Recruitment and Selection
Recruitment and Selection
Recruitment and Selection
)
Recruitment and Selection Process: Introduction, Sources of
Recruitment, Use of Assessment Centers, Selection Errors &
Minimizing Selection Errors, Reliability & Validity of Selection Tests,
Choosing suitable types of Interviews, Formulating a recruitment
strategy for senior level executives.
Employee Engagement: Process and outcomes of Employee
Engagement, Ways of Achieving Employee Engagement;
Talent Development: Need Analysis, Knowledge Management,
Competency Development and Developing Leadership Talent.
Case Studies
Recruitment and selection processes are part of HR routines.
To retain top talent and build a strong, consistent team, the HR
manager needs to know how to do the recruitment and selection
process the right way.
Selection methods are valid to the extent that predictors measure or are
significantly related to work behavior, job products, or outcomes.
Franco Bernabe was hired to run Telecom Italia, a large, recently privatized
conglomerate with a poorly performing stock price and a history of management
turmoil. At the time, Bernabe appeared to be the perfect choice for the job:
between 1992 and 1998, he had led the transformation of one of the world’s
largest energy companies, ENI, into a highly respected and profitable publicly
traded business—and it, too, had a legacy of extreme senior-level upheaval.
Bernabe’s skills were considered so appropriate for his new position that
Telecom Italia’s stock rose 5 percent the day his appointment was announced
—a multibillion-dollar increase in market value.
Only two months later, Bernabe’s job changed drastically when Telecom
Italia became the target of a hostile takeover attempt by Olivetti
Corporation. It became irrelevant, for instance, that Bernabe excelled at
leading cultural change. To fend off Olivetti, he quickly needed to
improve short-term financial results; rapidly assess the value and
synergy of core and noncore business combinations; and almost instantly
construct intricate investment and business obstacles that might thwart a
takeover. In the end, it wasn’t enough. Olivetti succeeded in its efforts,
and Bernabe stepped down only six months after he started.
Source: Harvard Business Review (July-August 1999), pp. 109-110.
RECRUITING CANDIDATES
• Internal Versus External Candidates
Steps in the recruitment and selection process
The process of recruitment and selection begins with recruiting candidates and ends
with selecting a candidate to hire, as you might expect from the name. Being
thorough and following each step can lead to better hires and retention rates. You
can start by considering this seven-step recruitment and selection process example.
Take a look at the steps of recruitment and selection:
1. Receive a job order
2. Source candidates
3. Screen applicants
4. Shortlist candidates
5. Interview candidates
6. Conduct testing
7. Extend a job offer
Follow each step in the recruitment and selection process to learn as much as you
can about each candidate. To prevent your recruitment and selection process from
getting stale, find what works and change what doesn’t.
An assessment center is defined as a method used by senior
management of an organization for identifying management potential
and determining the suitability of a candidate for given job roles and
specific types of employment such as management or military
command.
Assessment centers provide real-life scenarios.
In this, leaders immerse themselves in level-specific or role-specific
job simulations and assignments.
Assessment centers are multi-component standardized evaluation
experiences.
Advantages of Assessment Centre
• One of the most significant benefits of an assessment center is
its capacity to forecast the future capability of an individual for a
specific job position.
• Other sorts of assessments or data, on the other hand, can only
evaluate what others have done in the past or are doing in their
current function.
• In an assessment center, though, one can examine what
someone will do in a hypothetical situation.
1. Data About Future Performance Behaviour: Before people employ or promote someone, they should
conduct a realistic day-in-the-life simulation to get a good idea of performing in a specific role.
2. Attainment of Objective Statistics: An assessment center member obtains an objective measure of their
leadership capabilities instead of a 360-degree feedback assessment based on subjective data. The
outcomes are based on professional assessors’ recommendations or smart technologies.
3. Feedback on Specific Habits, Techniques, and Skills: It will assist people in understanding what worked
and what didn’t when they obtain a rating on a skill. A report from an assessment center and actionable
comments from a coach can assist leaders in determining where and how to develop.
4. The Validity and Fairness of the System are Established: Many academics have investigated assessment
center validity and recorded thousands of successful applications since its first use in the corporate
world. Assessment centers are undeniably predictive of on-the-job performance as well as future
performance. Furthermore, compared to other selection methods, the assessment center method is
often seen as more fair and objective in terms of gender, ethnicity, and age.
5. A Development Opportunity in a Leader’s Career:An evaluation center can be one of a leader’s most
valuable development opportunities. The lessons they learn from the high-stakes event will significantly
impact how they lead now and in the future to accomplish success. Furthermore, regardless of the
outcome, the experience enables participants to accept the fairness and accuracy of promotion
decisions and a better grasp of job needs.
Leaders can benefit from the following in an assessment center method:
1. Feedback Provided at Behavioural and Competency Levels: Leaders are given
explicit feedback on the behaviors they displayed or missed. They are also given
overall evaluations in the areas of leadership competency.
2. Role Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement: The data helps the leader
improve their strengths and narrow the gaps in their development areas if they go
through a simulation tailored to their present leadership level.
3. Data About Gaps in Readiness: When leaders are placed through a simulation at the
next level, they may see which competencies they’re ready for and where they need
to improve.
4. A Better Understanding of all the Skills Needed to Succeed: Even the most senior
executives have trouble seeing what it takes to advance in their careers. An
assessment center offers them a better understanding of the challenges they’ll
experience in these professions and why it’s important to develop vital skills. The
experience may also aid them in determining whether or not they want to pursue
specific careers.