Capacity design is a seismic design method that aims to ensure ductile failure by dissipating energy through predetermined, ductile zones. It has two key aspects: 1) ensuring flexural failure at the member level by suppressing brittle shear failure, and 2) establishing a plastic hinge hierarchy at the system level following the strong column-weak beam principle. This allows for a ductile response by forming plastic hinges first in beams and then in columns as lateral forces increase. Confinement reinforcement and shear design are important aspects of capacity design for achieving the necessary ductility.
Capacity design is a seismic design method that aims to ensure ductile failure by dissipating energy through predetermined, ductile zones. It has two key aspects: 1) ensuring flexural failure at the member level by suppressing brittle shear failure, and 2) establishing a plastic hinge hierarchy at the system level following the strong column-weak beam principle. This allows for a ductile response by forming plastic hinges first in beams and then in columns as lateral forces increase. Confinement reinforcement and shear design are important aspects of capacity design for achieving the necessary ductility.
Capacity design is a seismic design method that aims to ensure ductile failure by dissipating energy through predetermined, ductile zones. It has two key aspects: 1) ensuring flexural failure at the member level by suppressing brittle shear failure, and 2) establishing a plastic hinge hierarchy at the system level following the strong column-weak beam principle. This allows for a ductile response by forming plastic hinges first in beams and then in columns as lateral forces increase. Confinement reinforcement and shear design are important aspects of capacity design for achieving the necessary ductility.
Capacity design is a seismic design method that aims to ensure ductile failure by dissipating energy through predetermined, ductile zones. It has two key aspects: 1) ensuring flexural failure at the member level by suppressing brittle shear failure, and 2) establishing a plastic hinge hierarchy at the system level following the strong column-weak beam principle. This allows for a ductile response by forming plastic hinges first in beams and then in columns as lateral forces increase. Confinement reinforcement and shear design are important aspects of capacity design for achieving the necessary ductility.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 30
CAPACITY DESIGN
CAPACITY DESIGN
‘‘Design method in which elements of the
structural system are chosen and suitably designed and detailed for energy dissipation under severe deformations while all other structural elements are provided with sufficient strength so that the chosen means of energy dissipation can be maintained’’. CAPACITY DESIGN • A dissipative structure is able to dissipate energy by means of ductile hysteretic behavior at the dissipative zones, which are the predetermined parts of a dissipative structure. • Capacity design has two major implications, one at the member level, and the other at the system level. • Member level Flexural failure mode is ensured by suppressing shear failure (capacity shear principle in beams, columns, walls and connections). • System level The spreading of plastic regions that undergo flexural yielding follows a hierarchy for obtaining a more ductile system response (strong column–weak beam principle at the connections). Ductility • Actual forces that appear on structures are much higher than the design force that specified in the code. • It is recognized that the complete protection of building is economically not feasible. • The basic approach of earthquake resistant design is based upon lateral strength, deformability and ductility capacity of structure. • Ductility in the structure will arise from inelastic material behavior and detailing of reinforcement in such a manner that brittle failure is avoided and ductile behavior is induced by allowing steel to yield in controlled manner. • The primary task of design engineer is is to ensure that building will posses enough ductility to withstand the size and type of earthquake. IMPACT OF Ductility • Consider a Single degree of freedom system. • When the ground displaces, if the connection is so rigid the weight will experience same large force as compared to ground force • In case of flexible connection, it will bend and or deform and the weight will subjected to lesser force because some energy will be consumed to displace the system. • Thus ductility is important attribute in earthquake resistant structure that serves as a shock absorber and reduces the transmitted force to the structure. REQUIREMENT OF Ductility • In order to achieve a ductility we must give stress on two key areas during the design process.
• First the overall design concept for building configuration
must me sound.
• Second individual members must be designed for ductility and
connection needs special care. ASSESSMENT OF Ductility • Ductility is the capability of a material, structural component, or the entire structure to undergo deformation after its initial yield without any significant reduction in yield strength.
• Ductility is general measured in terms of ductility ratio or
ductility factor, which is the ratio of the maximum deformation that a structure or element can undergo without loss of initial yielding resistance to initial yield deformation FACTORS AFFECTING DUCTILITY
• Ductility increases linearly with an increase in the shear
strength carried by concrete for small value of axial compressive stress • Ductility linearly reduces upto the point where axial compressive stress becomes equal to the axial compressive stress at balanced failure. • With the increase of ultimate strain of concrete, the ductility factor increases. Thus confining of concrete increases the ductility appreciably. • An increase in yield strength of steel with all other variables constantly decreases ductility. The ductlity increases with increase in concrete strength. FACTORS AFFECTING DUCTILITY
• The lateral reinforcement tend to improve ductility by
preventing shear failures, restraining the compression steel against buckling. • The lateral reinforcement in the form of closed stirrups is effective in binding the compressive zone thereby confining the concrete and increasing the ductility of section. • Shear failure occurs at smaller deflection than the flexural failures and hence absorbs much less energy. Members should be designed and detailed by providing web reinforcement so that their strength in shear exceeds strength in flexure. Therefore ductility increases as the stirrups in the specimen increases. FACTORS AFFECTING DUCTILITY
• Bond failures and anchorage failures are sudden and brittle.
Special attention must be given in details to prevent them from occurring in structures, which must behave in ductile manner. Ductility in Reinforced Concrete Materials
• Triaxial stress state in reinforced concrete members can be
provided with confinement reinforcement. • When concrete is subjected to axial stress, passive lateral pressure developed by the lateral tie reinforcement provides significant increase in strength and enormous increase in the strain capacity of concrete. Ductility in Reinforced Concrete Materials
a. Hot rolled steel bar b. Cold worked reinforcing bar
Ductility in Reinforced Concrete Materials Ductility in Reinforced Concrete Materials
• Strength and deformation capacities of concrete fibers in the
core region of columns increase with the amount of lateral confinement reinforcement. • Confinement is most effective in circular columns since lateral pressure develops uniformly in all radial directions whereas a rectangular tie is more effective at the corners. Ductility in Reinforced Concrete Materials Limitations on Tension Reinforcement • The momentcurvature relationships of two beam sections with identical lateral reinforcement and compression reinforcement ratio that ensure flexural failure mode. • The only difference is the ratio of tension reinforcement. • It can be observed that ductility reduces with increase in tension reinforcement, and 0.02 appears as a reasonable upper limit for a ductile response. Minimum Compression Reinforcement • Compression reinforcement is known to be increasing the ductility of a beam cross section significantly. • Moment-curvature relations for beam sections with minimum tension and lateral reinforcement, but with different compression reinforcement ratios. • It is evident that q0/q[0.5 is a reasonable lower limit to ensure ductility. Shear Design of Beams • Shear failure is suppressed by calculating the design shear force from flexural capacity, but not from analysis. • Let us consider the free body diagram of a beam carrying uniformly distributed gravity loading (g + q) along its span. • When the earthquake moments act on the beam, we will assume that both end-sections i and j reach their flexural capacities (with strain hardening) under double flexure. Shear Design of Beams
• The shear capacity of the beam section Vr is calculated
according to the relevant concrete design standards. • Further, possible compression strut failure due to overreinforcing in shear is prevented by the requirement. Strong Column-Weak Beam • Flexural plastic hinges inevitably form at the ends of frame members under design ground motions. • A plastic hinge formed on a beam is less critical than a plastic hinge on a column or shear wall, because vertical members may lose their stability under gravity loads when plastic hinges form. • Accordingly, plastic hinge hierarchy requires formation of plastic hinges first on beams, then at the base of first story columns. • A plastic hinging hierarchy can be imposed in design by proportioning the flexural capacities of beam and column ends joining at a connection. • This is called the strong column–weak beam principle. Strong Column-Weak Beam Strong Column-Weak Beam
• Strong column-weak beam principle leads to a ductile