Chapter 2management Theories

Chapter Two
MANAGEMENT THEORIES/
THE DEVELOPMENT OF
MANAGEMENT THOUGHT
The 4 broad categories of
Management Theories/ Schools of
Thought
1. Pre-classical Management Thought= Early

Management Theory
2. Classical Management Theories
3. Neo-Classical Theories
4. Modern Management Theories
CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

FUNDAMENTALS OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR, THIRD CANADIAN
EDITION 1-2
Start up discussion point
What factors do you think shape and

reshape management thought and
practice?

FUNDAMENTALS OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR, THIRD
CANADIAN EDITION 3
1-3
PEST/STEP/SEPT
External Environmental factors

influencing Management/business
etc….

CANADIAN EDITION 4
1-4
Factors Shaping Management Thought
 Management thought has been shaped over

a period of centuries by three major sets of
forces:
1) Social forces
 Refer to those aspects of a culture that guide and influence relationships
among people.
2) Political forces
 political and legal institutions influence on people and organizations
3) Economic forces
 Pertain to the availability, production and distribution of resources in a society.
Early Management Practices/Pre-classical
Management Thought
Early Management
Practices/Pre-classical
Management Thought
1.Overview of Early Management Practices

2.The Industrial Revolution’s Influence on Management
Practices
3.Some examples of early management practices: Egypt,
Roman Empire, Roman Catholic church & Greece
4.Principal pre-classical/early management contributors –
Robert Owen, Charles Babbage, and Adam Smith
Class activity – discuss the
following points in your small
team
1 - Do you agree with the motion/notion/idea that the
practice of management is older than its theory or vice
versa?
2 - How do you think or in what ways does the Industrial
revolution contributed to the development of
management?
3 – What can you say about early management practices
that were observed in Egypt, Roman Empire, and Roman
Catholic church etc?

CANADIAN EDITION 8
1-8
Early Management Practices
 the inception of management thought dates
back to the days when people first attempted to
accomplish goals by working together in groups
 However, attempts to develop theories and
principles of management are relatively recent.
 In particular, the industrial revolution of the 19th
century gave rise to the need for a systematic
approach to management
The Industrial Revolution’s Influence On
Management Practices
 Machine power began to substitute for human
power

Lead to mass production of economical goods –
machine and labour combination, and more of machines
and less of labor
 Improved and less costly transportation systems
became available
Created larger markets for goods – marketing
management
 Larger organizations developed to serve larger
markets
Created the need for formalized management
practices – authority and responsibility
Early Management Practices Cont’d
 Some examples of early management practices:
1. Egypt - The construction of the Egyptian pyramid
(500-525 BC) is a testimony of the ancient Egyptian
organization and managerial abilities
 The ancient Egyptians constructed the pyramid by
100,000 labor forces for 20 years
 This construction shows how extensively Egyptians
used the management functions of planning,
organizing, staffing, directing and controlling.
“The best managers in history are the ones who managed the building of
the pyramids." Peter Drucker
2. Romans
 the most famous is the Emperor Diocletian's
reorganization of his empire.
 Establish management level
 Delegation of authority
3. Roman Catholic Church
Use of job descriptions for its priests, presbyters, and
other religious workers - specialization of activities
The chain of command (hierarchy of authority) that
extended from the pope to the laity was created
Staff Authority - advisors to key church officials
4. Greece – ancient Greece were known for

organized trading activities.
 Exhibited a real skill and capacity for
management in the operation of trading
companies.
 Use of uniform methods and motion study
as the means to maximize output
Class Activity
1 – first, in your small team identify the three
main/principal pre-classical contributors;
2 – then, discuss what their contributions were.
14
Early Management Pioneers/Contributors
 Principal pre-classical contributors:

 Robert Owen
 Adam Smith, and
 Charles Babbage
Robert Owen (1771 - 1858)
 British industrialist and an owner-manager of several successful
cotton mills in Scotland
 the first managers to recognize the importance of human
resource in an organization. Because of this he was considered
as ‘father of modern personnel management’.
 His ideas laid the groundwork for human relations movement
 In his organization, Owen :
 Reduce working hours
 Set a minimum hiring age
 Provide meal, housing, and shopping facilities for employees
 Improved working conditions in the factory
 He argued, "Improving the condition of employees would
inevitability lead to increased production and profits".
Charles Babbage (1792-1871)
 Built the first practical mechanical calculator and a prototype of
modern computers
 known as "the father of modern computing".
 He was an avid proponent of:
 Division of labor
 Economies of scale in manufacturing
 Incentive pay
 Profit sharing
 Application of mathematical concepts in production
 Harmonious relationship between management and workers
 Babbage laid the ground work for much of the work that later became
known as Scientific Management.
Adam Smith
 Published The Wealth of Nations in 1776
 Advocated the economic advantages that organizations
and society would reap from the division of labor (job
specialization):
• Increased productivity by increasing each
worker’s skill and dexterity.
• As a result, Time saved that is commonly lost in
changing tasks.
• The creation of labor-saving inventions and
machinery.
Classical Management Theory
Start up topics
1..What was the focus of classical
management theory?
2. What were the two broad
perspectives/branches of classical management theory?
2.
Classical Management Theory -
Focus
Its focus was on finding ways to
manage Work and Organizations
more efficiently
Classical Management Theory –
perspectives/branches foc
us
effi wa
cien s on
t ly find
ing
wa
Classical Management ys
to
ma
Theory nag
e Wo
rk/
wo
rke
rs and
Org
ani
zati
ons
mo
re
Itscon
ent focu c
rati s wa
ng
o n s i mp
wh r
at t oving
op
lev the pe
I ts CLASSICAL ORGANIZATION el m r
foc
u SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT a n a f o r ma
low s was THEORY g er n
s m ce of
er l imp ust th
eve d o e wh
l m roving to i o
an a mp le org
gem emplo rov a
e o nizati
ent yee ver
mu s pro BUREAUCRATIC all on by
st d d p er
o to uctiv MANAGEMENT for
ma
imp ity ( n ce
rov i.e.
ew it
ork focus
ers
’ effi ed on
cie w ADMINISTRATIVE
ncy hat
) MANAGEMENT
21
Ongoing topics for discussion – class activity
1.What was the focus of Scientific management?
2.What was the focus of classical Organization theory?

CANADIAN EDITION 22
1-22
Classical Management Theory –
perspectives/branches
23
1.Who were the chief proponents/contributors to scientific
management?
2.What did they contribute to the field of management?

CANADIAN EDITION 24
1-24
Scientific Management
 The theory of scientific management Presupposes
using scientific methods to define the “one best
way” for a job to be done:
Putting the right person on the job with the correct
tools and equipment.
 Having a standardized method of doing the job
 Providing an economic incentive to the worker
 The chief proponents of scientific mgt are:
 Frederick W. Taylor
 Frank and Lillian Gilbreth
 Henry Gantt
Frederick W. Taylor Cont’d
 known as "the father of scientific management.”
 Laborer to Chief Engineer in 6 Years
 Introduced the “piece-rate pay system” - the
differential rate system - instead of paying similar
amount of wage
 Taylor conducted the following studies in order to
maximizing efficiency in an organization:
1. Time and motion study
 The objective is to standardize activities for workers/determine a full-
day’s work
Frederick W. Taylor Cont’d
2. Uniform method of routine tasks

 The objective is to adjust worker with work
3. Functional foremanship study - which man for
which work
the objective is to scientifically select the best worker for a given job
4. Individual Incentive
the objective is to determine the appropriate wage or salary
After conducting these studies Taylor Published a book: Principles of
Scientific Management (1911)
Taylor’s Scientific Management Principles
1. Study of each part of a task scientifically, and develop a best method to perform it to replace the
old rule of thumb method.
2. Scientifically select and then train, teach, and develop the worker - Carefully select workers and
train them to perform a task using the scientifically developed method-
3. Cooperate fully with workers to ensure they use the proper method- Heartily cooperate with the
workers so as to ensure that all work is done in accordance with the principles of the science
that has been developed.
4. Divide work and responsibility almost equally between management and workers - Management
does all work for which it is better suited than the workers.Divide work and responsibility so
management is responsible for planning work method using scientific principles and workers
are responsible for executing work accordingly.
Frank and Lillian Gilbreth

CANADIAN EDITION 29
1-29
The first dual career couple
• Frank and his wife Lillian, a psychologist, studied work to eliminate inefficient hand-and body
motions.
• The Gilbreths also experimented with the design and use of the proper tools and equipment
for optimizing work performance
• Focused on increasing worker productivity through the reduction of wasted motion
• Frank identified 17 on-the-job motions and called them
‘THERBLIGS’. (The Gilbreths devised a classification scheme
to label 17 basic hand motions (such as search, grasp,
hold), which they called therbligs (Gilbreth spelled
backward with the th transposed). This scheme gave the
Gilbreths a more precise way of analyzing a worker’s exact
hand movements.)
For his work, Frank was named as ‘The Father of Motion
Study’.

Cont’d
 After he died, Lillian was determined to continue his
work.
 She pioneered the field of personnel administration.
 She argued that the purpose of scientific management
is to help people reach their maximum potential by
developing their skills and abilities.
 For her contribution to the field of management,
Lillian was known as ‘The First Lady of Management’.
Henry L. Gantt (1861-1919)
 Henry Gantt developed the famous - Gant Chart

 The Gantt chart – It is a simple chart that
compares actual and planned performances
 It is a chart that shows what to do when (and can
also be used to measure progress, achievement
etc)
 Well known for Task – and - bonus system
 If the worker completed the work fast, i.e., in less
than the standard time, he received a bonus.
1.What was the limitation of scientific management?
2.How Do Today’s Managers Use Scientific Management??

CANADIAN EDITION 33
1-33
Limitations of Scientific
Management
1. Disregard the human element

 equated people (worker) with machine;
Taylor said workers are extensions of machines,
cogs of machines
2. Taylor saw only money as a motivator
3. Taylor failed to recognize the complex nature of
human behavior
How Do Today’s Managers Use Scientific
Management?
 Use time and motion studies to increase
productivity
 Hire the best qualified employees
 Design incentive systems based on output
Class Activity
Well, so far we have discussed the one of the two components of classical
management theory, i.e Scientific management.
Now, we will see the second branch – Classical organizational theory, which
has two components:
1. Administrative Management
2. Bureaucratic Management and
Discussion Questions –
1- What is the focus of Administrative Management?
2 - Who is the well-known contributor to the administrative management
theory? And what were his 3 main contributions to the field of management?
3- Who was the contributor to Bureacratic Management, and what was his
contribution?

CANADIAN EDITION 36
1-36
Administrative Management
•General administrative theory focused more on
what managers do and what constituted good
management practice
Henri Fayol is a well-known contributor to
the administrative management theory
 Father of modern management
Henry Fayol’s 3 main
contributions
 Fayol identified/contributed 3 main
issues for management:
1.Rules of Management
2. The major activities of an industry or a
business
3. General management principles (14
principles of management)
38
Henry Fayol’s - Rules of
Management (1 contribution)
st
1. Rules of management:
 Foresight — to complete a plan of action for the future
 Organization — to provide and mobilize resources to implement the plan
 Command — to lead, select, and evaluate workers to get the best work
toward the plan
 Coordination — to fit diverse efforts together and ensure information is
shared and problems solved
 Control — to make sure things happen according to plan and to take
necessary corrective action.
39
Henry Fayol’s - The major activities of an
industry or a business (2nd contribution):
•Technical - producing and manning/handling products
•Commercial - buying raw materials and selling products
•Security- protecting employees and property
•Financial – search for and optimum use of capital
•Accounting - recording and taking stock of costs, profits,
and liabilities, keeping balance sheets, profit and loss
statements, etc
•Managerial – planning, organizing, commanding,
coordinating and controlling
Henry Fayol’s General prnciples
of Management (3rd
contribution
3. general management principles
1. Division of Labor: allows for job specialization.
2. Authority and Responsibility: Fayol included both formal and
informal authority resulting from special expertise.
3. Unity of Command: Employees should have only one boss.
4. Scalar chain/Line of Authority: a clear chain from top to
bottom of the firm.
5. Centralization: the degree to which authority rests at the very
top or this term refers to the degree to which subordinates are
involved in decision making.
6. Unity of Direction: having one plan of action to guide the
organization.
7. Equity: Treat all employees fairly in justice and respect.
Administrative Management Cont’d
8. Order: Each employee is put where they have the most value.
The right person at the right place or People and materials
should be in the right place at the right time.
9. Initiative: Encourage innovation.
10. Discipline: obedient, applied, respectful employees needed.
11. Remuneration of Personnel: Workers must be paid a fair
wage for their services.
12. Stability of Tenure: Long-term employment is important.
•13. Subordination of individual interests to the general interest. The interests of any
one employee or group of employees should not take precedence over the interests of
the organization as a whole ( General interest over individual interest: The organization
.
takes precedence over the individual.)

14. Esprit de corps: Promoting team spirit will build harmony and
unity within the organization
Class Activity
It is now time to discuss the second and last component of classical
management theory, which is Bureaucratic management
Discussion questions
1.What is bureaucracy?
2.Who was the main proponent/contributor to Bureaucratic management
theory?
3.What are the features and/or characteristics of bureaucratic management
theory?
4.Do you have any idea about dysfunctional bureaucracy?
43
Bureaucratic Management
Max Weber developed the concept of bureaucracy
Bureaucracy:
 An ideal, intentionally rational, and very efficient form of organization.
 Based on principles of logic, order, and legitimate authority.
• bureaucracy—a form of organization characterized by division of labor, a clearly

defined hierarchy, detailed rules and regulations, and impersonal relationships.
 Features of Weber’s ideal bureaucracy:
 Clear division of labor
 Clear hierarchy of authority
 Formal rules and procedures
 Impersonality
 Career advancement based on merit
CANADIAN EDITION
1-45
Dysfunctions of bureaucracy
 Excessive paperwork or “red tape” (rigid
conformity to formal rules)
 Slowness in handling problems
 Rigidity in the face of shifting needs
 Resistance to change
 Employee apathy (lack of interest, passion)
Limitations of Classical Organization Theory
 Not universally applicable to today’s complex

organizations.
 Classical theorists ignored the problems of
leadership, motivation, power or information
relations.
Neo –Classical Theories: Humanistic
Perspectives
- Human Relations Movement

- Human Resource perspective
- Behavioral Sciences approach
Em
pha
s
nee ized u
ds, n
and derst
atti andi
tud n
Neo-Classic Theories – Humanistic es i g hum
n th a
Perspectives e w n beh
ork a
pla vior,
ce
Human Resources
Human Relations Behavioral Science Approach
An Perspective
e ffo
rt t
om Su
ake gg Rel
m es ie
ts so
em anag jo n
plo ers b ss the scien
yee mo ho orie tific
s’ n re s ab r
e ed sen uld out esearc
siti hum h fo
s v et wo be d an r
ot
hei rk esi beh devel
er gn avio opin
r st e ur g
o dt
us o
Hawthorne Studies - Elton Mayo et m
Illumination Experiment, Relay Assembly Room he eet
ir
Experiment, Massive Interview Program, Bank fu high
ll p e
wiring Observation room study etc.. (Reading ot r-le
en ve
assignment) tia l n
l ee
Conc ds
dete lu sion: by
rmin So C o ntrib all
ants cial norm M as u tors ow
of in s o lo –
r
phys dividual w standar Bern w, Dou Mary in
g
ical s o d s ard gl as Park
ettin r k b eh o f the etc.. McG er Fo
gs/su av
rroun ior rega roup are
g hum Concern regor, H llet, Am
an s e b
dings rdl the
of wo ess of cha key ide o d that erzberg raham
f T a , C
nge1,s NANCY LANGTON ANDthSTEPHEN
rkerCHAPTER e r yloP.r ROBBINS, h
i gn o e s te r
s
FUNDAMENTALSin OF ORGANIZATIONAL oBEHAVIOUR, gani red
zatio THIRD th e
CANADIAN EDITION n
1-49
Class Activity
What is the focus of Neo classical
approach, AKA Humanistic
Perspective?
What are the three main branches
of Neo classical approach?

CANADIAN EDITION
1-50
Humanistic Perspective – Neo
classical approach
 Emphasized understanding human behavior, needs, and attitudes in
the workplace
 Encompasses:
●Human Relations Movement
●Human Resources Perspective
●Behavioral Sciences Approach

Class Activity
1. What was the focus of Human Relations Movement?
2. What can you say about the Hawthorne study –
(a) how many experiments were undertaken –
please name the experiments,
b) what was the chief/leader of the Hawthorne
study? and
(c) what were the conclusions from the Hawthorne
study?

CANADIAN EDITION 52
1-52
Human Relations Movement
 An effort to make managers more sensitive
to their employees’ needs
 Arose out of the influences of:
• The threat of unionization
• The Hawthorne studies
• The philosophy of industrial humanism
The Hawthorne Studies
Studies of how characteristics of the work setting affected worker fatigue

and performance at the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric
Company from 1924-1932.
A series of studies done during the 1920s and

1930s that provided new insights into group norms
and behaviors
 Hawthorne research conclusion:
• Social norms or standards of the group are the key determinants of
individual work behavior regardless of changes in physical
settings/surroundings of workers.
Hawthorne studies Cont’d
Changed the prevalent view of the time that
people were no different than machines.
 Elton Mayo was the founder of Hawthorne
studies
The Hawthorne studies consist of four major
experiments:
1.Illumination Experiments
2.Relay Assembly Test Room Experiment
3. The Massive Interviewing Program
4. The Bank Wiring Observation Room Study
Illumination Experiments
 The intention was to learn correlation between
intensity of light and productivity.
 two groups of women were taken:
1. The experiment group - one subjected to variety in the
intensity of light
2. Controlled group which was exposed to constant
illumination intensity.
 regardless of whether the light levels were raised or
lowered, productivity rose in both groups
Illumination Experiments Cont’d
 Conclusions:
Light intensity has no conclusive effect on output
Productivity has a psychological component –

Researchers interaction with the workers influenced
higher performance
Relay Assembly Test Room Experiment
 Designed to minimize the “psychological factors” of

previous experiment
 Group of 6 Women – (5) Assemblers and (1) Layout
Operator
 One Observer – Explained every incremental change
and recorded results
 Management visits / special attention
 Manipulated physical work conditions to assess impact
on output :
Pay incentives
Length of work day & work week
Use of rest periods
Company sponsored meals
Relay Assembly Cont’d
 changes in working conditions were later terminated and original
conditions reestablished
 output still remained high, indicating that the

change in conditions was not the only reason for
the increase in output
 Conclusions:
 supervisory management was the major reason
for the increase in productivity
 Strong social bonds were created within the test
group. Workers are influenced by need for
recognition, security and sense of belonging
The Massive Interviewing
Program
 Objective Questions -Yes/No Answers
 Work Conditions
 Work Relationships
 Conversational/Non-directive:
 Attentive Sympathetic Listening
 Concern for personal needs
 Increased in time from 30-90 minutes
The Massive Interviewing
Cont’d
 Result – Remarkable positive employee
perceptions:
 Conclusions:
 New supervisory style improved worker morale
 Complaints reflected personal and/or social
barriers that needed attention in order to raise
productivity
The Bank Wiring Observation Room Study
 to determine peers effect on individual performance
 focused on the effect of a group piecework incentive pay
 14 Male Workers
 Few Special Conditions
 Segregated work area
 No Management Visits
 Supervision would remain the same
 Observer would record data only – no interaction
with workers
 New incentive pay rate was established for the small group
The Bank Wiring Observation
Cont’d
 Result – No appreciable changes in output
 Conclusions:
 Well established performance norms existed in
the group
 Informal Social Organization dictated little
deviation from established production
standards
 Informal Social Organizations protect workers
from managers who:
• Raise production standards
• Cut pay rates
• Challenge workplace norms
Lessons from the Hawthorne
Studies
 Social and human concerns are keys to
productivity
 Hawthorne effect — people who are singled
out for special attention perform as
expected
Hawthorne
Experiments
(elaborated slides )
INTRODUCTION
The Hawthorne studies were conducted in

order to find out the role of human resource in
increasing the production of an organization.
The Hawthorne studies included the following

experiments..
Experiments Conducted
Illumination Experiment
Relay Assembly Test Experiments
Relay Assembly Room #2
Mica Splitting Test Group
Plant Interview Group
Bank Wiring Observation Group
HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENT
Conducted between 1924-1932
Conducted at WESTERN ELECTRIC

COMPANY, Chicago, USA
Conducted by,
 Elton Mayo
White Head
Roethlisberger
George Elton Mayo
He was an Australian Psychologist, Sociologist
and Organization Theorist.
Lectured at University of Queensland before

moving to the University of Pennsylvania
Spent most of his career at Harvard Business

School and was the Professor of Industrial
Research
Known as the founder of Human Relations

Movement
Also known for his research including

George Elton Mayo
Fritz Roethlisberger
*He was a Social Scientist and Management Theorist
*He was also the Professor of Harvard Business

School
WhiteHead
He was the Industrial Worker
Western Electric Company
•Gray and Barton, a telephone industry supply
company founded in 1869 by Elisha Gray and Enos
Barton
•In 1872, the company changed its name to the

Western Electric Manufacturing Company
•In 1881, when the annual sales had already grown

to nearly $1 million, the firm was purchased by the
American Bell Telephone Company, it was
renamed the Western Electric Company and
became Bells manufacturing arm
Airplane View of Hawthorne Works.
Magnetic Wire Insulating
Department
Western Electric Company
Research on productivity at massive manufacturing complexes like
the Hawthorne Works was made possible through partnerships
among industries, universities, and government. In the 1920s, with
support from the National Research Council, the Rockefeller
Foundation, and eventually Harvard Business School, Western
Electric undertook a series of behavioral experiments. The first, a
sequence of illumination tests from 1924 to 1927, set out to
determine the effects of lighting on worker efficiency in three
separate manufacturing departments. Accounts of the study
revealed no significant correlation between productivity and light
levels. The results prompted researchers to investigate other factors
affecting worker output.
Hawthorne Experiment
The Hawthorne experiment were first conducted in

November, 1924 at Western Electric Company’s Hawthorne
plant in Chicago
The initial tests were sponsored by The National Research

Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences
In 1927, a research team from Harvard Business School

was invited to join the studies after the illumination test drew
unanticipated results
A team of researchers led by George Elton Mayo from the

Harvard Business School carried out the studies
(General Electric originally contributed funding, but they
withdrew after the first trial was completed)
Illumination Studies
1924-1927
Funded by General Electric
Conducted by The National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences with
engineers from MIT
Measured Light Intensity vs. Worker Output
Result :
◦ Higher worker productivity and satisfaction at all light levels
◦ Worker productivity was stopped with the light levels reached moonlight intensity.
Conclusions:
◦ Light intensity has no conclusive effect on output
◦ Productivity has a psychological component
Concept of “Hawthorne Effect” was created

IILUMINATION STUDY
The next experiments beginning in 1927 focused on the
relay assembly department, where the electromagnetic
switches that made telephone connections possible were
produced. The manufacture of relays required the repetitive
assembly of pins, springs, insulators, coils, and screws.
Western Electric produced over 7 million relays annually.
As the speed of individual workers determined overall
production levels, the effects of factors like rest periods and
work hours in this department were of particular interest to
the company.
Relay Assembly Test Experiments
•1927-1929
•Experiments were conducted by Elton Mayo
•Manipulated factors of production to measure effect on output:

– Pay Incentives (Each Girls pay was based on the other 5 in the group)
– Length of Work Day & Work Week (5pm, 4:30 pm, 4pm)
– Use of Rest Periods (Two 5 minutes break)
– Company Sponsored Meals (Morning Coffee & soup along with sandwich)
•Results:
– Higher output and greater employee satisfaction
•Conclusions:
– Positive effects even with negative influences – workers’ output will increase as a response to
attention
– Strong social bonds were created within the test group. Workers are influenced by need for
PERFORMANCE RECORDING DEVICE
Relay Assembly Room #2
1928-1929
Measured effect on output with compensation rates

◦ Special observation room
◦ 1st Session- Relay Assemblers changed from departmental
incentive to small group incentive
◦ 2nd Session - Adjusted back to large group incentive
Results:
◦ ‘Small group incentives’ resulted in highest sustained level of production –Output
dropped in 2nd session
Conclusion:
◦ Pay relevant to output but not the only factor
WOMEN IN THE RELAY TEST ASSEMBLY ROOM
Theresa Layman Zajac’s
Paycheck, August 13, 1927
Mica Splitting Test Group
1928-1931
Measured output with changes to work conditions only:

◦ Special Observation Room
◦ Length of Work Day
◦ Use of Rest Periods
◦ Workers stayed on established Piece-rate compensation
Result:
◦ Productivity increased by 15% over standard output base
Conclusions:
◦ Productivity is affected by non-pay considerations
◦ Social dynamics are a basis of worker performance
Mass Interview Program
Conducted 20,000 interviews.
Objective was to explore information, which could be used to improve supervisory training.
Initially used the method of Direct Questioning and changed to Non Directive.
Results
- Giving an opportunity to talk and express grievances would increase the morale.
- Complaints were symptoms of deep-rooted disturbances.
-Workers are governed by experience obtained from both inside and outside the company.
Mass Interview Program
(Contd)
- The workers were satisfied or dissatisfied depending upon how they regarded their
social status in the company.
- Social groups created big impact on work.
- Production was restricted by workers regardless all financial incentives offered as

group pressure are on individual workers.
Bank Wiring Observation Group
1931-1932
Limited changes to work conditions

◦ Segregated work area
◦ No Management Visits
◦ Supervision would remain the same
◦ Observer would record data only – no interaction with workers
Small group pay incentive
Result:
◦ No appreciable changes in output
Conclusions:
◦ Preexisting performance norms
◦ Group dictated production standards –
◦ Work Group protection from management changes.
CONCLUSION
•The Hawthorne studies have had a remarkable impact on
management in organizations and how workers react to various
situations.
•The research carried out at the Western Electrics Hawthorne plant

during the 1920’s and early 1930’s helped to initiate a whole new
approach to human behaviour studies.
•The final result was “the organization of teamwork-that is, of

sustained cooperation leads to success”.
Human Relations Movement Cont’d
 The Threat of Unionization
 The Wagner Act of 1935 legalized union-management collective
bargaining, promoting the growth of unions and union avoidance by firms.
 The Philosophy of Industrial Humanism
 Emotional factors were more important
determinants of productive efficiency
than were physical and logical factors.
Class Activity
So, far we discussed just one of the three components of the Neo
classical approach (i.e Human Relations).
We are left with two more Human Resources Perspective and
Behavioral Sciences Approach
1. Human resources perspective – what is its focus, and who are the
contributors?

CANADIAN EDITION 94
1-94
Human Resource Perspective
 Suggests jobs should be designed to meet
higher-level needs by allowing workers to
use their full potential
 Contributors:
 Robert Owen
 Claimed that a concern for employees was profitable for management
and would relieve human misery.
 Hugo Munsterberg
 Created the field of industrial psychology—the scientific study of
individuals at work to maximize their productivity and adjustment.
Human Resource Perspective Cont’d
Mary Parker Follett

 Concerned that Taylor ignored the human side of
the organization
◦ Suggested workers help in analyzing their jobs
◦ If workers have relevant knowledge of the task, then
they should control the task
 Recognized that organizations could be viewed
from the perspective of individual and group
behavior.
Human Resource Perspective Cont’d
Chester Barnard
 Saw organizations as social systems that require
human cooperation.
 Expressed his views in his book The Functions of
the Executive (1938).
Abraham Maslow’s : Needs Hierarchy
Douglas McGregor: Theory X & Y
Herzberg’s Two factor theory
 The later three are considered as early
motivation theories
CANADIAN EDITION
1-99
CANADIAN EDITION
1-100
Herzberg’s two-factor theory –
hygiene factors and motivators
• Frederick Herzberg’s two-factor theory (also called motivation-hygiene
theory) proposes that intrinsic factors are related to job satisfaction,
while extrinsic factors are associated with job dissatisfaction.
•The extrinsic factors that create job dissatisfaction were called hygiene
factors. When these factors are adequate, people won’t be dissatisfied,
but they won’t be satisfied (or motivated) either. To motivate people,
Herzberg suggested emphasizing motivators, the intrinsic factors having
to do with the job itself.

CANADIAN EDITION
1-101
CANADIAN EDITION
1-102
CANADIAN EDITION
1-103
Behavioral Sciences Approach
Applies social science in an organizational context
relies on scientific research for developing theories about human behavior
that can be used to provide practical tools for managers
draws from sociology, psychology, anthropology, economics and other
disciplines to understand employee behavior and interaction in an
organizational setting
Contemporary Management Theories – Modern
management Theories
1. Management Science Approach
2. System approach
3. Contingency approach
4. Quality Management
Contemporary Management
Theories – Modern management
theories
 Management Science Approach

 System approach
 Contingency approach
 Quality Management
Management science approach
 Emerged after WW II
 Applied mathematics, statistics, and other quantitative techniques to
managerial problems
 It encompasses:
1. Operation Research— utilizes linear programming, modeling, simulation
systems and chaos theory.
2. Operations management —techniques used to analyze all aspects of the
production system.
3. Management Information Systems (MIS) - Management information systems
focuses on designing and implementing computer-based information systems
for business organizations
System approach
 Posits that the performance of the whole is greater than the
sum of the performance of its parts.
• Analytic versus synthetic thinking: outside-in thinking versus inside-
out thinking.
• Seeks to identify all parts of an organized activity and how they
interact.
• regards the organization as a system of interrelated parts
 System - A collection of parts that operate interdependently to
achieve a common purpose.
 Synergy - performance gains of the whole surpass the
components
 Look at your organization in two ways:
1. A collection of subsystems—parts making up the whole system
2. A part of the larger environment
Contemporary Theories Cont’dC
109
General Systems Theory
 General Systems Theory
 An area of study based on the assumptions that everything is part of a larger,
interdependent arrangement.
 Levels of systems
 Each system is a subsystem of the system above it.
 Identification of systems at various levels helps translate abstract systems
theory into more concrete terms.
Closed Versus Open Systems
 Systems are classified open (closed) by how much (how little) they
interact with their environments
 Closed system
• A self-sufficient entity.
• Closed systems often undergo entropy and

lose the ability to control itself, and fails.
 Open system
• Something that depends on its surrounding environment for survival.
New Directions in Systems
Thinking
 Organizational learning and knowledge
management
 Organizations are living and thinking open systems that
learn from experience and engage in complex mental
processes
 Chaos theory
 Every complex system has a life of its own, with its own
rule book
 Complex adaptive systems
 Complex systems are self-organizing.
Contingency approach
 Also sometimes called the situational approach.
 Tries to match managerial responses with problems and
opportunities unique to different situations.
 No “one best way” to manage.
 Draws on all past theories in attempting to analyze and
solve problems
 Is integrative
 Summarized as “it all depends” device
 Tells managers to look to their experiences
and the past and to consider many options before choosing
 Encourages managers to stay flexible
Quality Management Perspective
A philosophy of management driven by continual improvement in the
quality of work processes and responding to customer needs and
expectations
 Inspired by the total quality management (TQM) ideas of Deming and
Juran
Quality Mgt Perspective Cont’d
Includes quality control, quality assurance, and total quality management
(TQM).
Quality – refers to the total ability of a product or service to meet
customer needs.
Quality Control – the strategy for minimizing errors by managing each
stage of production.
Quality Assurance – focuses on the performance of workers, urging
employees to strive for “zero defects.”
The Four Pillars of Schools of
Quality
Pillar 1: A Customer-Supplier Focus
The organization and its people must focus, first
and foremost, on their customers and suppliers.
Pillar 2: Constant Dedication to Continuous
Improvement
Everyone in the organization must be dedicated
to continuous improvement - personally and
collectively - at work, at home, and in the
community
Pillars of Schools of Quality
Cont’d
Pillar 3: A Process-Systems Approach
The organization must be viewed as a system,
and the work people do within the system must
be seen as ongoing processes.
Pillar 4: Consistent Quality Leadership
The success of the Quality Transformation is the
responsibility of top management, and can only
be achieved over time though constant
dedication to the principles and practices of TQM
Total quality management (TQM)
A management concept coined by
W. Edwards Deming
Four components of TQM:
 Make continuous improvement a priority.
 Get every employee involved.
Listen to and learn from customers and employees.
Use accurate standards to identify and eliminate
problems.
Emerging viewpoints
 Kaizen
 BPR
 Theory Z
 The Learning Organization Approach
Emerging Views Cont’d
 Kaizen- A Japanese term used to mean
incremental, continuous improvement for people,
products, and processes
 BPR- Businesses processes are redesigned to
achieve improvements in performance
Theory Z
 William Ouchi, a management researcher
developed this new theory of management in
the 1980s
 Theory Z is a business management theory
that integrates Japanese and American
business practices.
The Japanese business emphasis is on
collective decision making
The American emphasis is on individual
responsibility
Theory Z Type Organization
1. Long-term employment
2. Consentual, participative decision-making
3. Individual responsibility
4. Slow evaluation and promotion
5. Implicit, informal control with explicit,
formalized measures
6. Moderately specialized career path
7. Holistic concern, including family
The Learning Organization
Approach
 The management approach based on an
organization anticipating change faster
than its counterparts to have an advantage
in the market over its competitors.
Managerial Approach to Learning Organization
 Managers must create an environment conducive to learning
Managers encourage the exchange or information among organization
members
 Managers promote
systematic problem solving
Experimentation
learning from experiences and past history
learning from experience of others
transferring knowledge rapidly throughout the organization
The End
Thank You!
FUNDAMENTALS OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR, THIRD CANADIAN
EDITION 1-126
127 Chapter 2
– Chapter 2: The Development of Management Thought
A) Pre-classical Management Thought

B) Classical Management Theories
(1) the universal process approach and
(2) the operational approach
C) Neo-Classical Theories
(3) the behavioral approach
D) Modern Management Theories
(4) the systems approach, and
(5) the contingency approach.
Management Theories
128 The Practice and Study of
Management
– The systemic study of management is relatively new.

– As an area of academic study, management is essentially a
product of the twentieth century.
– Only three universities— Pennsylvania, Chicago, and
California— offered business management courses before
1900.
Management Theories
129 Management Practice preceded
the Theory
– But the actual practice of management has been around

for thousands of years.
– The pyramids of Egypt, for example, stand as tangible
evidence of the ancient world’s ability to manage. It
reportedly took more than 100,000 individuals 20 years to
construct the great pyramid
Management Theories
130 Management theory
– No single theory of management is universally accepted today
– To provide a useful historical perspective that will guide our
study of modern management, we shall discuss five different
approaches to management:
(1) the universal process approach,
(2) the operational approach,
(3) the behavioral approach,
(4) the systems approach, and
(5) the contingency approach.
Management Theories
131 The Universal Process Approach
– Henri Fayol’s universal process approach assumes that all organizations,

regardless of purpose or size, require the same management process.
– Furthermore, it assumes that this rational process can be reduced to separate
functions and principles of management.
– The universal approach, the oldest of the various approaches, is still popular
today.
– A remarkable contribution of Henry Fayol- the 14 principles of management
explain the Universal Process approach
Management Theories
132
Management Theories
133 The Operational Approach
– This is a production-oriented field of management

dedicated to improving efficiency and cutting waste.
– Dedicated to promoting production efficiency and reducing
waste, the operational approach has evolved from scientific
management to operations management.
– Frederick W. Taylor, the father of scientific management, and
his followers revolutionized industrial management through
the use of standardization (e.g units of products to produce
a day per employee), time-and-motion study, selection and
training, and pay incentives.
Management Theories
134 The Operational Approach
– Some contributors to this approach

Fredrick W. Taylor
Frank and Lillian Gilberths
Henry Gant, and
The quality advocate - Edwards Deming (TQM)
Management Theories
135 The Behavioral Approach
– Advocates of the behavioral approach to management point out

that people deserve to be the central focus of organized activity.
– This approach insists that the success of management depends
largely on a manager’s ability to understand and work with people
who have a variety of backgrounds, needs, perceptions, and
aspirations.
– The progress of this humanistic approach from the human relations
movement to modern organizational behavior has greatly
influenced management theory and practice.
Management Theories
136 The Behavioral Approach
– Earlier contributors to this field

- Elton Mayo (Hawthorne studies) – psychological/emotional
factors are a more important determinant of productive efficiency than
physical and logical factors.
- Mary Parker Follet (promoted the importance of motivating
employees than merely demanding high performance)
- Douglas McGregor – (Theory X and Theory Y)
Theory Y - Work is a natural activity, like play or rest.
Theory X - Most people dislike work, and they will avoid it when they can.
The Systems Approach
137
– Advocates of the systems approach recommend that modern organizations
be viewed as open systems.
– Open systems depend on the outside environment for survival, whereas
closed systems do not.
– Chester I. Barnard stirred early interest in systems thinking in 1938 by
suggesting that organizations are cooperative systems energized by
communication.
– General systems theory, an interdisciplinary field based on the assumption
that everything is systematically related, has identified a hierarchy of systems
and has differentiated between closed and open systems.
– New directions in systems thinking are organizational learning and chaos
theory.
Management Theories
138
– Class activity
What is organizational learning?
What is the chaos theory?
Management Theories
139 Organizational learning and
Chaos Theory
– Organizational learning is a concept which states that organizations

are like humans that can learn from experience.
An organization is a living and thinking open system.
Like the human mind organizations depend on feedback to
adjust to changing environmental conditions?
– Chaos theory – being open for surprises, being open for the
unexpected (sometimes results may be nonlinear)
Management Theories
140 The Systems Approach
ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING
An organizational learning perspective portrays the
organization as a living and thinking open system.
-Like the human mind, organizations rely on feedback to
adjust to changing environmental conditions.
- In short, organizations are said to learn from experience,
just as humans and higher animals do.
Management Theories
141 The Systems Approach
– Chaos theory has one idea in common with organizational learning: systems are influenced by
feedback.
– Chaos theory is based on the notion that change should be encouraged through embracing
tension
– Chaos theory is about surprises
– It is expecting the unexpected
– As opposed to the conventional/classical management theory, Chaos theory upholds that
Organizational behavior is inherently nonlinear, and results may be nonproportional to
corresponding actions. New models and methods are needed to understand change
– Clssical/conventional view: Organizational behavior is essentially linear and predictable, and
results are proportional to causes. Thus linear regression models explain most of the variance
of organizational change.
Management Theories
142 Linear vs non linear
– A simple example?
Suppose you used to deny a two days wage for an employee who happened to
be absent from his job. Suppose his daily wage is 200 birr? You punished him
this way three times in the past a year ago?
Questions
a. How much did you deduct so far from his salary?
b. The employee get used to your rule, he knows it well, but is absent one
more time today. Your rule does not change, so how much will you deduct from
his next month salary?
Management Theories
143 Important Theories (mostly leadership
and motivation theories)
–To be lectured after the

book review and before
the article review
Management Theories
1) The contingency/Situational theory/
144 2) Management by Objectives (MBO)

3) Span of Control
4) Line vs staff authority
5) Expectancy Theory – expected outcomes have impact on pc
6) Reinforcement Theory – rewards impact Pc/motivation
7) Goal Setting Theory
8) Path Goal Model
9) Management Grid-----show slide
10) Likert’s Leadership Styles----”
11) Lewin’s Leadership styles ---”
12) Transactional leadership
13) Transformational leadership
14) Mclelland’s Theory of Motivation
Leadership Theories – Broad
145
categories
– Leadership Theories are broadly classified into 3

categories
1.Trait Theory – leaders are born
2.Contingency/situational theory – the situation creates a
leader
3.Behavioral Theory - focuses on what leaders do than
their trait. The behavioral theory states that there are
two distinct types of leadership: task (production)
oriented vs Employee (People) Oriented)
Management Theories
146 The Contingency
Approach/Theory
– A comparatively new approach to management thought is the contingency approach,
which stresses situational appropriateness rather than universal principles.
– the contingency approach is an effort to determine through research which managerial

practices and techniques are appropriate in specific situations
– contingency approach: research effort to determine which managerial practices and
techniques are appropriate in specific situations
– The idea is you better do some research first before considering a managerial
intervention
One of the prominent contributors to this field - Fred Luthans
Management Theories
147 Management By Objectives
(MBO)
–A process of setting mutually

agreed-upon goals and using
those goals to evaluate
employee performance
Management Theories
148 Span of Control
–The number of employees a

manager can efficiently and
effectively manage
Wide span vs Narrow Span
Management Theories
149 Line Authority vs Staff Authority
– LA - Authority that entitles a manager

to direct the work of an employee
– SA - Positions with some Authority
that have been created to support,
assist, and advise those holding line
authority,
Management Theories
150 Expectancy Theory
– Expectancy theory states that an

individual tends to act in a certain
way based on the expectation that the
act will be followed by a given
outcome and on the attractiveness of
that outcome to the individual.
Management Theories
151 Reinforcement theory
– Reinforcement theory is seen in the model by recognizing that

the organization’s rewards reinforce the individual’s performance
– rewarding a behavior with recognition immediately following
that behavior is likely to encourage its repetition.
– Reinforcement theory says that behavior is a function of its
consequences. To motivate, use positive reinforcers to reinforce
desirable behaviors. Ignore undesirable behavior rather than
punishing it.
152 Goal Setting Theory
– Goal-setting theory says that specific goals increase
performance, and difficult goals, when accepted, result in higher
performance than do easy goals. Important points in goalsetting
theory include intention to work toward a goal as a major source
of job motivation; specific hard goals that produce higher levels
of output than generalized goals; participation in setting goals as
preferable to assigning goals, but not always; feedback that
guides and motivates behavior, especially self-generated
feedback; and contingencies that affect goal setting—goal
commitment, self-efficacy, and national culture.
Management Theories
153Fiedler contingency model –
leadership style depends on the
situation
– The Fiedler contingency model proposed that effective
group performance depended upon properly matching the
leader’s style and the amount of control and influence in the
situation.
– The model was based on the premise that a certain
leadership style would be most effective in different types of
situations.
– The keys were to (1) define those leadership styles and the
different types of situations, and then (2) identify the
appropriate combinations of style and situation.
Management Theories
Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard’s
154 Situational Model – followers reediness
matters most
– Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard developed a leadership theory that has
gained a strong following among management development
specialists.
– This model, called situational leadership theory (SLT), is a contingency
theory that focuses on followers’ readiness.
– Before we proceed, two points need clarification: Why a leadership
theory focuses on the followers, and what is meant by the term
readiness.
– readiness, as defined by Hersey and Blanchard, refers to the extent to
which people have the ability and willingness
– to accomplish a specific task.
Management Theories
155 Path-Goal Model
: Leaders’ job is to assist
followers
– Another approach to understanding leadership is
path-goal theory, which states that the leader’s job
is to assist followers in attaining their goals and to
provide direction or support needed to ensure that
their goals are compatible with the goals of the
group or organization.
Management Theories
156 Managerial Grid
– Leaders may be concerned for their people and they also

must also have some concern for the work to be done. The
question is, how much attention to they pay to one or the
other?
– This is a model defined by Blake and Mouton in the early
1960s.
Management Theories
157 Managerial Grid
Management Theories
158 Likert's leadership styles
– Rensis Likert identified four main styles of leadership, in particular

around decision-making and the degree to which people are involved
in the decision.
– Exploitive authoritative
– Benevolent authoritative
– Consultative
– Participative
Management Theories
Exploitive authoritative
–In this style, the leader has a low concern for people and
uses such methods as threats and other fear-based methods
to achieve conformance. Communication is almost entirely
downwards and the psychologically distant concerns of
people are ignored.
Management Theories
– Benevolent authoritative
– When the leader adds concern for people to an
authoritative position, a 'benevolent dictatorship' is
formed. The leader now uses rewards to encourage
appropriate performance and listens more to concerns
lower down the organization, although what they hear is
often rose-tinted, being limited to what their subordinates
think that the boss wants to hear. Although there may be
some delegation of decisions, almost all major decisions
are still made centrally.
Management Theories
– Consultative
– The upward flow of information here is still cautious and
rose-tinted to some degree, although the leader is making
genuine efforts to listen carefully to ideas. Nevertheless,
major decisions are still largely centrally made.
Management Theories
– Participative
– At this level, the leader makes maximum use of
participative methods, engaging people lower down the
organization in decision-making. People across the
organization are psychologically closer together and work
well together at all levels.
Management Theories
163 Lewin’s Leadership Styles
– Autocratic – Low participation, high centralization

– Democratic – high participation
– Laissez faire - Hands-off management
Management Theories
164 McClelland Theory of
Motivation
– McClelland says that, regardless of our gender, culture, or

age, we all have three motivating drivers, and one of these
will be our dominant motivating driver. This dominant
motivator is largely dependent on our culture and life
experiences.
– 3categories of needs
1. Achievement
2. Power
3. Affiliation
Management Theories
McClelland’s Need Theory:
Need for Achievement
[Need for Achievement]
a manifest (easily perceived) need
that concerns individuals’ issues of
excellence, competition, challenging
goals, persistence, and overcoming
difficulties
Need for Power
[Need for Power]
a manifest (easily perceived) need that
concerns an individual’s need to make
an impact on others, influence others,
change people or events, and make a
difference in life
Need for Affiliation
[Need for Affiliation]
a manifest (easily perceived) need
that concerns an individual’s need to
establish and maintain warm, close,
intimate relationships with other
people
168 Organic Organization/Structure
– An organic organization is one that is very

flexible and is able to adapt well to changes.
– Its structure is identified as having little job
specialization, few layers of management
(wide span), decentralized decision-making,
and not much direct supervision.
Management Theories
Mechanistic (and also some
169
more on Organic)
– organic organization is characterized by “(1) Flatness:
communications and interactions are horizontal, (2) Low
specialization: knowledgeresides wherever it is most useful, and
(3) Decentralization: great deal of formal and informal
participation in decision making. Organic structure is a
decentralized approach, whereas mechanistic structure is a
centralized approach
– mechanistic organization is “the organization is hierarchical and
bureaucratic. It is characterized by its (1) highly centralized
authority, (2) formalized procedures and practices, and (3)
specialized functions.
Management Theories

Chapter 2management Theories

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 2management Theories

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 2management Theories

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter Two

1. Pre-classical Management Thought= Early

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

What factors do you think shape and

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

External Environmental factors

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

 Management thought has been shaped over

1.Overview of Early Management Practices

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

4. Greece – ancient Greece were known for

 Principal pre-classical contributors:

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

2. Uniform method of routine tasks

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

 Henry Gantt developed the famous - Gant Chart

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

1. Disregard the human element

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

takes precedence over the individual.)

 Based on principles of logic, order, and legitimate authority.

• bureaucracy—a form of organization characterized by division of labor, a clearly

 Not universally applicable to today’s complex

- Human Relations Movement

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

●Human Resources Perspective

●Behavioral Sciences Approach

CHAPTER 1, NANCY LANGTON AND STEPHEN P. ROBBINS,

Studies of how characteristics of the work setting affected worker fatigue

A series of studies done during the 1920s and

Light intensity has no conclusive effect on output

Productivity has a psychological component –

 Designed to minimize the “psychological factors” of

 output still remained high, indicating that the

The Hawthorne studies were conducted in

The Hawthorne studies included the following

Conducted between 1924-1932

Conducted at WESTERN ELECTRIC

Lectured at University of Queensland before

Spent most of his career at Harvard Business

Known as the founder of Human Relations

Also known for his research including

*He was a Social Scientist and Management Theorist

*He was also the Professor of Harvard Business

•In 1872, the company changed its name to the

•In 1881, when the annual sales had already grown

The Hawthorne experiment were first conducted in

The initial tests were sponsored by The National Research

In 1927, a research team from Harvard Business School

A team of researchers led by George Elton Mayo from the

Funded by General Electric

Measured Light Intensity vs. Worker Output

Concept of “Hawthorne Effect” was created

•Manipulated factors of production to measure effect on output:

Measured effect on output with compensation rates

Measured output with changes to work conditions only:

- Complaints were symptoms of deep-rooted disturbances.

- Social groups created big impact on work.