Chapter 3 - The Master Schedule
Chapter 3 - The Master Schedule
Chapter 3 - The Master Schedule
MASTER SCHEDULE
2. Identify the master schedule horizon, time fences, sources of demand and
basic methodology in production planning.
Ingredients of a Material
Requirement Planning (MRP)
system with:
- Bill of Material (BOM)
- Inventory
- Purchase records
- Lead time for each item.
Lead time : several months to more than a year. Lead time required to :
i. Order raw materials and components,
ii. Fabricate parts in the factory
iii. Assemble and test the final products.
Lead time
Purchasing systems :
-time between placing order and receiving it.
Production systems:
- wait, move, queue, setup and run times for each component produced.
MPS was dynamic plan (fixed in the near term within about a six-week horizon.
Adjustments are possible beyond six weeks (shifts in demand or new product)
Show relationships btwn all components and quantities needed for each
component.
Also typically contain lead times for purchase or production of each component
or assembly.
This lead time data used for calculation of cumulative lead time, by finding the
longest lead time for each level.
Many firms do not respond to minor scheduling or quantity changes even if they
are aware of them to avoid system nervousness that create havoc in
purchasing and production departments if implemented.
Tool to reduce this system nervousness are called time fences and pegging.
Time fence
Methods used for demand forecasting different for master schedule when
compared to S&OP.
MPS forecasts are more often generated from quantitative or time series
methods, plus demand number is the actual customer order.
In period 1:
- Demand = 40 units
- Projected available = 30 units
In period 2:
- Demand = 50 units
- MPS = 80 units
- Projected available = 30 + 80 – 50
= 60 units
Make-To-Stock (MTS).
• Not influence on final design.
• Master schedule act as final assembly schedule (FAS) for finished goods
inventory.
• Relatively few final products
• Orders are filled directly from stock.
Assemble-To-Order (ATO).
• Customer influence the product.
• Relatively small number of subasembly options.
• Final products often not planned on the master schedule.
• Master schedule may be needed for each unique combination
• Example: automobiles and pc (have optional modules)
Make-To-Order (MTO).
• Customer has influence on design of final product or service.
• May use standard components as raw materials in different way
• Typical of many service organisations.
• Demand is variable (quantity and design )
Note: Master schedule designed to operate at level of fewest items that need to be scheduled.
Allow organisation quickly and realistically promise delivery of product to customers
ATP will only add customer order promises until next period where MPS quantity exists.
Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Forecast 22 25 20 20 18 18 32 30 28 28 29 25
Customer order 24 23 17 22 15 14 17 16 12 16 13 11
Proj. Avail. Bal.
Avail. To Promise
MPS
On Hand = 56
Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Forecast 22 25 20 20 18 18 32 30 28 28 29 25
Customer order 24 23 17 22 15 14 17 16 12 16 13 11
Proj. Avail. Bal. 32 9 49 29 11 53 21 51 23 55 26 1
Avail. To Promise 9 6 29 32 20
MPS 60 60 60 60
Period 1
o ATP Period 3
= 56 – (23 + 24)
o MPS = 60
= 9 (can promise to
o Project available Balance
customers)
= (60 + 9) – 20
= 49
o ATP = 60 – ( 17 + 22 + 15)
DQP 3023: Production Planning and Control =6
Prepared by: Muhamad Zaki Bin Yusup
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Forecast 0 11 18 29 46 53 60 60 60
Customer order 70 2 52 45 13 6 0 0 0
Projected available
Available to promise
MPS
Assembly: Water Bottle On Hand: 100 Lot Size: 100
Demand time fence = 3 weeks
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Option Forecast 25 62 99 35 66 1 31 61 91
Customer orders 65 50 42 30 15 3 0 0 0
Projected available
Available to promise 35 0 0
MPS 100 100
DQP 3023: Production Planning and Control
Prepared by: Muhamad Zaki Bin Yusup
KEY ISSUES:
4. Lot sizes are usually established . Some time use lot for lot (order when
need)
1. Internal demand
i. Service requirements, especially for field repairs
ii. Requirements for new product engineering to build prototypes
iii. Requirements for quality assurance for testing
iv. Internal repairs or replacements for work-in-process
v. Distribution requirements
1. Prediction
2. Communication
3. Influence
4. Prioritization and allocation
1. Prediction
- forecasting of anticipated customer demand
- issue:
i. Selecting the best forecasting method
ii. forecast must be tracked and evaluated
iii. Checked the impact thru:
a. Communication : communicate with customers, marketing and sales to
understand the demand patterns.
b. Influence : influence with marketing tools.
c. Lead time reduction
d. Production flexibility
e. Policies guiding the development of both the S&OP and the master schedule
f. Safety stock or MPS over-planning
iv. Tracking demand
v. Service levels
2. Communication
- Effective two way communication, especially with customers.
- Issue:
i. Order entry
ii. Order delivery date promising
iii. Customer order servicing :
3. Influence
- Primary responsibilities of Sales and Marketing function
- Sales and Marketing work closely with Operations Planning to understand
constraints and opportunities.
1. Make to Stock:
- No order promising, prioritization, or order servicing
- Communication at minimum level
2. Assemble to Order
- More customer influence
- Customer can order various combinations of standard subassemblies or
options
- Focus on order promising made through available to promise (ATP) logic of
the master schedule.
- Customer communication should be both ways
3. Make to Order
- Has an extensive amount of customer influence, customer
- Communication and order promising are very important,