Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 125 views

    Math Department RPMS Cover Sy 2021 2022

    Uploaded by

    Roy Allan T. Ramo
    This document contains the performance standards and means of verification for evaluating teachers based on 4 key result areas: content knowledge and pedagogy, learning environment, diversity of learners and planning/assessment, and community linkages. It lists various forms of documentation that can serve as evidence for meeting each standard, including classroom observations, lesson plans, supplementary teaching materials, assessment data, and records of professional development activities.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Math Department RPMS Cover Sy 2021 2022

    Uploaded by

    Roy Allan T. Ramo
    125 views27 pages
    This document contains the performance standards and means of verification for evaluating teachers based on 4 key result areas: content knowledge and pedagogy, learning environment, diversity of learners and planning/assessment, and community linkages. It lists various forms of documentation that can serve as evidence for meeting each standard, including classroom observations, lesson plans, supplementary teaching materials, assessment data, and records of professional development activities.

    Original Title

    MATH-DEPARTMENT-RPMS-COVER-SY-2021-2022

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains the performance standards and means of verification for evaluating teachers based on 4 key result areas: content knowledge and pedagogy, learning environment, diversity of learners and planning/assessment, and community linkages. It lists various forms of documentation that can serve as evidence for meeting each standard, including classroom observations, lesson plans, supplementary teaching materials, assessment data, and records of professional development activities.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    125 views27 pages

    Math Department RPMS Cover Sy 2021 2022

    Uploaded by

    Roy Allan T. Ramo
    This document contains the performance standards and means of verification for evaluating teachers based on 4 key result areas: content knowledge and pedagogy, learning environment, diversity of learners and planning/assessment, and community linkages. It lists various forms of documentation that can serve as evidence for meeting each standard, including classroom observations, lesson plans, supplementary teaching materials, assessment data, and records of professional development activities.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 27

    CRISTINA JOY D.

    RELATOR
    Teacher I

    NANCITA R. SARDIDO

    Head Teacher II, Rater

    LIBERTY L. RASGO-ARELLANO, Ed.D.

    School Principal III


    ROY ALLAN T. RAMO

    Teacher II

    NANCITA R. SARDIDO

    Head Teacher II, Rater

    LIBERTY L. RASGO-ARELLANO, Ed.D.

    School Principal III


    KRA 1
    CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
    AND PEDAGOGY
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    Classroom Observation Tool


    (COT) rating sheet or inter-
    observer agreement form
    from:
    1
    An Observation of synchronous
    teaching.
    2
    (limited face-to-face teaching, online
    teaching or two-way radio instruction)
    If option 1 is not possible, an observation
    of a recorded video lesson or audio
    3
    lesson that is SLM-based or MELC-
    aligned.
    If options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
    observation of a demonstration teaching
    via LAC.
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    One (1) lesson plan with


    annotations identifying
    the research-based
    knowledge and/or
    principles of teaching and
    learning used as bases for
    planning/designing the
    lesson.
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    Classroom Observation Tool


    (COT) rating sheet or inter-
    observer agreement form
    from:
    1
    An Observation of synchronous
    teaching.
    2 (limited face-to-face teaching, online
    teaching or two-way radio instruction)
    If option 1 is not possible, an observation
    3
    of a recorded video lesson or audio
    lesson that is SLM-based or MELC-
    aligned.
    If options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
    observation of a demonstration teaching
    via LAC.
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    Classroom Observation Tool


    (COT) rating sheet or inter-
    observer agreement form
    1 from:
    An Observation of synchronous
    teaching.
    (limited face-to-face teaching, online
    2
    teaching or two-way radio instruction)
    If option 1 is not possible, an observation
    of a recorded video lesson or audio
    3 lesson that is SLM-based or MELC-
    aligned.
    If options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
    observation of a demonstration teaching
    via LAC.
    KRA 2
    LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    Classroom Observation Tool


    (COT) rating sheet or inter-
    observer agreement form
    1 from:
    An Observation of synchronous
    teaching.
    (limited face-to-face teaching, online
    2
    teaching or two-way radio instruction)
    If option 1 is not possible, an observation
    of a recorded video lesson or audio
    3
    lesson that is SLM-based or MELC-
    aligned.
    If options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
    observation of a demonstration teaching
    via LAC.
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n
    Classroom Observation Tool
    (COT) rating sheet or inter-
    observer agreement form
    from:
    1
    An Observation of synchronous
    teaching.
    (limited face-to-face teaching, online
    2
    teaching or two-way radio instruction)
    If option 1 is not possible, an observation
    of a recorded video lesson or audio
    3
    lesson that is SLM-based or MELC-
    aligned.
    If options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
    observation of a demonstration teaching
    via LAC.
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n
    SET A
    Any supplementary material (in print/digital
    format) made by the ratee and used in the lesson
    delivery
    that highlights maintaining learning environments that nurture and
    inspire learners to participate, cooperate and collaborate in continued
    learning
     activity sheet/s
     one lesson from a self-learning module (SLM)
     lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, lesson
    exemplars, and the likes
     video lesson
     audio lesson
     other learning materials in print/digital format (please specify
    and provide annotations)
    with client/learner feedback on how the material encouraged the
    S E and
    learners to participate, cooperate, T collaborate
    B
    Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
    sheet or inter-observer agreement form
    1 from:
    An Observation of synchronous teaching.
    2 (online teaching or two-way radio instruction)
    If option 1 is not possible, an observation of a recorded video
    3 lesson or audio lesson that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned.
    If options 1 and 2 are not possible, an observation of a
    demonstration teaching via LAC.
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n
    SET A
    Any supplementary material (in print/digital
    format) made by the ratee and used in the lesson
    delivery
    that highlights a range of strategies that maintain learning
    environments that motivate learners to work productively by
    assuming responsibility for their own learning activity sheet/s
     activity sheet/s
     one lesson from a self-learning module (SLM)
     lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, lesson
    exemplars, and the likes
     video lesson
     audio lesson
     other learning materials in print/digital format (please specify
    and provide annotations)SET B
    Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
    sheet or inter-observer agreement form
    1 from:
    An Observation of synchronous teaching.
    (online teaching or two-way radio instruction)
    2
    If option 1 is not possible, an observation of a recorded video
    3 lesson or audio lesson that is SLM-based or MELC-aligned.
    If options 1 and 2 are not possible, an observation of a
    demonstration teaching via LAC.
    KRA 3
    DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS,
    CURRICULUM and PLANNING,
    & ASSESSMENT and
    REPORTING
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n
    SET A
    Classroom Observation Tool (COT)
    rating sheet or inter-observer
    agreement form from:
    1
    An Observation of synchronous teaching.
    (limited face-to-face teaching, online teaching
    or two-way radio instruction)
    2
    If option 1 is not possible, an observation of a
    recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is
    SLM-based or MELC-aligned.
    3
    If options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
    observation of a demonstration
    S E T B teaching via
    LAC.

    Teacher Reflection Form (TRF)


    on designing, adapting, and/or implementing
    teaching strategies that are responsive to
    learners with disabilities, giftedness and talents
    and a certification from the school head that the
    ratee’s classes have no identified learner/s with
    disabilities, giftedness and/or talents
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n
    SET A
    Classroom Observation Tool (COT)
    rating sheet or inter-observer
    agreement form from:
    1 An Observation of synchronous teaching.
    (limited face-to-face teaching, online teaching
    or two-way radio instruction)
    2 If option 1 is not possible, an observation of a
    recorded video lesson or audio lesson that is
    SLM-based or MELC-aligned.
    3
    If options 1 and 2 are not possible, an
    observation of a demonstration
    S E T B teaching via
    LAC.

    Teacher Reflection Form (TRF)


    on adapting and using culturally appropriate
    teaching strategies to address the needs of
    learners from indigenous groups and a
    certification from the school head that the
    ratee’s classes have no identified learner/s from
    indigenous groups.
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    1 Proof of evaluation on the implementation


    of the adapted /contextualized learning
    program
    2
    Progress report in learners under the
    adapted/ contextualized learning program
    after implementation
    3
    Accomplishment/completion/ technical
    report on the implementation of an adapted/
    contextualized
    4
    Action plan/activity proposal/ activity
    matrix that shows an
    adapted/contextualized learning program
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n
    A list of identified least/most
    mastered skills based on the
    frequency of error/correct responses
    with any of the following
    supporting MOV
    1
    accomplishment report for
    remedial/enhancement activities (e.g.,
    remedial sessions, Summer Reading
    2 Camp, Phil-IRI-based reading program

    intervention material used for remediation/


    reinforcement/enhancement
    3
    lesson plan/activity log for remediation/
    enhancement utilizing of assessment data
    to modify teaching and learning practices
    or programs
    KRA 4
    COMMUNITY LINKAGES AND
    PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT
    & PERSONAL GROWTH AND
    PROFESSIONAL
    DEVELOPMENT
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    1 Accomplishment report of a
    program/project/activity that maintains
    a learning environment

    2 Program/Project/Activity plan on
    maintaining a learning environment

    3 Minutes of a consultative
    meeting/community stakeholders
    meeting about a program/
    project/activity that maintains a
    learning environment with proof of
    attendance
    4
    Communication letter about a
    program/project/activity that maintains
    a learning environment
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n
    1 Annotated video/audio recording of
    one’s teaching that shows impact of
    regularly reviewing one’s teaching
    practice/s
    2
    Annotated teaching material that shows
    impact of regularly reviewing one’s
    teaching practice/s
     lesson plan
     activity sheet
     assessment materials
     others (please specify)
    3
    Personal reflection notes as outputs
    from participation in review of personal
    teaching practices in four (4) quarters
    4
    Proof of attendance (with date) in LAC
    or coaching and mentoring sessions for
    review of personal teaching practices
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    1 Proof of participation/ involvement in a


    school-community partnership for the
    implementation of a school
    policy/procedure (e.g., certificate as
    committee member, narrative report)

    2 Minutes of parent-teacher
    conference/stakeholders’ meeting about
    an implemented school policy/
    procedure with proof attendance

    3 Communication letter about an


    implemented school policy/procedure
    sent to parent/guardian
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    One (1) lesson plan


    with annotations
    explaining the application of a
    learner-centered teaching
    philosophy (e.g.,
    constructivism, existentialism)
    used as basis for
    planning/designing the lesson
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    1 Documented feedback from superiors,


    colleagues, learners, parents/guardian, or
    other stakeholders directly reflecting the
    ratee’s good practices that uphold the
    dignity of teaching as a profession
    2
    Annotated evidence of practice indirectly
    linking to the upholding of the dignity of
    teaching as a profession by exhibiting
    qualities such as caring attitude, respect,
    and integrity
     Screenshot of text message/chat/email/any
    form of communication with
    parents/guardian or leaners (name or any
    identifier removed)
     Remarks from mentor/master
    teacher/school head about one’s qualities
    (e.g. entries in Performance Monitoring and
    Coaching Form (PMCF) or in Mid-Year
    Review Form)
     Recognition from the school/school
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n

    1 Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase


    II
    2

    Mid-Year Review Form (MRF)


    3
    IPCRF-DP
    4
    Certification from the ICT
    Coordinator/ School Head/Focal
    Person-In-Charge of e-SAT
    KRA 5
    PLUS FACTOR
    M e a n s o f Ve r i f i c a t i o n
    1 Committee Involvement

    2 Advisorship of Co-curricular Activities

    3 Book or Journal Authorship/


    Contributorship
    4
    Coordinatorship /chairpersonship
    5
    Coaching and mentoring learners in
    6 competitions

    Serving as Reliever of Classes in the


    7 absence of Teachers

    8 Mentoring pre-service teachers

    9 Participation in demonstration teaching

    10
    Participation as technical working group
    member

    Others (please specify and provide

    You might also like