Local Media7206356050706637850
Local Media7206356050706637850
Local Media7206356050706637850
Philosophy Of The
Human Person
NAEJ
LUAP
ERTRAS
JEAN-PAUL SARTRE
JEAN-PAUL SARTRE
Explains that when you look at
a person, the act of objection
allows you to capture that
person’s freedom to be what he
or she wants to be. That is, you
are limiting a person’s
possibilities by a look.
JEAN-PAUL SARTRE
This is evident when you
stereotype or label a person
based on his or her
appearance or certain
actions. (Attribution effect)
JEAN-PAUL SARTRE
TOTALIZATION
Occurs when one limit the
other to set of a rational
categories, be they racial,
sexual or otherwise.
One totalize the other when
one claim he/she already know
who is that person before they
can even speak to.
WHO IS HE?
DNUMDE
LRESSUH
EDMUND HUSSERL
EDMUND HUSSERL
Believes that
intersubjectivity is more
than just shared
understanding, but is the
capability to put oneself in
the place where other is.
EDMUND HUSSERL
Intersubjectivity occurs when
people undergo acts of empathy
because an intersubjective
experience is highly empathic.
This happens when people put
themselves in the shoes of
others.
EMPATHY
• The ability to share emotion is driven by
a person’s awareness that the other is a
person with thought and feelings.
• Enables us to experience another
person’s emotion, such as hapiness,
anger, and sadness.
• Sympathy is “feeling with”, while
empathy is “feeling in”.
AVAILABILITY
The willingness
of a person to be
present and be
at disposal of
another
THE ETHICS
OF CARE
Is an ethical theory
that emphasizes the
moral dimension of
relationship and
interactions.
WHO IS HE?
ENER
SETRACSED
RENE DESCARTES
RENE DESCARTES
As a proponent of the doctrine of
individualism, he resolved to doubt
absolutely everything that could
possibly be doubted– in the hope of
thereby finding something that was
beyond doubt. ) “Doubt everything that
can be doubted”
According to him there is one thing
that cannot be doubted, and that is
thinking.
SEEMING
Actions where an individual presents
himself or herself in a certain way when
dealing with others. Persons take on “roles”
or act out characters when dealing with
certain people or when in certain situations.
There may be instances when people
behave a certain way in order to
intentionally deceive or manipulate other
people.
Most human interactions, however, are not
based on deception. Since our human nature
desires us to uphold dignity and goodness,
our interactions with others are also geared
towards what is good and beneficial. These
lead human to strive to achieve deeper and
more substantial interactions and relations
with other people.
This deeper and more genuine interaction is
called dialogue
What
characterizes a
genuine
interaction?
DIALOGUE
NITRAM
REBUB
MARTIN BUBER
MARTIN BUBER
A jewish philosopher had a great
interest in the study of relating
ourselves to others.
He said “i” or yourself, can only
realized through recognition of “others.”
The “i ” cannot be aware of its
uniqueness and existence without
encountering the “other”
SEVERAL WAYS BY WHICH WE
RELATE TO OTHERS
(ACCORDING TO BUBER)
THE “I-I” RLATIONSHIP
“I-I” RELATIONSHIP IN WHICH
PEOPLE MAKE THEMSELVES
THE CENTER OF THEIR WORLD.
TALKING TO OTHER PEOPLE DO
NOT INTEREST THEM AND IF
THEY TALK TO OTHERS,IT IS THE
“I ” WHO WILL BE THE CENTER
OF THE CONVERSATION.
THEY DON’T REALLY LISTEN TO
WHAT OTHERS ARE SHARING.
“I-IT” RELATIONSHIP
Relativeness or
relatedness –
ability to
understand one and
other.
LISTED ON THE DIAGRAM ARE SOME
TOOLS FOR INTER SUBJECTIVE
COMMUNICATION:
•Education – the
transmitting of ideas,
knowledge, and or
experiences with one and
other.
AUTHENTIC DIALOGUE
IS A FORM OF INTERPERSONAL
COMMUNICATION WHICH OCCURS WHEN
PEOPLE RECOGNIZE THAT THEY ARE PART
OF GREATER WHOLE AND CAN RELATE WITH
OTHERS WITHIN THE WHOLE
IN SOME CASES, NON VERVAL DIALOGICAL
RELATIONS ARE NOT ONLY THE MORE
APPROPRIATE MEANS OF CONVERSATION,
BUT CONSIDERED AS A MORE PROFOUND OF
CONVERSATION.
I-THOU RELATIONSHIP FOR BUBER
IS EXPERIENCE OF BEING THROUGH
CONVERSATION IN COMMUNION
WITH THE OTHER; AND HERE, THE
OTHER MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE A
HUMAN BEING. IT COULD BE YOUR
DOG, OR YOUR TREE, OR GOD.
IN LINE WITH THIS, WE MUST
REMEMBER THAT A PRIVILEGE
FORM OF RELATIONSHIP IS THE I-
THOU RELATIONSHIP. THIS
RELATIONSHIP INVOLVES EFFORT.
MARTIN
HEIDEGGER
MARTIN HEIDEGGER
• ARGUED THAT HUMAN IS A CONVERSATION.
• CONVERSATION IS MORE THAN JUST A SIMPLE
TALK BUT RATHER A DIALOGUE. IT MEANS THAT
HUMANITY IS GRADUALLY ACCUTOMED TO
COMMUNICATION ABOUT BEING.
• LANGUAGE, AS ONE OF THE CONTROLS OF
HUMAN, CREATES HUMAN WORLD. LANGUAGE IS
A TOOL FOR COMMUNICATION, INFORMATION,
AND SOCIAL COLLABORATION.
HEIDEGGER
FOR HEIDEGGER, ALL CONVERSATIONS
ARE REALLY ONE CONVERSATION, THE
SUBJECT OF WHICH IS BEING. A
CONVERSATION IS CREATIVE,
EXPRESSIVE, AND PROFOUND THAT
ALLOWS HUMANITY TO EXIST AS MORE
THAN OBJECTS. WE ARE HUMAN
BEINGS WHO SINCERELY CARE MORE
THAN ACQUIRING INFORMATION AND
SATISFACTION.
PAULO FREIRE
ACCORDING TO PAULO
FREIRE’S”PEDAGOGY OF THE
OPPRESSED”, DIALOGUE IS ENCOUNTER
BETWEEN MEN, MEDIATED BY THE
PEOPLE IN ORDER TO TRANFORM THE
WORLD.
PAULO FREIRE
FOR HIM, DIALOGUE IS NOT JUST
SIMPLY AN INTERACTION BETWEEN
PEOPLE TO EXPLORE THE WORLD
TOGETHER, IT IS ALSO A SIGN OF
FREEDOM, EQUALITY, AND
RESPONSIBILITY IN DISCOVERING
AND TRANSFORMING THE WORLD OF
EVERY HUMAN BEING.
PAULO FREIRE