What Is Safety Culture
What Is Safety Culture
What Is Safety Culture
How to Improve HSE Performance through Measuring and Developing Safety Culture
02/04/2012
Summary of Presentation
Purpose and Objectives What is Safety Culture? What influences Safety Culture? When to use Behaviour Interventions Diagnostic and Measuring Tools
Advantages and Disadvantages
Objectives
To provide:
An insight into the topic of Safety (HSE)
Culture and what it takes to establish a successful culture An understanding of why measuring safety culture is an important pre-cursor to applying any Behavioural Safety intervention or modification An overview of a Safety Climate process through demonstration and use of the tools
Accidents that result in severe injuries may not be random events, rather their causal factors may derive from an accumulation, over time, of deficiencies in an organizations safety culture
We are convinced that the management practices overseeing the Shuttle program were as much a cause of the accident as the foam that struck the left wing CAIB Report
E. I. Dupont starting manufacturing explosives in the early 1800s Developed concept of separation distances for the powder mills and designed buildings so that explosions would go upwards or away from occupied buildings Built his house inside the plant and insisted managers also live inside the plant Developed plant rules and procedures
Definitions
Safety Culture
The collective values and attitudes of
people in the organization
Behavioural Issues Task Group Step Change
Definitions
Safety Climate
Surface snapshot of the state of safety
providing an indicator of the underlying safety culture Step Change Behavioural Issues Task Group
The product of individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies and patterns of behaviour that determine the commitment to and style and proficiency of an organizations health and safety management ACSNI 1993 The way we do things around here CBI
1990
As the Board investigated the Columbia accident, it expected to find a vigorous safety organiztion, process and culture at NASA, bearing little resemblance to the ineffective silent safety system identified during Challenger Disaster (86) NASAs initial briefings to the Board on its safety programs espoused a risk averse philosophy that empowered any employee to stop an operation at the mere glimmer of a problem Unfortunately, NASAs views of its safety culture, did not reflect reality CAIB Report
Imagine the difference if a Shuttle Program Manager had simply asked Prove to me that Columbia has not been harmed by the foam strike
What does a good safety culture look like? How do you know if the safety culture is improving? What are the key issues to focus upon first? When to stop working on a specific safety culture issue and move onto the next Is it always necessary to survey staff to measure safety culture? How does behaviour modification link to safety culture improvement?
Incident Frequency
Reduction through TRADITIONAL QHSE PROGRAMS Reduction through addition of ADVANCED APPROACHES WITH SUPPORTING SYSTEMS
Sound Culture
Reporting Culture
Organizations with little trust often find it
difficult to get people to admit to their own mistakes
Sound Culture
Learning
The ability to share knowledge across
organizational boundaries is a key aspect of a sound safety culture e.g. are employees fully involved in decisions affecting their safety and health? Conflicting objectives are a way of life i.e. do the job quickly and efficiently, but do it safely without getting hurt
The significance of the way managers speak and behave is often underestimated Managers who only get involved after the event e.g. an accident will not enjoy the same credibility as those who were involved all the time
Behavioural Issues
Example of airlines Fly similar aeroplanes Similar standards of pilot training Risk to passengers varies by a factor of 42
Interaction between:
The person The job Organizational factors
Unsafe behaviour may have been the final act in an accident sequence, but worker behaviour will have been influenced by the job, work environment and the organization
Safety
Safety
Climate
Culture
Organization
Job
Safety performance is improved when all factors job, environment and organization are considered Requires behavioural changes at all levels in the organization, not just at workplace People behave the way they do because of the consequences that result for themselves after doing it.
If there are safety problems, it is because the behaviours producing the problems are being reinforced Managers and supervisors change worker behaviours by their own action or inaction Focusing only on the front line worker will not result in positive changes
Management has the most influence How do they walk the talk and demonstrate safety leadership?
Field visits to talk knowledgeably about
safety e.g. accident stats and near misses Safety manager is a full member of the senior management team
Senior managers meet to discuss safety performance against objectives and targets Time off provided for safety training. Managers safety leadership appraisal and self assessment questionnaire Managers lead Safety Orientation training Adequate # of safety professionals are available to assist operational and field staff. (Not to take over!!)
Is a significant proportion of accidents primarily caused by the behaviour of front line workers? Do a majority of managers and supervisors want to reduce the current accident rate? Will management be comfortable with empowering and delegating some authority for safety to workers? Is management willing to trust the results produced by the workers? Are the workers willing to trust management?
Is there a high level of management involvement in safety? Is management willing to provide the necessary time and resources for workers to be trained and to carry out observations? Has a program champion or champions been identified? Are the existing communication processes adequate for the increased communication and feedback between management and workers?
Any behavioural modification program needs a strongly implemented and robust HSE MS as a foundation Research and practical evidence shows significant improvements can be achieved by implementing appropriate behaviour interventions Behavioural modification initiatives unlikely to be successful unless job environment and organization factors also considered
Intervention tools which work at one location, may not work at another Suitability of behavioural tools is influenced by the existing safety culture A Safety Culture model provides a framework to identify current level and identify appropriate action to improve and move to next level
Involving Level 3
Managing Level 2 Emerging Level 1
Develop management commitment
Kiel Centre
The Journey
Diagnostic tools
Safety climate surveys Structured workshops Combination of the above
Results assist in selection of appropriate behaviour modification program and planning in how to implement
Diagnostic
Used to identify issues, which require improvement
Intervention
Establishing where an organizations safety culture maturity lies is key to selecting appropriate behaviour modification programs and implementing them effectively
Assess current level Develop plan to improve Implement plan Monitor implementation Re-assess to evaluate success and identify further actions
coverage Can ask for yes/no or sliding scale responses Flexible timing for respondents Standard format easy to summarize
Limited
frequent opportunities Real players are in the room Decisions can be made Commitment to act
Regular
agenda items intrude No fresh perspectives Unequal status of participants Internal problems go unchallenged
Self Assessment
Carefully considered evaluation resulting in a judgment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization and the maturity of its HSE Management System Self Assessment provides fact based guidance on where to invest resources for optimum improvement
Audit
auditee provides information to auditor
who performs the evaluation
Combination of Survey Questionnaire and Facilitated workshop Complements the audit process by focusing resources on prioritized areas Where to use?
Need to measure status of HSE MS
performance and the safety culture
Reliable identification of HSE Culture and all major concerns and strengths Full understanding of underlying factors Prioritized action plan for continual improvement Commitment and support from all levels
plus standard questions Key players in room Focus and equality Deep discussion New benchmarks Electronic voting = speed, anonymity
Time
consuming for participants Limited coverage Participants all come to location Is there adequate time to develop action plans?
Workshop principles
Open, frank communication Trust Everyone's input is important The person who performs the task understands it better than anyone else Group comments may be shared externally but individual anonymity is preserved
Combination Advantages
Wide coverage to gather data Deep discussion to understand Managers/staff collaborative effort Accurate final analysis Graphic + Qualitative reporting Save audit for key risk areas Management workshop takes decisions and feeds into business (action) plan
7 Strongly agree 4
1 Strongly disagree
5 Agree
Abandon Ship!!
This company walks the talk on safety.
Votes 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 Disagree 2 3 4 5 Agree 6 7
6
BU Comparisons
5 4 3 2 1 0
y g e s k e s s g y n n p ts w is in rit in m io io ur hi rd es ie nc di nc r t t t g a R n s o u e a c r r ia n ev to en te ec A ic ec rg pl ss R la de ni og tru ar rr In e e R a P o o S un w Pr om C M ss A ps m Le Em C E A O S om H C
North
South
Central
Workshop Output
Conclusions
The need to understand Safety Culture or Human Factors is the way of the future if we are to improve safety performance Everyones doing it!
UK - Culture Maturity Model and Climate
Questionnaires Canada Safety Stand Down Week Perception Survey, Imperial, CPC, Shell Hearts and Minds US Dan Petersen Perception Surveys started in the early 90s on railroads
Conclusions
In the 80s, there was UPITFOS, which initiated the Basic Safety Program (BSP) and Certificate of Recognition (COR) Is Safety Culture the step change needed for the beginning of the 21st century? Should we draw closer parallels to Quality Management and use Six Sigma Safety Culture approach? Statistical information from the UK offshore and North America would suggest that significant improvements are resulting from Safety Culture initiatives