This document summarizes an article that analyzes Alice Walker's novel "The Color Purple" through an ecofeminist lens. It discusses how the novel depicts the oppression of women and nature through male dominance. It shows how Celie's liberation comes through her connection with the natural world and breaking from patriarchal religion/ideology. The document also analyzes scenes depicting the interconnection between the cultural practices and environmental conservation of the Olinka tribe in Africa and how they are disrupted by colonialism. Overall, the document uses ecofeminist theory to examine themes of feminist and environmental liberation in Walker's novel.
1 of 6
More Related Content
An ecofeminist study of alice walker the color purple
1. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5766(Paper) ISSN 2225-0484(Online)
Vol.2, No.1, 2011
An Ecofeminist Study of Alice Walker’s “The Color Purple”
V.Bhuvaneswari * Rosamma Jacob.
School of Social Sciences and Languages, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
* E-mail of the corresponding author: vbhuvaneswari@vit.ac.in
Abstract
This paper describes the contribution of Alice Walker’s novel “The Color Purple” to the seminal ideas of
ecological conscience and environmental protection, using schemes that intertwine ecocriticism with
feminist criticism. The methodology involves the discourses on the images of women and nature in “The
Color Purple”, the association between the oppression of women and the exploitation of nature by male
dominance, enslaving the female and nature in the commercial market. Through an ecofeminist lens, this
paper finds that Alice Walker infuses her novel with a theme of feminine and natural liberation from
domination and violence. Alice Walker foresees the establishment of symbiosis, in which there is no male
oppression or environment exploitation.
Keywords: domination, ecofeminism, ecological conscience, male oppression, interconnectedness.
1. Introduction
Nature abounds with incredulous wonders. Our heritage of natural resources is being ripped and frayed. But
it is propitious that we have the ability to solve this crisis and avoid the worst. Man driven by the desire for
profit, threatens to destroy the environment/non-humans. Non-humans that sustain us are enmeshed by the
humans. While Race, Class and Gender oppressions have actually found a place in the literary theory and
criticism Nature has been neglected and negated from the core. The theology of creation places God as the
architect of the Universe at the periphery. Life sprang ex nihilo or from lifeless chaos, there arose a rampant
dualism from a deep-seated belief that differentiates the earthly being from the divine. The same theology
places man (as God’s authority on earth) not woman at the apex. God’s abode is heaven and the human soul
is destined to escape, going home to immortality in heaven. Thus domicile is somewhere else with God,
beyond this earth and God is not revealed in Nature but is enigmatic. When the ecological consciousness
grew on one side it got merged with the rising feminist consciousness and opened new avenue called
‘ecofeminism’. Ecofeminism, described as feminist environmental philosophy, emerged in the 1970’s
drawing influence from the second wave feminism and green movement.With the publication of ‘Feminism
or Death’ in 1974 by Francoise d’Eaubonne, the French Feminist, the term ecofeminism came into vogue
and occupied a pivotal position in the ongoing debates on feminism and ecology. As an activist an academic
movement, ecofeminism as a distinct discourse perceives critical connections between women and nature.
Ecofeminism is a social and political movement which points to the existence of considerable common
ground between environmentalism and feminism, with some currents linking deep ecology and feminism
(Ruether, Rosemary Radford 1993).
7
2. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5766(Paper) ISSN 2225-0484(Online)
Vol.2, No.1, 2011
2. Background and Literature Review
In the late eighteenth century political revolutions in America and France were accompanied by momentous
social upheavals that put new emphasis on individual rights. The best minds of the age were speaking out in
favor of democratic libertarian ideals – for free white males, at any rate. The rights of women (along with
black slaves, Indians, and indentured servants) were generally disregarded (Schneir 1994,p. 2).
Ecofeminism seeks to strengthen the bonds between women and nature by critiquing their parallel
oppressions and encouraging an ethic of caring and a politics of solidarity. Although ecofeminism
advocates a "pronature" stance, Haraway's theories of "artifactualism" and the cyborg break down the
schism between nature and culture and even nature and technology, thus radically destabilizing the whole
concept of "nature" (Alaimo 1994, pp. 133-152).
Ecofeminists broke new ground stating that the exploitation of natural resources and the degradation of
women are interconnected. They introduced a feminist perspective quite contradictory to the traditional
patriarchal ways of relating things to the environment.Janis Birkeland (1993) in “Ecofeminism: Linking
Theory and Practise” defines Ecofeminism as “a value system, a social movement and a practice, but it also
offers a political analysis that explores the links between androcentricism and the environmental
destruction.”. Since its inception ecofeminism critiques the dualistic concept of the patriarchal system such
as self/other, man/woman, human/animal, culture/nature and white/non-white thereby constructing “white
male human identity as separate from and superior to the identities of women, people of color, animals and
the natural world” (Gaard 1993,p. 9).Ecofeminism contrives to obliterate these detrimental dichotomies
which are nurtured by western creeds.
3. Alice Walker and The Color Purple
In the chaotic ebb and flow of human affairs, Alice Walker sees writing as a way to correct wrongs that she
observes in the immediate world around her. Her recognition of misogyny and exploitation of the
environment as parallel forms of male domination, undoubtedly takes an ecofeminist stance. In an interview
with John O’Brien Walker admits that she is committed to the cause of black women but equally to the cause
of nature. She has openly declared her love of nature, which is one of the reasons why, she did not commit
suicide. Walker’s writing is suffused with a concern for the environment. Walker reproves that the earth has
become the nigger of the world and will assuredly undo us if we don't learn to care for it, revere it, and even
worship it.
Alice Walker's The Color Purple published in 1982 is an epistolary novel. It deals with the story of Celie, a
black woman in the South. Celie writes letters to God in which she reveals her life--her roles as daughter,
wife, sister, and mother. Through writing letters, women not only record their lives but also reflect upon
them, a source of personal growth. In The Color Purple, as in her other writings, Walker focuses on the
theme of double repression of black women in the American experience. Walker contends that black
women suffer from discrimination by the white community and from a second repression from black males,
who impose the double standard of white society on women. The primary theme of the novel, though,
8
3. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5766(Paper) ISSN 2225-0484(Online)
Vol.2, No.1, 2011
reflects Walker's desire to project a positive outcome in life, even under the harshest conditions her central
character triumphs over adversity and forgives those who oppressed her. This central theme of the triumph
of good over evil is no doubt the source of the book’s great success and that is achieved by the protagonist
by her close association with all beings of nature irrespective of race and gender. The protagonist shifts her
attention from an anthropocentric male god to an ecocentric god. A god of trees, a god of birds and air and
all other things. This perspective leads us to view the novel through an ecofeminist lens.
4. Women, Culture and Nature
Celie’s condition is deplorable. She is abused physically, sexually, emotionally and socially. She becomes
preganant at a young age. Culture norms condemn her though she is faultless. Her forced physical
degradation inculcates feeling of inferiority in her that exiles her from the traditional camp of “good girls”.
The novel begins with the threat “you better not never tell nobody but God.It’d kill your mummy.”(Walker
1982,p. 1).The warning implies that God knows and he understands. He compromises with male
wickedness and accepts a woman’s silence. Throughout her life she has been subjected to a cruel form of
male dominance. Metaphorically dumb and left with nobody to share she turns to write letters to God. The
female body becomes the target of male aggression and so woman like Celie begins to view their bodies
with animosity. Thus, Celie hates her feminine self, a raison d’etre of her inferior position.The black
woman lives in a society where men are aggressive and women remain acquiescent. Walker reminiscences
the black mothers and grandmothers as “creatures so abused and mutilated in body , so dimmed and
confused by pain that they considered themselves unworthy of hope” (Walker 1983,p. 232).This situation
stems from the patriarchal culture that replicates the historic gender-based relationship between men and
women. It clearly demonstrates the power over the powerless. A practical movement ecofeminism not only
condemns these patriarchal perceptions but also aims to eradicate it, thereby negating any hierarchical
notion of difference.
Walker gives the epistolary structure to the novel which subverts the predominantly male code of western
literary tradition. Celie addresses her letters to God because she has no one else to write to and because she
is so afraid to tell any one. To survive beatings, Celie destroys her emotions: “It all I can do not to cry. I
make myself wood. I say to myself, Celie, you a tree” (Walker 1982,p. 23).Wendy Wall (1998) explains that
“Celie’s attempt to negate her pain by desensitizing herself creates within her emotionally hollow spaces,”
subsequently leading to fragmentation, alienation and unresponsiveness. Just like a tree which gives way to
man’s exploitation, Celie remains quite and silenced. Celie recognizes that trees must also despise men for
their attempts at deforestation and effluence.
Celie gets to know the beauty of her body only by the arrival of Shug Avery, her husband’s lover. Shug
introduces Celie to the mysteries of the body and making it possible for Celie to the discovery of speech
which eventually leads to the freedom of speech and liberation from masculine brutality. Celie needs a
mentor and a friend whom Sharon Hymer calls a “narcissistic friendship” (Hymer 1984,p. 423).Sharon
further projects Shug as an initiator of all the activities and a provider of a value system and lifestyle which
Celie faithfully embraces. It is Shug who changes the perspectives of Celie. Initially Celie has viewed God
9
4. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5766(Paper) ISSN 2225-0484(Online)
Vol.2, No.1, 2011
as a man with whom she can share her confidences and who can provide the necessary protection from the
world around her. Shug, the female liberator infuses self- confidence in her. Now Celie perceives God as a
man who acts like other men “trifling, forgetful and lowdown” (Walker 1982,p. 199).Faith germinates and
Celie’s life rejuvenates when she breaks the shackles of male supremacy. Even religion is revitalized when
it extends to encompass the segregated and God loses “Its” color and gender: “God ain’t a he or she, but a
It” (Walker 1982,p. 202). Religion is created by man and when religion loses its limitations imposed on it
by white, male hierarchy, faith opens in many directions” (Sypher 1956,p. 249).Walker never rejects or
reprimands the society to which she belongs but accusses its limitations that are imposed upon it which
makes it closed and restrictive.
It is through Shug that Walker imparts her pantheistic view.God is not confined to a shrine but God is in
nature and within us. In an interview with O’Brien “Certainly I don’t believe there is a God, although I
would like to believe there is a God beyond nature. The world is God. Man is God. So is a leaf or snake”
(Walker 1983,p. 265). Throughout the story, Celie is the center of this community of women, but the one
who knows how to survive, to be independent, to be free from the clutches of patriarchs and the one who
wants to change herself and others especially the life of tribal people is her sister, Nettie. Although Celie is
the central character in the novel it can also be read as the story and victory of Nettie, the ecofeminist, who
understands the Olinka tribes, their worship of the roofleaf, their struggle to preserve the pristine beauty
and strength of the settlements around their lives. Nettie joins with the missionary family of Samuel and
Corrine and leaves for Africa. They are welcomed by the tribal people.It is during the welcoming ceremony
one of the villagers recited the story of the village chief and his greediness.He wanted more than his share
of land inorder to plant more.His greed increased and he began to cultivate cassava, millet and
groundnuts on the land on which the life protector, roofleaf grew. Nothing can withstand nature’s fury.
Soon there came a strom to teach a lesson to the chief’s greed. The storm destroyed all the houses and that
the huts remain roofless and there is no longer any roofleaf to be found.For nearly six months the people of
Olinka were subjected to the wrath of nature. Ultimately the people ended up with fever.Soon the village
began to die and half the village was wiped out. As soon as the rain stopped they rushed to the old roofleaf
beds and tried to find the old roots. It took five years for the roofleaf to become plentiful. The rootleaf
became the thing they worship.
5. Interconnectedness of Culture and Nature
Walker recognizes the interconnectedness of culture and nature in the Olinka tribe. She identifies the
relationship between the local cultural preservation and the defence of biological diversity.Thus by
projecting the Olinka tribal life Walker shows the most ecologically responsible people. Nettie observes the
exploitation of the Olinka’s life as a result of the clearing the way for culture.To the Olinka “the roofleaf is
not Jesus Christ but in its own humble way, is it not God?” (Walker 1982,p. 160).For these people the
roofleaf is not simply a thing but an embodiment of the very essence of life. Nettie, in one of her letters,
writes “the Olinka territory has been destroyed and their women folk spend all their time in the fields, tending
10
5. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5766(Paper) ISSN 2225-0484(Online)
Vol.2, No.1, 2011
their crops and praying. They sing to the earth and to the sky and to their cassava and groundnuts. Songs of
love and farewell. We are all sad here, Celie” (Walker 1982,p. 179). The white man explores and exploits the
Olinka territory for its rubber plantation. Nettie first perceives Olinka as a natural and self-describing people
but astonished to find them vulnerable to invasion of the white emperor.The Olinka though happy to
welcome the road but never thought it will be for the worse. The road actually destroys their fields and
homes.The church, the school including Nettie’s hut were levelled down. In anger the village chief went to
the coast seeking explanation and reparation for laying the road.He returned to the village with the breaking
news that the whole village including its territory belongs to the rubber manufacturer in England.
Like a cancerous cell that slowly penetrates into the body and destroys it the white man slowly enters to the
Olinka village and seize it.At first, they build roads for transporting their goods. Second, the trees which are
venerated by the tribes are hauled off to make ship and captain’s furniture. Third, the land is planted with
something that cannot be eaten. And finally the tribes are forced to work as slaves in their own land.The tribes
feel a terrible sense of loss and dispossession because they are inexticably bound to their land and consider it
as the sacred mother.The devastation of the Olinka village is a perfect example of modernization or the
presumed pursuit of development which leads to the ecological and cultural rupture of the bonds that the
tribes have established with nature.Ecofeminist Vandhana Shiva in “Ecofeminism” discuss a similar
situation, but in the Indian context. “The culturally rooted tribal is made physically homeless by being
uprooted from the soil of his anscestors” (Shiva 1993,p. 98).The native’s traditional practices have played a
key role in conserving the forest and its pristine beauty. Abandonment of these traditional practices by
modernism accompanied by colonial characteristics of oppressive tendencies has led to the present ecological
crisis.
6. Conclusion
All strands of ecofeminism are ultimately anti-dualistic, rejects transcendence and embrace immanence
interdependence with nature. Ecofeminism tries to transform the men who are the culture bearers of
oppression.Women must stand up against the unfair treatment they receive at the hands of men and they must
do this by helping one another. The women in the novel band together to support and sustain one another
throughout the novel. The bond of sisterhood is important, both literally in the persons of Nettie and Celie,
Sofia and Odessa and metaphorically in the persons of Mary Agnes and Sofia, Albert's sister and Celie, Tashi
and Olivia and of course Shug Avery and Celie, who embody the twin roles of sisters and lovers in their
relationship.Formation of mutually beneficial bonds among women is the only answer to a suffocatingly
male-controlled world when women are systematically commodified, demoralised and dehumanised.
Traditionally, women are thought to gravitate more towards the “SHE” cluster of issues social security,
health care and education. While men are considered in the “WE” issues war and economy. But it is high time
that we take a look on the key issue to save the “damsel in distress”(Earth) before it falls apart. A sword of
11
6. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5766(Paper) ISSN 2225-0484(Online)
Vol.2, No.1, 2011
Damocles hangs over our head. It will be devastating if we remain silent and guilty of myopic indifference
to the progressive erosion and environmental degradation.
References
Alaimo, Stacy. (1994), “Cyborg and Ecofeminist Interventions: Challenges for an Environmental
Feminism”, Feminist Studies 20, (1), pp.133-152.
Birkeland, Janis. (1993), “Ecofeminism: Linking Theory and practice” in Greta Gaard (ed) Ecofeminism:
Women, Animals, Nature, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, (p.19)
Gaard, Greta. (1993), Ecofeminism:Women,Animals,Nature, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Hymer, Sharon. (1984), “Narcissistic Friendship”, Psychoanalytical Review 71, 423-439.
O’Brien, John. (1983), “From an Interview”, in Alice Walker (ed) In Search of My Mother’s Garden:
Womanist Prose, USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. (pp.244 - 272 )
Ruether, Rosemary Radford. (1993), “Ecofeminism: Symbolic and Social Connections of the Oppression of
Women and the Domination of Nature”, in Carol Adams (ed) Ecofeminism and the Sacred, New York: The
Continuum Publishing Company, p.13.
Schneir, Miriam. (1994), Feminism: The Essential Historical Writings, New York: Vintage.
Shiva ,Vandana. (1993), Ecofeminism, New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Sypher, Wylie. (1956), The Meanings of Comedy, New York: Doubleday.
Walker, Alice. (1982), The Color Purple, New York: Pocket Books.
Walker, Alice. (1983), In Search of My Mother’s Garden: Womanist Prose, USA: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, Inc.
Wall, Wendy. (1988), “Lettered Bodies and Corporeal Texts in The Color Purple” Studies in American
Fiction 16 (1), 83-97.
12