ra ph y

t h n o g e
u t oe rc h i v
A t h e A
a n d an th ro p ol og i
o
c
r
a
t
lr
h
e
ea
se
rc
a
h
rch
ive
n al
ha t o f si o
W s c and p r of es
od
meth
 Why
choo do re
se the searcher
ir me s
• Object
ivity
t h ods?
• Resear versus Sub
cher j ec t i v
• How a v ersus
Sub
ity
in the researche j ec t
ir r
resul project c situates th
ts an de emse
• Our re t e rmine lves
their
as pro s e a r ch m
fessio ethod
nals s sha
pe ou
r wor
k
Register entry for the birth of Alexander Randall
accessed via www.familysearch.org [30th July 2011]

Alex
ande
rR anda
ll (1 9
17-19
82)
  ‘The ad
profe vice from
e of
of
ssion

Self ’
archi als is care
ption
e Ro l
vists] th a t w
unde must e [as
restim never
know a te t h
Perce
, ‘Th

, espe e nee
separ cially d to
ated for pe
famil f r
y mem om family ople
e rto n
n th e

emot
ional ber, or the or a
searc uphe
h Et h

h itse aval
ives i

235) lf can that t

cause he
.’ (p.
Judit
Arch
  ‘One c
e nt
in
sts
‘A b s the g an be sim
ries’, ather u lta n
ir Pa
the o er of eousl
ne wh m a t e y
mate o inte r ials..
Histo
orth,

rials rpret . and

d the
interp and p s the
retati resen
ts thi
Fathe in Bashf

while o n to s
le a n
e sen t

physi the w
emot o
ional cally and rld...
resea ly bei
Peop

n g th
rs, Pr

rch.’ e obj
(p . 2 0
Mart

4) ect of
 How can I tap into my empathy for
family historians and other
potentially vulnerable researchers?

do? e Can anthropology help us investigate

can w
the cultural and human value of
archives and records?
What

What is
autoethnography?
 p h y ”
th n ogra

Auto
“ E
t ific
u t o -” i e n
A sc tion of
“A
ek
 d e sc r ip
s of
G re st om
s: u

et
u to f’ th e c
 A
f or ‘s e l
peop s.
le s a n d

hnog
te r m o w n ’
‘ on e ’s l t u re
or c u p le
s : P eo
h n o
 Et pho: to write

raphy
 Gra
 e t h a t
r r a t i v l
a a

a u to e
e lf - n s o c i
o f s th i n a

Defin raphy
fo rm f w i
 places the
A se l
r e

th n o g
t. o m p a
t e x s c
con p h i e t h o r

itions
n o g r a h e a u
t o e t h s o f t .
e l e
 the experie f other pe
A u n c o p
o s e o
t h

of
),
with , (e d.
a na hay nd
e ed- D S el f a
bor ahR ting the 997)
De r i , ( 1
h y : Rew e Social
nograp th
Eth
Auto/
 e a r c h
e r e s
li ta t i v s
q u a t i l i z e
a u
 method w ic metho ations
… c h t o

a u to e
‘ h i d s

Defin raphy
ra p h r p re t
th n o g l i n t e d a t a
e u l t u r a h i c a l
c p t

th n o g
b r i n g io g r a i n t e n
a u t o b t h t h e s
e i i t

itions
to t h h e r s w f a n d
s e a r c g s e l
of r e a n d i n r s ’
d e r s t o t h e
of u n w it h
c t i o n
e

of
co n n o g ra ph y as
utoe , (th
20 n 08)
, A o d
Chang Me th
eewon
H
 o n s h ip
r e l a ti
t in a
e m en a l
e ng a g e r s o n r ch
n p e a
Abetween you and your re ys to
r s

a u to e
Defin raphy
e n c e s e w a
i v
exper o f c r e a ti
i n g s
t io n i nd

th n o g
se le c o u r f e
h
 demonstr
A a te y
n f r o m t
s )

itions
a c t i o e tim e
sa t is f ( s o m
e n se t h a t
m t h
Ipmersonal gro w

of
u e s t i n g
ens un c ey, Cr e a
010)
s sa M i es , (2
Te g raph
et hn o
Au t o
 u s e s:
r a p h y l
o g i c a

a u to e
o e t h n i o lo g a l
t c n
 ‘systema n and e and an
A u ic s o o t io

Defin raphy
t m
e c t i o d e r st
o s p u n

th n o g
int r r y to e d
l l t o t e li v
a ’ v u r

itions
re c c e w e r i t e o
e r i e n w e w
ex p T h e n y ’ .
u g h . s to r
th r o e a s a
r i e n c

of
phy,
expe no gr a
‘ A u toeth ubject’,
r, e S s
P. B ochn earcher a n. (2000)
nd A rthur ivity: Res ch, 2nd ed
n El lis a e, Reflex e Resear
ly v iv
Caro al Narrati f Qualitat
n o
Perso andbook
in H
 Auto
e t h no
graph
postm Autoeth
y
odern nogra
resea e thn phy i
rcher ograp s a br
’s life hy w anch
to fra exper hich of
me th ience uses
e in s a s the
sourc vestig a dev
e of d ation ice
ata in and a
its ow sa
n righ
t.
  Diary:
my m research t
atern he lif
al gra e of

ction
ndfat
her
 Field n
Fami otes: Cari
C o ll e
ly Hi bbean
Meet story G
ings roup
Da ta

 Intervi
e
histo w with a
rian famil
y
 Betra
Reco
yed b
rd
ythe
te o f
rt i f i ca
ea th ce a n d all
t h e d d e r R
fro m l e x an
il A
Deta
 “The technology helps in presentation at least, yeah it is
useful. I haven’t really mastered it either. It’s about
finding time to do all of these things and it’s- it’s only
when you find time to put a few hours in that you do and
that goes in. I might put it down for months and go back

t
to it. But at least uh I would say that it’s- I’ve had a lapse-

xtrac
a lapse in the sense that I found who owned my great
great great grandfather and... and just finding out the
name of that... owner uh... I wouldn’t say it was sort of
shock but there’s some subconscious traumatised
iew E
situation that stops you from going further and it’s very
difficult to go further in Barbados because Barbados did
not ah import a lot of slaves uh after a certain period.
They bred their own and uh and they were mainly women
for- and though it was an entry point from Africa it was
Interv

just a clean up job and sent off to other islands to order

etcetera. So uh linking it with Africa, which was the step
that I wanted to take, uh was a little frustrating because
the records that... direct me there and haven’t really got
into uh... really researching that because that’s the big one
because the records are here and uh I think there’s a
subscription for that and... I haven’t pursued it.”
 f o r th e
e C a se
Th e
th e c

Au to
f o r e f en a l ly! )
a se D no, re
C
The ution fu n (
t’s is
ec  oethnogra
I p hy

why
P r os
ck ut ar y

ethno
i m e ( o r l a  A
p l e m e nt
 Tthereof) co m
e t h n og r a ph y
to

/
u to h o w
 A c h us

wh y
ei n g f or te a a t
 vulnerabl s
B i s n h

graph
e c a ra t w
b e t te
le s b e
e f e ar do
th rin g w e
a

n o t?
c s: sh
t h i
 Estories that g to

y:
b e l o n
don’t
you
Than
k you f
l i s t en or
i ng!
  Mart
in
Pasts Bashfort
: h,
(Ham Public Hi ‘Absent F
pshir story ather

r
 Heew
e: Pa
lgrav Today, ed s, Present
e Ma .
cmill by Paul A Histories’

i ng!
o 
o
Press n Chang,
, 200
8) Autoe
thnog
a n, 20 s
p. 20 H
,
09), p hton and in People
a
3-222 ilda Kean nd their
you f
Caro raphy
lyn E a s Meth
Narra lli
tive, s and Arth od, (C
alifor
Qual Refle u
itativ xivity r P. Boch nia: L
eft C
Linco e Res : R e searc n e r, ‘Auto oast
ln (C earch
 alifor
nia: S
, 2 nd e
dn
her as
Su
ethno
gra
l i s t en
Judit age P . ed. by N bject’, in phy, Pers
h Et h o
ublic Hand
of the ert
Socie on, ‘The R ation orman K. book nal
 Ruth
ty of
Archi ole of Arc
s Inc., D
2000 enzin and f
)
o
F v ists, 2 hi , pp. 7 Y v
Histo innegan, 7:2 (2 ves in the 33-76 onna S.
ry R e ‘Fam 0 06), 2 P er 8
 ader, ily
ed. by Myths, M 27-24 ception o
k

Ellen 6 f Self
T Lu Robe emor ’, Jou
Proje e p rt Perk ies an rnal
cting ker, Reco s and d Interv
Than

Brun Confi rd Ke A listair iew

ner-R d e Thom ing’, in T
 outle entiality ping in P son, p he
dge, a
Tessa
Munc 2003 nd the Pr sychother p. 17 Oral
Ltd., ) o fessio a p y 7 -183
2010 ey, Creati nal R and Cou
 Debo
) ng Au
toeth
elatio n
nship selling:
ra nogra (New
and t h E. Reed phies
,
York:
he So -D an ( L o ndon
cial,
(Oxfo ahay, (ed. : Sag
e P ub
rd: B ), Auto lisher
erg, 1 /Ethn s
997) ograp
hy: R
ewrit
ing th
e Self