Assignment: Critique of Qualitative Research Article Topic: Psychosocial Issues of RRT Patients
Assignment: Critique of Qualitative Research Article Topic: Psychosocial Issues of RRT Patients
Assignment: Critique of Qualitative Research Article Topic: Psychosocial Issues of RRT Patients
• Co-Authors:
Chin-Yen Han, PhD, RN: Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science
and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan
• The authors are all nurses, PhD holders, working in academic domain, and
experienced researchers. This makes that their research work can be trusted.
REPORT TITLE
“A Qualitative Approach of Psychosocial Adaptation Process in Patients
Undergoing Long-term Hemodialysis”
The report title is clear and accurate, and shows following important
elements:
• Study approach: qualitative
• the phenomena of interest: Psychosocial Adaptation Process
• The study population: Patients undergoing Long-term Hemodialysis
ABSTRACT
• The abstract of this study is clear and brief and gives a brief
summary of main features of reports including purpose,
methodology, results and conclusion. But some elements are
lacking like the research problem and sample.
• An abstract or summary should clearly outline the problem,
the hypothesis or research questions, aims and objectives of
the study (Polit and Hungler, 1997)
2. ELEMENTS INFLUENCING
ROBUSTNESS OF THE RESEARCH
STATEMENT OF THE PHENOMENON OF INTEREST
• According to the authors, most studies conducted on HD have focused
on quality of life, wellbeing, and symptom management, but these
studies reflect the objective evaluations of health professionals.
• A relatively small number of studies have considered the subjective
views of clients with renal disease.
• Then, it is vital to gain information from clients about their psychosocial
adjustment experiences on HD in Taiwan.
PURPOSE/SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
• The phenomenon of interest is well stated in the research report, the authors were
aiming to interpret the process of psychosocial adaptation of people with end-stage renal
• The sample was including 10 men and 5 women, aged from 30 to 78 years, and
other demographic data are figured in the article.
• Theoretical sampling was performed throughout the process of data collection.
The selection criteria were being diagnosed with ESRD and receiving regular HD
treatment.
• Theoretical sampling was appropriate for this study as it permits to generate
theory whereby the analyst jointly collects, codes and analyzes the data and
decides what data to collect next and where to find them, to develop his theory
as it emerges
• MCcrae & Purssell ( 2 0 1 6 ).
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
This study filled all ethical considerations of studies including human beings:
• This study received ethical approval from the IRB (99-IRB-002).
• The researcher obtained consent from administrative authority of HD center.
• Potential participants have been informed by the nurse in charge of the HD
unit about the study, and the researchers invited clients who were interested
to volunteer in person.
• Those meeting the selection criteria received an information sheet outlining
the purpose of the study, and when satisfied with the explanations they
signed a consent form before interviewing started.
DATA COLLECTION/DATA ANALYSIS
• /is"ussion
• part of this article is consisted with findings along
with limitation of the study. An-mportant point to
remember is that the research does not necessarily
prove a point and may onlysuggest a relationship or
highlight an issue needing further
investigation !'arahoo and (eid,$%))&.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCES
• References
• part of this article very informative, and is linked with old
sources to new sources. -thas included sources of books,
reports, other +journal articles which have been used to
support the concepts outlined. <or those interested in pursuing
additional reading on the topic, the reference list of a current
study provides an excellent starting place !'olit and "ungler $%
%&
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
• Schneider, N. C., Coates, W. C. and Yarris, L. M. (2017) ‘Taking Your Qualitative Research to the
Next Level : A Guide for the Medical Educator’, pp. 368–378. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10065.