Unit I Linear Programming (2 and 3)
Unit I Linear Programming (2 and 3)
Origin of L.P.
• It was in 1947 that George Dantzig and his associates found out that a
technique for solving military planning problems while they were
working on a project for U.S. Air Force. This technique consisted of
representing the various activities of an organization as a linear
programming (L.P.) model and arriving at the optimal programme by
minimizing a linear objective function.
Requirements for a L.P. problem
• There must be a well defined objective function (profit, cost or
quantities produced) which is either maximized or minimized and
which can be expressed as a linear function of decision variables.
• There must be constraints on the amount or extent of attainment of
the objective and these constraints must be capable of being
expressed as linear equations or inequalities in terms of variables
• There must be alternative courses of action. For
example, a given product may be processed by two
different machines and problem may be as to how
much of the product to allocate to which machine.
• Another necessary requirement is that decision
variables should be interrelated and non-negative.
• The resources must be in limited supply.
Assumptions in L.P. model
• Proportionality – A basic assumption of linear programming is that
proportionality exists in the objective function and the constraints.
This assumption implies that if a product yields profit of Rs. 10, the
profit earned from the sale of 12 products will be 120.
• Additivity – It means that if we use t hours on machine A and s hours
to make product 2, the total time required to make products 1 and 2
on machine A is t + s hours.
• Continuity – The decision variables are continuous i.e. they are
permitted to take any non-negative values that satisfy the constraints.
• Certainty – The R.H.S. coefficients of the constraints and resource
values in the constraints are certainly and precisely known and that
their values do not change with time.
Areas of application
• Industrial applications –
• Product mix problems
• Blending problems
• Production scheduling problems
• Trim loss problem
• Assembly line balancing
• Make or buy problems
• Management applications
• Media selection problems
• Portfolio selection problems
• Profit planning problems
• Transportation problems
• Assignment problems
• Manpower scheduling problems
• Miscellaneous
• Diet problems
• Agriculture problem
• Flight scheduling problems
• Environment protection
• Facilities location
Solution of L.P. problem
• Step 1 – Key decision – products 1,2, 3
• Step 2 – Assign variables to the products x1, x2, x3
• Step 3 – feasible alternatives x1,x2,x3 > 0
• Step 4 – Objective – Minimize or maximize
• Step 5 – Influencing factors
Q.1.
• A firm produces three products. These products are processed on
three different machines. The time required to manufacture one unit
of each of the three products and the daily capacity of the three
machines are given in the table below:
• i.e.
• For proteins 3x1 + 4x2 + 8x3 + 6x4 > 800 or
• For fats 2x1 + 2x2 + 7x3 + 5x4 > 200
• For carbohydrates 6x1 + 4x2 + 7x3 + 4x4 > 700
• x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 > 0
Q.3.
• A firm produces an alloy having the following specifications:
• (i) specific gravity < 0.98
• (ii) Chromium > 8%
• (iii) melting point > 450 degree C
• Raw materials A, B, and C having the properties shown in table can be
used to make an alloy.
Property Properties of raw material
A B C
Specific gravity 0.92 0.97 1.04
Chromium 7% 13% 16%
Melting point 440 0 C 490 0 C 480 0 C
• Cost of the various raw materials per ton are Rs. 90 for A, Rs. 280 for
B and Rs. 40 for C.
• Formulate the L.P. model to find the proportions in which A, B, and C
be used to obtain an alloy of desired properties while the cost of raw
materials is minimum.
• Let the proportions of raw materials A,B and C be used for making the
alloy be x1, x2, x3 respectively
• Or
• x3 > 3
• x4 > 2
• Constraint on number of units on television
• 5 < x1 < 10
• Where x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 > 0