Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Assignment: Critique of Qualitative Research Article Topic: Psychosocial Issues of RRT Patients

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

ASSIGNMENT: CRITIQUE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE

TOPIC: PSYCHOSOCIAL ISSUES OF RRT PATIENTS

BY: MBABAZI PIERRE MARIE THEOS: 218014400


UR/CMHS/SONM/MSN/NEPHROLOGY
INTRODUCTION

• A qualitative research is an approach which focusing


to understand human experiences about social
phenomena (Schneider, Coates and Yarris, 2017).

1. ELEMENTS INFLUENCING BELIEVABILITY OF THE RESEARCH
WRITING STYLE:
AUTHOR
• The Author: Associate Professor Chun-Chih Lin, PhD, RN, Department of Nursing,
ChiaYi Campus, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, ChiaYi, Taiwan.
Has published 33 articles about qualitative research.

• Co-Authors:

 Chin-Yen Han, PhD, RN: Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science
and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan

 I-Ju Pan, PhD, RN 3: Department of Nursing, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

• The authors are all nurses, PhD holders, working in academic domain, and
experienced researchers. This makes that their research work can be trusted.
REPORT TITLE
“A Qualitative Approach of Psychosocial Adaptation Process in Patients
Undergoing Long-term Hemodialysis”
The report title is clear and accurate, and shows following important
elements:
• Study approach: qualitative
• the phenomena of interest: Psychosocial Adaptation Process
• The study population: Patients undergoing Long-term Hemodialysis
ABSTRACT
• The abstract of this study is clear and brief and gives a brief
summary of main features of reports including purpose,
methodology, results and conclusion. But some elements are
lacking like the research problem and sample.
• An abstract or summary should clearly outline the problem,
the hypothesis or research questions, aims and objectives of
the study (Polit and Hungler, 1997)
2. ELEMENTS INFLUENCING
ROBUSTNESS OF THE RESEARCH
STATEMENT OF THE PHENOMENON OF INTEREST
• According to the authors, most studies conducted on HD have focused
on quality of life, wellbeing, and symptom management, but these
studies reflect the objective evaluations of health professionals.
• A relatively small number of studies have considered the subjective
views of clients with renal disease.
• Then, it is vital to gain information from clients about their psychosocial
adjustment experiences on HD in Taiwan.
PURPOSE/SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

• The phenomenon of interest is well stated in the research report, the authors were

aiming to interpret the process of psychosocial adaptation of people with end-stage renal

disease (ESRD) undergoing regular HD.


• To analyze their phenomenon of interest, researchers scrutinized three broad topics:
what psychosocial adjustment experiences clients with ESRD undergoing regular HD have;
what needs are specific to these clients
what factors influence the psychosocial adaptation process to HD in these clients and how
these are demonstrated.
LITERATURE REVIEW

• In qualitative studies, after choosing the problem of interest,


researchers review the existing information about it.
• To accomplish this, qualitative researchers must develop a
research plan that determines what sources they will use,
such as libraries, databases or specific search engines.
Relevant documents are reviewed and carefully summarized.
The final literature review should briefly describe how the
literature review was conducted and provide summaries of
documents relevant to the research problem.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
• In the research report, a conceptual or theoretical
Framework are not present.
METHOD
The research report gives different components of methodology:
Study design: Grounded theory and how it has been used
Setting: An HD unit in rural southern
Sample: 10 men and 5 women, aged from 30 to 78 years.
Sampling: theoretical sampling
METHOD (CONT’D)
Ethical considerations: the study received ethical approval from IRB,
permission from research setting and consent of participants
Data collection and procedure: each participant was privately
interviewed using the technique of un-structured interview
Data analysis: data have been analyzed using the computer software
ATLAS.ti, the analysis continued until analytical saturation was
achieved. Data analysis was based on a grounded theory
Trustworthiness: criteria to ensure the rigor of the study process
PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGS
• Grounded theory guided this qualitative study with its roots in the
concept of symbolic interactionism, which is about human behavior being
determined by an adaptation to the environment.
• Constructivism is akin to symbolic interactionism; it focuses on how the
self (in context) defines a situation and reproduces social actions, as well
as how the self shares an understanding of an object in constructing its
meaning.
• order to understand the applicability of grounded theory to interpret the
process of psychosocial adaptation to HD in people with ESRD, it is
important to articulate the philosophy of symbolic interactionism.
SAMPLE

• The sample was including 10 men and 5 women, aged from 30 to 78 years, and
other demographic data are figured in the article.
• Theoretical sampling was performed throughout the process of data collection.
The selection criteria were being diagnosed with ESRD and receiving regular HD
treatment.
• Theoretical sampling was appropriate for this study as it permits to generate
theory whereby the analyst jointly collects, codes and analyzes the data and
decides what data to collect next and where to find them, to develop his theory
as it emerges
• MCcrae & Purssell ( 2 0 1 6 ).
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
This study filled all ethical considerations of studies including human beings:
• This study received ethical approval from the IRB (99-IRB-002).
• The researcher obtained consent from administrative authority of HD center.
• Potential participants have been informed by the nurse in charge of the HD
unit about the study, and the researchers invited clients who were interested
to volunteer in person.
• Those meeting the selection criteria received an information sheet outlining
the purpose of the study, and when satisfied with the explanations they
signed a consent form before interviewing started.
DATA COLLECTION/DATA ANALYSIS

• is focused on human experience. The data collection is a semi


structured interview method is used in this study which is an
appropriate method of data collection in a qualitative and descriptive
design because it is focused on human experiences. structured
interview are useful in controlling content of interview and to
increase accuracy in results.!3urns 8 9 Grove&
RIGOUR
• To ensure the rigor of the study process, the researcher observed the criteria for judging the quality of
qualitative research as recommended by Lincoln and Guba: credibility, transferability, dependability, and
confirmability [16]. The qualifications of the principal researcher enabled her to credibly and reliably undertake
all aspects of this investigation, including the interviewing. She is a trained counselor comfortable in
undertaking interviews, a trained qualitative researcher, and has extensive work experience in clinical nursing
and nursing education. The interviews were participant-centered and audio-taped. The data coding were
discussed with the team members of the study regularly. Codes and themes were verified by two HD nurses. To
meet the criteria of transferability and dependability, each interview transcript was augmented with “thick
descriptions”, that is, transcripts were annotated with descriptions of interviewees' nonverbal responses
conveyed in the interview but not captured in the transcript. The thick data were identified on the basis of their
relevance to the topic of study and congruence with participants' point of view. Confirmabilitywas concerned
with the objectivity of the researcher for ensuring the trustworthiness of the process of the methods and
procedures of this study. Therefore, the process of study was rigorous.
FINDINGS
• This section should include a direct report of the data. It should be succinct and impartial
without engaging in personal reflections or interpretations. Describe the data in detail
without drawing conclusions of any kind (Kendra, 2017).
• The findings in this article are presented according to the analytical typologies. They
clearly describe nursing student experiences of clinical practice but it would be more
attractive and easily understandable if graphical method to present findings. -nvestigator
findings are accurate in relation to the data collected. The process of obtaining results is
clear and appropriate to the approach. The researcher was similarly aware of his own
knowledge and assumptions. 8umerical data tends to be presented in two forms, firstly as
raw figures and percentages within the text and secondly, more visually, as line graphs,
tables or histograms !3urns and Grove055$&.Graphical methods are the most appropriate
way of presentation of data as a large amount of data can be ad+usted in an attractive
table very vigorously.
DISCUSSION

• /is"ussion
•  part of this article is consisted with findings along
with limitation of the study. An-mportant point to
remember is that the research does not necessarily
prove a point and may onlysuggest a relationship or
highlight an issue needing further
investigation !'arahoo and (eid,$%))&.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCES

• References
•  part of this article very informative, and is linked with old
sources to new sources. -thas included sources of books,
reports, other +journal articles which have been used to
support the concepts outlined. <or those interested in pursuing
additional reading on the topic, the reference list of a current
study provides an excellent starting place !'olit and "ungler $%
%&
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
• Schneider, N. C., Coates, W. C. and Yarris, L. M. (2017) ‘Taking Your Qualitative Research to the
Next Level : A Guide for the Medical Educator’, pp. 368–378. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10065.

• McCrae N. & Purssell E. ( 2 0 1 6 ) ‘Is it really theoretical? A review of sampling in grounded


theory studies in nursing journals’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 00(0), 000–000. doi:
10.1111/jan.12986

• Kendra Y., (2017). ‘Components of a Qualitative Research Report’.


https://penandthepad.com/components-qualitative-research-report-7613569.html

You might also like