ReillyBrown IAPM 11e PPT Ch06
ReillyBrown IAPM 11e PPT Ch06
ReillyBrown IAPM 11e PPT Ch06
An Introduction
to Portfolio
Management
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-1
6.1 Some Background Assumptions
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-2
6.1.1 Risk Aversion
• Given a choice between two assets with equal
rates of return, risk-averse investors will select
the asset with the lower level of risk
• Evidence
• Many investors purchase insurance purchase various types
of insurance, including life insurance, car insurance, and
health insurance
• Yield on bonds increases with risk classifications, which
indicates that investors require a higher rate of return to
accept higher risk
• Not all investors are risk averse
• It may depend on the amount of money involved
• Risking small amounts, but insuring large losses
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-3
6.1.2 Definition of Risk
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-4
6.2 Markowitz Portfolio Theory
(slide 1 of 2)
• The Markowitz model is based on several assumptions
regarding investor behavior:
1. Investors consider each investment alternative as being
represented by a probability distribution of potential returns
over some holding period
2. Investors maximize one-period expected utility, and their utility
curves demonstrate diminishing marginal utility of wealth
3. Investors estimate the risk of the portfolio on the basis of the
variability of potential returns
4. Investors base decisions solely on expected return and risk, so
their utility curves are a function of expected return and the
variance (or standard deviation) of returns only
5. For a given risk level, investors prefer higher returns to lower
returns. Similarly, for a given level of expected return, investors
prefer less risk to more risk
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-5
6.2 Markowitz Portfolio Theory
(slide 2 of 2)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-6
6.2.1 Alternative Measures of Risk
(slide 1 of 2)
• Variance or standard deviation of expected
return
• Range of returns
• Returns below expectations
• Semi-variance – a measure that only
considers deviations below the mean
• These measures of risk implicitly assume that
investors want to minimize the damage from
returns less than some target rate
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-7
6.2.1 Alternative Measures of Risk
(slide 2 of 2)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-8
6.2.2 Expected Rates of Return
(slide 1 of 3)
• Expected rate of return
• For an individual investment
• Equal to the sum of the potential returns multiplied
with the corresponding probability of the returns
• Exhibit 6.1
• For a portfolio of investments
• Equal to the weighted average of the expected
rates of return for the individual investments in the
portfolio
• Exhibit 6.2
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-9
6.2.2 Expected Rates of Return
(slide 2 of 3)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-10
6.2.2 Expected Rates of Return
(slide 3 of 3)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-11
6.2.3 Variance (Standard Deviation) of Returns
for an Individual Investment (slide 1 of 2)
• Exhibit 6.3
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-12
6.2.3 Variance (Standard Deviation) of Returns
for an Individual Investment (slide 2 of 2)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-13
6.2.4 Variance (Standard Deviation) of
Returns for a Portfolio (slide 1 of 9)
• Covariance of Returns
• A measure of the degree to which two
variables “move together” relative to their
individual mean values over time
• For two assets, i and j, the covariance of rates
of return is defined as:
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-15
6.2.4 Variance (Standard Deviation) of
Returns for a Portfolio (slide 3 of 9)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-16
6.2.4 Variance (Standard Deviation) of
Returns for a Portfolio (slide 4 of 9)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-17
6.2.4 Variance (Standard Deviation) of
Returns for a Portfolio (slide 5 of 9)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-18
6.2.4 Variance (Standard Deviation) of
Returns for a Portfolio (slide 6 of 9)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-19
6.2.4 Variance (Standard Deviation) of
Returns for a Portfolio (slide 7 of 9)
• Covariance and Correlation
• The correlation coefficient is obtained by
standardizing (dividing) the covariance by the
product of the individual standard deviations
Where:
rij = correlation coefficient of returns
σi = standard deviation of Rit
σj = standard deviation of Rjt
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-20
6.2.4 Variance (Standard Deviation) of
Returns for a Portfolio (slide 8 of 9)
• The coefficient can vary only in the range +1 to −1
• A value of +1 would indicate perfect positive
correlation. This means that returns for the two
assets move together in a positively and completely
linear manner
• A value of −1 would indicate perfect negative
correlation. This means that the returns for two
assets move together in a completely linear manner,
but in opposite directions
• Exhibit 6.9
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-21
6.2.4 Variance (Standard Deviation) of
Returns for a Portfolio (slide 9 of 9)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-22
6.2.5 Standard Deviation of a Portfolio (slide
1 of 10)
where:
σport = standard deviation of the portfolio
wi = weights of an individual asset in the portfolio; where weights
are determined by the proportion of value in the portfolio
σ2i = variance of rates of return for Asset i
Covij = covariance between the rates of return for Assets i and j
Covij = σiσj
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-23
6.2.5 Standard Deviation of a Portfolio (slide
2 of 10)
• Impact of a New Security in a Portfolio
• Two effects to the portfolio’s standard deviation when
we add a new security to such a portfolio:
• The asset’s own variance of returns
• The covariance between the returns of this new asset and
the returns of every other asset that is already in the portfolio
• The relative weight of these numerous covariances is
substantially greater than the asset’s unique variance;
the more assets in the portfolio, the more this is true
• The important factor to consider when adding an
investment to a portfolio that contains a number of
other investments is not the new security’s own
variance but the average covariance of this asset with
all other investments in the portfolio
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-24
6.2.5 Standard Deviation of a Portfolio (slide
3 of 10)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-25
6.2.5 Standard Deviation of a Portfolio (slide
4 of 10)
• Equal Risk and Return—Changing Correlations
• The expected return of the portfolio does not change because it
is simply the weighted average of the individual expected returns
• Demonstrates the concept of diversification, whereby the risk
of the portfolio is lower than the risk of either of the assets held
in the portfolio
• Risk reduction benefit occurs to some degree any time the
assets combined in a portfolio are not perfectly positively
correlated (that is, whenever ri,j < +1)
• Diversification works because there will be investment periods
when a negative return to one asset will be offset by a positive
return to the other, thereby reducing the variability of the overall
portfolio return
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-26
6.2.5 Standard Deviation of a Portfolio (slide
5 of 10)
• The negative covariance term exactly offsets the
individual variance terms, leaving an overall
standard deviation of the portfolio of zero
• This would be a risk-free portfolio, meaning that
the average combined return for the two
securities over time would be a constant value
(that is, have no variability)
• Thus, a pair of completely negatively correlated
assets provides the maximum benefits of
diversification by completely eliminating variability
from the portfolio
• Exhibit 6.10
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-27
6.2.5 Standard Deviation of a Portfolio (slide
6 of 10)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-28
6.2.5 Standard Deviation of a Portfolio (slide
7 of 10)
• Combining Stocks with Different
Returns and Risk
• Consider two assets (or portfolios) with
different expected rates of return and
individual standard deviations
• With perfect negative correlation, the portfolio
standard deviation is not zero
• This is because the different examples have
equal weights, but the asset standard
deviations are not equal
• Exhibit 6.11
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-29
6.2.5 Standard Deviation of a Portfolio (slide
8 of 10)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-30
6.2.5 Standard Deviation of a Portfolio (slide
9 of 10)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-32
6.2.6 A Three-Asset Portfolio
• The results presented earlier for the two-asset
portfolio can be extended to a portfolio of n assets
• As more assets are added to the portfolio, more risk
will be reduced (everything else being the same)
• The general computing procedure is still the same,
but the amount of computation has increase rapidly
• For the three-asset portfolio, the computation has
doubled in comparison with the two-asset portfolio
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-33
6.2.7 Estimation Issues (slide 1 of 3)
Where:
bi = the slope coefficient that relates the returns for security i to the
returns for the aggregate market
Rm = the returns for the aggregate stock market
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-35
6.2.7 Estimation Issues (slide 3 of 3)
where:
σ2m = variance of returns for the aggregate stock market
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-36
6.3 The Efficient Frontier (slide 1 of 4)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-38
6.3 The Efficient Frontier (slide 3 of 4)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-39
6.3 The Efficient Frontier (slide 4 of 4)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-41
6.3.1 The Efficient Frontier: An Example
(slide 2 of 3)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-42
6.3.1 The Efficient Frontier: An Example
(slide 3 of 3)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-43
6.3.2 The Efficient Frontier and Investor
Utility (slide 1 of 3)
• An individual investor’s utility curve specifies the
trade-offs he is willing to make between
expected return and risk
• The slope of the efficient frontier curve
decreases steadily as you move upward
• The interactions of these two curves will
determine the particular portfolio selected by an
individual investor
• The optimal portfolio has the highest utility for a
given investor
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-44
6.3.2 The Efficient Frontier and Investor
Utility (slide 2 of 3)
• The optimal lies at the point of tangency
between the efficient frontier and the utility
curve with the highest possible utility
• See Exhibit 6.16
• Investor X with the set of utility curves will achieve
the highest utility by investing the portfolio at X
• With a different set of utility curves, Investor Y will
achieve the highest utility by investing the portfolio
at Y
• Which investor is more risk averse?
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-45
6.3.2 The Efficient Frontier and Investor
Utility (slide 3 of 3)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-46
6.4 Capital Market Theory: An Overview
• Because the returns for the risk free asset are certain,
the covariance between the risk-free asset and any
risky asset or portfolio will always be zero
• Similarly, the correlation between any risky asset and
the risk-free asset would be zero
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-51
6.4.2 Developing the Capital Market Line
(slide 3 of 8)
• Combining a Risk-Free Asset with a Risky Portfolio
• Expected Return
• Is the weighted average of the two returns:
• Standard Deviation
• Is the linear proportion of the standard deviation of the risky
asset portfolio
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-52
6.4.2 Developing the Capital Market Line
(slide 4 of 8)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-53
6.4.2 Developing the Capital Market Line
(slide 5 of 8)
• The Capital Market Line
• The risk–return relationship holds for every
combination of the risk-free asset with any
collection of risky assets
• This relationship holds for every combination of
the risk-free asset with any collection of risky
assets
• However, when the risky portfolio, M, is the market
portfolio containing all risky assets held anywhere
in the marketplace, this linear relationship is called
the Capital Market Line (CML)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-54
6.4.2 Developing the Capital Market Line
(slide 6 of 8)
• Risk–Return Possibilities with Leverage
• One can attain a higher expected return than is available
at point M
• One can invest along the efficient frontier beyond point M,
such as point D
• With the risk-free asset, one can add leverage to the
portfolio by borrowing money at the risk-free rate and
investing in the risky portfolio at point M to achieve a point
like E
• Clearly, point E dominates point D
• Similarly, one can reduce the investment risk by lending
money at the risk-free asset to reach points like C
• Exhibit 6.17, 6.18
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-55
6.4.2 Developing the Capital Market Line
(slide 7 of 8)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-56
6.4.2 Developing the Capital Market Line
(slide 8 of 8)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-57
6.4.3 Risk, Diversification, and the Market
Portfolio (slide 1 of 8)
• Because portfolio M lies at the point of tangency,
it has the highest portfolio possibility line
• Everybody will want to invest in Portfolio M and
borrow or lend to be somewhere on the CML
• It must include all risky assets
• Because the market is in equilibrium, all assets in
this portfolio are in proportion to their market
values
• Because it contains all risky assets, it is a
completely diversified portfolio, which means that
all the unique risk of individual assets
(unsystematic risk) is diversified away
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-58
6.4.3 Risk, Diversification, and the Market
Portfolio (slide 2 of 8)
• Systematic risk
• Only systematic risk remains in the market portfolio
• Systematic risk can be measured by the standard
deviation of returns of the market portfolio and can
change over time
• Systematic risk is the variability in all risky assets
caused by macroeconomic variables:
• Variability in growth of money supply
• Interest rate volatility
• Variability in factors like industrial production, corporate
earnings, cash flow
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-59
6.4.3 Risk, Diversification, and the Market
Portfolio (slide 3 of 8)
• Diversification and the Elimination of
Unsystematic Risk
• The purpose of diversification is to reduce the
standard deviation of the total portfolio
• This assumes that imperfect correlations exist among
securities
• As you add securities, you expect the average
covariance for the portfolio to decline
• How many securities must you add to obtain a
completely diversified portfolio?
• Exhibit 6.19
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-60
6.4.3 Risk, Diversification, and the Market
Portfolio (slide 4 of 8)
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-61
6.4.3 Risk, Diversification, and the Market
Portfolio (slide 5 of 8)
• The CML and the Separation Theorem
• The CML leads all investors to invest in the M
portfolio
• Individual investors should differ in position on the
CML depending on risk preferences
• How an investor gets to a point on the CML is based
on financing decisions
• Risk averse investors will lend at the risk-free rate,
while investors preferring more risk might borrow
funds at the RFR and invest in the market portfolio
• The investment decision of choosing the point on
CML is separate from the financing decision of
reaching there through either lending or borrowing
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-62
6.4.3 Risk, Diversification, and the Market
Portfolio (slide 6 of 8)
• A Risk Measure for the CML
• Capital market theory now shows that the only
relevant portfolio is the market Portfolio M.
Together, this means that the only important
consideration for any individual risky asset is
its average covariance with all the risky
assets in Portfolio M or the asset’s covariance
with the market portfolio
• This covariance, then, is the relevant risk
measure for an individual risky asset
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-63
6.4.3 Risk, Diversification, and the Market
Portfolio (slide 7 of 8)
• Because all individual risky assets are a part of the
market portfolio, one can describe their rates of return in
relation to the returns to Portfolio M using a linear model:
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-64
6.4.3 Risk, Diversification, and the Market
Portfolio (slide 8 of 8)
• Note that Var(biRMt) is the variance of return for an asset
related to the variance of the market return, or the
asset’s systematic variance or risk
• Also, Var(ε) is the residual variance of return for the
individual asset that is not related to the market portfolio
• This residual variance is what we have referred to as the
unsystematic or unique risk because it arises from the
unique features of the asset
• Therefore:
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-65
6.4.4 Investing with the CML: An Example
(slide 1 of 2)
Suppose you have a riskless security at 4% and a market
portfolio with a return of 9% and a standard deviation of 10%.
How should you go about investing your money so that your
investment will have a risk level of 15%?
• Portfolio Return
©2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or
posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 6-67