Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 71

Improved production technologies

for rabi pulses in Jammu region

Dr. Brij Nandan


Sr. scientist (Agronomy) & PI (QSP ,NFSM)
Councillor Zone -1 ISPRD, FISPRD
PRSS, Samba , SKUAST-Jammu
Bmankotia333 @ gmail.com
09419234393
Contents
• General Overview of Pulses
• Status of pulses in J&K and Jammu region
• Nutritional Aspects of pulses
• Improved production technologies of rabi
pulses
 Selection of suitable varieties
 Crop geometry
 Compatibility of rabi pulses with other crops
 Recent weed management options
 Trends in nutrition & water management aspects
 Effect of climate change on rabi pulses cultivation
 Mechanization of aspects in rabi pulses
Global Status : Major Pulses Producing
Countries
Area Production Yield
Countries
(m. ha) (m.ton) (Kg/ha)

India 28.17 18.31 710

Myanmar 3.88 5.44 1398

Brazil 2.85 2.95 1032

China 2.87 4.46 1550

Canada 2.42 6.10 2520

Australia 1.92 2.70 1410

USA 1.09 2.23 2038

Others 37.55 29.88 796

Total 80.75 73.07 904


Percentage Share of Different Countries
in global pulse production
% share of individual pulse in total production

Other Rabi Pulses;


13; 13% Arhar; 21; 21%
Other Kharif Pulses;
4; 4%

Urad; 13; 13%

Gram; 41; 41%

Moong; 9; 9%

5
World Pulse Production

22.4 mt in 2016-17

6
Present Status of Pulses in India

• All time record pulses production of 22.4 million tonnes is


estimated during 2016-17 as per 3rd advance estimate. The
previous highest pulses production of 19.25 million tonnes was
attained in the year 2013-14.
• The major pulses producing states are Madhya Pradesh (27.1%),
Maharashtra (16.4%), Rajasthan (13.3%), Uttar Pradesh (9.7%),
Karnataka (6.6%), and Andhra Pradesh (4.7%), Gujarat (3.7%),
which together accounts for 81.5 % of the total production
during 2016-17.
• Among pulses, gram alone contributes 40.5% of total pulses
production in the country followed by arhar (20.5%), urd bean
(13.1%), moong bean (9.2%) and other pulses (16.7%).
• As on 28.7.2107, about 11.4 million hectare have been covered
under kharif pulses, which is 7% more than 2016-17 for this
period.
Growth rate of major crops 2001-2010
Import & Export of Pulses

Imports of Pulses
2009-10 2010-11

Quantity Value Quantity Value


(‘000 tons) (Crores) (‘000 tons) (Crores)

3509.58 9813.37 2591.25 6979.95

Exports of Pulses
2009-10 2010-11
Quantity Value Quantity Value
(‘000 tons) (Crores) (‘000 tons) (Crores)
99.91 407.35 205.69 852.79

Source: Director General of Commercial Intelligence & Statistics, Ministry


of Commerce, Kolkata
Area under important pulse crops in different states

Major Crops Major States


Crop Area %) State Production (%)

Chickpea 40 Maharashtra 16
Pigeon pea 13 M.P. 26
Green gram 12 Rajasthan 13
Black gram 12 U.P. 9
A.P 8
78% of Total area 70% of Total Production
Share of Rabi & Kharif Pulses -
2013-14

Area (M. Ha) Production (M. Tons Yield (Kg/Ha)


Kharif
6.02
Kharif
10.14

Rabi 31%
Rabi Kharif
15.08 13.25
40% Rabi 594

60% 69%
878
Pulses- Productivity in Different States
State Highest State Lowest
productivity productivity
(Kg/ha) (Kg/ha)

Kerala 2515 Tamil Nadu 495

HP 1165 Odisha 533

Jharkhand 1005 J & K 497


MP 938 Assam 576
Bihar 974 Karnataka 595
765  
All India
Trends of Area, Production and Productivity of Pulses in J&K State w.e.f
1980-81 to 2009-10
Area and production of pulses in Jammu Division of J&K

Year Area (000 Production Average


Hect.) (000 Qtls) Yield
(q/ha)
2010-11 18.80 109
5.80
2011-12 17.68 71
4.02
2012-13 17.03 74.49 4.37
2013-14 15.42 69.29
4.49
2014-15 16.11 61.69
3.83
Status of pulses in Jammu region
District Area Production
Jammu 5.590 56.68
Samba 2.991 70% 65% 2.14
Kathua 4.053 12.40
Udhampur 2.102 11.27
Reasi 0.415 2.13
Rajouri 0.213 14.23
Poonch 0.028 8.75
Doda 2.179 0
Kishtwar 1.233 1.06
Ramban 0.000 0.19
Total 18.803 108.85
Statistics of rabi pulses grown in J&K during 2011-12

Crop Area(000’ ha) Production Productivity


(000’ tonnes) (Kg/ha)

Chickpea 0.2 0.1 500


Lentil 0.5 0.3 613
Peas 0.2 0.1 500

(IIPR website)
WHY PULSES ?
Pulses Integral Part
Cropping System
Human and animal Diet,
Sustainability
Role of Pulses in Nutrition
Sl. No. Constituents Magnitudes
1. Protein >20-%
2. Carbohydrate 55 – 60%
3. Fat >1.0%
4. Fiber 3.2%
5. Phosphorus 300-500 mg/100 g
6. Iron 7-10mg/100 g
7. Vitamin C 10-15 mg/100 g
Dietary fibre, Vitamin B Complex, Minerals ( Calcium,
Magnesium, Zinc & Iron), Excellent source of folate
Oligosaccharides, Various phytochemicals
Per capita net availability of Pulses (Kg per annum) in India

Year Pulses availability


1951 22.1
1961 25.2
1971 18.7
1981 13.7
1991 15.2
2001 10.9
2011 15.7
2012 15.2
2013 15.9
Source: Agri. Statistics at a glance 2013

WHO Recommendations of 80
grams/capita/day (29.2 kg/capita/year)
Demand Projections of Pulses

Item/Year 2015 2020 2025

Pulses 21.31 24.26 29.43


NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY MISSION(NFSM)
2014-15 (12th Five Year Plan)

National Food Security Mission


in the J&K State
 5 components ( Only 4 components are under Implementation
)
 NFSM- Rice (Under Implementation since 2011-12)
 NFSM- Wheat (Under Implementation since 2012-13)
 NFSM-Coarse Cereals ( Under Implementation from the Current
Year 2014-15)
 NFSM- Pulses (Under Implementation from the ensuing Rabi -
2014-15)
 NFSM- Commercial Crops ( Not Covered in J&K State)
Rabi pulses

Lentil

Chickpea
Production Constraints in rabi pulses Cultivation

• Inadequate supply of quality seeds and low


SRR
• Less input use
• Mostly cultivated under rainfed conditions
• Biotic and abiotic stresses
• Technological gap
• Lack of attractive Market Price (recently MSP
has been enhanced upto 30%)
• Lack of proper procurement
• Poor storage facilities of the farm produce
Strategies to increase pulse production

Germplasm enhancement
Restructuring plant types
Wide hybridization
Multiple disease & pest resistance
Development of Drought & heat tolerance
Development of short duration varieties
Exploitation of molecular marker technology
Transgenic approach
Promotion of pulses in new niches
For What these parameters are required ------
Yield gap (kg/ha) in irrigated
and rainfed pulses (1999-2000)
Crops Irrigated 114
Rainfed
Chickpea 586 472
Pigeonpea 640 624
Mungbean 562 533
Urdbean 566 492
Horsegram 525 498

Ramasamy & Selvaraj,2002


Rabi pulses improved technologies
Land configuration


Enhances crop establishment in rainfed areas


Seed priming


Integrated nutrient management


Application of sulphur, Zn and Iron fortification in pulses


Irrigation management


Weed management


Use of new strains of PGPR


Cropping systems
Seed drill in operation at farmer’s field and
view of seed drill sown germinated crop
Field inspections/Monitoring by worthy Director
Research , SKUAST-Jammu

Field pea
Lentil PL-6 VL- 42

Chickpea
GNG-1581 PU-31
High yielding varieties developed in the
country since 1992

Total 316 (34)

Chickpea 89 (8) Lentil 22(6)

Pigeonpea 36 (1) Fieldpea 23 (5)

Mungbean 60 (6) Rajmash 4 (3)

Urdbean 44 (5) Others 38

* Numbers in parenthesis indicate varieties released from IIPR


Pulse Production System In India
NHZ (North Hill Zone)
– Himanchal Pradesh, J & K,
Hills of Uttarakhand and
NEH states

NWPZ (North West Plain Zone)


– Panjab, Haryana, Rajasthan,
Delhi, West U.P., Plains of
Uttarakhand

CZ (Central Zone) – M.P.,


Maharashtra, Chhatisgarh,
Gujarat, Bundelkhand
region of U.P

NEPZ (North East Plain Zone)


– East U.P., Bihar, Jharkhand,
SZ (South Zone) West Bengal, Assam
– Andhra Pradesh,
Karnataka, Tamilnadu,
Biotic factors associated with pulses production

Diseases 26% Insects 20%,

Weeds account for 33 %

• Among the annual agricultural losses in India, weeds account for 33 %, insects 20%, diseases
26% and others 21 %. The annual economic losses account for Rs. 2000 crores in the country
( Kulshrestha and Parmer, 1992). Bhan (1997) estimated that average crop yield reduction
due to weeds vary from 12 to 72 % depending upon the crop
Pulse varieties developed for

Specific niches
Different maturity groups
Diseases resistance
Abiotic stress tolerance
Seed size
Improving heat tolerance in chickpea
(2009/10 to 2012/13)

Increasing incidence of heat stress in chickpea


• Increasing area under late sown conditions
• Fluctuations and increase in temperatures due to climate change
• Large shift in chickpea area from northern India to Southern India
Large genetic variation for heat tolerance in chickpea

Sensitive

Tolerant
What more is needed?
• Availability of quality seed
- Linking formal & non-formal seed sector
- Involve Agro-entrepreneurs in seed supply chain
- Village Seed Banks/Farmer cooperatives
• Supply micronutrients
- Link farmer groups with industry/ suppliers
- Soil testing facilities and Soil Health Cards
• Procurement of grain
- Remunerative prices to farmers
- Timely procurement (at harvest)
• Helicoverpa resistance and herbicide tolerance
(Transgenics)
• Suitability for mechanical cultivation
Salient achievement of Seed System project

• Farmer-preferred varieties of
chickpea, groundnut and
pigeonpea identified for each
location through FPVS trials
• ‘Model’ seed production
system(s) identified for each
location
• Availability of improved seed
enhanced at the local level
Yield loss due to weeds in pulses
Crop Yield loss (%)
Pigeonpea 20-40
Mungbean 25-50
Urdbean 30-50
Cowpea 15-30
Chickpea 15-25
Pea 20-30
Lentil 20-30
Critical period of weed competition in different
pulses
Crops and cropping systems Critical periods
 Sole crops
Pigeonpea 45-60 DAS
Greengram 15-30 DAS
Blackgram 15-30 DAS
Cowpea 15-30 DAS
Chickpea 30-60 DAS
Pea 30-45 DAS
 Intercropping
Sorghum + pigeonpea 7 WAS
Pigeonpea + blackgram 2-8 WAS
Groundnut + pipeonpea 2-8 WAS
Maize + blackgram 4-5 WAS
Pigeonpea + sesamum 2-6 WAS
Chickpea + mustard 8 WAS

(Source: Mishra 1997; Tewari 1999)


Recommendation (National level )
• Pendimethalin 30 EC + imazethapyr 2 % ready
mix combination @ 1.0 kg/ha PE + one
hoeing/HW at 35 DAS is recommended for
broad spectrum weed control at Ludhiana,
Samba, Badnapur and Bangalore.
Samba

Ludhiana

Badanapur

Bangalore
Conservation technology
Maize –chickpea cropping system
New herbicide molecules –weed management ---Villore
Weed management under CA

Without Mulch
With Mulch
Herbicides recommended for pulses.
Crop Herbicide Dose (kg a.i./ha) Application time
Chickpea, Pea, Lentil Pendimethalin 1.0 Pre-emergence
Fluchloralin 1.0 Pre-plant
Trifluralin 1.0 incorporation
Pre-plant
incorporation

Bio-efficacy of different herbicides for broad The treatments Pendimethalin 30 EC formulation +


spectrum weed management in chickpea Imazethyper 2% (Ready mix combination) @ 1.0 Kg/ha PE +
one hoeing at 30-35 DAS followed by same treatment except
hand hoeing at 30-35 DAS was showing good results till date in
respect of weed control than other treatments under study .

Weed management options for small and marginal farmers


•Crop rotation
•Planting density
•Slashing of weeds in inter-row space
•Superficial weeding (hoeing)
•Pulling out, and/or slashing even at crop maturity and post-harvest to prevent seed production
•Green manures/cover crops and crop residues
•Herbicide application
Major weeds associated with pulses
Season Type of weeds Name of weeds

Rabi Non Chenopodium album, Solanum


pulses -grasses nigrum, Anagallis arvensis, Vicia
Grasses sativa, Fumaria parviflora,
Sedges Asphodelus tenuifolius,
Convolvulus, Melilotus indica,
Medicago denticulate
Phalaris minor, Avena
ludoviciana
Cyperus rotundus
Manual Weeding - ?

Shortage of labour

Timeliness

Cost

Input loss
•Cultural means of weed control
Crop rotation
Selection of good crop rotation is must to prevent development of diverse weed
population in the RCT fields. Crop that grows fast and can compete with the weeds very
well should be included in the cropping systems either as sole cropping or
intercropping.
Optimum plant population
Right quantity of seed rate is must to develop good crop stand which is necessary to
obtain a good crop yield. The crop geometry is also important. Thus, crop geometry
with optimum plant population can compete better with weeds and do not leave space
for weeds to grow.

Intercropping
Intercropping has been found to suppress the weeds through formation of good canopies due to
competitive planting pattern and thus provided an opportunity to utilize intercropping system as a
tool of weed management (Rao and Shetty, 1976). The suppression of weed growth in
intercropping system is mainly due to increased leaf area index and light interaction. Inclusion of
short duration and quick growing intercrops in the rows of long duration and tall growing crops has
been found to suppress the weed infestation resulting in considerable saving of weeding
requirement in base crops.
Intercropping
Farmers getting good
yield from weed free
crop

Weed free crop Dr. Brij Nandan


inspecting th e FLD
crop
Dr. N.P Singh Director ,IIPR, Kanpur
,Inspecting theChickpea crop at
Farmers field in Village NUD

weedy check
Mechanization options
for pulse cultivation
Use of Seed drill in pulses cultivation

Use of power sprayers

Use of wheel hoe


Use of rain gun to supplement moisture during stress
conditions

Use of harvesting machines

 Threshing through multicrop thresher


Sowing operations of rabi pulses with seed drill at farmers field
GNG-1581
Chickpea
GNG-1581
Chickpea

PL-6
Lentil

Field view of rabi pulses while


monitoring by PI

VL-42
Fieldpea
Lentil Variety
PL-6 NALMOT at farmers
field

Field Pea Variety Field Pea Variety


VL-42 VL-42
Enhancing profitability of pulses production
• Reducing cost of cultivation

• Promotion of market preferred cultivars


• Value addition and linking farmers to market
Threshing and winnowing of kharif pulses
through different means
EDUCATING FARMERS IN LEARNING BY DOING
WORKSHOP AT DEMONSTRATION BLOCK
Impact of improved production technology on
productivity of pulses (Mean of FLD 1993-98)

Types of intervention No .of FLDs % increase in yield


Improved varieties 5210 30.34
Fertilizers 423 14.31
Weeds 280 21.01
79.97 %
Insects 386 26.08
Rhizobium culture 178 12.00
Irrigation 130 32.65

IIPR, 1998
Minimum Support Price – Pulses
MOA&FW Monitoring
Team inspected
Crop 2007-08 2011-12
demonstrations of the 2013-14
project
Chickpea 1445 2800 3100
Arhar 1410 3200 4300
PI monitoring
Moong 1520 3500 4500 Mungbean crop
Internal monitoring
Urd
team monitoring 1700 3300 4300
demonstrations
Lentil 1545 2800 2950
Project team
educating the
farmers

Field pea crop at


faremers field

Field day
organization
Thanks for patience
Hearing

You might also like