Supervision Methods
Supervision Methods
Supervision Methods
and methods
Regularity consistency
Structure
Documentation
Work related Evaluation
structure refers to the available
formats for conducting social
work supervision such as
Structure
The
individual or group supervision
or a combination of the two
formats.
effective
Involves the aims and objectives
social worker have to prepare
of supervision, contracts,
for the supervision session,
agenda, dates, time, meeting
including the joint responsibility
place and so forth.
to compile an agenda.
social work
supervision The reason behind structuring is
to give shape and focus to the
supervision session.
It gives weight to the
seriousness and importance of
the session and gives the social
worker the impression that the
session is closely and strictly
controlled.
2. Regularity
The
• Effective social work supervision is performed on
a regular basis.
• If the arrangement is made that supervision will
effective Interventions
supervision Approaches
Process
5. Evaluation
- Effective social work supervision needs to be evaluated in order to
assess the developments and the failures of the social worker
The elements - come up with alternative approaches where deemed necessary.
of effective
- Evaluation entails providing positive and/or negative feedback so that
both parties (i.e. the supervisor and the supervisee)
social work
- Critically assess how services are performed, giving recognition and
credit in all cases where a job has been performed well and providing
support with a view on the personal and professional development
supervision of the social worker.
- The performance appraisal may also be used to evaluate the work of
the social worker and give guidance where it is needed.
6. Documentation
- Reamer (2005:326) points the way:
“Careful documentation and record
keeping protect practitioners against
The elements allegations of ethical misconduct and
professional negligence, guard clients’
Sometimes the agenda is not discussed as the agenda will be the item that
needs attention
Both these types are beneficial for supervision process, however they need to
be managed and be balance
Methods of supervision
Individual supervision
Supervision methods
Group supervision
Individual
supervision
• One-to-one supervision with a supervisor
and a supervisee.
• Can be face-to-face, using computer
(virtual: Microsoft teams, zoom, skype etc)
by telephone, or by email, although the
latter is still a relatively new area and
requires additional attention in relation to
relevant practical, ethical and legal issues.
• The aim here is to develop the supervisee.
• The supervisor focuses on the learning
needs of their supervisee.
Advantages of individual supervision
• Bernard and Goodyear (1998) describe in detail the different techniques offered by individual supervision. Below is a brief summary of
each:
Self Report
• The ‘self report’ technique requires the supervisee to recollect and discuss sessions she /he had.
• This allows the supervisee to reflect in detail their own experiences with their clients.
• However, the effectiveness of the technique is greatly affected by the insightfulness and observation skills of the supervisee.
Process Notes
• This technique requires the supervisee, after a case (interview) session, to write comprehensive notes about the processes encountered.
• This is not a literal account of what occurred in case (interview) session, rather an introspective description of the experience from the
supervisee’s perspective.
• The discussion of these notes in supervision can create a productive and meaningful supervisory environment.
• This s well depends on the supervisee’s ability to accurately observe internal and external occurrences.
Individual supervision
techniques
Audiotape
supervision - Focus supervision by setting realistic goals for the videotaped therapy session.
- Discuss the internal processes of the supervisee during the videotaped therapy
techniques session.
- Select tape segments that focus on performance that the supervisee is able to
change with corrective feedback.
- Use supervisor comments to create a moderate discrepancy between performance
and the target goal.
- Refine goals moderately as the videotape review must be seen in the larger context
of supervisee development.
- Maintain a moderate level of challenge so that the supervisee is stimulated to grow
without becoming overly threatened.
Live Observation & Live Supervision
• Live observation as its name suggests is simply when a supervisor observes through
a one-way mirror, the supervisee conducting a counselling session with a client.
• It’s a supervision that allows the supervisee to receive immediate personal
supervision at the very time of the interview. Eg telephonic link with the supervisor,
using one way mirror
• It’s a gaining direct access to supervisee’s practice with scope , if appropriate, to
correct any bad habits
Individual • Implementation needs skill on the part of the supervisee
supervision • Both live observation and live supervision provide a more complete picture of the
supervisee’s skills than audio or videotape, and allow the supervisor to intervene in
the case of an emergency. Live supervision can be conducted by using any of the
Group •
others are facing similar issue ( Hawkins and Shohet, 2006). Provides opportunity for sharing .
Supervisees receive inputs ,reflections and feedback from their colleagues as well as the supervisor
( Hawkins and Shohet, 2006) and therefore have wider range of skills and abilities (Proctor 2000) . It
supervision
facilitate the giving and receiving feedback within a supporting setting.
• The group can give a way for the supervisor to test out their emotional or intuitive response to material
presented by checking if group members response the same way ( Hawkins and Shohet, 2006). It
Encourage interaction
• Within a group there is a wide range of life experience, age, race, personality types and therefore a greater
likelihood of someone in the group be able to empathize with the supervisee or supervisee’s client
( Hawkins and Shohet, 2006). It encourage development of group cohesion
• Action technique such as role reversal, and re-enactment
can be used within the group to create an understanding
( Hawkins and Shohet, 2006)
• Group supervision allows learning to be gained from the
supervision taking place in a group, giving opportunities to
Group learn how to run groups and to reflect on dynamics of
groups ( Hawkins and Shohet, 2006). They learn from each
supervision other and are able to generate a corporate sense of
responsibility for problem solving
advantages • The supervisor apply the principles of group dynamic to
build positive group moral and encourage a supportive
atmosphere
• The supervisor handles group feelings and subgroups
development openly and honestly
Disadvantages
The impact of group dynamics on the process can be negative and undermine the process of
supervision ( Hawkins and Shohet, 2006)
That can lead other members feel inferior to ask or contribute or share experiences in front of
other members
There can be less individual time per supervision ( Hawkins and Shohet, 2006). As the
supervisor at times not able to see the participation of other members
Group Supervisee may work on different developmental level from supervision (Proctor and Inskipp
2001)
supervision Inability to learn and identify all members learning and training needs
Group supervision does not mirror the individual work the supervise may be doing compared (
Hawkins and Shohet, 2006)
The group can be preoccupied with their own dynamics and lose focus of the supervision
( Hawkins and Shohet, 2006)
Think about your previous supervisors. These may include significant figures
outside your current profession, such as previous managers, mentors or
teachers.
• In broad terms, were they helpful or not to your development and in what
ways?
• Provide factors which were significant about his or her supervision.
• Which factors were influencing your supervision eg race, gender, age etc
and how.
• Which method of supervision was applied and how positively and
negatively those methods impacted on you?
• Consider how the way you were supervised impacted on: a) your practice
with users b) your team and colleague relationships c) how you used
supervision d) your confidence both before and after supervision.