Q Gate Check List SAP Activate
Q Gate Check List SAP Activate
Q Gate Check List SAP Activate
PUBLIC
Agenda
• Overview
The new SAP Activate Methodology requires an adjusted generic Project Quality Gate Checklist
• Covers all project types and is generic for all various implementation scenarios and deployment
types
• Four mandatory Quality Gates (Preparation, Explore, Realize, Deploy)
• Checklist items are identical for all Quality Gates
• Additional checklist items/deliverables need to be added by the different project types along the
implementation lifecycle
CLOUD READY
START WITH BEST PRACTICES
Leverage the flexibility and speed
Use ready-to run business processes
of the cloud
SAP places quality at the center of projects that we deliver for our customers.
A Quality Gate provides oversight and early visibility into potential risks and issues. It has
a profound impact on reducing project risk and driving Customer Value.
Objectives: Benefits:
• Assure quality at the milestones of the • Enhance project quality
project
• Minimize project risk exposure
• Assure that all key deliverables and actions
have been completed in compliance with • Manage expectations and monitor
best practices customer satisfaction
• Enable project managers to continuously • Reduce cycle time - get it done right the
communicate and build quality into the first time
project
• Are we following the SAP Activate methodology to provide a guided project approach?
• Are provided tools and methods used in order to avoid unnecessary expenditure of
redevelopment of such things?
• Have we taken into consideration what happens if the customer relationship is no longer
positive?
• Can the project, without serious disturbance, continue if key people are no longer unexpectedly
available?
• Do we have an organizational and operational structure, which allows us to identify risks and
disturbances in the project at an early stage and confront them?
is not…
• A guarantee that the project will carry out no more risks and will never escalate.
• A comprehensive project management review that prioritizes and reports all project risks and
recommendations in a balanced way.
• A detailed content review of all key deliverables of the project.
• A complete view on the project, because the customer is not involved in these sessions (as of now).
• Overview
A minimum of four Quality Gates will be mandated to perform for SAP implementation projects
• Within complex projects or projects with open risks that are critical, additional Q-Gates may be executed
• Within agile projects G-Gate reviews for each release / sprint may be sufficient
Review
• Check that necessary standards and project approach have been established
• Overview
Prior to the end of each stage in the project lifecycle, before moving into the next
Delivery events phase
Result
Pass/No Pass Status (based on Approval from QA Manager and Delivery/ Demand
Manager)
Follow-Up
QA manager dispatch all follow-up activities and ensure that they have been
executed
1 -3 hours 2 Assessment
Presentation of status of project Project Manager
Review of status of stage deliverables Quality Mgr, Proj. Mgr
Maintenance of scorecard ratings Quality Mgr.
Identification of action items and satisfaction Quality Mgr., Proj. Mgr.
Q-Gate preparation
• Call or short meeting to plan the assessment
• Present: QM/DM/PM, others on invitation by PM/QM
PM prepares the checklist for the appropriate Q-Gate by indicating the deliverables of the project:
• Project Management key deliverables
• Key deliverables
• Other deliverables added on demand
Deliverables should be provided to the QM team one week in advance of the Q-Gate assessment
meeting.
PM prepares to present overall project status and status of each indicated deliverable.
QM studies the provided documentation.
Yellow and Red acceptance scores should be actioned. The action, the due date as well as the action
owner are recorded.
By the end of the session the minutes and action items are revisited, including the needs for
additional project support and final sign-off decision of the Quality Gate
© 2021 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ PUBLIC 17
Project Quality Gate in Detail
Example on Evaluating Individual Deliverables
The Project Manager has to demonstrate to the Q-Gate team the sufficient quality of each individual applicable deliverable in Q-Gate
Checklist (or Excel Scorecard). With regard to his / her project scope. However a full deep content review is not possible due to time
constraints. This is also not in the scope of a Quality Gate.
Acceptance Criteria:
• Deliverable is physically available (printed-off or shown on screen)
and in the right format/using an appropriate template
Example: final version of Solution Validation is shown on screen
• Deliverable has followed the appropriate sign-off procedure
Example: Solution Validation has been physically signed off by Customer and Project Manager or
e-mail is shown where Customer and PM approved the document.
• Deliverable is actively used for the purpose it’s meant for
Example: will the Solution Validation be used to accept the configured solution at the acceptance test? Example: how will the project deal
with change requests to the solution validation?
• Stated acceptance criteria have been met
Conditionally Accepted: There are some action items in place in order to complete or
improve certain deliverables. No direct risk for project success.
Not Accepted: Indicates that this quality gate is not passed. There are serious action
items in place. Direct risk for project success is given.
Overall status cannot set to a better level as the single checklist item status of:
Risk Management
WBS (deliverables list, resources, scope)
Project Management Plan
Budget Management
Time Management (schedule)
• Overview
Question 1
Workstream Deliverable 1 Question 2
Supporting Questions covering
individual project types
Setup
Question n
Workstream as
individual Deliverable 2
Topics as checklist. On this level status to be assigned.
knowledge area Deliverable 3
Project
Are all roles in the project defined?
Roles and responsibilities Is a description of participated Roles and their Responsibilities available (RACI)?
Management Has the process workshop been prepared by the product owner and the team?
Steering Committee
Sample
……
……..
WORKSTREAM
WORK STREAM
description Acceptance Criteria on Deliverable
DELIVERABLES
Phase
Acceptance Criteria on Deliverable