Serological tests play an important role in the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. Key serological tests discussed in the document include agglutination, immunodiffusion, complement fixation, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and lateral flow assays. ELISA tests have advantages like rapidity and are commonly used to detect fungal antigens or antibodies associated with diseases like cryptococcosis, aspergillosis, histoplasmosis, and candidiasis. The galactomannan ELISA assay detects a polysaccharide antigen released by Aspergillus and is useful for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis.
3. INTRODUCTION – Need for Serologic tests
• Invasive fungal infections(IFI) present a great challenge
nowadays, esp. d/t expansion of population with
immunosuppression.
• Key elements in improving outcome of invasive fungal
infections is rapid diagnosis & early initiation of appropriate
antifungal therapy.
• Cultures, though the gold standard of diagnosis, is time
consuming and has low sensitivity d/t low concentration of the
organism in the tissues.
• Hence non-culture methods for fungal diagnosis is opted.
• These include- detection of specific host immune responses to
fungal antigens using immunologic reagents.
- amplification and detection of specific fungal
nucleic acid sequences .
- detection and quantitation of specific fungal
metabolite products.
4. • Serological tests have now gained importance d/t
- rapidity of results
- serve as a prognostic indicator
• Serological methods utilise the reactions and properties of
the serum.
• Determine humoral response of the host (skin test, invitro
lymphocyte stimulation test-CMI)
• Targets for serological tests are
- Antigen
- Antibody
- Metabolites
• Decision of fungal serologic test is based on
- clinical presentation
- exposure history
- risk factor for infection
5. FUNGAL PATHOGENS OF MEDICAL
IMPORTANCE
OPPORTUNISTIC
• Candida species
• Aspergillus species
• Cryptococcus species
• Pneumocystis jiroveci
TRUE PATHOGENS
• Coccidioides immitis
• Paracoccidioides brasiliensis
• Histoplasma capsulatum
• Blastomyces dermatitidis
6. HISTORY
• Serologic tests were first applied to the diagnosis of
mycotic diseases in the early 1900’s.
• 1956 – discovery of Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate
• 1978 – Restrepo and Moncada developed Latex
agglutination test for P.brasiliensis
• 1979- First detection of circulating antigen of Aspergillus
fumigatus in sera of mice and rabbits by Enzyme linked
immunosorbent assay.
• 1980 – Development of commercial fungal identification
systems using fungal antigens and metabolites.
7. SEROLOGICAL TESTS IN USE
• AGGLUTINATION
• IMMUNODIFFUSION (ID)
• COMPLEMENT FIXATION TEST (CFT)
• ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY(ELISA)
• LATERAL FLOW ASSAY
• COUNTER IMMUNO-ELECTROPHORESIS (CIE)
• RADIO IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY (RIA)
8. AGGLUTINATION
• LATEX AGGLUTINATION TEST
• Grading of the Latex Agglutination test
Negative- milky suspension with absence of agglutination
1+ - small clumpings against a cloudy background
2+ - small to moderately sized clumps against a slighlty cloudy
background
3+ - moderately to large sized clumps against a clear
background
4+ - large sized clumps against a clear background
• Advantages – rapid
- long shelf life (4-6 months)
• Disadvantages
- false positives (Eliminated by pretreatment of crude
exoantigens with sodium metaperioidate or pretreating serum with 2β
mercaptoethanol)
9. DIAGNOSIS
1.Cryptococcosis
• Capsulated yeasts
• Polysaccharide antigen ((glucuronoxylomannan)
Serum>CSF>Urine
• Detection of the capsular antigen is confirmative of Cryptococcal infection
• Qualitative & semi-quantitative test
• Sample – serum , CSF, bronchoalveolar lavage
• Significant titre ≥1:8
• Sensitivity – 90.9%
• Specificity – 95%
• False positives – Rheumatoid factor, Trichosporon asahii, Stomatococcus
• False negative – Prozone phenomenon
• Prognostic marker
• Marketer – Meridian Bioscience
10. 2.Diagnosis of Invasive Candidiasis
• Detection of Heat labile glycoprotein (HLP)
• Detection of Mannan antigen (Pastorex Candida Antigen)
• Detection of anti –Mannan antibody (Pastorex Candida Antibody)
• Sensitivity
• Specificity
• False positives
• False negatives
3.Diagnosis of Paracoccidioidomycosis
• Paracoccidioides brasiliensis
• Sensitivity – 84%
• Specificity – 81%
• False positives – Aspergillosis , Histoplasmosis.
11. IMMUNO DIFFUSION
• Patient samples are placed in wells in an agar plate surrounded
by a larger well containing purified antigen.
• Antibodies (serum) and antigen will diffuse out of their
respective wells and an antigen-antibody complex will form a
visible precipitation band in between the wells .
• The presence of a precipitation band indicates a positive test.
• SENSITIVITY : 80-90% (lower in patients with early or
localized disease)
• SPECIFICITY : >90%
• Disadvantages – costly
• - difficult to standardize
- long turn around timehow long
12. 1. Aspergillosis
• Diagnosis of Allergic Bronchopulmonary
Aspergillosis(ABPA), Aspergilloma ,
• Detection of IgE antibodies
• False positives – seens in healthy individuals in
endemic areas
• Sample
• Sensitivity
• Specificity
13. 3. Candidiasis
• Detection of Anti- Mannan antibodies
4.Blastomycosis
• Blastomyces dermatitidis
• Sample – serum, CSF
• Qualitative assay
• Detection of precipitating antibodies to purified A antigen
• Specificity ≥90%
• Sensitivity – low in early infection or
localised disease
• Long turnaround time how long
14. 5.Histoplasmosis
• Histoplasma capsulatum
• Antigens
M protein –abundant in mycelial form
H protein - indicative of active infection
• Antibodies
Anti M Ab - develop soon after infection
- lasts upto 3 yrs after resolution
Anti H Ab - alone /with Anti-M Ab indicates active/recent
infection
15. • Sample – serum
• 2 precipitating bands – M and H
• M band alone – active or past infection
• H and /or M band – active histoplasmosis
• Sensitivity – 80-100%
• Specificity >90%
• Significant titre : 1:32
• False negatives - immunocompromised pt.
- early stage of infection
• Marketers – Meridian Bioscience(USA only)
- H.capsulatum serum & antigen
16. 6.Coccidioidomycosis
• Coccidioides immitis /C.posadasii
• IgM – develop to tube precipitin(TP) Ag
- detectable from 3wks – 6 mths of symptoms
• IgG – develop to complement fixation (CF) Ag
- indicates current or past infection
• Detection of IgM & IgG separately
• Sample – serum
• Sensitivity
• Specificity
• Marketers – Meridian Bioscience
- C.immitis F Ag & anti C.immitis F serum
- C.immitis TP Ag & anti C.immitis TP serum
17. COMPLEMENT FIXATION TEST
The ability of antigen-antibody complex to ‘fix’ complement is
made use of in CFT
Antibody(patient sample) + fungal antigen (added)
Antigen –Antibody complex
Inactivates exogenously added complement
specific Ab + specific Ab –
Complement fixed Complement lyse RBCs
RBC pellet
20. 2. Histoplasmosis
• Ab detected against M & H antigens
• Determination of endpoint titre
≥1:32 or serially increasing titres – active infection
1:8 -1:16 – presumptive evidence of infection
< 1:8 - insignificant
Declining titres – resolution of infection.
• High sensitivity but low specificity compared with ID
• False positive with low titres- in endemic individuals
• Long turnaround time
• Labour intensive
21. 3.Coccidioidomycosis
• Detects IgG Ab to Coccidioides culture filtrate
• Endpoint titre
≥ 1:16 – severe / disseminated infection
1:8 – 1:16 – acute infection
1:2 – 1:8 – past infection / acute focal infection
• Sample
• Sensitivity
• Specificity
• False positives
• False negatives
• Marketers
24. Galactomannan assay
• Polysaccharide released by growing Aspergillus hyphae.
• Screening test for diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis
• Sample – serum (neutropenics)
- bronchoalveolar lavage ( neutropenics &
- CSF non neutropenics)
• One stage immuno enzymatic sandwich microplate assay
• Uses rat EBA-2 monoclonal antibodies, directed against
circulating Aspergillus Galactomannan(exo antigen)
• Result – expressed as Index
• Cut-off : Serum : ≥ 0.5
Bronchoalveolar lavage : ≥ 1.5
• Sensitivity : 96.8%
• Specificity : 82.4%
• High negative predictive value :98.3%
• GM in serum ,along with radiological improvement,is used to
monitor treatment.
25. • False positives – Direct cross reaction with antibiotics(β lactams)
- Lipoteichoic acid from Bifidobacterium cross
reacts with the assay ( gut of paediatric age group)
- cross reaction with other fungi (Fusarium
sp.,Histoplasma capsulatum,Alternaria sp.,Paecylomyces
- iv fluids containing GM
- some food items contain GM (popsicle)
- immunosupressive agents
• False negatives – non neutropenic patients
- on anti fungal treatment
• Disadvantages
- Sensitivity decreases following Itraconazole prophylaxis
- Circulating GM is rapidly eliminated by formation of immune
complexes.
Marketers – Platelia Aspergillus
- Pastorex
26. 3.Candidiasis
• Presumptive diagnosis of Invasive candidiasis by Mannan &
Anti-Mannan Assay
MANNAN & ANTI-MANNAN ASSAY
• Mannan is a highly immunogenic component of cell wall of
Candida species.
• Combined detection of Mannanemia and anti-Mannan
antibodies is useful in diagnosis of Candidemia
• Complemantary to 1,3 β D Glucan assay
• Sandwich ELISA
• Sample – serum ,CSF, bronchoalveolar lavage(pediatric)
• Positive : Mn Ag : ≥0.5ng/ml
anti Mn Ab : ≥10 arbitrary units/ml
• Indeterminate : Mn Ag :0.25-0.5ng/ml
anti Mn Ab : 5-10 arbitrary units/ml
27. • Sensitivity : Mn Ag assay : 58%
Anti Mn Ab assay : 59%
Mn/anti Mn : 83%
• Specificity : Mn Ag assay : 93%
anti Mn Ab assay : 83%
Mn/anti Mn : 86%
• False positives – Candida colonisation
• Disadvantages - Candida mannan is rapidly eliminated
from circulation by formation of immune complexes & by
mannose receptor mediated endocytosis by Kuppfer cells
• Third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia
recommends combined Mn/anti-Mn assay over Mn or
anti-Mn alone in diagnosis of invasive candidemia.
• Marketers – Platelia Candida Antigen (Bio Rad Lab)
- Platelia Candida Antibody (Bio Rad Lab)
28. Detection of metabolites
D-ARABINITOL
• Large amounts produced by all strains of C.albicans,
C.tropicalis , C.parapsilosis
• Not produced by C.glabrata, C.krusei, Cryptococcus
neoformans
• Serum marker for diagnosis of Candida species
• Therapeutic monitor for invasive candidiasis.
• Sample : serum , urine
SECRETED ASPARTYL PROTEINASE
• Serodiagnostic marker to differentiate between invasive
candidiasis by Candida albicans and Candidal colonization.
• Antigen capture ELISA, inhibition ELISA
Sensitivity – 93.9%
Specificity – 96%
• False positives- aspergillosis
• False negatives- imunocompromised patients (anti SAP Ab)
29. 4.Blastomycosis
• Samples – serum, CSF
• Qualitative assay
• Detection of antibodies to purified yeast phase antigens
• Sensitivity : ̴̴ 85% (negative EIA does not exclude diagnosis
• Specificity : ≥ 95%
• Rapid turnaround time
5.Histoplasmosis
• Screening assay .
6.Coccidioidomycosis
• Screening test
31. 1.Cryptococcosis
• Dipstick method
• Screening test and determination of endpoint titres
• Detection of C.neoformans and C.gattii
• Sample – serum , CSF
• LFA titres are higher than LAT titres
• Sensitivity
• Specificity
• False reactions
• Marketers
32. 2.Aspergillosis
• Diagnosis of allergic aspergillosis – detects IgE Ab
• Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis – detects GM
33. 1,3 β D GLUCAN ASSAY
• Adjunct in diagnosis of IFI
• Pan fungal marker
• Exo antigen- component in majority of fungal cell walls
- Candida sp., Saccharomyces, Trichosporon sp., Sporothrix
sp., Penicillium sp., Fusarium sp., Aspergillus sp.
• Low levels of 1,3 β D glucan (BG) seen in
- Cryptococcus sp.,Histoplasma sp., Coccidioides sp.,
Blastomyces sp., Mucorales.
• Calorimetric assay
• BG triggers coagulation cascade of amoebocyte cells in North
American horseshoe crab(Limulus polyphemus) through
Factor G.
35. • Sample – Serum
- Pus
- CSF
- Bronchoalveolar lavage
• Positive > 80ng/ml
• Use of antifungal drugs does not affect sensitivity of this test
• Sensitivity – 76%
• Specificity – 98%.
• High positive predictive value .- 59%
• Negative predictive value – 97%
• Prevent false reactions by pre treatment with alkali – inhibits
serine proteases
36. USES
• The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of
Cancer and Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSG) consensus
has included 1,3β D glucan assay in the diagnosis of IFI.
• Prognostic tool to determine treatment outcome
• Helpful tool in diagnosis of : Pneumocystis jiroveci
Invasive aspergillosis
Invasive candidiasis
• MARKETERS
- Fungitell - Associates of Cape Cod (FDA approved)
- Fungitec G – Seikagaku Biobusiness,Japan
- BGSTAR beta glucan
37. Advantages of serological tests
• To interpret the clinical significance of positive cultures –to
rule out lab contamination
• To identify new isolate when the antibody is demonstrated
against that particular antigen.
• Rapid diagnosis
• Prognostic marker
38. Disadvantages of serological tests
• Kits are expensive which makes continuous monitoring
difficult
• Inability to distinguish between superficial colonization
and deep infection based on the mere presence of
antibodies.
• Antibodies not in detectable levels in the early stage of
disease or immunosuppression.Antigen detection
preferred.
• Detection of macromolecular microbial antigens generally
requires a relatively large microbial burden, which may
limit assay sensitivity.
• Cross reactions – shared antigenicity of several genera and
species of different pathogenic fungi.
39. SUMMARY
• Serology is a useful tool for rapid diagnosis of fungal disease
• Results may be obtained several days before the clinical
symptoms develop.
• Continued screening allows to follow the progress of the
disease, but it is difficult to obtain appropriate specimens.
• Kits are expensive which makes continuous monitoring
difficult.
• Major disadvantage is cross reaction between various
pathogenic fungi. Can be minimised by pretreating sera with
2β mercaptoethanol.
• Tests now in use are 1,3β D Glucan assay, Galactomannan
assay, mannan assay, ELISA, Lateral flow assay.
• No one serological test is confirmatory for the diagnosis of
invasive fungal infections.
40. • REFERENCES
• Jagdish Chander.Mehta Publishers.Textbook of Medical
Mycology 3rd edition.
• Leo kaufman.Serology of Systemic Fungus Diseases.Public
Health Reports.1966.Vol.81(2):177-185.
• Siew Fah Yeo;Brian Wong. Current Status of Nonculture
Methods for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections. Clin
Microbiol Rev. 2002 Jul; 15(3): 465–484.
• Wheat LJ.Approach to the diagnosis of endemic
mycoses.Clin Chest Med.2009.30,379-389.
• Espinel,Ingroff.History of Medical Mycology in United
States.Clin.Microbiol.Rev.1996.Vol:9(2)235-272.
41. • Ostrosky Ziechner,Roxana , Marcio Nucci.New serological
markers in medical mycology.Infectio.2012;16(Supl 3)59-63.
• Malhotra S, Sharma S, Bhatia NJK, Kumar P, Bhatia NK, et al.
Recent Diagnostic Techniques in Mycology. J Med Microb
Diagn.2014.3: 146.
• Silviera-Gomes et al.LA test for Serodiagnosis of
Paracoccidioidomycosis.Clin.Vaccine
Immunol.2011.vol.18(4),604-608.
• Odabashi Z et al.Beta-D-Glucan as a diagnostic adjunct for
invasive fungal infections:Validation,cutoff development and
performance in patients with AML.Clin.Infec.Dis.2004:39:199-
205.
• Mikulska et al.The use of mannan antigen and anti-mannan
antibodies in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.Critical Care
.2010,14 R222-236
• NA and Song.Use of Monoclonal Antibody in daignosis od
Candidiasis.Clin.Diagn.Lab.Immunol.1999.vol,6,p 924-929.