The document summarizes the historical research on the discovery of the Philippines. It discusses that while Magellan was the first European to arrive in 1521, the Philippines had been discovered and inhabited long before by ancient traders and settlers from China, India, the Middle East and surrounding regions, with evidence of contact dating back thousands of years. The earliest evidence of human occupation comes from stone tools used by Homo erectus around 700,000 years ago in Kalinga. Thus, Magellan did not discover the Philippines, which had been inhabited for centuries prior to European contact.
The document summarizes the historical research on the discovery of the Philippines. It discusses that while Magellan was the first European to arrive in 1521, the Philippines had been discovered and inhabited long before by ancient traders and settlers from China, India, the Middle East and surrounding regions, with evidence of contact dating back thousands of years. The earliest evidence of human occupation comes from stone tools used by Homo erectus around 700,000 years ago in Kalinga. Thus, Magellan did not discover the Philippines, which had been inhabited for centuries prior to European contact.
Original Description:
Performance Task on GEC 102 (Readings in Philippine History)
The document summarizes the historical research on the discovery of the Philippines. It discusses that while Magellan was the first European to arrive in 1521, the Philippines had been discovered and inhabited long before by ancient traders and settlers from China, India, the Middle East and surrounding regions, with evidence of contact dating back thousands of years. The earliest evidence of human occupation comes from stone tools used by Homo erectus around 700,000 years ago in Kalinga. Thus, Magellan did not discover the Philippines, which had been inhabited for centuries prior to European contact.
The document summarizes the historical research on the discovery of the Philippines. It discusses that while Magellan was the first European to arrive in 1521, the Philippines had been discovered and inhabited long before by ancient traders and settlers from China, India, the Middle East and surrounding regions, with evidence of contact dating back thousands of years. The earliest evidence of human occupation comes from stone tools used by Homo erectus around 700,000 years ago in Kalinga. Thus, Magellan did not discover the Philippines, which had been inhabited for centuries prior to European contact.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27
Historical Research:
The Discovery of the Philippines
Problem • Did Magellan discover the Philippines? If not, why was it said that he “discovered” the Philippines? • If not Magellan, then who discovered the Philippines? • When was the Philippines discovered? Hypothesis Magellan did not discover the Philippines. The first people to discover the Philippines are actually traders from China, India, Middle East and the neighboring countries in the South East Asia. Discovery happened centuries prior the arrival of Europeans. Location of relevant sources • Library • Scribd • The Internet Summary of information based from sources I. Arrival of Magellan • Ferdinand Magellan and his crew caught sight of and landed on the Philippine shores in March 1521. • This was the first recorded sighting of the Philippines by Europeans. • Magellan claimed the islands he saw for Charles I of Spain and named them Islas de San Lazaro. Summary of information based from sources II. Pre-Magellan’s Arrival • There had been contact between early settlers of the Philippines and the Hindus, Chinese, Japanese and Arabs before the 16th century. Summary of information based from sources II. Pre-Magellan’s Arrival - Hindu • Archeological findings like the image of Siva and clay medallion with image of Garuda engravings were proof of connection between Philippines and Hindus. • Spaniards, upon arrival, found systems of writing developed from the alphabet then used by Hindu people at Java that were being used by Filipino people. Summary of information based from sources II. Pre-Magellan’s Arrival - Chinese • Prior to the coming of Spaniards, trade had already existed between China and Philippines according to Chinese scholars Ma Tuan-Li and Chau Ju-Kua. • The Chinese had the connection in the Philippines even in the early years during the Tang era (618-906) • Trade became active during the Sang Dynasty (960-1279), which greatly flourished during the Yuan (1271-1368) and Ming (1368-1662) Dynasties. Summary of information based from sources II. Pre-Magellan’s Arrival - Japanese • At the time of Spain’s early occupation, there were already active communities of Japanese settlers and traders in Manila and parts of Northern Luzon. Summary of information based from sources II. Pre-Magellan’s Arrival - Arab • Prior to arrival of Spaniards, Islam, an Arab influence, was already extending its influence beyond Maguindanao and the Sulu Archipelago. • The Sultanate of Sulu was established in Jolo in1450. Summary of information based from sources II. Pre-Magellan’s Arrival - LCI • The Laguna Copperplate Inscription, the earliest known written document found in the Philippines, is written in an ancient Indonesian script called Kavi. • The language used was a mixture of Sanskrit, old Javanese, old Malay and old Tagalog. Summary of information based from sources III. Models of Migration – H. Otley Beyer • Wave Migration Theory: the first migrants are the “Dawn Man” who resembled the Java Man, Peking Man and other Asian Homo sapiens that existed about 250,000 years ago followed by the Negritos who arrived about 30,000 years ago, then the Indonesians and Malays who came to the islands in boats about 2,000 years ago. • No archeological or historical evidence to support this theory. Summary of information based from sources III. Models of Migration – Wilhelm Solheim • Nusantao Maritime Trading and Communication Network: People with distant origins from 50,000 years ago in the area of present-day coastal eastern Vietnam and Southern China had moved to the area of the Bismarck Islands south and east of Mindanao and later spread among seafarers from the area to the rest of Island Southeast Asia. Summary of information based from sources III. Models of Migration – Peter Bellwood • Out of Taiwan: the first Austronesians reached the Philippines at around 2200 BC from Taiwan Summary of information based from sources IV. Archeological Discoveries (Paleolithic) • Tabon Man (Palawan, 1962) – possibly the oldest Homo sapiens sapiens fossil evidence in Southeast Asia in the form of a tibia fragment dating to 47,000 (+/- 11,000) years ago • Callao Man (Cagayan, 2007) – a hominin third metatarsal discovered and dated to 66,700 (+/-1000) years ago. The unknown hominin was later identified as a new species, the Homo luzonensis Summary of information based from sources IV. Archeological Discoveries (Paleolithic) • Cache of butchered rhino bones and dozens of stone tools are discovered in Kalinga in 2018 which proves that there has been human occupation in the Philippines more than 700,000 years ago. • Most likely used by Homo erectus, an archaic human species that first evolved 2 million years ago and the first member of our genus to expand out of Africa. Homo erectus bones have been found in China and Java. Sources 1. Calilung F.C ., Jaime V.G. (2013) Kamalayan; Kultura't Kasaysayan. 79-90 2. Garcia, C. (2015). Philippine History and Government for College Students. 28-31 3. Wiley, J. (2009). A Short History of South-East Asia. 213-214 4. Marvin, U. (2016). History and Culture of Philippines, Early History. 23-25 5. Barrows, D. (1905). History of the Philippines. 99-131 Sources 6. Morrow, P. (2006). The Laguna Copperplate Inscription. Retrieved from http://paulmorrow.ca/lcieng.htm 7. Alvarez, A. (2019). The First “Filipinos”. Retrieved from https://www.philippine-history.org/early-filipinos.htm 8. Solheim II, W. (2006). Origins of Filipinos and Their Languages. 5-11 9. Bellwood, P. (2007). Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago. 213-214 Sources 10.NCCA. (2006). The Tabon Cave Complex and all of Lipuun. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/1860/ 11.Mijares, A. et al. (2010). New evidence for a 67,000-year- old human presence at Callao Cave, Luzon, Philippines. Journal of Human Evolution. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.008 Sources 12.Greshko, M. et al. (2019). New species of ancient human discovered in the Philippines. National Geographic. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/04/ne w-species-ancient-human-discovered-luzon-philippines- homo-luzonensis/ Sources 13.Wade, L. (2018). Ancient humans settled the Philippines 700,000 years ago. Science. Retrieved from https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/05/ancient- humans-settled-philippines-700000-years-ago-new-fossils- reveal Evaluation of historical sources • External Criticism All the books that we used as sources except Barrows have been published in the last 15 years. Evaluation of historical sources • Internal Criticism Information from all sources are the same. The author of Philippine History and Government for College Students is a Doctor of Education and Dean of College of Liberal Arts, Criminology and Education at Jose Rizal University. Evaluation of historical sources • Internal Criticism Kamalayan; Kultura't Kasaysayan (FC Calilung, VG Jaime, 2013) cited multiple and well-known historians/references (Agoncillo, Constantino, Zaide). John Wiley and Sons is a well-established international publisher. Evaluation of historical sources • Internal Criticism Uzo Marvin is a historian and has published multiple books on history of different countries. The-Philippine-History.org, though cannot be edited by users as it is handled by a single admin, still relies on multiple sources and users’feedback. All other sources from the world wide web are well- known publications and/or recognized organizations. Limitation of research study • We have very little information about the arrival of the ancient people and their discovery of the Philippines. • The earliest written document in the Philippines dates back to 900 A.D. only. • No human bones were found in Kalinga which is crucial in establishing the presence of a human species older than the Callao man. • Once older fossils are discovered, conclusion becomes invalid. Conclusion Magellan did not discover the Philippines. He was, however, among the first Europeans to set foot in our country. The ancient men (most likely Homo erectus) who used the stone tools found in Kalinga could have been part of the group that discovered the country 700,000 years ago.