APHASIA
APHASIA
APHASIA
Defenition
Neuronal network
cerebral dominance
Aetiology
Clinical assessment
Syndromes of aphasia
Aphasia
=
a disorder of language rather than
speech.
Speech
=
the articulation and phonation of
language sounds;
Principal method
of
human communication,
consisting of words
used in a structured and conventional way and
conveyed by speech,
writing,
or
gesture.
Expression of
or
the ability to express
thoughts and feelings
By
articulate sounds.
Aphasia
is
the loss of ability
to
produce
and/or
understand language.
usually manifests
as a
difficulty speaking
or understanding
spoken language,
but reading and writing are also usually impacted.
Aphasia can also impact the use of manual sign
language and Braille.
A large, complex neurocognitive network, usually
located
in the left hemisphere,
subserves the capacity
for human language
• Aphasia is defined as a disorder of language
that is acquired secondary to brain damage.
• First, aphasia is distinguished from congenital
or developmental language disorders,
called dysphasias.
• (Contrary to British usage, in the United States,
the term dysphasia applies to developmental
language disorders rather than partial or
incomplete aphasia.)
language is a complex system of
communication symbols and rules for their
use
the method of human communication, either
spoken or written, consisting of the use of
words in a structured and conventional
way
Language centers —
The language network comprises areas of perisylvian
cortex,
including
the classical language areas
of
Broca and Wernicke.
These are not anatomically discrete areas,
Important neural networks subserving critical language
function have been identified:
Broca's area
or
Brodmann area
44
in the
posterior inferior frontal gyrus
innervates adjacent motor neurons
subserving the mouth and larynx,
and
controls
the output of spoken language.
Wernicke's area
or
Brodmann area 22,
comprising the posterior two-thirds of the
superior temporal gyrus,
receives information from the auditory cortex and
accesses a network of cortical associations
to assign word meanings.
The angular gyrus
in the inferior parietal lobule
is adjacent to
visual receptive areas
and
subserves the perception of written language,
as well as
other language-processing functions
Angular gyrus
Other regions of the cerebrum contribute importantly to
normal language.
These include
insula,
which is integral to normal articulation,
several frontal and temporal lobe regions
that support sentence-level processing,
and
vast regions of temporal, occipital, and parietal cortex that
support knowledge of words and their meanings
• Although it is likely that subcortical nuclei make
a contribution to normal language performance
evidence from perfusion imaging indicates that
aphasic syndromes associated with ischemic
subcortical lesions are often accompanied by
perfusion defects that involve cortical language
regions
• The fact that these subcortical aphasias have
been associated with a better prognosis than
cortical varieties may be explained by their
tendency to resolve with restoration of cortical
perfusion.
• While the classic Wernicke-Lichtheim model described
here maintains its utility for clinicians seeking a
rudimentary understanding of aphasia, advances in
methodology for aphasia assessment and brain imaging
have permitted the development of a dual-stream
model for the neuroanatomy of language. This model
consists of a ventral stream and a dorsal stream.
The ventral stream is rooted
in the
bilateral temporal lobes
and
is important for mappings from auditory input to meanings. Integrity of
regions and the connections within this stream are crucial for normal
auditory comprehension.
The dorsal stream is unilaterally organized and includes
chiefly frontal lobe areas associated with speech production and a
region in the temporoparietal junction.
Integrity of these regions and connections among them are essential
for fluent speech, as they provide auditory and proprioceptive
feedback.
Finally, there is increasing evidence
that
cerebellar lesions may result in linguistic deficits,
including grammatical disturbances
Cerebral dominance —
Most individuals are left-hemisphere dominant for
language function.
Cerebral dominance is influenced by handedness;
of the
90 to 95 percent of people who are right handed, more
than 95 percent have left-sided language dominance
. A smaller proportion of left-handed individuals,
variably estimated between 31 to 70 percent, have
left-sided language dominance
• Patients with right-sided language dominance tend to have
less severe and less enduring aphasia after right-sided
brain injury, suggesting that language lateralization is
incomplete in these individuals.
• The presence of bilateral representation of language
function in certain individuals is further supported by
functional neuroimaging studies, as well as in studies of
• Wada testing performed in patients prior to epilepsy
surgery.
• Such studies indicate that language networks are not as
strongly lateralized in women compared with men, and in
left-handed versus right-handed individuals
• Abnormalities of the left cerebral hemisphere that are
present during development may result in atypical
hemispheric dominance. A substantial left-hemisphere
injury in childhood (before the age of six years) is likely
to be associated with a shift in at least some language
functions to the right.
• Atypical language dominance is also noted to be more
common in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy,
particularly when the pathology is most prominent in the
left side
Aphasia with an acute or subacute presentation with relatively fixed
deficits is likely due to structural disease. The most common etiology
is ischemic stroke.
Other structural causes include
hemorrhagic stroke;
neoplasm;
cerebral abscess,
encephalitis,
or
other central nervous system infections;
and traumatic brain injury
. Multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis are
uncommon but reported causes of aphasia
Transient episodes of aphasia may occur
(TIA),
migraine,
&
seizures.
The presence of aphasia during a TIA is one risk factor that
identifies an individual at relatively high risk of stroke in the
next few days and weeks .
In seizures, aphasia may be either an ictal phenomenon (eg,
brief speech arrest at onset of a complex partial or
secondary generalized seizure) or a postictal manifestation
A progressive aphasia
can be a manifestation of
neurodegenerative disease
. In children, certain forms of epilepsy (such as Landau-
Kleffner syndrome and epilepsy with continuous
spike-and-waves during slow-wave sleep) are
associated with a progressive loss of previously attained
language function.
The aphasia may be the presenting symptom in 40 percent
of
Landau-Kleffner cases
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and semantic
dementia are syndromes that occur in older adults and
most commonly represent
frontotemporal degeneration,
or,
less commonly,
Alzheimer disease,
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
or
another form of neurodegenerative dementia
Fluency
Comprehension
Repetition
Naming
Content
Reading
Writing
Nonfluent • Fluent
Dysarthric
Effortfull
Sparse
Prosody lost
Phrase length
decreased
Despp
Other language assessments
Bedside examination is sufficient in most cases to assess
aphasia.
Validated scales such as the
Boston diagnostic aphasia examination
and
Western aphasia battery
often used in clinical studies and as part of neuropsychologic
test batteries .
The Aachen aphasia test appears useful in distinguishing
between Broca- and Wernicke-type aphasias
The language examination is best interpreted in the context of the
entire neurologic examination.
A broad mental status examination that includes the assessment of
level of
consciousness,
attention,
memory,
praxis,
executive function,
And
visuospatial abilities is important to avoid mistaking aphasia for other
conditions causing mental status changes and vice versa
The diagnosis of aphasia
should be usually made
only in the setting of an otherwise
intact sensorium.
Hearing should be specifically tested;
if abnormal,
this must be taken into account when interpreting
the examination of comprehension and
repetition.
Dysarthria should be noted.
Dysarthria vs Aphasia;
Asking them to mimic the speech disturbance can be
helpful.
A right-sided visual field disturbance
=
left-hemisphere lesion of the
optic tract,
lateral geniculate nucleus,
optic radiations,
or
posterior cortices.
A right hemiparesis with spasticity, abnormal
reflexes, and a Babinski sign is common in the
setting of nonfluent aphasias.
At times, weakness will be very subtle,
consisting only of
a facial weakness
and/or
a pronator drift.
(Barré's sign).
Cerebellar findings, such as
dysmetria
and
dysdiadochokinesia,
are not commonly caused by lesions that result in
aphasia,
but cases have been reported in which aphasia
seemed to result from cerebellar damage
Hemianesthesia suggests a parietal lobe or
thalamic lesion.
Fluent aphasia is more commonly associated with
sensory deficits.
Sensory deficits from parietal lobe lesions may
include failure of two-point discrimination,
astereognosis, and agraphesthesia.
These may be difficult to reliably test in the
patient with aphasia.
Conduction aphasia
Good Repetition - Nominal
Good Comprehension
Poor repetition – Conduction
Fluent
Good Repetition –Trans
cortical-sensory
Poor Comprehension
Non Fluent
Good Repetition - Isolation
Poor Comprehension
Poor Repetition – Global
• Perisylvian aphasias
Perisylvian aphasias
Wernicke’s
Broca’s
Conduction
Good Repetition - Nominal
Good Comprehension
Poor repetition – Conduction
Fluent
Good Repetition –Trans
cortical-sensory
Poor Comprehension
Comprehension Intact
Repetition Intact
Reading Intact
Repetition Impaired
Non Fluent
Good Repetition - Isolation
Poor Comprehension
Poor Repetition – Global
Good Repetition – Transcortical motor
Good Comprehension
Poor Repetition –Broca’s
Non Fluent
Good Repetition - Isolation
Poor Comprehension
Poor Repetition – Global
4 Transcortical motor
aphasia.
• Nonfluent severely disrupted, nonfluent, and halting
• Comprehension good
• Repetition relatively spared
• a) prefrontal cortices and subjacent white matter
anterior or superior to Broca’s area
• Watershed area between ACA and MCA anteriorly
• Or
• (b) supplementary motor area and cingulate gyrus.
These lesions disconnect Broca’s area from limbic areas
and other sources of the drive to communicate.
• ACA
Bedside Features of Transcortical
Aphasias
Isolation Transcortical Transcortical
syndrome motor sensory
Speech Nonfluent Nonfluent Fluent
Echolalic echolalic
Naming impaired Impaired Impaired
Comprehension Impaired Intact Impaired
repetition intact intact intact
Non Fluent
Good Repetition - Isolation
Poor Comprehension
Poor Repetition – Global
1. Broca’s aphasia.
Nonfluent
Good comprehension relatively
Poor repetition
Telegraphic
Depression Frustration
Gesture prominent
Posterior portion of the inferior frontal gyrus
(Broca’s area; Brodmann areas 44 and 45)
superior division of the MCA.
Broca’s aphasia
Feature findings
Spontaneous speech nonfluent/mute /dysrthric/telegraphic
naming impaired
comprehension intact
repetition impaired
Reading Often impaired( third alexia)
Writing Impaired dysmorphic dysgrammatical
Associated signs Right hemiparesis
Right hemisensory loss
± Apraxia of left limbs
Aphemia
Non Fluent
Good Repetition - Isolation
Poor Comprehension
Poor Repetition – Global
6Mixed transcortical aphasia.
• rare and remarkable condition is analogous to global aphasia,
except for preserved ability to repeat
• Fluency minimal or absent.
• Comprehension lost
• Echolalia
• Lesions are an additive combination of those producing
transcortical motor and sensory aphasias.
• Insults anterosuperior to Broca’s area and posterosuperior to
Wernicke’s area cut off the perisylvian language zone from access
to other cortices.
• Isolation of the speech area is a synonym for mixed transcortical
aphasia
• lesions fall in the crescentic vascular border zone among the ACA,
MCA, and PCA
Bedside Features of Transcortical
Aphasias
Isolation Transcortical Transcortical
syndrome motor sensory
Speech Nonfluent Nonfluent Fluent
Echolalic echolalic
Naming impaired Impaired Impaired
Comprehension Impaired Intact Impaired
repetition intact intact intact
Non Fluent
Good Repetition - Isolation
Poor Comprehension
Poor Repetition – Global
7 Global
Nonfluent
comprehension lost
repetition lost
Entire left perisylvian region, encompassing Broca’s area in
the inferior frontal lobe, Wernicke’s area in the posterior
temporal lobe, and all the interposed parietofrontal
cortices.
In rare cases, separate, discrete lesions of Broca’s area
and Wernicke’s area produce global aphasia without
hemiparesis.
ICA and MCA occlusions
Global aphasia
Feature
Spontaneous speech Mute/ nonfluent
Naming impaired
Comprehension impaired
repetition impaired
Reading impaired
writing impaired
Non Fluent
Good Repetition - Isolation
Poor Comprehension
Poor Repetition – Global
• Poor Repetition, WBC
– Wernicke
– Broca’s
– Conduction
• Good Repetition, TIA
– Transcortical / Motor & Sensory
– Isolation
– Anomic
34 Perisyvian aphasia include all
EXCEPT
Alexia,
or
acquired inability to read,
is a form of aphasia,
=
as a linguistic blindfolding:
patients can write but cannot read their own writing.
On bedside examination,
speech,
auditory comprehension,
and
repetition are normal.
Naming may be deficient,
especially for colors