Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Nces PPT Unit 1

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 30

NCES UNIT 1

BY
K.RAJENDRA
EEE,BEC
FORMS OF ENERGY
There is an important principle stating that the total amount of energy in a closed system remains constant.
Energy may change from one form to another, but the total amount in any closed system remains constant. This
principle, known as ‘Conservation of energy’ is extremely important for understanding a variety of
phenomena various forms of energy are :

(a) Kinetic energy


(b) Potential energy
(c) Chemical energy
(d) Electrical energy
(e) Heat energy
(f) Radiant energy
(g) Nuclear (Mass) energy
There are five ultimate primary sources of useful energy:
1. The Sun.
2. The motion and gravitational potential of the Sun, Moon and Earth.
3. Geothermal energy from cooling, chemical reactions and radioactive decay in the Earth.
4. Human-induced nuclear reactions.
5. Chemical reactions from mineral sources.

Renewable energy derives continuously from sources 1, 2 and 3 (aquifers). Finite energy
derives from sources 1 (fossil fuels), 3 (hot rocks), 4 and 5. The sources of most significance
for global energy supplies are 1 and 4. The fifth category is relatively minor, but useful for
primary batteries, e.g. dry cells.
COMPARISON BETWEEN RENEWABLE AND FINITE ENERGY SUPPLIES.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY FLOW ABC, HARNESSED ENERGY FLOW DEF.
NATURAL ENERGY CURRENTS ON EARTH
SHOWING RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS.
UNITS TERAWATTS (TW) OR (10^12W)
Sankey (‘spaghetti’) diagram
PRIMARY SUPPLY TO END-USE
Pie diagrams
ENERGY PLANNING

COMPLETE ENERGY SYSTEMS must be analysed, and supply should not


be considered separately from end-use. Unfortunately precise needs for energy
are too frequently forgotten, and supplies are not well matched to end-use.
Energy losses and uneconomic operation therefore frequently result. For
instance, if a dominant domestic energy requirement is heat for warmth and hot
water, it is irresponsible to generate grid quality electricity from a fuel, waste the
majority of the energy as thermal emission from the boiler and turbine,
distribute the electricity in lossy cables and then dissipate this electricity as heat.
Sadly such inefficiency and disregard for resources often occurs. Heating would
be more efficient and cost-effective from direct heat production with local
distribution. Even better is to combine electricity generation with the heat
production using CHP – combined heat and power (electricity).
SYSTEM EFFICIENCY
The calculations can be most revealing and can pinpoint unnecessary losses. Here we define ‘efficiency’ as the
ratio of the useful energy output from a process to the total energy input to that process.
Consider electric lighting produced from ‘conventional’ thermally generated electricity and lamps. Successive
energy efficiencies are:
Electricity generation ≈30%, distribution ≈ 90% and incandescent lighting (energy in visible radiation, usually
with a light-shade) 4–5%. The total efficiency is 1–1.5%. Contrast this with cogeneration of useful heat and
electricity (efficiency ≈ 85%), distribution ≈ 90%! and lighting in modern low consumption compact
fluorescent lamps (CFL) ≈ 22%!.
The total efficiency is now 14–18%;
a more than tenfold improvement!
The total life cycle cost of the more efficient system will be much less than for the conventional, despite higher
per unit capital costs, because
(i) less generating capacity and fuel are needed,
(ii) less per unit emission costs are charged, and
(iii) equipment (especially lamps) lasts longer
ENERGY MANAGEMENT

Energy management is always important to improve


overall efficiency and reduce economic losses. No
energy supply is free, and renewable supplies are
usually more expensive in practice than might be
assumed. Thus there is no excuse for wasting energy of
any form unnecessarily. Efficiency with finite fuels
reduces pollution; efficiency with renewables reduces
capital costs.

You might also like