EYES, THE CHILD
TOOK THE CANDLE OF HOPE
AND LIT THE OTHER CANDLES.
 The flame of
Hope should
never go out
from your life
…and that each of
us can maintain
Hope, Faith, Peace
and Love !!!!
Have an Inspirational Day...

HOPE

LOVE

FAITH

PEACE
What are to be evaluated in the OHSP? Who
shall be involved?
To determine the results of the program, the
following shall be evaluated:
• Performance of the learner/student.
• Performance of the teacher-implementers
• Overall Implementation of the OHSP
(Summative Evaluation)
 Performance of the learner/student

• The learner shall be evaluated by the subject

teachers using the same scheme used for the
regular high school
Performance of the teacher-implementers

• The performance of the teacher implementers

shall be looked into determine areas for
improving the implementation of the
program. The assessment shall be a
collaborative undertaking of the OHSP
Coordinator and the School DORP Council
 Overall Implementation of the OHSP (Summative
Evaluation)

• The Division Office through its Division DORP

Council and the school head shall evaluate the
overall implementation at the end of the
school year in terms of the following
• Approaches/methodologies
• Learner/performance
• Community/LGU support
 How shall the learner be evaluated?
• Assessment and evaluation for the regular high
school shall also apply for the OHSP learners
• Evaluation in each subject can include written
and oral teats and the assessment of required
output.
• Promotion is based on the fulfillment of
requirements and mastery of at least 75% of
the competencies in each subject area.
 How shall the learner be evaluated?
• Acceleration by learning area and by year level
shall be determined in highly meritorious cases
upon fulfillment of the requirements and mastery
of at least 90% of the competencies in the subject
area.
• In case of acceleration, an evaluation committee
composed of the school principal, guidance
counselor, teacher-adviser and subject area
teachers shall determine the action to be taken
based on the learner’s updated portfolio.
 How shall the learner be evaluated?

• The following shall constitute a portfolio:

• Initial Summary - states the total rating of the learners

in the subject area

• General Essay – states the past experiences and the

kind of learning for which recognition is sought
The following supporting documents shall be
needed in a portfolio:
• Written examinations
• Performance ratings
• Products/outputs submitted
• Eyewitness’ testimonies from peers,
community leaders and Employers (If
employed)
• Other documents that will provide evidence of
meritorious performance
 Assessment Tools

• Form 1- FICS Analysis tool/SARDO

Watchlist
• Form 2a- ILRT( Independent Learning
Readiness Test)
• Form 2b- Coping Scale
• Form 2c- Reading Comprehension
(English/Filipino/Math/Science)
• Form 2d- Essay ( English/Filipino)
• Form 3- Phil. IRI ( to be furnished by the
Division) or other Reading Diagnostic Tool
 Form 1- FICS Analysis tool/SARDO Watchlist
Republic of the FORM 1

Department of Education

BUREAU OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

Dropout Reduction Program (DORP)

School:______________________________Division:____________________ Region : _______________

 
FICS Analysis Tool __________________________(Year Level)

 
    Academic Information

(1)
(4) (7) (10) Appears
(5) (8) Diagnosed or (9)
(3) Non Bridge taker Final Reading (6) No. of days absent No of days late disengaged, (11) Non-membership in any (12) School
Bridge (2) Enrolled at Bridge Final grades Repeated a year suspected learning Transfer  
grades in Grade VI Grade level, if during the preceding year during the preceding disinterested, or school or campus organization Requirements
candidate but did not level difficulties student
known year unmotivated
opt to enroll

   

 
No Names   Math English Science Math English Science                  
 
1                                  
 
2                                  
 
3                                  
 
4                                  
 
5                                  
 
6                                  
 
7                                  
 
8                                  
 
9                                  
 
10                                  
 
11                                  
 
12                                  
 
13                                  
 
14                                  
 
15                                  
 
16                                  
 
17                                  
 
18                                  
 
19                                  
 
20                                  
 
21                                  
 
22                                  
 
23                                  
 
24                                  
 
25                                  

PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS IN FILLING OUT THIS FORM

 Conduct/Behavior Information Family and Other Related Information

(14)
(22)
(19) (20) (21) (23) (24)
(13) (15) (17)
(16) (18) Number of Highest Place of residence,
Reported If Estimate
Suspensions Previous Living people in the educational indicate if distance
conduct or Health female, income for
and other Abuse Pregnancies with Number of household who attainment of from school is a risk
misbehavior Problems pregnant? entire
disciplinary parents siblings are employed parents factor
household
actions

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       

                       
Thank you and God bless us all….