Incorporation
Incorporation
Incorporation
• Provided that where the fraud in question involves public interest, the
term of imprisonment shall not be less than three years.
First Directors liable
• (6) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (5) where, at
any time after the incorporation of a company, it is proved that the
company has been got incorporated by furnishing any false or
incorrect information or representation or by suppressing any
material fact or information in any of the documents or declaration
filed or made for incorporating such company, or by any fraudulent
action, the promoters, the persons named as the first directors of the
company and the persons making declaration under clause (b) of
subsection (1) shall each be liable for action under section 447
Application to Tribunal
• (7) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (6), where a
company has been got incorporated by furnishing any false or
incorrect information or representation or by suppressing any
material fact or information in any of the documents or declaration
filed or made for incorporating such company or by any fraudulent
action, the Tribunal may, on an application made to it, on being
satisfied that the situation so warrants,—
Orders that may be passed
• (a) pass such orders, as it may think fit, for regulation of the
management of the company including changes, if any, in its
memorandum and articles, in public interest or in the interest of the
company and its members and creditors; or
• (b) direct that liability of the members shall be unlimited; or
• (c) direct removal of the name of the company from the register of
companies; or
• (d) pass an order for the winding up of the company; or
• (e) pass such other orders as it may deem fit:
Reasonable opportunity
• Provided that before making any order under this sub-section,—
• (i) the company shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being
heard in the matter; and
• (ii) the Tribunal shall take into consideration the transactions entered
into by the company, including the obligations, if any, contracted or
payment of any liability.
Pre-incorporation contracts
• Company cannot be sued on pre-incorporation contract.
• Sometimes contracts are made on behalf of a company even before it
is duly incorporated.
• But no contract can bind a company before it becomes capable of
contracting by incorporation.
• "Two consenting parties are necessary to a contract, whereas the
company, before incorporation, is a non-entity".
• A company has no status prior to incorporation.
• Company cannot sue on pre-incorporation contract.-
• Secondly, the company is also not entitled to sue on a pre-
incorporation contract.
Ratification of pre-incorporation contract.-
• Thus, so far as the company is concerned, it is neither bound by, nor can have
the benefit of, a pre-incorporation contract.
• But this is subject to the provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Section 15 of
the Act provides that where the promoters of a company have made a contract
before its incorporation for the purposes of the company, and if the contract is
warranted by the terms of incorporation, the company may adopt and enforce it.
• "Warranted by the terms of incorporation" means within the scope of the
company's objects as stated in the memorandum.
• Section 19 of the same Act provides that the other party can also enforce the
contract if the company has adopted it after incorporation and the contract is
within the terms of incorporation.
Personal right and liability of contracting
agent.-
• Now, in reference to contracts which do not fall within the purview of
the above provisions, the question arises whether they can be
enforced by or against the agent who acted on behalf of the projected
corporation?
• The answer will depend upon the construction of the contract.
• If the contract is made on behalf of a company not yet in existence,
the agent might incur personal liability.
Kelner v Baxter (1866) LR 2 CP 174
• A group of promoters for a new hotel company, the “Gravesend Royal
Alexandra Hotel Company” (Gravesend) entered into a contract for wine.
• This contract was purportedly on behalf of Gravesend, but Gravesend had not
at that point been registered. It was a “pre-incorporation contract”.
• Gravesend was eventually registered, but by that stage the wine had been
consumed before the money had been paid. Gravesend soon went into
liquidation.
• The promoters, as Gravesend’s agents, were sued.
• The promoters argued that, as Gravesend had been incorporated, the contract
had subsequently been ratified and the liability had passed to the company.
Held
•The Court held that because the company did not exist at the time of the signing of the
agreement it would be wholly inoperative unless it was binding on the promoters.
•A stranger cannot, by subsequent ratification, relieve the promoters from that
responsibility of liability.
•A promoter can avoid liability if a substituted agreement novices the original pre-
incorporation contract.
• Thanks